F. R. Leavis in The Great Tradition reprints James's ‘Daniel Deronda: A Conversation’, a perceptive and witty critical piece in which three different readers discuss George Eliot's novel, expressing three different opinions of it, all of them valid. Theodora, who is modelled on, and named after, the Dorothea of Middlemarch, takes the high-mindedly approving line that Dorothea herself might have taken if she had had the opportunity to read Eliot's novel; Pulcheria, frivolous but sharp-minded, focuses on the book's defects; while Constantius takes a judicial middle view, which James is careful to prevent the reader from assuming too easily to be his own. Leavis advances the ‘Conversation’ as proof of the influence of Eliot's Gwendolen Harleth on James's Isabel Archer, drawing particular attention to Theodora's description of Gwendolen as

which he tricks the reader into taking for a moment to be a description of ‘some girl encountered in actual life’ whom James had in mind when creating Isabel. I think that Leavis was undoubtedly right about the influence of Gwendolen on Isabel, but that influence operated in a more subtle way than his analysis of her as ‘Gwendolen Harleth seen by a man’ would suggest.