Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:42:48.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Razing the Citizen: Economic Inequality, Gender, and Marriage Tax Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Linda C. McClain
Affiliation:
Boston University
Joanna L. Grossman
Affiliation:
Hofstra University, New York
Get access

Summary

Social citizenship ideals fall not only outside the bounds of fundamental constitutional rights, but also at the margins of plausible politics in the United States. Citizenship, in the prevailing view, confers the political and civil rights that ensure access to a democratic state and market. That view distinguishes rights to economic equality or socioeconomic security as peripheral, or even antagonistic, to the concerns of democratic government.

Indeed, over the last several decades, leading U.S. intellectuals and policy makers have designed and defended a citizenship vision linked to upward redistribution of economic resources. In this vision, economic inequality and widespread insecurity are necessary and natural to freedom and strength in state and market. Among mainstream leaders of law and politics, the response to this antisocial citizenship has been mostly acquiescence, obliviousness, or resignation, rather than sustained critical analysis or vigorous resistance.

This chapter links the failure of social citizenship ideals in the United States to a broader weakness in citizenship ideals – a weakness that is deeply related to gender ideology and practice. To better advance a vision of social citizenship, U.S. law and politics need a stronger vision, not just of economic equality, but of gender equality and of democracy in general. Feminist scholars have analyzed how ideas about gender help shape the common assumption that the costs of raising and sustaining capable, productive citizens are largely private family responsibilities. But ideas about gender also help to undermine egalitarian economic policy more generally.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gender Equality
Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship
, pp. 267 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fineman, Martha Albertson, The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency (New York: New Press, 2004), at 18–22Google Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., “Efficiency and Social Citizenship: Challenging the Neoliberal Attack on the Welfare State,” 78 Ind. L. J.783, 805–06 (2003)Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne, “How High the Apple Pie? A Few Troubling Questions About Where, Why, and How the Burden of Care for Children Should Be Shifted,” 76 Chi-Kent L. Rev.1753–86 (2001)Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C., “Toward a Formative Project of Securing Freedom and Equality,” 85 Cornell L. Rev.1221, 1251–56 (2000)Google Scholar
Silbaugh, Katharine, “Turning Labor into Love: Housework and the Law,” 91 Nw. U. L. Rev.1 (1996)Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva, “The Modernization of Marital Status Law: Adjudicating Wives' Rights to Earnings, 1860–1930,” 82 Geo. L. J.2127, 2131 (1994)Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C., “Care as a Public Value: Linking Responsibility, Resources and Republicanism,” 76 Chi-Kent L. Rev.1673, 1677–90 (2001)Google Scholar
Pifer, Alan and Chisman, Forrest, eds., 50th Anniversary Edition of the Report of the Committee on Economic Security of 1935 and Other Basic Documents Relating to the Development of the Social Security Act 56 (Washington, DC: Project on the Federal Social Role, 1985, 1985****)
Abramovitz, Mimi, Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy From Colonial Times to the Present318–19 (Boston: South End Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Olsen, Frances E., “The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform,” 96 Harv. L. Rev.1497–578 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., “The Politics of Economics in Welfare Reform,” in Fineman, Martha Albertson and Dougherty, Terence, eds., Feminism Confronts Homo Economicus: Gender, Law and Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005), at 193, 199Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., The Second Bill of Rights: FDR's Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More Than Ever (New York: Basic Books, 2004), at 185Google Scholar
King, Desmond S. and Waldron, Jeremy, “Citizenship, Social Citizenship and the Defence of Welfare Provision,” 18 Br. J. Pol. Sci.415, 426–27 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H., Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950)Google Scholar
Murray, Charles, Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950–1980 (New York: Basic Books, 1984)Google Scholar
Gilder, George, “The Coming Welfare Crisis,” in Mink, Gwendolyn and Solinger, Rickie, eds., Welfare: A Documentary History of U.S. Policy and Politics (New York: New York University Press, 2003), at 443–46Google Scholar
Gilmore, Ruth Wilson, Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), at 40–51, 70–72, 83, 140–55Google Scholar
Lapham, Lewis H., “Tentacles of Rage: The Republican Propaganda Mill, a Brief History,” Harper's, Sept. 2004, at 31–41Google Scholar
