Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T07:31:02.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

40 - Radiation Therapy in Organ Transplant Recipients

from Section Eight - Special Scenarios in Transplant Cutaneous Oncology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Clark C. Otley
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester MN
Thomas Stasko
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common malignancy worldwide. Most lesions (80–90%) arise on the sun-exposed head and neck in middle-aged to elderly fair-skinned people. In the nontransplant, or immunocompetent population, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) occurs more often than squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, organ transplant recipients (OTR) experience not only a markedly higher incidence NMSC compared to the general population but also a much higher incidence of SCC compared to BCC. OTR developing NMSC are often younger (<50 years old) and may experience multiple primary NMSC. In addition to occurring on the head and neck, NMSC in OTR also arise on the sun-exposed extremities especially the arms and dorsal hands. A subset of OTR develop aggressive and potentially life threatening skin malignancies (usually SCC) secondary to immunosuppression. Other less common, but also potentially aggressive cutaneous malignancies encountered in OTR are listed in Table 40.1.

Radiotherapy (RTx) is an important modality in treating patients with cutaneous malignancies. The general principles for recommending RTx apply equally to OTR and immunocompetent patients; however, an immunosuppressed state must be factored in to any management decision, particularly in the adjuvant (postoperative) setting, where recurrent (local or nodal) disease may be life threatening.

The recommendation of definitive RTx, defined as primary RTx as a therapeutic modality instead of surgery, may be made when the outcome (cosmetic and/or functional) is considered better with RTx than with surgery, especially when a clinician constrained by the site or size of the lesion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×