Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:25:22.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Actualizing Potentials: Learning through Psychology's Recurrent Crises

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Michael Cole
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, University of California, San Diego
Jaan Valsiner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA
David B. Pillemer
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire
Sheldon H. White
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

It was presumably the philosopher George Santayana who commented that those who do not know the past are doomed to repeat it. Yet study of the history of psychology has rarely, if ever, been used as a tool by social scientists to help them avoid the pitfalls of the past. Instead, social scientists use the study of the history of the discipline as a tool to plan and organize their work. Sheldon (Shep) White represents a distinctly different model of how to view the history and practice of psychology. In the 1970s, Shep began writing articles on the history of psychology that were pointedly designed to be used by the current practitioners of the discipline to help them to reflect upon their own practices (White, 1976, 1978; Cahan & White, 1992).

The Nature of Knowledge in Science: From Crises to Potentials

Contrary to the fast-paced reporting of science to the lay public – by journalists and scientists – scientific knowledge grows slowly and is subject to various periods of stagnation and even regression. Both evolution and involution in scientific thinking are linked with social events (Danziger, 1990). Usually such periods are filled with the tension created between the avalanche of new ideas (in new contexts) and the rigidities of the previous habits of thought. This tension may emerge along a multitude of parameters – between theory and (social) practice; ways of knowing and religious dogmas (remembering Galileo's troubles about moving celestial objects at his time and arguments about stem cell research in our own); generality and fragmentation within a discipline; and the “stress of interdisciplinarity” – a discipline resisting the incoming streams of ideas from other disciplines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Developmental Psychology and Social Change
Research, History and Policy
, pp. 288 - 313
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, L. (1990). De amores y desamores: Relaciones de México con el surrealismo. El surrealismo entre Viejo y Nouevo Mundo (pp. 101–109). Madrid: Ediciones El VisoGoogle Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt Psychology in German Culture 1890–1967. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C. (1985). Toward a solution to the learning paradox. Review of Educational Research 55, 201–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branco, A. U. (1997, July). Perspectivas Teorico-Metodologicas no Estudo da Meta-comunicação. Paper presented at the 26th Interamerican Congress of Psychology, São Paulo, Brazil
Branco, A. U., Neiva, A., Ferreira, M., & Pessina, L. (1997, July). Metacomunicaçao Entre Crianças: Estudo Microgenetico em Contexto Estruturado. Paper presented at the 26th Interamerican Congress of Psychology, São Paulo, Brazil
Branco, A. U., & Valsiner, J. (1997). Changing methodologies: A co-constructivist study of goal orientations in social interactions. Psychology and Developing Societies 9, 1, 35–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, K. (1927/1978). Die Krise der Psychologie. Frankfurt-am-Main: Ullsten (Original Published in 1927)Google Scholar
Cahan, E. D., & White, S. H. (1992). Proposals for a second psychology. American Psychologist 47, 2, 224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. (1981) Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 3, 5–8Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1992). Context, modularity, and the cultural constitution of development. In Winegar, L. T. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Children's Development within Social Context. Vol. 2. Research and Methodology (pp. 5–31). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1995). Culture and cognitive development: From cross-cultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Culture and Psychology 1, 1, 25–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Reconstructing the Subject. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Río, P., Alvarez, A., & Wertsch, J. (Eds). (1994). Explorations in Socio-Cultural Studies. Vol. 1–4. Madrid: Infancia y AprendizajeGoogle Scholar
Diriwächter, R. (2003, June). What Really Matters: Keeping the Whole. Paper presented at the 10th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Theoretical Psychology, Istanbul
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-KonsultitGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A., & Branco, A. U. (1997). Meta-communication as a source of indeterminism in relationship development. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Dynamics and Indeterminism in Developmental and Social Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.) (1997). Dynamics and Indeterminism in Developmental and Social Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Josephs, I. E. (1998). Constructing one's self in the city of the silence: Dialogue, symbols, and the role of “as-if” in self development. Human Development 41, 180–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C. (1988). The Social Facilitation of Reading Comprehension. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego
King, C., Griffin, P., Diaz, E., & Cole, M. (2000). A Model System Approach to Reading. http://lchc.ucsd.edu/Pubs/NEWTECHN.pdf
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC) (1982). A model system for the study of learning disabilities. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 4, 39–66
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC) (1983). Culture and cognition. In Mussen, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. 4th edition. Vol. 1. History, Theory, and Methods. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Litowitz, B. E. (1997). Just say no: Responsibility and resistance. In Cole, M., Engestrom, Y., & Vasquez, O. (Eds.), Mind, Culture, and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 473–484). New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1932). The Nature of Human Conflicts. New York: LiverightGoogle Scholar
Maciel, D. (1996). Analise das Interacões Professora-Crianca em Situacão de Ensino-Aprendizagem da Leitura e Escrita. Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Education, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Maciel, D. A., Branco, A., & Valsiner, J. (2004). Teacher-student interactions within learning contexts: Analysis of metacommunicative and constructive processes. In Branco, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Communication and Metacommunication in Human Development. Westport, CT: GreenwoodGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1988). The challenge of universal literacy. Science 241, 1293–1299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierre, J. (1990). Algunas reflexiones deshilvanadas sobre el encuentro de México y del surrealismo. In El Surrealismo Entre Viejo y Nouevo Mundo (pp. 110–117). Madrid: Ediciones El Viso
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1992). Outlines of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In Wold, A. H. (Ed.), The Dialogical Alternative: Towards a Theory of Language and Mind (pp. 19–44). Oslo: Scandinavian University PressGoogle Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1998). On human beings, computers, and representational-computational versus hermeneutic-dialogical approaches to human cognition and communication. Culture and Psychology 4, 2, 213–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing. In Shipman, S. F., Segal, J. W., & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills: Research and Open Questions. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (2001). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In Dalal, A. K. & Misra, G. (Eds), New Directions in Indian Psychology. Vol. 1. Social Psychology (pp. 241–256). New Delhi: SageGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children/Committee on the Prevention of Reading Difficulties in Young Children, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council Committee on the Prevention of Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Tashjian, D. (1995). A Boatload of Madmen: Surrealism and the American Avant-garde, 1920–1950. New York: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A Quest for Synthesis. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the Development of Children's Action. Chichester, UK: WileyGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1988). Developmental Psychology in the Soviet Union. Brighton: HarvesterGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and Human Development. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2001). Comparative Study of Human Cultural Development. Madrid: Fundacion Infancia y AprendizajeGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (1993). The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations. In Cocking, R. R. & Renninger, K. A. (Eds.), The Development and Meaning of Psychological Distance (pp. 35–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J., & Veer, R. (2000). The Social Mind: Construction of the Idea. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1926/1982). Istoricheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa. In Vygotsky, L. S., Sobranie sochinenii. Vol. 1 (pp. 291–346). Moscow: Pedagogika (Original published in 1926)Google Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review 20, 158–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. (1976). Developmental psychology and Vico's concept of universal history. Social Research 43, 4, 659–671Google ScholarPubMed
White, S. (1978). Psychology in all sorts of places. In Kasschau, R. A. & Kessel, F. (Eds.), Psychology and Society: In Search of Synthesis (pp. 103–131). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & WinstonGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×