Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T21:39:33.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Strategic position, organic growth, and financial performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

William F. Joyce
Affiliation:
Professor of Strategy and Organization, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth
Edward D. Hess
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Robert K. Kazanjian
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Growth remains one of the most intriguing organizational objectives. Research in organization science (OS) has examined growth both as a means to profitability and as an alternative to profitability (Baumol, 1958). With growth as a central concept in OS – either as a means to an end, or as an end in itself – the management literature has variously discussed strategies and structures for growth and varieties of growth (such as organic and inorganic growth), and, indeed, much of the traditional management literature has been concerned with the relationships between functional area strategies and this important outcome criterion.

The large existing literature on growth therefore raises several questions: Is further research on growth needed? What additional contributions can be made to this literature? How can we advance an already voluminous literature and contribute to management practice? Any further research in this area must proceed with at least some amount of hubris, for many, many research efforts have gone before and many issues have been studied.

Research concerning firm growth has tended to follow the path taken by most research in organization science; that is, from general to specific. Research began with an important set of questions, and these have subsequently been fragmented and separated into smaller and smaller parts. This has allowed for the rigorous examination of progressively less and less important problems, and has led us further from the fundamental questions that originally stimulated this field of inquiry. These are: How important is growth, and in particular, organic growth?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumol, W. J. 1958. On the theory of oligopoly. Economica, New Series, 24(99): 187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, W. W. 1949. Theory of the firm: some suggestions for revision. American Economic Review, 39(6): 1204–1222Google Scholar
Govier, T. 1992. A Practical Study of Argument. Belmont, CA: WadsworthGoogle Scholar
Gulick, L. & Urwick, L. 1937. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public AdministrationGoogle Scholar
Joyce, W. 1986. Matrix organization: a social experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3): 536–561Google Scholar
Joyce, W. 2005a. What really works: building the 4+2 organization. Organizational Dynamics, 34: 118–129CrossRef
Joyce, W. 2005b. What really works: HR's role in building the 4+2 organization. Human Resource Management Journal, 44(1): 67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, W., McGee, V., & Slocum, J. 1997. Designing lateral organizations: an analysis of the benefits, costs, and enablers of nonhierarchical organizational forms. Decision Sciences, 28: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, W., Nohria, N., & Roberson, B. 2003. What Really Works: The 4+2 Formula for Sustained Business Performance. New York: Harper BusinessGoogle Scholar
Joyce, W., Nohria, N., & Roberson, B. 2005. HR's role in building the 4+2 organization. In , S. Meisenger, Losey, M. and Ulrich, D. (eds.), The Future of HR: 50 Thought Leaders Call for Change. Hoboken, NJ: WileyGoogle Scholar
Kast, D. & Rosenzweig, J. 1972. General systems theory: applications for organization management. Academy of Management Journal, 15: 447–465
Kruskal, J. B. 1987. Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison. Boston: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. 1958. The analysis of the firm: rationalism, conventionalism, and behaviorism. Journal of Business, 31(3): 187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. 1964. Theories of Business Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×