Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Searching for Sustainability
- General Introduction: An Interdisciplinary Experiment
- I PRAGMATISM AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
- II SCIENCE, POLICY, AND POLICY SCIENCE
- 6 What Is a Conservation Biologist?
- 7 Biological Resources and Endangered Species: History, Values, and Policy
- 8 Leopold as Practical Moralist and Pragmatic Policy Analyst
- 9 Improving Ecological Communication: The Role of Ecologists in Environmental Policy Formation
- III ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
- IV SCALING SUSTAINABILITY: ECOLOGY AS IF HUMANS MATTERED
- V SOME ELEMENTS OF A PHILOSOPHY OF SUSTAINABLE LIVING
- VI VALUING SUSTAINABILITY: TOWARD A MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
- Index
- References
9 - Improving Ecological Communication: The Role of Ecologists in Environmental Policy Formation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Searching for Sustainability
- General Introduction: An Interdisciplinary Experiment
- I PRAGMATISM AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
- II SCIENCE, POLICY, AND POLICY SCIENCE
- 6 What Is a Conservation Biologist?
- 7 Biological Resources and Endangered Species: History, Values, and Policy
- 8 Leopold as Practical Moralist and Pragmatic Policy Analyst
- 9 Improving Ecological Communication: The Role of Ecologists in Environmental Policy Formation
- III ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
- IV SCALING SUSTAINABILITY: ECOLOGY AS IF HUMANS MATTERED
- V SOME ELEMENTS OF A PHILOSOPHY OF SUSTAINABLE LIVING
- VI VALUING SUSTAINABILITY: TOWARD A MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION: DO WE NEED NEW TERMINOLOGY FOR ECOLOGICAL COMMUNICATION?
I recently [1995] attended an excellent workshop on “Communicating with the Public on Ecological Issues”; the subject of the workshop was to discuss how well scientific ecologists, agencies, and the public communicate regarding ecological matters and how to improve these communication processes. Generally, participants were critical of the current levels of communication, but many positive and constructive ideas were contributed by break-out groups. One group was charged to discuss “Characteristics of Ecological Issues Affecting the Communication Process” and reported back with a list of caveats and recommendations. The first of these (as delivered by group leader Lawrence Slobodkin) was that we do not need any new scientific terms, such as “ecological health” or “ecological integrity.” “Everything that needs to be said to the public,” Slobodkin argued, “can be said in the existing terminology of ecological science.” Since I know Larry enjoys a good philosophical argument, and I hope he will agree that the subject is of general interest, I here set out to provide a careful criticism of that recommendation. In the process, I hope also to provide, more positively, a brief glimpse of a somewhat different way of looking at the relationship between description and evaluation, and of a different way of relating social and natural science in policy process.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Searching for SustainabilityInterdisciplinary Essays in the Philosophy of Conservation Biology, pp. 136 - 164Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
Allen, T. F. H. and T. W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a Unified Ecology. Columbia University Press, New York
Allen, T. F. H. and T. B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
, , , , , , , , , , and . 1995. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268: 520–521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batie, S. S. and H. H. Shugart 1989. “The biological consequences of climate changes: an ecological and economic assessment,” pp. 121–131 in Rosenberg, N. J., Easterling, W. E., III, Crosson, P. R., and Darmstadter, J., editors, Greenhouse Warming: Abatement and Adaptation. Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C
, , , , , and . 1995 Ecological economic modeling and valuation of ecosystems. Ecological Economics 14: 143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1950. Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40Google Scholar
Costanza, R., B. Norton, and B. Haskell. 1992. Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Covelo, CA
Cronon, W. 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. Hill and Wang, New York
Cronon, W., editor. 1995. Uncommon ground. W. W. Norton and Co., New York
Crosby, A. W. 1986. Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Freeman, A. M. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Gunderson, L. H., C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light, editors, 1995a. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
Gunderson, L. H., C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light, editors 1995b. Barriers broken and bridges built: a synthesis, pp. 489–532 in L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and S. S. Lignt, editors, Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
Hammond, A. 1995. Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
Harwell, M., J. Gentile, B. Norton, and W. Cooper. 1994. Ecological Significance in Ecological Risk Assessement Issue Papers. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/630/009, 2-1–2-49
Holling, C. S., editor. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. John Wiley & Sons, London
1992. Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 62: 447–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kentula, M. E., R. P. Brooks, S. E. Gwin, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos. 1993. Wetlands: An Approach to Improved Decision Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation. Island Press, Covelo, CA
King, D. M. 1997a. Comparing Ecosystem Services and Values. Report to the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Damage Assessment and Restoration Program, Silver Spring, MD, January 12
King, D. M. 1997b. Using Ecosystem Assessment Methods in Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Report to the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Damage Assessment and Restoration Program, Silver Spring, MD, January 31
King, D. M. 1997c. Personal communication, March
King, D. M. 1997d. Wetland values, wetland mitigation and sustainable watershed management. Unpublished manuscript
Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
Lee, K. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope. Island Press, Covelo, California
McIntosh, R. P. 1985. The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. Second Edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Norton, B. G. 1991. Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford University Press, New York
Norton, B. G. 1994. Ascertaining Public Values Affecting Ecological Risk Assessment in Ecological Risk Assessment Issue papers. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/630/009, 10-1–10-38
1995a. Objectivity, intrinsicality, and sustainability. Environmental Values 4: 323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. G. 1996. A scalar approach to ecological constraints in P. C. Schulze, editor, Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy Press for the National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC
and . 1997. Environmental values: a place-based theory, Environmental Ethics 19: 227–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. 1979. The value of wetlands: a hierarchical approach, in P. E. Greeson, J. R. Clark, and J. E. Clark, editors, Wetlands Functions and Values: The State of Our Understanding, pp. 1–25. American Water Resources Association, Bethesda, MD
O'Neil, L. J., T. M. Pullen, and R. L. Schroeder. 1991. A Wildlife Community Habitat Evaluation Model for Bottomland Hardwood Forests in the Southeastern United States. Biological Report 91(ⅹ). U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
O'Neill, R. V., D. L. DeAngelis, J. B. Waide, and T. F. H. Allen. 1986. A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Peters, R. H. 1991. A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Pimm, S. L. 1991. The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
Proctor, R. N. 1991. Value-Free Science? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Quine, W. V. O. 1964. Word and Object. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
1988. Ethics, ecology, and the environment: integrating science and law. Tennessee Law Review 56: 78–229Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. and E. D. McCoy. 1993. Method in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
and . 1996. Function equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi Te estuarine wetland. Ecological Applications 6(1): 38–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuan, Y.-F. 1974. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Tuan, Y.-F. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Walters, C. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan Publishers, New York
Williams, B. A. O. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Williams, B. A. O. 1987. Why it is so difficult to replace lost wetland functions, pp. 121–123 in J. Zelazny and J. S. Feierabend, editors, Increasing Our Wetland Resources. Conference Proceedings, National Wildlife Federation Corporate Conservation Council, October 4–7. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC
1996. Ecological issues in wetland mitigation: an introduction to the forum. Ecological Applications 6: 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar