Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T19:07:03.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - What the models say about social learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Kevin N. Laland
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK
Jeremy R. Kendal
Affiliation:
Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, Cambridge, CB3 8AA, UK
Dorothy M. Fragaszy
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Susan Perry
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Introduction

All too often theoretically minded scientists soar off into an abstract mathematical world that seemingly makes little contact with empirical reality. The field of animal social learning and tradition has its very own assortment of theory, although in truth it is a somewhat paltry portion, and the mathematics rarely get that sophisticated. Nonetheless, the modelers and the empirical scientists, while perhaps converging, have for the most part yet to meet in any consensus of shared goals and understanding. As the most effective mathematical models in science are undoubtedly those making clear, empirically testable predictions, it would obviously be of value if the mathematics had some utility to other researchers in the field of animal social learning. Moreover, as the best models are those with assumptions well informed by empirical findings, it would also clearly help if social learning researchers collected the kind of information that was relevant to grounding the models.

The over-arching goal of this article is to contribute towards the further integration of empirical and theoretical work in animal social learning. While this is a worthy long-term objective, it is apparent that such an integration is unlikely to happen overnight. At the time of writing, most of the mathematical theory in our field has been developed without the benefit of a thorough understanding of animal social learning, in fact, largely without nonhuman animals in mind.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Biology of Traditions
Models and Evidence
, pp. 33 - 55
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, K. and Feldman, M. W. 1987. Toward a theory for the evolution of cultural communication: coevolution of signal transmission and receptionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 84, 7164–7168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, M. and Galef, B. G. Jr. 1989. Social influences on the selection of a proteinsufficient diet by Norway rates (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, A. and Feldman, M. W. 1995. On the evolution of learning: representation of a stochastic environment. Theoretical Population Biology, 48, 251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. 1988. An evolutionary model of social learning: the effects of spatial and temporal variation. In Social Learning: Psychological and Biological Perspectives, ed. T. R. Zentall and B. G. Galef, Jr., pp. 29–48. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum
Brown, C. and Laland, K. N. 2003. Social learning in fishes: a review. [Learning in Fish, ed. K. N. Laland, C. Brown and J. Krause] Fish and Fisheries, special edition
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and Feldman, M. W. 1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and Feldman, M. W. 1983. Cultural versus genetic adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 79, 1331–1335Google Scholar
Coussi-Korbel, S. and Fragaszy, D. M. 1995. On the relation between social dynamics and social learning. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1441–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. W., and Laland, K. N. 1996. Gene–culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 453–457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, M. W., Aoki, K., and Kumm, J. 1996. Individual versus social learning: evolutionary analysis in a fluctuating environment. Anthropological Science, 104, 209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galef, B. G., Jr. 1991. Tradition in animals: field observations and laboratory analyses. In Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Behaviour, Vol. 1: Interpretation, Intentioinality and Communication, ed. M. Bekoff and D. Jamieson, pp. 74–95. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Galef, B. G. Jr. 1995. Why behaviour patterns that animals learn socially are locally adaptive. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1325–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galef, B. G. Jr. 1996. The adaptive value of social learning: a reply to Laland. Animal Behaviour, 52, 641–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., and Spicer, J. I. 1998. Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 70–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giraldeau, L.-A., Caraco, T., and Valone, T. J. 1994. Social foraging: individual learning and cultural transmission of innovations. Behavioural Ecology, 5, 35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guglielmino, C. R., Viganotti, C., Hewlett, B., and Cavall-Sforza, L. L. 1995. Cultural variation in Africa: role of mechanisms of transmission and adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92, 7585–7589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press
Kendal J. R. 2002. An investigation into social learning: mechanisms, diffusion dynamics, functions and evolutionary consequences. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK
Kirkpatrick, M. and Dugatkin, L. A. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiololgy, 34, 443–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummer, H. and Goodall, J. 1985. Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 308, 203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachlan, R. F. and Slater, P. J. B. 1999. The maintenance of vocal learning by gene-culture interaction: the cultural trap hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 701–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. 1994. Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theoretical Population Biology, 45, 1–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K. N. 1996. Is social learning always locally adaptive?Animal Behaviour, 52, 637–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. and Reader, S. 1999a. Foraging innovation in the guppy. Animal Behaviour, 52, 331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. and Reader, S. 1999b. Foraging innovation is inversely related to competitive ability in male but not female guppies. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. and Williams, K. 1998. Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N., Richerson, P. J., and Boyd, R. 1993. Animal social learning: towards a new theoretical approach. Perspectives in Ethology, 10, 249–277Google Scholar
Laland, K. N., Richerson, P. J., and Boyd, R. 1996. Developing a theory of animal social learning. In Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, ed. C. M. Heyes, and B. G. Galef Jr., pp. 129–154. New York: Academic Press
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., and Feldman, M. W. 2000. Niche construction, biological evolution and cultural change. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., and Feldman, M. W. 2001. Cultural niche construction and human evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 22–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, P. 1991. Adaptations to environmental change: an evolutionary perspective. In Primate Responses to Environmental Change, ed. H. O. Box, pp. 39–56. London: Chapman & Hall
Lefebvre, L. 1995a. Culturally transmitted feeding behaviour in primates: evidence for accelerating learning rates. Primates, 36, 227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L. 1995b. The opening of milk-bottles by birds: evidence for accelerating learning rates, but against the wave-of-advance model of cultural transmission. Behavioural Processes, 34, 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L. and Giraldeau, L. A. 1994. Cultural transmission in pigeons is affected by the number of tutors and bystanders present. Animal Behaviour, 47, 331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L. and Giraldeau, L. A. 1996. Is social learning an adaptive specialization? In Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, ed. T. Zentall and B. G. Galef Jr., pp. 141–163. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum
Odling-Smee, F. J. 1988. Niche constructing phenotypes. In The Role of Behaviour in Evolution, ed H. C. Plotkin, pp. 73–132. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. 1996. Niche construction. American Naturalist, 147, 641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. 2003. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Reader S. M. 2000. Social learning and innovation: individual differences, diffusion dynamics and evolutionary issues. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK
Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. N. 2000. Diffusion of foraging innovation in the guppy. Animal Behaviour, 60, 175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. N. 2003. Animal Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Rogers, A. 1988. Does biology constrain culture?American Anthropologist, 90, 819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, T. J. 1986. Cultural evolution of feeding behaviour in animals. Science Progress, 70, 571–583Google ScholarPubMed
Sibley, R. M. 1999. Evolutionary biology of skill and information transfer. In Mammalian Social Learning: Comparative and Ecological Perspectives, ed. H. O. Box and K. R. Gibson, pp. 57–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stephens, D. 1991. Change, regularity and value in the evolution of learning. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkel, J. 1996. Cultural transmission of feeding behavior in the black rat (Rattus rattus). In Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, ed. C. M. Heyes and B. G. Galef Jr., pp. 267–286. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
White, D. J. and Galef, B. G. Jr. 2000. Culture in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 59, 975–979CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, T., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W. W., and Boesch, C. 1999. Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682–685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, G. S. and Boughman, J. W. 1999. Social influences on foraging in bats. In Mammalian Social Learning: Comparative and Ecological Perspectives, ed. H. O. Box and K. R. Gibson, pp. 188–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • What the models say about social learning
    • By Kevin N. Laland, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK, Jeremy R. Kendal, Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, Cambridge, CB3 8AA, UK
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • What the models say about social learning
    • By Kevin N. Laland, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK, Jeremy R. Kendal, Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, Cambridge, CB3 8AA, UK
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • What the models say about social learning
    • By Kevin N. Laland, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK, Jeremy R. Kendal, Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, Cambridge, CB3 8AA, UK
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.003
Available formats
×