Eighteenth-century enthusiasm has provided the terrain for a classic debate among historiographers: namely, whether or not the Methodist revival somehow inhibited a second English revolution on the French model. Historians thus disagree as to the extent to which Methodism can be understood as the containment of an older and more radical tradition. As is well known, the eulogy delivered at John Wesley's funeral “stressed the leavening influence of Methodism in a politically restive situation,” implying that Wesley had helped to prevent revolution. Methodism can thus be seen as little more than a massive cooptation of plebeian energy for conservative and disciplinary purposes. A usefully nuanced contribution to this debate emerges in the historiography of Bernard Semmel, who emphasizes the ways in which Methodism did nevertheless produce significant popular reforms. What Semmel stresses is, above all, the supple and fence-straddling nature of mid-Georgian evangelical enthusiasm: