Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:03:39.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary-stratotype at Vrica, Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

John A. Van Couvering
Affiliation:
American Museum of Natural History, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Plio–Pleistocene sequence of deep-water marine beds at Vrica, Calabria, Italy, was proposed by INQUA Subcommission 1-d, “Pliocene/Pleistocene Boundary,” and by the working group of IGCP Project 41, “Neogene/Quaternary Boundary,” as the location for a physical boundary-stratotype for the base of the Pleistocene, according to modern chronostratigraphic guidelines. The recommended level has been adopted formally by the IUGS (Nikiforova and Alekseev, Chapter 1, this volume). That section is herein characterized in terms of sedimentology, paleoecology, biostratigraphy, biochronology, and magnetostratigraphy, based on a decade of studies by stratigraphers in different countries. According to criteria established by prior recommendations, the physical location of the Pleistocene boundary-stratotype is identified with the base of the claystone conformably overlying marker bed e of the Vrica section. This level is very close to the Olduvai normal-polarity subzone and is approximately coeval with the beginning of a cold-climate phase marked by the first appearance of the “northern guest” Arctica islandica, a mollusk confined to boreal waters during interglacial periods.

Background

At the XVIII International Geological Congress in London in 1948, the council unanimously accepted the recommendation of the temporary commission to advise on the question of the definition of the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary, which made the following essential points: “The Commission considers that the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary should be based on changes in marine faunas…. The classic area of marine sedimentation in Italy is regarded as the area where this principle can be implemented best” (King and Oakley, 1950).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×