Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T14:22:57.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Thirteen - Plant secondary metabolite polymorphisms and the extended chemical phenotype

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Glenn R. Iason
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Ben D. Moore
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Jack J. Lennon
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Jenni A. Stockan
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Graham H. R. Osler
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Colin D. Campbell
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
David A. Sim
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Joan R. Beaton
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Joanne R. Russell
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute
Glenn R. Iason
Affiliation:
James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen
Marcel Dicke
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Susan E. Hartley
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

As it was originally proposed, the extended phenotype comprised ‘all effects of a gene upon the world’ (Dawkins, 1989) and portrayed how the effects of a gene borne by an organism influenced its biotic and abiotic environments. The consideration of indirect genetic effects, in which an organism’s phenotype becomes part of the selective environment of conspecifics (Wolf et al., 1998), was developed rigorously in the population genetics context and the concept subsequently extended to include effects on heterospecifics (Whitham et al., 2003). The extended phenotype concept has been adopted as a framework by some evolutionary biologists and ecologists to study the roles of plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) since Whitham et al. (2003) used heritable variation in tissue tannin concentrations among Populus species and hybrids to develop the concept of community and ecosystem genetics (Antonovics, 1992).

Many studies of how genetically determined variation in plant traits, including PSMs, drive associated community phenotypes and processes, have been based on differences between hybrids (Dungey et al., 2000; Hochwender & Fritz, 2004; Bailey et al., Chapter 14). Fewer studies have investigated the effects on extended phenotypes of continuously varying PSMs or between known genotypes within a species (Whitham et al., 2006; Schweitzer et al., 2008; Barbour et al., 2009; O’Reilly-Wapstra et al., Chapter 2). A convenient approach to identification and utilisation of genotypic variation for the study of multiple effects of PSMs is provided by the use of genetic polymorphisms. A polymorphism can be defined as occurring when a trait such as a morphological or biochemical character exists in two or more distinct forms in a randomly mating population within a species (Ford, 1975). The approach is particularly useful in species that cannot be readily cloned. Here, we review examples of how intra-specific variation in a particular group of PSMs, the monoterpenes, has informed our understanding of how PSMs can play multiple ecological roles and mediate the extended phenotype of plants. The monoterpenes are a group of low-molecular-weight, volatile terpenoids which form a very diverse group in terms of number of compounds, structure and function (Gershenzon & Dudareva, 2007). We use variation within species which are polymorphic for concentrations or presence of monoterpenes to provide an insight into their ecological ramifications and larger-scale consequences, against the background of intra-specific variation in other traits.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Ecology of Plant Secondary Metabolites
From Genes to Global Processes
, pp. 247 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelgaleil, S. A. M. 2010 Molluscicidal and insecticidal potential of monoterpenes on the white garden snail, (Muller) and the cotton leafworm, (Boisduval)Applied Entomology and Zoology 45 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aharoni, A.Jongsma, M. A.Bouwmeester, H. J. 2005 Volatile science? Metabolic engineering of terpenoids in plantsTrends in Plant Science 10 594CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amiot, J.Salmon, Y.Collin, C.Thompson, J. D. 2005 Differential resistance to freezing and spatial distribution in a chemically polymorphic plant Ecology Letters 8 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonovics, J. 1992 Toward community geneticsFritz, R. S.Simms, E. L.Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens; Ecology Evolution and GeneticsChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press426Google Scholar
