Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T16:20:55.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - ‘It Was Not My Choice, You Know?’: Young People's Subjective Views and Decision-Making Processes in Biographical Transitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

Ingrid Schoon
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There is a broad spectrum of empirical evidence showing that young people's transitions from school to work are structured by class, education, gender, ethnicity, and region. Recently, increasing scientific attention has been given to the biographical aspects of youth transitions. The notion of ‘structured individualisation’ refers to the fact that individuals have access to different resources and opportunities in navigating through their lives, while social inequalities are being increasingly reproduced through individual decision making, such as whether to continue with education or to drop out at an early stage (Ball, Maguire, & Macrae, 2000; du Bois-Reymond & Chisholm, 2006; European Group for Integrated Social Research, 2001; Furlong & Cartmel, 1997; Henderson, Holland, McGrellis, Sharpe, & Thomson, 2006). Moreover, consequences of social inequality have changed. The implications of social inequality now reach beyond young people being allocated to different careers depending on their social status. Increasing risks of social exclusion imply that transitions can also fail (Castel, 2000). The view of institutional actors tends to reduce transitions exclusively to the achievement of educational qualifications and to labour-market entry. They ascribe success and failure in this respect to individuals' responsibility and rationality in making decisions regarding education, training, and job search. Recently, this has been reflected by a policy trend towards activation aimed at influencing individuals' adaptive behaviour (Harsløf, 2005; Lødemel & Trickey, 2001; McNeish & Loncle, 2003; Pohl & Walther, 2007; Serrano, 2004; van Berkel & Møller, 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Transitions from School to Work
Globalization, Individualization, and Patterns of Diversity
, pp. 121 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahl, H. (2006). Motivation in adult education: A problem solver or a euphemism for direction and control?International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(4), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alheit, P., & Dausien, B. (2002). ‘Biographicity’ as a basic resource of lifelong learning. In Alheit, P. et al. (Eds.), Lifelong learning inside and outside of schools (pp. 400–422). Roskilde: Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Allmendinger, J. (1989). Educational systems and labour market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unravelling the mystery of health. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Macrae, S. (2000). Choice, pathways and transitions post-16: New youth, new economics in the global city. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1976). The economic approach to human behaviour. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Biggart, A., & Kovacheva, S. (2006). Social change, family support and young adults in Europe. In Bois-Reymond, M. du & Chisholm, L. (Eds.), The modernization of youth transitions in Europe. New Directions for Childhood and Adolescent Development, (pp. 49–63). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Bloomer, M., & Hodkinson, P. (2000). Learning careers: Continuity and change in young people's dispositions to learning. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhnisch, L. (2001). Sozialpädagogik der Lebensalter. Eine Einführung. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
Bonß, W., & Zinn, J. (2004). Erwartbarkeit, Glück und Vertrauen: Zum Wandel biographischer Sicherheitskonstruktionen in der Moderne. Soziale Welt, 56, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castel, R. (2000). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, J. (2000). Social theory and the underclass: Social realism or rational choice individualism? In Archer, M. S. and Tritter, J. Q. (Eds.), Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization (pp. 75–93). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Bois-Reymond, M. (1998). ‘I don't want to commit myself yet’: Young people's life-concepts. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Bois-Reymond, M., & Chisholm, L. (Eds.). (2006). The modernization of youth transitions in Europe. New Directions for Childhood and Adolescent Development, No. 113, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
,Eurobarometer. (2007). Young Europeans: A survey among young people aged between 15 and 30 in the European Union. Analytical Report. Brussels: Eurostat.Google Scholar
,European Group for Integrated Social Research (EGRIS). (2001). Misleading trajectories: Transition dilemmas of young adults in Europe. Journal of Youth Studies, 4(1), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, K. (2002). Taking control of their lives? Agency in young adult transitions in England and the New Germany. Journal of Youth Studies, 5(3), 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change: Individualization and risk in late modernity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gallie, D., & Paugam, S. (Eds.). (2000). Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shell, German. (Ed.). (2006). Jugend 2006. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. (2000). On sociology. Volume 1: Critique and Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, T. (Ed.). (2003). Youth Unemployment and Social Exclusion in Europe. A comparative study. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRef
