Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:42:48.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction to rock physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2010

Per Avseth
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, and Odin Petroleum, Bergen
Tapan Mukerji
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Gary Mavko
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Make your theory as simple as possible, but no simpler.

Albert Einstein

Introduction

The sensitivity of seismic velocities to critical reservoir parameters, such as porosity, lithofacies, pore fluid type, saturation, and pore pressure, has been recognized for many years. However, the practical need to quantify seismic-to-rock-property transforms and their uncertainties has become most critical over the past decade, with the enormous improvement in seismic acquisition and processing and the need to interpret amplitudes for hydrocarbon detection, reservoir characterization, and reservoir monitoring. Discovering and understanding the seismic-to-reservoir relations has been the focus of rock physics research.

One of our favorite examples of the need for rock physics is shown in Plate 1.1. It is a seismic P–P reflectivity map over a submarine fan, or turbidite system. We can begin to interpret the image without using much rock physics, because of the striking and recognizable shape of the feature. A sedimentologist would tell us that the main feeder channel (indicated by the high amplitude) on the left third of the image is likely to be massive, clean, well-sorted sand – good reservoir rock. It is likely to be cutting through shale, shown by the low amplitudes. So we might propose that high amplitudes correspond to good sands, while the low amplitudes are shales.

Downflow in the lobe environment, however, the story changes. Well control tells us that on the right side of the image, the low amplitudes correspond to both shale and clean sand – the sands are transparent.

Type
Chapter
Information
Quantitative Seismic Interpretation
Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk
, pp. 1 - 47
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×