Asensio, D.Owen, S. M.Llusia, J.Peñuelas, J. 2008 The distribution of volatile isoprenoids in the soil horizons around treesSoil Biology and Biochemistry 40 2937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astani, A.Reichling, J.Schnitzler, P. 2010 Comparative study on the antiviral activity of selected monoterpenes derived from essential oilsPhytotherapy Research 24 673Google ScholarPubMed
Barbour, R. C.O’Reilly-Wapstra, J. M.De Little, D. W. 2009 A geographic mosaic of genetic variation within a foundation tree species and its community-level consequencesEcology 90 1762CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beker, R.Dafni, A.Eisikowitch, D.Ravid, U. 1989 Volatiles of two chemotypes of (Labiatae) as olfactory cues for the honeybeeOecologia 79 446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben Arfa, A.Combes, S.Preziosi-Belloy, L.Gontard, N.Chalier, P. 2006 Antimicrobial activity of carvacrol related to its chemical structureLetters in Applied Microbiology 43 149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biernaskie, J. M.Tyerman, J. G. 2005 The overextended phenotypeEcoscience 12 3Google Scholar
Bohlmann, J.Martin, D.Miller, B.Huber, D. 2004 Terpenoid synthases in conifers and poplarsPlantation Forest Biotechnology for the 21st Century181Google Scholar
Carisey, N.Bauce, E. 1997 Balsam fir foliar chemistry in middle and lower crowns and Spruce budworm growth, development, food and nitrogen utilizationJournal of Chemical Ecology 23 1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cates, R. G. 1996 The role of mixtures and variation in the production of terpenoids in conifer–insect–pathogen interactionsRomeo, J. T.Saunders, J. A.Barbosa, P.Phytochemical Diversity and Redundancy in Ecological InteractionsNew YorkPlenum179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetin, H.Cilek, J. E.Oz, E. 2010 Acaricidal activity of L. essential oil and its major components, carvacrol and gamma-terpinene against adult (Acari: Ixodidae)Veterinary Parasitology 170 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. D.Markham, J. L. 2007 Susceptibility and intrinsic tolerance of to selected plant volatile compoundsJournal of Applied Microbiology 103 930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R. 1989 The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the GeneOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Degenhardt, J.Kollner, T. G.Gershenzon, J. 2009 Monoterpene and sesquiterpene synthases and the origin of terpene skeletal diversity in plantsPhytochemistry 70 1621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domisch, T.Finer, L.Neuvonen, S. 2009 Foraging activity and dietary spectrum of wood ants ( group) and their role in nutrient fluxes in boreal forestsEcological Entomology 34 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driebe, E. M.Whitham, T. G. 2000 Cottonwood hybridization affects tannin and nitrogen content of leaf litter and alters decompositionOecologia 123 99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, A. J.Hartley, S. E.Iason, G. R. 1994 The effect of monoterpene concentrations in Sitka spruce () on the browsing behavior of red deer ()Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 72 1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dungey, H. S.Potts, B. M.Whitham, T. G.Li, H. F. 2000 Plant genetics affects arthropod community richness and composition: evidence from a synthetic eucalypt hybrid populationEvolution 54 1938CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehlers, B. K.Thompson, J. 2004 Do co-occurring plant species adapt to one another? The response of to the presence of different chemotypesOecologia 141 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbilgin, N.Raffa, K. F. 2000 Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetles to their aggregation pheromonesJournal of Chemical Ecology 26 2527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, P. 1991 The evolution of chemical ecology: contributions from the study of herbivorous insectsRosenthal, G. A.Berenbaum, M. R.Herbivores: Their Interaction with Plant Secondary MetabolitesSan Diego, CAAcademic Press1Google Scholar
Ford, E. B. 1975 Ecological GeneticsLondonChapman and HallGoogle Scholar
Frank, T.Bieri, K.Speiser, B. 2002 Feeding deterrent effect of carvone, a compound from caraway seeds, on the slug Annals of Applied Biology 141 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershenzon, J.Dudareva, N. 2007 The function of terpene natural products in the natural worldNature Chemical Biology 3 408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grime, J. P.Cornelissen, J. H. C.Thompson, K.Hodgson, J. G. 1996 Evidence of a causal connection between anti-herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leavesOikos 77 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grondahl, E.Ehlers, B. K. 2008 Local adaptation to biotic factors: reciprocal transplants of four species associated with aromatic and Journal of Ecology 96 981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltpold, I.Turlings, T. C. J. 2008 Belowground chemical signaling in maize: when simplicity rhymes with efficiencyJournal of Chemical Ecology 34 628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiltunen, R. 1976 On variation, inheritance and chemical interrelationships of monoterpenes in Scots pine ( L.)Annales Academiae Scientiarium Fennicae 208 1Google Scholar
