Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T18:40:38.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Trade and renewable resources in a second-best world: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

Erwin H. Bulte
Affiliation:
Professor in Environmental Economics, Department of Economics Tilburg University, The Netherlands
Edward B. Barbier
Affiliation:
John S. Bugas Professor of Economics, Department of Economics and Finance University of Wyoming, USA
Andreas Kontoleon
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Unai Pascual
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Timothy Swanson
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The past decade has witnessed a proliferation of texts on trade and pollution. Compared with this rapidly expanding literature, there are relatively few contributions on trade and renewable resource management. This imbalance in the economics literature is not readily explained by lack of popular interest. The impact of trade liberalisation on renewable resource management and conservation is a highly contentious issue, fiercely debated outside academia by international bodies (e.g. the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, the International Tropical Timber Organization, the World Trade Organization and the World Bank), non-governmental organizations (e.g. TRAFFIC, the World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth) and the popular media (e.g. The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, The Environment and New Scientist). Mass demonstrations against globalisation and the freeing of world trade in recent years in Genoa, Copenhagen, Seattle and other cities hosting meetings of international policy-makers dominated the news worldwide, and the alleged negative impact of free trade on environmental resources was a major theme during these demonstrations.

While the topic ‘trade and renewable resources’ might be capable of arousing strong emotions in the public, it is a fair question to ask whether it is sufficiently different from other fields in economics to warrant attention as a separate and emerging academic field (albeit obviously an applied one). We argue that this is indeed the case.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biodiversity Economics
Principles, Methods and Applications
, pp. 201 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. and Blackhurst, R. (eds.). 1992. The Greening of World Trade Issues. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Baland, J. and Francois, P. 2000. Rent seeking and resource booms. Journal of Development Economics. 61. 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baland, J. and Platteau, J. 1996. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barbier, E. B. 2001. International Trade and Sustainable Forestry. In Günther, G. Schulze and Heinrich, W. Ursprung (eds.). International Environmental Economics: A Survey of the Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 114–147.Google Scholar
Barbier, E. B. 2003. Habitat fishery linkages and mangrove loss in Thailand. Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (1). 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B. 2004. Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 86 (5). 1347–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B. and Burgess, J. C. 1997. The economics of tropical forest land use options. Land Economics. 73 (2). 174–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B. and Rauscher, M. 1994. Trade, tropical deforestation and policy interventions. Environmental and Resource Economics. 4. 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B. and Schulz, C. E. 1997. Wildlife, biodiversity and trade. Environment and Development Economics. 2 (2). 33–60.
Barbier, E. B. and Shogren, J. R. 2004. Economic growth and the endogenous risk of biological invasion. Economic Inquiry. 42 (4). 587–601.
Barbier, E. B. and Strand, I. 1998. Valuing mangrove–fishery linkages – a case study of Campeche, Mexico. Environmental and Resource Economics. 12. 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.Burgess, J. C.Swanson, T. M. and Pearce, D. W. 1990. Elephants, Economics and Ivory. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Barbier, E.Burgess, J. C.Bishop, J. T. and Aylward, B. A. 1994. The Economics of the Tropical Timber Trade. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Berck, P. and Perloff, J. M. 1984. An open access fishery with rational expectations. Econometrica. 52. 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. D. and Whinston, M. 1986. Menu actions, resource allocation and economic influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 101. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, I. J. and Leitch, J. 2000. Trade Restrictions and Their Impact on International Trade in Forest Products. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Brander, J. and Taylor, M. S. 1997a. International trade and open access renewable resources: the small open economy case. Canadian Journal of Economics. 30. 526–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J. and Taylor, M. S. 1997b. International trade between consumer and conservationist countries. Resource and Energy Economics. 19. 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J. and Taylor, M. S. 1998. Open access renewable resources: trade and trade policy in a two country model. Journal of International Economics. 44. 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. 2000. Renewable natural resource management and use without markets. Journal of Economic Literature. 38. 875–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulte, E. H. and Kooten, G. C. 1999. The ivory trade ban and elephant numbers: theory and application to Zambia.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 81. 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulte, E. H and Horan, R. D. 2003. Habitat conservation, wildlife extraction and agricultural expansion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 45. 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulte, E. H., Horan, R. D. and Shogren, J. F. 2003. Elephants: comment.American Economic Review. 93. 1437–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chichilnisky, G. 1994. North–south trade and the global environment. American Economic Review. 84. 851–874.Google Scholar
