Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:32:07.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Bereavement self-help groups: A review of conceptual and methodological issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Margaret S. Stroebe
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Wolfgang Stroebe
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Robert O. Hansson
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Exploring the benefits of self-help or mutual aid groups for the bereaved requires the prior examination of the bereaveds' social and psychological dilemmas and how these interact with the special characteristics of self-help groups (SHGs). This chapter addresses the following questions: What are SHGs? How do they work? What are the special problems of the bereaved? How do these interact with SHG processes to create a setting helpful to the bereaved? What is the empirical evidence that SHGs are useful in addressing problems of bereavement?

The designation self-help group is commonly applied to a wide variety of activities. SHGs are described as support systems, as social movements, as spiritual movements and secular religions, as systems of consumer participation, as alternative, care-giving systems adjunct to professional helping systems, as intentional communities, as supplementary communities, as expressive-social influence groups, and as organizations of the deviant and stigmatized (Killilea, 1976). Self-help, or mutual aid, groups are a poorly defined and unbounded area; arbitrary judgments rather than conceptual structure are the rule. In this chapter the working definition of SHG emphasizes (1) membership composition, people who share a common condition, situation, heritage, symptom, or experience; (2) self-governing and self-regulating; and (3) values, self-reliance and accessibility without charge.

SHGs are used extensively for a variety of problems. Mellinger and Baiter (1983) and Lieberman (1986), using a national probability sample of more than 3,000 households, reported on 1 year's utilization rate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Bereavement
Theory, Research, and Intervention
, pp. 411 - 426
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×