Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T09:34:55.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Impact on Public Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

L. Sandy Maisel
Affiliation:
Colby College, Maine
Darrell M. West
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Brett M. Clifton
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

Voters play a crucial role in campaign reform. They are the objects of persuasion and mobilization, and the people who are on the receiving end of political advertisements, news coverage, debates, mailings, phone calls, Web sites, and speeches. Efforts to make the electoral system work better center on how citizens feel about the political process. Without some positive impact on the general public, campaign reform cannot be judged effective. It is not enough for consultants, candidates, and reporters to view proposed remedies as an improvement. Rather, citizens must see a difference in how elections function.

These objectives are difficult to achieve because there long has been a culture of cynicism and dissatisfaction in the United States. Citizens do not trust the government in Washington to do what is right. Following Watergate, Vietnam, economic stagflation, Iran-Contra, the House bank scandal, and Monica Lewinsky, voters believe that politicians are out for themselves and are not likely to represent the public interest.

This chapter looks at how voters have responded to campaign reform proposals and whether changes are associated with making citizens feel better about the system. Using the results of our national public opinion survey, we examine voter opinions about campaign reform and the election. If there were debates, forums, and candidate pledges to avoid negative campaigning in the person's local congressional district, was there any association with citizen impressions of campaign tone, issue discussion, and knowledge of the candidates?

Type
Chapter
Information
Evaluating Campaign Quality
Can the Electoral Process be Improved?
, pp. 79 - 93
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×