Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T19:48:01.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Preanesthetic Assessment of the Cosmetic Surgery Patient

from PART III - OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR ANESTHESIA IN COSMETIC SURGERY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

Norman Levin M.D.
Affiliation:
Chief, Department of Anesthesiology Century City Hospital, Los Angeles, CA
Barry Friedberg
Affiliation:
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Klafka, JM, Rozien, MF: Current understanding of patient's attitudes toward and preparation for anesthesia: A review. Anesth Analg 83:1314, 1996.Google Scholar
Natof, HE: Pre-existing medical problems. Ambulatory surgery. IL Med J 166:101, 1984.Google Scholar
Dix, P, Howell, S: Survey of cancellation rate of hypertensive patients undergoing anesthesia and elective surgery. Br J Anaesth 86:7889, 2001.Google Scholar
Howell, SJ, Hemming, AE, Allman, KG, et al.: Predictors of postoperative myocardial ischaemia. The role of intercurrent arterial hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors. Anaesthesia 52:107, 1997.Google Scholar
Muscholl, MW, Hense, HW, Brockel, U, et al.: Changes in left ventricular structure and function in patients with white coat hypertension: Cross sectional survey. Br Med J 317:565, 1998.Google Scholar
Kihara, S, Brimacombe, J, Yaguchi, Y, et al.: Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg 96:890, 2003.Google Scholar
Cannel, WB: Risk stratification in hypertension: New insights from the Framingham study. Am J Hypertension 13:3S, 2000.Google Scholar
Auerbach, AD, Goldman, L: Beta-blockers and reduction of cardiac events in noncardiac surgery. Scientific review. JAMA 287:1435, 2002.Google Scholar
Auerbach, AD, Goldman, L: Beta-blockers and reduction of cardiac events in non-cardiac surgery. Clinical applications. JAMA 287:1445, 2002.Google Scholar
Howell, SJ, Sear, JW, Foex, P: Peri-operative beta-blockade: A useful treatment that should be greeted with cautious enthusiasm. Br J Anaesth 86:161, 2001.Google Scholar
Tarhan, S, Moffitt, EA, Taylor, WF, et al.: Myocardial infarction after general anesthesia. JAMA 220:1451, 1972.Google Scholar
Rao, TLK, Jacobs, KH, El-Etr, AA: Reinfarction following anesthesia in patients with myocardial infarction. Anesthesiol 59:499, 1983.Google Scholar
Shah, KB, Kleinman, BS, Sami, H, et al.: Reevaluation of peri-operative myocardial infarction in patients with prior myocardial infarction undergoing non-cardiac operations. Anesth Analg 71:231, 1990.Google Scholar
Shah, KB, Kleinman, BS, Rao, T, et al.: Angina and other risk factors in patients with cardiac diseases undergoing non-cardiac operations. Anesth Analg 70:240, 1990.Google Scholar
Ang-Lee, MK, Moss, J, Yuan, C: Herbal medicine and peri-operative care. JAMA 286:208, 2001.Google Scholar
Tsen, LC, Segal, S, Pothier, M, et al.: Complementary and alternative medicine use should be included in preoperative evaluations. Anesthesiol 931:148, 2000.Google Scholar
Kaye, AD, Clarke, RC, Sabar, R, et al.: Herbal medicines: Current trends in anesthesiology practice – A hospital survey. J Clin Anesth 12:468, 2000.Google Scholar
Bovil, JG: Adverse drug interactions in anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 9 (Suppl 6):3S, 1997.Google Scholar
Ernest, E: The risk-benefit profile of commonly used herbal therapies: Ginko, St. John's Wort, Ginseng, Echinacea, Saw Palmetto, and Kava. Ann Int Med 136:42, 2002.Google Scholar
Petry, JJ: Surgically significant nutritional supplements. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:233, 1996.Google Scholar
Boiven, JF: Risk of spontaneous abortion in women occupationally exposed to anesthetic gases: A meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 54:541, 1997.Google Scholar
Mazze, RI: Halothane prevents nitrous oxide teratogenicity in Sprague-Dawley rats; folic acid does not. Teratology 38:121, 1988.Google Scholar
Shiono, PH, Mills, JL: Oral clefts and diazepam use during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 311:919, 1984.Google Scholar
Mallampati, SR, Gatt, SP, Gugino, LD, et al.: A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 32:429, 1985.Google Scholar
Khan, ZH, Kashfi, A, Ebrahimkhani, E: A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: A prospective blinded study. Anesth Analg 96:595, 2003.Google Scholar
Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on preanesthesia evaluation. Anesthesiol 96:490, 2002.
McLeanne, GJ, Cooper, R: The nature of peri-operative anxiety. Anesthesia 45:153, 1990.Google Scholar
Egbert, LD, Battit, GE, Turndorf, H, et al.: The value of pre-operative visit by the anesthetist. JAMA 185:553, 1963.Google Scholar
, Oxorn DC, , Ferris, , Harrington E, , Orser BA: The effects of midazolam on propofol-inducedanesthesia: Propofol dose requirements, mood profiles, and perioperative dreams. Anesth Analg 85:553, 1997.