Miller, John J., A Gift of Freedom: How the John M. Olin Foundation Changed America (New York: Encounter Books, 2004), 23, 32–37Google Scholar
Steinfels, Peter, The NeoConservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America's Politics (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979), at 53–56Google Scholar
Yergin, Daniel and Stanislaw, Joseph, The Commanding Heights: The Battle Between Government and the Marketplace That Is Remaking the Modern World (New York: Touchstone, 1998)Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas L., The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999)Google Scholar
Carlson, Allan, Fractured Generations: Crafting a Family Policy for Twenty-First-Century America (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2005)Google Scholar
Solinger, Rickie, Beggars and Choosers: How the Politics of Choice Shapes Adoption, Abortion and Welfare in the United States (New York: Hill and Wang, 2001)Google Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., “Thinking With Wolves: Left Legal Theory After the Right's Rise,” 54 Buffalo L. Rev.1191, 1293 (2007)Google Scholar
Dubber, Markus Dirk, The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005), at 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed. 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate (White River Jct., VT: Chelsea Green, 2004), at 6–10Google Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., “The Illusion of Efficiency in Workers' Compensation ‘Reform,’50 Rutgers L. Rev.657, 918–20 (1998)Google Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., “Rhetoric of Risk and the Redistribution of Social Insurance,” in Baker, Tom and Simon, Jonathan, eds., Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), at 146, 164–66Google Scholar
McCaffrey, Edward J., Taxing Women (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), at 54–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Carolyn C., “Split Income and Separate Spheres: Tax Law and Gender Roles in the 1940s,” 6 Law and History Rev.259, 294–96 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alstott, Anne L., “Tax Policy and Feminism: Competing Goals and Institutional Choices,” 96 Colum. L. Rev.2001, 2015–18 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler-Harris, Alice, In Pursuit of Equity: Women, Men, and the Quest for Economic Citizenship in 20th-Century America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), at 188–98Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik, Man and Wife in America: A History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), at 115–22Google Scholar
Kalinka, Susan, “Highlights of the 2003 Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act: Economic Stimulus or Long-Term Disaster?,” 64 La. L. Rev.219, 229–30 (2004)Google Scholar
Nelson, Julie A., Feminism, Objectivity and Economics (New York: Routledge, 1996), 104–05Google Scholar
Horn, Wade F., “The Marriage ‘Bonus’ Offers Little Tax Relief,” Washington Times, April 11, 2000, at E2Google Scholar
Zelenak, Lawrence A., “The Declining Progressivity of the Federal Income Tax,” in Carrington, Paul D. and Jones, Trina, eds., Law and Class in America: Trends Since the Cold War (New York: New York University Press, 2006), at 163–90Google Scholar
Klein, Ezra, “The Rise of the Republicrats,” American Prospect, Aug. 13, 2006Google Scholar
Carasso, Adam and Steuerle, Eugene, “The Hefty Penalty on Marriage Facing Many Households With Children,” 15 Future of Children157, 159, 163 (2005)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burman, Leonard E. et al., The Expanding Reach of the Individual Alternative Minimum Tax (Washington, DC: Urban Institute and Brookings Institute, 2005), at 4–6Google Scholar
Gravelle, Jane G., The Individual Alternative Minimum Tax: Interaction With Marriage Penalty Relief and Other Tax Cuts (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2001), at CRS-7Google Scholar
Perrucci, Robert and Wysong, Earl, The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream? (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2nd ed. 2002), at 3–34Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., The Great Risk Shift: The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health Care, and Retirement (and How You Can Fight Back) (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Warren, Elizabeth and Tyagi, Amelia Warren, The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke (New York: Basic Books, 2003), at 5–6Google Scholar
Rank, Mark Robert, One Nation, Underprivileged, Why American Poverty Affects Us All (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), at 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H., Falling Behind: How Rising Inequality Harms the Middle Class (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), at 78–86Google Scholar
LeRoy, Greg, The Great American Jobs Scam: Corporate Tax Dodging and the Myth of Job Creation (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2005)Google Scholar
Faux, Jeff, The Global Class War: How America's Bipartisan Elite Lost Our Future – and What It Will Take to Win It Back (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2006)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×