Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:47:57.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Interstate Arbitration: Chapter 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2009

Edward Brunet
Affiliation:
Lewis and Clark College, Portland
Richard E. Speidel
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Jean E. Sternlight
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Stephen J. Ware
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Stephen J. Ware
Affiliation:
Professor of Law, University of Kansas
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION: THE CONTRACTUAL APPROACH TO ARBITRATION LAW

This chapter consists of proposals to reform the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). These proposed reforms address only domestic (United States) arbitration law, which is covered by Chapter 1 of the FAA. These reforms do not address the law governing international arbitration, which is covered by Chapters 2 and 3 of the FAA, as well as by various treaties including the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.

These proposed reforms rest on what I call the contractual approach to arbitration law. This approach consists of at least three principles. Stated colloquially, these principles are that: (1) you should not be sent to arbitration unless you have agreed to be there, (2) if you have agreed to arbitration then your agreement should be enforced, and (3) your arbitrator's powers are only those that you and the other party to the agreement gave the arbitrator. Stated more precisely, these three principles of the contractual approach to arbitration law are:

First Principle: a court should not send a dispute to arbitration unless the parties have formed an enforceable contract requiring arbitration of that dispute.

Second Principle: arbitration agreements should be enforced “save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”

Third Principle: because an arbitrator's power derives from the parties' contract, the arbitrator should not be permitted to reach a result that the parties could not have reached themselves by simply contracting for it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Arbitration Law in America
A Critical Assessment
, pp. 88 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×