Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T08:35:51.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - People and power on the frontier: liberty, diversity, and de-centralization in the Don region to 1700

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Brian J. Boeck
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Like the pirates, buccaneers, and marroons that emerged on the margins of European colonial societies in the early modern period, the Don Cossacks created community out of diversity and constructed a new polity in interstitial space between empires. Among the Cossacks outcasts and outlaws could seek liberty. For those returning from Tatar captivity the region served as a halfway house between bondage and new identities. Diversity and decentralization dominated the political and social world of the Don Cossacks.

Most historians have tended to simply view the Don Cossacks as a peculiar group of Russians, consigning the hybrid nature of early Cossack society to the margins of discussions of Cossack identity. In contrast, this study emphasizes that Don Cossacks created a new society, a socio-cultural fusion comprised of diverse elements, but committed to an anti-bureaucratic and egalitarian political system. Early Cossack identity was not defined by common language or common origins, but by common interest.

LIBERTY AND AUTOCRACY

Both Cossack and Russian observers agree that volia, translated here as liberty, was a predominant feature of life in the Don, but what did the term mean in a seventeenth-century context? The term itself has connotations of liberty, lack of restraint, and unencumbered actions according to one's own will. For Russian observers it likely meant the antithesis of the Muscovite value system in which autocracy, bureaucracy, legally protected honor, inherited social status, and an emerging institution of social and migration control, usually labeled serfdom, predominated.

Type
Chapter
Information
Imperial Boundaries
Cossack Communities and Empire-Building in the Age of Peter the Great
, pp. 27 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kivelson, Valerie, “Bitter Slavery and Pious Servitude: Muscovite Freedom and its Critics,” Forschungen zur Osteuropaischen Geschichte 58 (2001), 110–19, here pp. 114–15Google Scholar
Kotoshikhin, G. K., O Rossii v tsarstvovanie Alekseia Mikhailovicha (Saint Petersburg, 1906), p. 135Google Scholar
Plavsic, Borivoj, “Seventeenth-Century Chanceries and their Staffs,” in Pintner, Walter and Rowney, Don, eds., Russian Officialdom: The Bureaucratization of Russian Society from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1980), pp. 19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demidova, N. F., Sluzhilaia biurokratiia v Rossii XVII veka i ee rol' v formirovanii absoliutizma (Moscow, 1987)Google Scholar
Faragher, John Mack, ed., Rereading Frederick Jackson Turner: The Significance of the Frontier in American History and Other Essays (New York, 1994), here p. 59
Kumke, Carsten, Führer und Geführte bei den Zaporoger Kosaken: Struktur und Geschichte kozakischer Verbände im polnisch-litauischen Grenzland (1550–1648) (Wiesbaden, 1993), pp. 109–10, 190–91Google Scholar
Prianishnikov, K., Materialy dlia istorii Voiska Donskago: gramoty (Novocherkassk: 1864), p. 41; RIB, 18: 249Google Scholar
Poe, Compare Marshall, “The Truth about Muscovy,” in Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 3: 3 (2002), 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Marshall, “What Did Russians Mean When They Called Themselves ‘Slaves of the Tsar?’Slavic Review 57 (1998), 587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivelson, also Valerie, “On Words, Sources and Historical Methods: Which Truth about Muscovy,” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 3: 3 (2002), 487–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpov, A., Ural'tsy: istoricheskii ocherk (Uralsk, 1911), p. 862Google Scholar
Mininkov, N. A., Donskoe kazachestvo v epokhu pozdnego srednevekov'ia (Rostov-na-Donu, 1998), p. 439Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States (Cambridge, Mass., 1970)Google Scholar
Rediker, Marcus, Villains of All Nations: Atlantic Pirates in the Golden Age (Boston, 2004)Google Scholar
Pennell, C. R., ed., Bandits at Sea: A Pirates Reader (New York, 2001)
Kotel'nikov, Evlampii, “Istoricheskoe svedenie Voiska Donskago o Verkhnei Kurmoiarskoi stanitse,” in Chteniia v obshchestve istorii i drevnostei rossiiskikh 3 (1863), 6–7Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L., “Ethnic Identity,” in Glazer, Nathan and Moynihan, Daniel P., eds., Ethnicity Theory and Experience (Cambridge, Mass., 1975), p. 115Google Scholar
Kreis, K. [Cruys, C.], “Rozyskaniia o Done, Azovskom more, Voronezhe i Azove” in Otechestvennyia zapiski 53 (1824), 50Google Scholar
Brekhunenko, Viktor, Stosunky ukrainskoho kozatstva z Donom (Kiev, 1998)Google Scholar
Rigel'man, Aleksandr, Istoriia ili povestvovanie o Donskikh Kazakakh (Moscow, 1846), p. 9Google Scholar
Sakharov, P. P., “Beloe Rabstvo na Donu,” Donskaia tserkovnaia starina 111 (1911), 145Google Scholar
Boeck, , Shifting Boundaries on the Don Steppe Frontier: Cossacks, Empires and Nomads to 1739 (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 2002), pp. 66–67Google Scholar
Tikhomirov, B. N., Razinshchina (Moscow, 1930), p. 53Google Scholar
Sukhorukov, V. D., Istoricheskoe opisanie zemli voiska Donskago (Novocherkassk, 1869), pp. 382–83Google Scholar
Svatikov, S. G., Rossiia i Don, 1549–1917 (Belgrade, 1924), p. 132Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×