Johnson, M: Anxiety in surgical patients. Psychol Med 10:145, 1980.Google Scholar
Gold, BS, Kitz, DS, Lecky, JH, et al.: Unanticipated admission to the hospital following ambulatory surgery. JAMA 262:3008, 1989.Google Scholar
Fortier, J, Chung, F, Su, J: Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery: A prospective study. Can J Anaesth 45:612, 1998.Google Scholar
Macario, A, Weinger, M, Carney, S, et al.: Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid?Anesth Analg 89:652, 1999.Google Scholar
Apfel, CC, Laara, E, Koivuranta, M, et al.: A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiol 91:693, 1999.Google Scholar
Sinclair, DR, Chung, F, Mezei, G: Can post-operative nausea and vomiting be predicted?Anesthesiol 91:109, 1999.Google Scholar
Visser, K, Hassink, EA, Bonsel, GJ, et al.: Randomized controlled trial of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane-nitrous oxide: Post-operative nausea with vomiting and economic analysis. Anesthesiol 95:616, 2001.Google Scholar
Goll, V, Ozan, A, Greif, R, et al.: Ondansetron is no more effective than supplemental intraoperative oxygen for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 92:112, 2001.Google Scholar
Yogendran, S, Asokumar, B, Cheng, DC, et al.: A prospective randomized double-blinded study of the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on adverse outcomes on outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 80:682–6, 1995.Google Scholar
Apfel, CC, Kranke, P, Eberhart, LH, et al.: Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 88:234, 2002.Google Scholar
Tram, M, Moore, A, McQuay, H: Meta-analytic comparison of prophylactic anti-emetic efficacy for postoperative nausea and vomiting: Propofol anaesthesia vs. omitting nitrous oxide vs. total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol. Br J Anaesth 78:256, 1997.Google Scholar
Apfel, CC, Katz, MH, Kranke, P, et al.: Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not delayed postoperative vomiting: A randomized controlled trial of factorial design. Br J Anaesth 88:659, 2002.Google Scholar
Sukhani, R, Vazquez, J, Pappas, AL, et al.: Recovery after propofol with and without intra-operative fentanyl in patients undergoing ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 83:975, 1996.Google Scholar
M■niche, S, R■sing, J, Dahl, JB, et al.: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of operative site bleeding after tonsillectomy: A quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 96:68, 2003.Google Scholar
Polati, E, Verlato, G, Finco, G, et al.: Ondansetron versus metoclopramide in the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 85:395, 1997.Google Scholar
Scuderi, PE, James, RL, Harris, L, et al.: Multi-modal anti-emetic management prevents early postoperative vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 91:1408, 2000.Google Scholar
Zarate, E, White, P, Klein, KW, et al.: A comparison of the costs and efficacy of ondansetron versus dolasetron for antiemetic prophylaxis. Anesth Analg 90:1352, 2000.Google Scholar
Riley, TJ, McKenzie, R, Tantisira, BR, et al.: Droperidol- ondansetron combination versus droperidol alone for post-operative control of emesis after total abdominal hysterectomy. J Clin Anesth 10:6, 1998.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Ledesma, MJ, Lopez-Olaondo L, , Pueyo, FJ, et al.: A comparison of three anti-emetic combinations for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 95:1590, 2002.Google Scholar
Wang, JJ, Ho, ST, Lee, SC, et al.: The use of dexamethasone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in females undergoing thyroidectomy: A dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg 91:1404, 2000.Google Scholar
Wang, JJ, Ho, ST, Tzeng, JI, et al.: The effect of timing of dexamethasone administration on its efficacy as a prophylactic anti-emetic for post-operative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 91:136–9, 2000.Google Scholar
Domino, KB, Anderson, EA, Polissar, NL, et al.: Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 88:1370, 1999.Google Scholar
Sun, R, Klein, KW, White, PF: The effect of timing of ondansetron administration in outpatients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg 84:331, 1997.Google Scholar
Graczyk, SG, McKenzie, R, Kallar, S, et al.: Intravenous dolasetron for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting after outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Anesth Analg 84:325, 1997.Google Scholar
Fortney, JT, Gan, TJ, Graczy, KS, et al.: A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of ondansetron versus droperidol as anti-emetics for elective outpatient surgical procedures. S3A-409 and S3A-410 Study Groups. Anesth Analg 86:731, 1998.Google Scholar
ASA practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiol 90:896, 1999.
Manchikanti, L, Colliver, JA, Roush, , et al.: Evaluation of ranitidine as an oral antacid in outpatient anesthesia. South Med J 78:818, 1985.Google Scholar
Hey, VMF, Ostrick, DG, Mazumder, JK, et al.: Pethidine, metoclopramide and gastro-oesophageal sphincter. Anaesthesia 36:173, 1981.Google Scholar
Manchikanti, L, Grow, JB, Colliver, JA, et al.: Bicitra® (sodium citrate) and metoclopramide in outpatient anesthesia for prophylaxis against aspiration pneumonitis. Anesthesiol 63:378, 1985.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×