Hochwender, C. G.Fritz, R. S. 2004 Plant genetic differences influence herbivore community structure: evidence from a hybrid willow systemOecologia 138 547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honkanen, T.Haukioja, E.Kitunen, V. 1999 Responses of branches to simulated herbivory are modified by tree sink/source dynamics and by external resourcesFunctional Ecology 13 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iason, G. 2005 The role of plant secondary metabolites in mammalian herbivoryProceedings of the Nutrition Society 64 123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iason, G. R.Lennon, J. J.Pakeman, R. J. 2005 Does chemical composition of individual Scots pine trees determine the biodiversity of their associated ground vegetation?Ecology Letters 8 364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iason, G. R.O’Reilly-Wapstra, J.Brewer, M. J.Summers, R. W.Moore, B. D. 2011 Do multiple herbivores maintain the chemical diversity of Scots pine monoterpenes?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366 1337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, C. G.Ehlers, B. K. 2010 Genetic variation for sensitivity to a thyme monoterpene in associated plant speciesOecologia (Berlin) 162 1017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, K. S.Bak, M. J.Jun, M. 2010 Alpha-pinene triggers oxidative stress and related signalling pathways in A549 and HepG2 cellsFood Science and Biotechnology 19 1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. T. J.Vellend, M.Stinchcombe, J. R. 2009 Evolution in plant populations as a driver of ecological changes in arthropod communitiesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364 1593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kainulainen, P.Holopainen, J. K. 2002 Concentrations of secondary compounds in Scots pine needles at different stages of decompositionSoil Biology and Biochemistry 34 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, N.Sugawara, Y.Miyamoto, T.Hasegawa, M.Hiura, T. 2005 Oribatid mite community structure and tree species diversity: a link?Pedobiologia 49 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, C. I.Bohlmann, J. 2006 Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogensNew Phytologist 170 657CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, A.Baldwin, I. T. 2004 Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Plant Journal 38 639CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinloch, B. B.Westfall, R. D.Forrest, G. I. 1986 Caledonian Scots pine – origins and genetic-structureNew Phytologist 4 703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingler, H.Frosch, S.Wagner, E. 1991 effects of monoterpenes on chloroplast membranesPhotosynthesis Research 28 109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, J. O.Park, I. R.Choi, K. S.Shin, S. C.Afini, Y. 2007 Nematicidal and propagation activities of thyme red and white oil compounds toward (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae)Journal of Nematology 39 237Google Scholar
Kordali, S.Cakir, A.Sutay, S. 2007 Inhibitory effects of monoterpenes on seed germination and seedling growthZeitschrift für Naturforschung C: A Journal of Biosciences 62 207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langenheim, J. H. 1994 Higher-plant terpenoids – a phytocentric overview of their ecological rolesJournal of Chemical Ecology 20 1223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lankau, R. A.Strauss, S. Y. 2008 Community complexity drives patterns of natural selection on a chemical defense of American Naturalist 171 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerdau, M.Gray, D. 2003 Ecology and evolution of light-dependent and light-independent phytogenic volatile organic carbonNew Phytologist 157 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichstein, J. W. 2007 Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis toolPlant Ecology 188 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, C.Mappes, J.Paivinen, J.Varama, M. 2006 Effects of group size and pine defence chemicals on Diprionid sawfly survival against ant predationOecologia 150 519CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linhart, Y. B.Thompson, J. D. 1999 Thyme is of the essence: biochemical polymorphism and multi-species deterrenceEvolutionary Ecology Research 1 151Google Scholar
