Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:14:37.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The conceptualization of power and the nature of interdependency: The role of legitimacy and culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Dean Tjosvold
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Barbara Wisse
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Power is often considered the central animating force of human interaction. Who has power, who is affected by power, and how that power is exercised provide the foundation for understanding human relations (Russell 1960). Although it is difficult to give both a parsimonious and a complete definition of power (Fiske and Berdahl 2007; Lukes 1974), power is often defined as the ability to control resources, own and others, a definition rooted in theories of dependency and interdependency (Thibaut and Kelly 1959). Because those who possess power depend less on the resources of others than vice versa, the powerful are more easily able to satisfy their own needs and desires. Given this asymmetric interdependence, many models of power typically describe it as an inherently social variable.

Although power emerges from a specific set of social relations, the possession of power has a transformative impact on an individual's psychological state, leading the powerful to roam in a very different psychological space than the powerless (Keltner et al. 2003; Kipnis 1972). An explosion of research has demonstrated that the possession of power has metamorphic effects on the mental states of individuals and can lead to both positive and negative consequences.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C. and Berdahl, J. L. (2002) The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, C. and Galinsky, A. D. (2006) Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., and Kring, A. M. (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, C., Keltner, D., and John, O. P. (2000) Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. (1969) On violence, New York, N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1996) The politics and the constitution of Athens, trans. Everson, S., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., and Strack, F. (1995) Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, M. B., and Gardner, W. (1996) Who is this we? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. and Thaler, R. H. (1995) Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. and White, T. L. (1994) Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (2), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cast, A. D. (2003) Power and the ability to define the situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., and Bargh, J. A. (2001) Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cousins, S. D. (1989) Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T. and Berdahl, J. L. (2007) Social power. In Kruglanski, A. and Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 678–692), New York, N.Y.: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. H. (1959) The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 118–149), Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Magee, J. C. (2003) From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H, Whitson, J., and Liljenquist, K. A. (2007) Power and immunity to constraint on cognition: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., and Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1968) Power in the recent writing of Talcott Parsons. Sociology, 2, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S. T., and Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000) Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenfeld, D. H, Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., and Galinsky, A. D. (2008) Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guinote, A. (2007) Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hindess, B. (1996) Discourses of power, From Hobbes to Foucault, New York, N.Y.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1998) Leviathan, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1651.)Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1979) Hierarchical power distance in forty countries. In Lammers, C. J. and Hickson, D. J. (Eds.), Organizations alike and unlike: Towards a comparative sociology of organizations (pp. 97–119), London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Anderson, C. (2003) Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110 (2), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipnis, D. (1972) Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., and Otten, S. (2007) Power and cooperation: The moderating effect of legitimacy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., and Otten, S. (2008) Legitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenski, G. E. (1966) Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification, New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974) Power, A radical view, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, J. C., Galinsky, A. D., and Gruenfeld, D. H. (2007) Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 200–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D., and Peruche, B. M. (2007) Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision-making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S. (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, D. J. (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. (1956) The power elite, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1966) Beyond good and evil, trans. Kaufmann, W., New York, N.Y.: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1886.)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1968) The will to power, trans. Kaufmann, W., New York, N.Y.: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1901.)Google Scholar
Overbeck, J. R. and Park, B. (2001) When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overbeck, J. R., and Park, B. (2006) Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of power-holders' social attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 227–243.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967) Sociological theory and modern society, New York, N.Y.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Plato, (1998) The Republic, trans. Waterfield, R., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997) The social contract, and the first and second discourses, trans. Gourevitch, V., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1762.)Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1960) Power, a new social analysis, London: Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1938.)Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957) Models of man, New York, N.Y.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Smith, K. G., Carroll, S. J., and Ashford, S. J. (1995) Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 7–23.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. and Bargh, J. A. (2008) Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P. K. and Trope, Y. (2006) You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (4), 578–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snodgrass, S. E. (1992) Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (1), 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. W. and Kelley, H. H. (1959) The social psychology of groups, New York, N.Y.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D. and Okun, M. (1979) Effects of unequal power on cooperation in conflict. Psychological Reports, 44, 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, E. and Vermunt, R. (2000) Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleef, G. A., Dreu, C. K. W., Pietroni, D., and Manstead, A. S. R. (2006) Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knippenberg, B., Knippenberg, D., and Wilke, H. A. (2001) Power use in cooperative and competitive settings. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1947) The theory of social and economic organization, trans. Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, T., New York, N.Y.:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhong, C., Magee, J. C., Maddux, W. W., and Galinsky, A. D. (2006) Power, culture, and (in)action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western society. In Chen, Y. (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: National culture and groups (pp. 53–73), Greenwich, Conn.: Elsevier Science Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×