Harsløf, I. (2005). ‘Integrative’ or ‘defensive’: Youth activation in nine European welfare states. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(4), 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S., Holland, J., McGrellis, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (2006). Inventing adulthoods: A biographical approach to youth transitions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Keupp, H., Ahbe, T., Gmür, W., Höfer, R., Kraus, W., Mitscherlich, B., & Straus, F. (1999). Identitätskonstruktionen: Das Patchwork der Identitäten in der Spätmoderne. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to self-determination theory. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), The handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405–427). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Leccardi, C. (2005). Facing uncertainty: Temporality and biographies in the new century. Young, 13(2), 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessenich, S. (1995). Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Regulierung und die Strukturierung von Lebensläufen. Zur Selektivität sozialpolitischer Intervention. Soziale Welt, 46, 51–69.Google Scholar
Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2001). An offer you can't refuse: Workfare in an international perspective. Bristol, England: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, V., Heinz, W. R., Krueger, H., & Verma, A. (Eds.). (2001). Restructuring work and the life course. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
McNeish, W., & Loncle, P. (2003). State policy and youth unemployment in the EU: Rights, responsibilities and lifelong learning. In Blasco, L. A., McNeish, W., & Walther, A. (Eds.), Young people and contradictions of inclusion: Towards integrated transition policies in Europe (pp. 105–126). Bristol, England: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, W., & Gangl, M. (Eds.). (2003). Transitions from education to work in Europe: The integration of youth on EU labour markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pais, J. M. (2003). The multiple faces of the future in the labyrinth of life. Journal of Youth Studies, 6(2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, A. (2000). Rational choice or ‘Hobson's choice’? Intention and constraint in UK higher education. In Archer, M. S. & Tritter, J. Q. (Eds.), Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization (pp. 126–145). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pohl, A. & Walther, A. (2007). Activating the disadvantaged. Variations in addressing youth transitions across Europe. International Journal for Lifelong Education, 26(5), 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosholm, M., & Svarer, M. (2004). Estimating the threat effect of active labour market programmes. Copenhagen: CAM Working Paper.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender and welfare state regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, P. A. (Ed.). (2004). Are activation policies converging in Europe?Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
Shavit, Y. & Müller, W. (Eds.). (1998). From school to work. A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stauber, B. (2004). Junge Frauen und Männer in Jugendkulturen. Selbstinszenierungen und Handlungspotentiale. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
Stauber, B., & Walther, A. (2006). Destandardised pathways to adulthood in Europe: Informal learning in informal networks. Revista de Sociología, 79, 241–262.Google Scholar
Thomson, R., Bell, R., Holland, J., Henderson, S., McGrellis, S., & Sharpe, S. (2002). Critical moments: Choice, chance and opportunity in young people's narratives of transition. Sociology, 36(2), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkel, R., & Møller, I. H. (2002). Active social policies in the EU. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotskij, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, A. (2000). Spielräume im Übergang in die Arbeit. Junge Erwachsene im Wandel der Arbeitsgesellschaft in Deutschland, Großbritannien und Italien. Weinheim et al.: Juventa.Google Scholar
Walther, A. (2006). Regimes of youth transitions: Choice, flexibility and security in young people's experiences across different European contexts. Young, 14(2), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, A., Stauber, B., Biggart, A., du Bois-Reymond, M., Furlong, A., López Blasco, A., Mørch, S. & Pais, J. M. (Eds.). (2002). Misleading trajectories. Integration policies for young adults in Europe?Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRef
Walther, A., du Bois-Reymond, M., & Biggart, A. (Eds.). (2006). Participation in transition: Motivation of young adults in Europe for learning and working. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Walther, A., & Pohl, A. (2005). Thematic study on policy measures concerning disadvantaged youth: Final report for the European Commission. Available at www.europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/social_inclusion/studies_en.htm. Accessed December 1, 2007.
Williamson, H. (1997). Status zer0 youth and the ‘underclass’: Some considerations. In MacDonald, R. (Ed.), Youth, the ‘underclass’ and social exclusion (pp. 70–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×