Linhart, Y. B.Keefover-Ring, K.Mooney, K. A.Breland, B.Thompson, J. D. 2005 A chemical polymorphism in a multitrophic setting: thyme monoterpene composition and food web structureAmerican Naturalist 166 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludley, K.Jickells, S.Chamberlain, P.Whitaker, J.Robinson, C. 2009 Distribution of monoterpenes between organic resources in upper soil horizons under monocultures of and Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41 1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludley, K.Robinson, C.Jickells, S.Chamberlain, P.Whitaker, J. 2009 Potential for monoterpenes to affect ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungal activity in coniferous forests is revealed by novel experimental systemSoil Biology and Biochemistry 41 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludley, K. E.Robinson, C. H.Jickells, S.Chamberlain, P. M.Whitaker, J. 2008 Differential response of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungal mycelium from coniferous forest soils to selected monoterpenesSoil Biology and Biochemistry 40 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macchioni, F.Cioni, P. L.Flamini, G. 2002 Acaricidal activity of pine essential oils and their main components against , a stored food miteJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50 4586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madritch, M. D.Hunter, M. D. 2002 Phenotypic diversity influences ecosystem functioning in an oak sandhills communityEcology 83 2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madritch, M. D.Hunter, M. D. 2005 Phenotypic variation in oak litter influences short- and long-term nutrient cycling through litter chemistrySoil Biology and Biochemistry 37 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, D.Kolb, S.Haumaier, L.Borken, W. 2008 Inhibition of atmospheric methane oxidation by monoterpenes in Norway spruce and European beech soilsSoil Biology and Biochemistry 40 3014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKey, D. 1979 The distribution of secondary compounds within plantsRosenthal, G. A.Janzen, D. H.Herbivores: Their Interaction with Plant Secondary MetabolitesNew YorkAcademic Press135Google Scholar
Misra, G.Pavlostathis, S. G.Perdue, E. M.Araujo, R. 1996 Aerobic biodegradation of selected monoterpenesApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology 45 831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, K. A. 2007 Tritrophic effects of birds and ants on a canopy food web, tree growth, and phytochemistryEcology 88 2005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, K. A.Tillberg, C. V. 2005 Temporal and spatial variation to ant omnivory in pine forestsEcology 86 1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muona, O.Hiltunen, R.Shaw, D. V.Morén, E. 1986 Analysis of monoterpene variation in natural stands and plustrees of in FinlandSilva Fennica 20 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakahara, K.Alzoreky, N. S.Yoshihashi, T.Nguyen, H. T. T.Trakoontivakorn, G. 2003 Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil from (citronella grass)Jarq – Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 37 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northup, R. R.Dahlgren, R. A.McColl, J. G. 1998 Polyphenols as regulators of plant–litter–soil interactions in northern California’s pygmy forest: a positive feedback?Biogeochemistry 42 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly-Wapstra, J. M.Iason, G. R.Thoss, V. 2007 The role of genetic and chemical variation of seedlings in influencing slug herbivoryOecologia 152 82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, S. M.Clark, S.Pompe, M.Semple, K. T. 2007 Biogenic volatile organic compounds as potential carbon sources for microbial communities in soil from the rhizosphere of Fems Microbiology Letters 268 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paavolainen, L.Kitunen, V.Smolander, A. 1998 Inhibition of nitrification in forest soil by monoterpenesPlant and Soil 205 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakeman, R. J.Beaton, J. K.Thoss, V. 2006 The extended phenotype of Scots pine structures the understorey assemblageEcography 29 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmann, S.Kollner, T. G.Degenhardt, J. 2005 Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize rootsNature 434 732CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salle, A.Raffa, K. F. 2007 Interactions among intraspecific competition, emergence patterns, and host selection behaviour in Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytinae)Ecological Entomology 32 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlyter, F.Smitt, O.Sjodin, K.Hogberg, H. E.Lofqvist, J. 2004 Carvone and less volatile analogues as repellent and deterrent antifeedants against the pine weevil, Journal of Applied Entomology 128 610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, J. A.Bailey, J. K.Rehill, B. J. 2004 Genetically