Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T06:34:14.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Michael Zürn
Affiliation:
Dean of the Hertie School of Governance and Director of the Research Unit “International Institutions and Conflicts”, Social Science Research Centre Berlin
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science, University of Oslo; Research Associate, Centre for the Study of Civil War, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

As a scientific term, the concept of socialization originated more than 100 years ago—in the first issue of the American Journal of Sociology. It later became a central term in sociology through the work of Durkheim, who saw it as the process through which individuals develop from the stage of being driven by instinct to being a sociable human being. Socialization research in general has, since then, been marked by a definitional paradox. The closer the definition gets to the common-sense meaning of socialization—actors internalize norms and standards of behavior by acting in social structures—the more it runs into operational problems. The more operational the definition, the more detached socialization research becomes from its original sociological meaning, and the more it becomes the study of soft power.

This volume revisits the concept and links it to international relations (IR) by focusing on international socialization. It links to debates in IR theory by adopting a definition that allows for both sociological and rationalist accounts of norm adoption: socialization is the process of inducting actors into the norms and rules of a given community. Whereas this definition cannot overcome the general paradox, it is nonetheless open both to the introduction of novices into common standards through the impersonal power of structures, and to the deliberate use of soft means of influence. It thus fosters a dialogue between constructivists and rationalists, specifically over the possibility of building bridges between different theoretical schools.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1993. Die Erfindung des Politischen. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 1997. Mechanism and Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (4):410–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy, and Katzenstein, Peter, eds. 2006. Religion in an Expanding Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36 (3):245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1999. Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1):83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2001. Constructing European Institutions. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Schneider, Gerald and Aspinwall, Mark, 19–39. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2003. ‘Going Native’ in Europe? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2):209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2004. Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay. Review of International Studies 30 (2):229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Moravcsik, Andrew. 2001. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? Forum Debate. European Union Politics 2 (2):219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortell, Andrew, and Davis, James. 2000. Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda. International Studies Review 2 (1):65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CowlesGreen, Maria, Caporaso, James A., and Risse, Thomas, eds. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1994. A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation. Political Science Quarterly 109 (l):23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1922. Éducation et sociologie. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1985. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1992. Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblee Constituante. In Rationality and Institutions: Essays in Honour of Knut Midgaard, edited by Malnes, Raino and Underdal, Arild, 13–50. Oslo, Norway: Universitets-forlaget.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1998. A Plea for Mechanisms. In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard, 45–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar, and Fossum, John Erik, eds. 2000. Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation?London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Alexander Wendt. 2002. Rationalism versus Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Simmons, Beth, and Risse, Thomas, 52–72. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, John Erik. 2003. The European Union: In Search of an Identity. European Journal of Political Theory 2 (3):319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 2002. Domestic Politics and International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth, 309–28. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–57. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 2001. Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-Functionalism? In The Social Construction of Europe, edited by Christiansen, Thomas, Jorgensen, Knud Erik, and Wiener, Antje, 22–31. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hemmer, Christopher, and Katzenstein, Peter. 2002. Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization 56 (3):575–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritier, Adrienne, Knill, Christoph, and Mingers, Susanne. 1996. Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and Redefinition of the State. Britain, France, Germany. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Richard, and Marilynn Brewer. 2004. Identities and Institutions: Becoming European in the EU. In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Herrmann, Richard, Risse, Thomas, and Brewer, Marilynn, 1–24. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard, Risse, Thomas, and Brewer, Marilynn, eds. 2004. Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2004a. Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration?PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (3):415–20.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2004b. The Neofunctionalists Were (Almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration. Paper presented at the ARENA Research Seminar, October, ARENA Centre for European Studies, Oslo.
Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hovi, Jon. 2004. Causal Mechanisms and the Study of International Environmental Regimes. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, edited by Underdal, Arild and Young, Oran, 71–86. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrelmann, Klaus. 2002. Einführung in die Sozialisationstheorie. 8th ed. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, John R. 2000. Smart Inductive Generalizations are Abductions. In Abduction and Induction: Essays on Their Relation and Integration, edited by Flach, Peter A. and Kakas, Antonis, 31–44. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, and Caporaso, James A.. 1999. Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James A., and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (l/2):7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2004. Defining Accountability Up: The Global Economic Multilaterals. Government and Opposition 39 (2):132–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 2003. Same War–Different Views: Germany, Japan and Counterterrorism. International Organization 57 (4):731–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Krasner, Stephen, eds. 1998. International Organization at Fifty: Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645–1061.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2004. International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization 58 (3):425–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 2000. Introduction. In Governance in a Globalizing World, edited by Nye, Joseph S. and Donahue, John D., 1–41. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kohler-Koch, Beate, ed. 2003. Linking EU and National Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler-Koch, Beate, and Eising, Rainer, eds. 1999. The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. 1998. The European Union: A Distinctive Model of Internationalization. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2):235–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. 2004. The European Union and Its Institutions as ‘Identity Builders.’ In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Herrmann, Richard, Risse, Thomas, and Brewer, Marilynn, 75–96. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. A Review Essay. International Organization 48 (2):279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa, and Simmons, Beth. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, Renate. 2003. Mechanisms in the Analysis of Macro-Social Phenomena. MPIfG Working Paper 03/3. Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
Milner, Helen. 1992. International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. A Review Essay. World Politics 44 (3):466–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining. In Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, edited by Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold, and Putnam, Robert, 3–42. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2002. In Defense of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4):603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Harald. 2004. Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3):395–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Harald, and Thomas Risse-Kappen. 1993. From the Outside In and From the Inside Out: International Relations, Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy. In The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation, edited by Skidmore, David and Hudson, Valerie, 25–48. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Pierce, Charles S. 1878. Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly 13 (8):470–82.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (l):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2004. European Institutions and Identity Change: What Have We Learned? In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Herrmann, Richard, Risse, Thomas, and Brewer, Marilynn, 247–71. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2005. Neo-Functionalism, European Identity, and the Puzzles of European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (2):291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Maier, Matthias, eds. 2003. Europeanization, Collective Identities and Public Discourses—Draft Final Report submitted to the European Commission. Florence, Italy: European University Institute and Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Edward A. 1896. Social Control. American Journal of Sociology 1 (5):513–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saretzki, Thomas. 1996. Wie unterscheiden sich Argumentieren und Verhandeln? Definitionsprobleme, funktionale Bezüge und strukturelle Differenzen von zwei verschiedenen Kommunikationsmodi. In Verhandeln und Argumentieren. Dialog, Interessen und Macht in der Umweltpolitik, edited by Prittwitz, Volker, 19–39. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Economic Integration, Democracy, and the Welfare State. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (l):18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. Internationale Sozialisation: Von einem “erschöpften” zu einem produktiven Forschungsprogramm? In Die Neuen Internationalen Beziehungen: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, edited by Hellmann, Gunther, Wolf, Klaus-Dieter, and Zürn, Michael, 401–28. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Schneider, Volker. 2003. Komplexität und Policy-Forschung: Über die Angemessenheit von Erklärungsstrategien. In Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden, edited by Mayntz, Renate and Streeck, Wolfgang, 291–317. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1991. The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing About Mechanisms in Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Olav Schram, and Davor Vidas. 1996. Effectiveness and Legitimacy of International Regimes. In Governing the Antarctic: The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System, edited by Stokke, Olav Schram and Vidas, Davor, 13–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weber, Steven. 1994. Origins of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. International Organization 48 (l):1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang. 1998. Comitology: Fusion in Action. Politico-Administrative Trends in the EU System. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2):209–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, and Diez, Thomas, eds. 2004. European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R., and Marc Levy. 1999. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. In The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, edited by Young, Oran, 1–32. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zangl, Bernhard, and Zürn, Michael. 1996. Argumentatives Handeln bei internationalen Verhandlungen. Moderate Anmerkungen zur post-realistischen Debatte. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3 (2):341–66.Google Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja. 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinnecker, Jürgen. 2000. Selbstsozialisation. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation 20 (3):272–90.
Zürn, Michael. 1992. Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik. Grundlegung und Anwendungen des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1997. Assessing State Preferences and Explaining Institutional Choice: The Case of Intra-German Trade. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2000. Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2):183–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2002. From Interdependence to Globalization. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Simmons, Beth, and Risse, Thomas, 235–54. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael, and Juergen Neyer. 2005. Conclusions—The Conditions of Compliance. In Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance Beyond the Nation-State, edited by Zürn, Michael and Joerges, Christian, 183–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×