Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T11:35:15.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Impaired empathy following ventromedial prefrontal brain damage

from Part I - ‘Dysempathy’ in psychiatric samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa
Tom F. D. Farrow
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Peter W. R. Woodruff
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The study of the neurobiological bases of social cognition is currently one of the most prominent areas of research in behavioural neurology and in neuropsychology. Similar to many other areas of contemporary neuropsychological research, it was first characterized by single case reports of patients suffering from brain damage. One of the first descriptions of impaired social cognition following brain damage was provided by Harlow (1868). In his famous case report, Harlow portrays the case of Phineas Gage, a railroad employee, who suffered severe frontal lobe injury due to an iron bar that penetrated his frontal lobes. Although he survived, recovered physically and had many preserved cognitive abilities, his social behaviour was so impaired that his acquaintances said he was ‘no longer Gage’. Harlow does not refer directly to Gage's empathic ability yet he describes him as ‘… fitful, irreverent, indulging at times in the grossest profanity, manifesting but little deference for his fellow …’ (Harlow, 1868). In the following years, similar clinical reports have offered accumulating evidence regarding the role of the frontal lobes in emotions and behaviour regulation, and the past 10 years have seen tremendous resurgence of interest in this area. Studies have consistently suggested that acquired damage to the prefrontal cortex may result in severe impairment in interpersonal behaviour (Damasio et al., 1991; Mesulam, 1985; Stuss and Benson, 1986; Stuss et al., 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×