Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-x59qb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:04:32.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Habitat conservation evaluation criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

G. Trucker
Affiliation:
Freelance Ecologist
David Hill
Affiliation:
RPS Group plc, UK
Matthew Fasham
Affiliation:
RPS Group plc, UK
Graham Tucker
Affiliation:
Ecological Solutions, UK
Michael Shewry
Affiliation:
Scottish Natural Heritage
Philip Shaw
Affiliation:
Scottish Natural Heritage
Get access

Summary

KEY EVALUATION CONSIDERATIONS

The conservation importance of habitats occurring in the UK has generally been assessed in terms of the threat status of each habitat type, where attributes such as rarity and rate of decline (of overall area) have been taken into account. In terms of evaluating the conservation importance of any particular habitat type, reference must be made to international and national conservation legislation and initiatives such as the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) process, described further below.

The key considerations with regards to evaluating habitats are listed below.

  1. Check lists of habitats of conservation importance (see below for information on which lists to check and where to obtain the relevant information).

  2. Check existing designation status: for EIAs (see Box 8.1), the search area should extend to 2 km from the boundary of the site. This will inform the results of the Phase 1 survey and highlight areas of habitat on or near the site that are within the boundaries of statutory or non-statutory designations.

  3. Carry out a preliminary (scoping) survey for habitats. This will normally be a Phase I habitat survey (see Section 6.1.5) to identify the broad habitat types present on site.

These three steps should enable the determination of Valuable Ecosystem Components (VECs) (in terms of habitat types) that may potentially be present. To establish the actual presence or absence of a VEC, further survey may be necessary; for habitats, a National Vegetation Classification (NVC) survey (Rodwell, 1991) is recommended.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Biodiversity Methods
Survey, Evaluation and Monitoring
, pp. 245 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×