Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Grooming, sequencing, and beyond: how it all began
- 2 Self-grooming as a form of olfactory communication in meadow voles and prairie voles (Microtus spp.)
- 3 Phenotyping and genetics of rodent grooming and barbering: utility for experimental neuroscience research
- 4 Social play, social grooming, and the regulation of social relationships
- 5 Grooming syntax as a sensitive measure of the effects of subchronic PCP treatment in rats
- 6 Modulatory effects of estrogens on grooming and related behaviors
- 7 Lack of barbering behavior in the phospholipase Cβ1 mutant mouse: a model animal for schizophrenia
- 8 Grooming after cerebellar, basal ganglia, and neocortical lesions
- 9 Striatal implementation of action sequences and more: grooming chains, inhibitory gating, and the relative reward effect
- 10 An ethological analysis of barbering behavior
- 11 Should there be a category: “grooming disorders?”
- 12 Neurobiology of trichotillomania
- Index
- References
2 - Self-grooming as a form of olfactory communication in meadow voles and prairie voles (Microtus spp.)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Grooming, sequencing, and beyond: how it all began
- 2 Self-grooming as a form of olfactory communication in meadow voles and prairie voles (Microtus spp.)
- 3 Phenotyping and genetics of rodent grooming and barbering: utility for experimental neuroscience research
- 4 Social play, social grooming, and the regulation of social relationships
- 5 Grooming syntax as a sensitive measure of the effects of subchronic PCP treatment in rats
- 6 Modulatory effects of estrogens on grooming and related behaviors
- 7 Lack of barbering behavior in the phospholipase Cβ1 mutant mouse: a model animal for schizophrenia
- 8 Grooming after cerebellar, basal ganglia, and neocortical lesions
- 9 Striatal implementation of action sequences and more: grooming chains, inhibitory gating, and the relative reward effect
- 10 An ethological analysis of barbering behavior
- 11 Should there be a category: “grooming disorders?”
- 12 Neurobiology of trichotillomania
- Index
- References
Summary
Summary
We explore the possibility that self-grooming in response to the odors or presence of another animal plays a role in olfactory communication. For some animals, the substances released by self-grooming may make groomers more easily detected, more attractive, and/or less threatening to conspecifics that are in close proximity to them. The fact that animals self-groom at different rates when they encounter different individuals suggests that they can target particular conspecifics for purposes of communicating with them. Given that voles and other animals generally spend more time grooming in response to reproductively active, opposite-sex conspecifics than to reproductively quiescent opposite-sex conspecifics, self-grooming may be involved in attracting potential mates and is associated with the behaviors that surround reproduction. Studies have shown that conditions such as endocrine state, diet, age, and familiarity and relatedness of both the groomer and the scent donor affect the amount of time that individuals self-groom when they are exposed to the odors of opposite-sex conspecifics. Consequently, self-grooming in response to the odors of opposite-sex conspecifics may be akin to scent marking in that animals are transmitting odiferous substances into the environment that honestly signal features of their quality and condition to potential mates and competitors.
Introduction
As many terrestrial animals move about their home ranges they are surrounded by scent marks, some are their own and some are those of conspecifics. Animals investigating these scent marks can often determine many features about the individual that deposited them such as its sex, age, reproductive condition, diet, etc.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Neurobiology of Grooming Behavior , pp. 19 - 45Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(1985): Nutrition. In: , ed., Biology of New World Microtus, Special Publ. 8. Lawrence, KS: The American Society of Mammalogists, pp. 779–811.Google Scholar
and (1983): Release of LH in the female rat by olfactory stimuli: effect of the removal of the vomeronasal organs or lesioning of the accessory olfactory bulbs. Neuroendocrinology 36:53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1989): Patterns of resource use, food quality, and health status of voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) trapped from fluctuating populations. Oecologia 79:306–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1993): Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behav Ecol 4:83–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980): Care of the body surface. In: , ed., Comparative Psychology: An Evolutionary Analysis of Animal Behavior. New York: Wiley Press, pp. 362–84.Google Scholar
and (1963): The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J Theoret Biol 5:443–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1976): Self-anointing by wild hedgehogs, Erinaceus europaeus. Anim Behav 24:68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000): Do California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) use ritualized syntactic cephalocaudal grooming as an agonistic signal?J Comp Psychol 114:281–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , et al. (1989): Hormonal correlates of sexual behavior and ovulation in male-induced and postpartum estrus female prairie voles. Physiol Behav 46:941–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004): Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males. Nature 431:446–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2007): Female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, experience a reduction in copulatory behavior during postpartum estrus. Ethology 113:466–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994): Snake odors alter behavior, but not pain sensitivity in mice. Physiol Behav 55:125–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996): Reproductive and immune responses to photoperiod and melatonin are linked in Peromyscus maniculatus. J Comp Physiol (A) 179:819–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987): Involvement of olfactory bulb catecholamines and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in response to social stimuli mediating reproductive functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 519:252–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1981): Male vole urine changes luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and norepinephrine in female olfactory bulb. Science 212:573–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1981): Hyperprolactinemia-induced excessive grooming in the rat: time-course and element analysis. Behav Neural Biol 33:117–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1980): Systemic and intraventricular prolactin induced excessive grooming. Eur J Pharmacol 65:457–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (1986): Intracerebroventricular injection of anti-prolactin serum suppresses excessive grooming of pituitary homografted rats. Behav Neural Biol 46:99–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, (1984): Hormonal regulation of the annual pelage color cycle in Djungarian hamster, Phodopus songurus, II. Role of prolactin. J Exp Zool 230:97–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1977): Hormonal control of mammalian skin glands. In: and , eds., Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1968). Interrupted ongoing behaviour in two species of vole (Microtus and Clethrionomys brittanicus) II. Extended analysis of motivational variables underlying fleeing and grooming behaviour. Anim Behav 16:154–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1999): Attractiveness of opposite-sex odor and responses to it vary with age and sex in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). J Chem Ecol 4:757–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005): Self-grooming in meadow voles. In: , and , eds., Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Vol. 10. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 64–9.Google Scholar
(2006): The amount of time that a meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, self-grooms is affected by its reproductive state and that of the odor donor. BehavProcesses 73:266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1992): Photoperiod and testosterone control seasonal odor preferences of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Physiol Behav 51:1087–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995a): Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, use multiple sources of scent for sexual recognition. Anim Behav 49:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995b): Effects of pregnancy, lactation, and postpartum oestrous on odour signals and the attraction to odours in female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Anim Behav 49:1211–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996): Melatonin treatment affects the attractiveness of the anogenital area scent in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Horm Behav 30:227–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005): Self-grooming by rodents in social and sexual contexts. Acta Zool Sinica 51:772–9.Google Scholar
and (2008): Age of the subject and scent donor affects the amount of time that voles self-groom when they are exposed to odors of opposite-sex conspecifics. In: , , and , eds., Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 11. New York: Springer Press, pp. 281–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005): A battery of olfactory-based screens for phenotyping the social and sexual behaviors of mice. Physiol Behav 85:489–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987): Odor preference and social behavior in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus: seasonal differences. Can J Zool 65:2931–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991): Seasonal control of odour preferences of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) by photoperiod and ovarian hormones. J Reprod Fert 92:433–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1996): Self-grooming as a sexually dimorphic communicative behaviour in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Anim Behav 51:801–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997): Effect of prolactin on the attractiveness of male odors to females: independent effects and synergism with testosterone. Horm Behav 31:55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2001): Self-grooming as a tactic used by prairie voles Microtus ochrogaster to enhance sexual communication. Ethology 107:939–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007): Melatonin treatment affects conspecific odor preferences and self-grooming of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Physiol Behav 91:255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1998): 5HT1A-receptors and behaviour under chronic stress: selective, counteraction by testosterone. Eur J Neurosci 10:2685–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1982): Auto- and allo-grooming in pine voles (Microtus pinetorum) and meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Physiol Behav 28:409–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1981): Prolactin release in golden hamsters: photoperiod and gonadal influences. Biol Reprod 24:287–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1988): Antagonism of behavioral effects of bromocriptine by prolactin in female rats. Behav Neural Biol 49:74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001): Scent marking in male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Adv Study Behav 30:169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967): Saliva spreading, activity, and body temperature regulation in the rat. Am J Physiol 212:1288–92.Google ScholarPubMed
and (1995): Cheek rubbing as grooming by Abert squirrels. Anim Behav 50:987–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982): Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?Science 218:384–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1985): Harderian letdown in male Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) contributes to proceptive behavior. Horm Behav 19:213–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1990): Behavioral adaptations to pathogens and parasites: five strategies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 14:273–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1990): Antibacterial properties of saliva: role in material grooming and in licking wounds. Physiol Behav 48:383–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , (2008): Self-grooming response of meadow voles to the odor of opposite-sex conspecifics in relation to the dietary protein content of both sexes. Ethology 114:1210–17.CrossRef
(1998): Pheromones, the vomeronasal system, and communication: from hormonal responses to individual recognition. Ann NY Acad Sci 855: 333–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002): Acute fasting decreases sexual receptivity and neural estrogen receptor-alpha in female rats. Physiol Behav 77:19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2006): Conflict management by hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas hamadryas) during crowding: a tension-reduction strategy. Am J Primatol 68:993–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005): The grooming analysis algorithm discriminates between different levels of anxiety in rats: potential utility for neurobehavioural stress research. J Neurosci Methods 143:169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2007): Hypolocomotion, anxiety and serotonin syndrome-like behavior contribute to the complex phenotype of serotonin transporter knockout mice. Genes Brain Behav 6:389–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1985): Reproductive patterns. In: , ed., Biology of New World Microtus, Special Publ. 8. Lawrence, KS: The American Society of Mammalogists, pp. 725–78.Google Scholar
and (1984): Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004): The grooming invitation dance of the Honey Bee. Ethology 110:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999): Prolactin and testosterone affect seasonal differences in male meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, odor preferences for female conspecifics. Physiol Behav 68:139–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005): Seasonal differences in self-grooming in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Acta Ethol 8:86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2005): The role of prolactin and testosterone in mediating seasonal differences in the self-grooming behavior of male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Physiol Behav 85:461–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2004): Hydrocarbon circulation and colonial signature in Pachycondyla villosa. J Insect Physiol 50:595–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1980): An integrated view of the social biology of meadow voles Microtus pennsylvanicus. Biologist 62:20–33.Google Scholar
and (1990): Acute increase in plasma corticosterone level in female mice evoked by pheromones. Physiol Behav 48:577–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1998): Involvement of main and vomeronasal systems in modification of oestrous cycle in female laboratory mice. Acta Theriol 43:235–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002): Pheromones, odors, and vasanas: the neuroendocrinology of social chemosignals in humans and animals. In: , ed., Hormones, Brain, and Behavior. New York: Elsevier Science, pp. 797–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2008): Autism-like behavioral phenotypes in BTBR T+tf/J mice. Genes Brain Behav 7:152–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1990): Potential for social interaction in a natural population of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Can J Zool 68:391–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1990): Short photoperiods affect male hamster sociosexual behaviors in the presence and absence of testosterone. Physiol Behav 47:95–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1999): Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986): A hormonal basis for sex differences in the self-grooming of rats. Horm Behav 20:155–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2000): Testing the interspecific body size principle in ungulates, the smaller they come, the harder they groom. Anim Behav 60:5–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1977): Pheromonal effects of Harderian gland homogenates on aggressive behaviour in the hamster. J Endocrinol 73:191–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2002): Self-grooming and sibling recognition in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and prairie voles (M. ochrogaster). Anim Behav 63:331–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005a): Protein content of the diet does not influence proceptive or receptive behavior in female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. In: , and , eds., Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Vol. 10. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 70–6.Google Scholar
, and (2005b): Food-deprivation-induced changes in sexual behavior of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Anim Behav 70:339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1985): Male hamster sociosexual behaviors: effects of testosterone and its metabolites. Physiol Behav 35:607–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2002): Mammalian seasonal rhythms: behavior and neuroendocrine substrates. In: , ed., Hormones, Brain and Behavior. New York: Elsevier Press, pp. 93–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979): Stress, behavioural arousal and open-field activity: a reexamination of emotionality in the rat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 3:247–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998): Age-related changes in rodent cortical acetylcholine and cognition: main effects of age versus age as an intervening variable. Brain Res Rev 27:143–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1996): Primate displacement activities as an ethological model of anxiety. Anxiety 2:186–91.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995): Grooming expresses Harderian gland materials in the blind mole rat. Aggr Behav 21:137–46.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997): Mole-rat Harderian gland secretions inhibit aggression. Anim Behav 54:1255–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1987): Effects of unit payoff asymmetries on aggression and dominance in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Anim Behav 35:606–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1992): Ethology and neurobiology of grooming behavior. Physiol Rev 72:825–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1973): Self- and allo-grooming behavior in some ground squirrels (Sciuridae), a descriptive study. Can J Zool 51:151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974): Body-rubbing, marking, and other scent-related behavior in some ground squirrels (Sciuridae). Can J Zool 52:889–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998): Signal interchange during mating in the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) the concept of active and passive signaling. Behaviour 135:231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977): Thermoenergetics and the evolution of pheromone communication. Prog Psychobiol Physiol Psychol 7:91–191.Google Scholar
and (1986): Harderian gland exudates in the male Meriones unguiculatus regulate female proceptive behavior, aggression, and investigation. J Comp Psychol 100:85–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1988): Sex differences in investigatory and grooming behaviors of laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) following exposure to novelty. J Comp Psychol 102:188–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1994): Effect of environmental stressors on time course, variability, and form of self-grooming in the rat: handling, social contact, defeat, novelty, restraint and fur moistening. Behav Brain Res 65:47–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1994): Pheromones and mammalian reproduction. In: and , ed., The Physiology of Reproduction, 2nd edn. New York: Raven Press, pp. 343–59.Google Scholar
(1979): The social significance of self-grooming in rats. Netherlands J Zool 29:622–3.Google Scholar
, , and (1988): Sexual and social interaction preceding and during male-induced oestrous in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Anim Behav 36:1465–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1990): Patterns of behavior during postpartum estrous in prairie voles. Anim Behav 39:528–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002): Is self-grooming by male prairie voles a predictor of mate choice?Ethology 108:169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991): The effects of odors from stressed mice on conspecific behavior. Physiol Behav 50:221–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1988): Condition-dependent sex ornaments and field-tests of sexual-selection theory. Am Nat 132:454–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by