Clark, C. W. 1990. Mathematical Bioeconomics. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S. 2003. Trade, tragedy and the commons. Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Damania, R., Frederiksson, P. G. and List, J. A. 2003. Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 46. 490–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Meza D. and Gould, J. R. 1987. Free access versus private property in a resource: income distributions compared. Journal of Political Economy. 95. 1317–1325.Google Scholar
, Meza D. and Gould, J. R. 1992. The social efficiency of private decisions to enforce property rights. Journal of Political Economy. 95. 561–580.Google Scholar
Emami, A. and Johnston, R. 2000. Unilateral resource management in a two-country general equilibrium model of trade in a renewable fishery resource.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 82. 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksson, P. G., Vollebergh, H. and Dijkgraaf, E. 2004. Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: theory and evidence.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 47. 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksson, P. G. and Svensson, J. 2003. Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics. 87. 1383–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. 1994. Protection for Sale. American Economic Review. 84. 833–850.Google Scholar
Hannesson, R. 2000. Renewable resources and the gain from trade. Canadian Journal of Economics. 33. 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, R. D., Lupi, F., Perrings, C. and Bulte, E. H. 2002. Management of invasive species under ignorance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Principal Paper Session. 84. 1303–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotte, L., Long, N. and Tian, H. 2000. International trade with endogenous enforcement of property rights. Journal of Development Economics. 62. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isham, J., Woodcock, M., Pritchett, L. and Busby, G. 2003. The varieties of resource experience: how natural resource export structures affect the political economy of economic growth. Economics Discussion Paper 03–08. Vermont: Middlebury College.
Karl, T. L. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Karp, L., Sacheti, S. and Zhao, J. 2001. Common ground between free traders and environmentalists.International Economic Review. 42. 617–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, L., Zhao, J. and Sacheti, S. 2003. The long run effects of environmental reform in open economies.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 45. 246–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, M. C. and Long, N. V. 1984. The role of natural resources in trade models. In Jones, R. and Kenen, P. (eds.). Handbook of International Economics vol I. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Kremer, M. and Morcom, C. 2000. Elephants. American Economic Review. 90. 212–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, C. and Weidmann, J. 1999. Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption and economic growth. IMF Working Paper WP/99/85.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R and Lancaster, K. 1956. The general law of second best. Review of Economic Studies. 24. 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, R. and Mitra, S. 2000. Corruption, pollution and the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 40. 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchak, M. P. 1995. Logging the Globe. Montreal, Quebec: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
McAusland, C. and Costello, C. 2004. Avoiding invasives: trade-related policies for controlling unintentional exotic species introductions.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 48. 954–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuyama, K. 1992. Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory. 58. 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, J. 1999. International Trade and the Environment: Theoretical and Policy Linkages. Invited lecture. Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. Oslo. 25–27 June.Google Scholar
Nunes, P. and Riyanto, Y. 2001. Policy instruments for creating markets for biodiversity: certification and ecolabeling. FEEM Working Paper 72. Rome: Italy.Google Scholar
Polasky, S.Costello, C. and McAusland, C. 2004. On trade, land-use, and biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 48. 911–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. L. 2001. Timber Booms and Institutional Breakdown in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruseski, G. 1998. International fish wars: the strategic role for fleet licensing and effort subsidies.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 36. 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D. and Warner, A. M. 1997. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper Series, WP 5398. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Schulz, C. 1996. Trade policy and ecology. Environmental and Resource Economics. 8. 15–38.Google Scholar
Smulders, J. A., Soest, D. P. and Withagen, C. 2004. International trade, species diversity and habitat conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 48. 891–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swallow, S. and Sedjo, R. 2002. Voluntary eco-labeling and the price premium. Land Economics. 87. 272–284.Google Scholar
Swanson, T. 1994. The economics of extinction revisited and revised: a generalised framework for the analysis of the problems of endangered species and biodiversity losses. Oxford Economic Papers. 46. 800–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torvik, R. 2002. Natural resources, rent seeking and welfare. Journal of Development Economics. 67. 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vannuccini, S. 2003. Overview of Fish Production, Utilization, Consumption and Trade. Rome: Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. 1974. Free acces vs private ownership as alternative systems for managing common property.Journal of Economic Theory. 8. 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilen, J. 2000. Renewable resource economists and policy: what differences have we made?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 39. 306–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×