based trait in a dominant tree affects ecosystem processesEcology Letters 7 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, J. A.Bailey, J. K.Fisher, D. J. 2008 Plant–soil–microorganism interactions: heritable relationship between plant genotype and associated soil microorganismsEcology 89 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, H. P.Batish, D. R.Kaur, S.Arora, K.Kohli, R. K. 2006 Alpha-pinene inhibits growth and induces oxidative stress in rootsAnnals of Botany 98 1261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, H. P.Kaur, S.Mittal, S.Batish, D. R.Kohli, R. K. 2009 Essential oil of inhibits plant growth by generating reactive oxygen species and causing oxidative damageJournal of Chemical Ecology 35 154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sipura, M. 2002 Contrasting effects of ants on the herbivory and growth of two willow speciesEcology 83 2680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolander, A.Ketola, R. A.Kotiaho, T. 2006 Volatile monoterpenes in soil atmosphere under birch and conifers: effects on soil N transformationsSoil Biology and Biochemistry 38 3436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarayre, M.Thompson, J. D.Escarre, J.Linhart, Y. B. 1995 Intra-specific variation in the inhibitory effects of (Labiatae) monoterpenes on seed-germinationOecologia 101 110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarayre, M.Saumitou-Laprade, P.Cuguen, J.Couvet, D.Thompson, J. D. 1997 The spatial genetic structure of cytoplasmic (cpDNA) and nuclear (allozyme) markers within and among populations of the gynodioecious (Labiatae) in southern FranceAmerican Journal of Botany 84 1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. D.Manicacci, D.Tarayre, M. 1998 Thirty-five years of thyme: a tale of two polymorphismsBioScience 48 805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. D.Chalchat, J. C.Michet, A.Linhart, Y. B.Ehlers, B. 2003 Qualitative and quantitative variation in monoterpene co-occurrence and composition in the essential oil of chemotypesJournal of Chemical Ecology 29 859CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. D.Gauthier, P.Amiot, J. 2007 Ongoing adaptation to Mediterranean climate extremes in a chemically polymorphic plantEcological Monographs 77 421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoss, V.O’Reilly-Wapstra, J.Iason, G. R. 2007 Assessment and implications of intraspecific and phenological variability in monoterpenes of Scots pine () foliageJournal of Chemical Ecology 33 477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uribe-Carvajal, S.Guerrero-Castillo, S.King-Diaz, B.Hennsen, B. L. 2008 Allelochemicals targeting the phospholipid bilayer and the proteins of biological membranesAllelopathy Journal 21 1Google Scholar
Uusitalo, M.Kitunen, V.Smolander, A. 2008 Response of C and N transformations in birch soil to coniferous resin volatilesSoil Biology and Biochemistry 40 2643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dam, N. M.Harvey, J. A.Wackers, F. L. 2003 Interactions between aboveground and belowground induced responses against phytophagesBasic and Applied Ecology 4 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokou, D. 2007 Allelochemicals, allelopathy and essential oils: a field in search of definitions and structureAllelopathy Journal 19 119Google Scholar
Ward, B. B.Courtney, K. J.Langenheim, J. H. 1997 Inhibition of by monoterpenes from coastal redwood () in whole-cell studiesJournal of Chemical Ecology 23 2583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. S. 1991 The role of monoterpenes in soil-nitrogen cycling processes in Ponderosa pine – results from laboratory bioassays and field studiesBiogeochemistry 12 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. S. 1994 Monoterpenes – their effects on ecosystem nutrient cyclingJournal of Chemical Ecology 20 1381CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitham, T. G.Young, W. P.Martinsen, G. D. 2003 Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotypeEcology 84 559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, T. G.Lonsdorf, E.Schweitzer, J. A. 2005 ‘All effects of a gene on the world’: extended phenotypes, feedbacks, and multi-level selectionEcoscience 12 5Google Scholar
Whitham, T. G.Bailey, J. K.Schweitzer, J. A. 2006 A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystemsNature Reviews Genetics 7 510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimp, G. M.Martinsen, G. D.Floate, K. D.Bangert, R. K.Whitham, T. G. 2005 Plant genetic determinants of arthropod community structure and diversityEvolution 59 61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, J. B.Brodie, E. D.Cheverud, J. M.Moore, A. J.Wade, M. J. 1998 Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effectsTrends in Ecology and Evolution 13 64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×