Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T17:10:38.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Restoration ecology and the role of soil biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

J. A. Harris
Affiliation:
Cranfield University
P. Grogan
Affiliation:
Queen's University Kingston
R. J. Hobbs
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
Richard Bardgett
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Michael Usher
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
David Hopkins
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. B. & Allen, M. F. (1980). Natural re-establishment of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae following stripmine reclamation in Wyoming. Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. B. & Allen, M. F. (1988). Facilitation of succession by the monomycotrophic colonizer Salsola kali (Chenopodiaceae) on a harsh site: effects of mycorrhizal fungi. American Journal of Botany, 75, 257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. N. & Sparling, G. P. (1997). Ants as indicators of restoration success: relationship with soil microbial biomass in the Australian seasonal tropics. Restoration Ecology, 5, 109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, J. K., O'Neill, R. V., Noss, R. & Slosser, N. C. (2001). Considerations for the development of a terrestrial index of ecosystem integrity. Ecological Indicators, 1, 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., Floret, C., Floc'h, E., Ovalle, C. & Pontanier, R. (1993). Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid regions: I. A view from the south. Restoration Ecology, 1, 8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D. & McAllister, E. (1999). The measurement of soil fungal: bacterial biomass ratios as an indicator of ecosystem self-regulation in temperate meadow grasslands. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 29, 282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, H., Harris, J. A., Birch, P. & Short, K. C. (1992). Habitat classification and soil restoration assessment using analysis of soil microbiological and physico-chemical characteristics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, J. D. (1994). Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology, 75, 1965–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, A. (1997). Restoration of mined lands: using natural processes. Ecological Engineering, 8, 255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, A. & Chadwick, M. J. (1980). The Restoration of Land: The Ecology and Reclamation of Derelict and Degraded Land. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. K. & Gange, A. C. (1992). Secondary plant succession: how is it modified by insect herbivory?Vegetatio, 101, 3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, D. C. (1994). Compositional analysis of microbial communities: is there room in the middle? Beyond the Biomass (Ed. by , K. Ritz, , J. Dighton & , K. E. Giller), pp. 201–220. Chichester: Wiley-SayceGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. & Slatyer, R. O. (1977). Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organisation. American Naturalist, 111, 1119–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. L. V., Aarde, R. J., Scholz, C. H. & Delport, J. H. (2003). Convergence between dung beetle assemblages of a post-mining vegetational chronosequence and unmined dune forest. Restoration Ecology, 11, 29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boer, W., Verheggen, P., Klein Gunnewiek, P. J. A., Kowalchuk, G. A. & Veen, J. A. (2003). Microbial community composition affects soil fungistasis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 835–844CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deyn, G. B., Raaijmakers, C. E., Zoomer, H. R., et al. (2003). Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity. Nature, 422, 711–713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degens, B. P. & , Harris J. A. (1997). Development of a physiological approach to measuring the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29, 1309–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, D. L., Harris, J. A., Birch, P. & Bullock, P. (1995). Linear relationship between aggregate stability and microbial biomass in three restored soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27, 1499–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfeld, J. G. (2000). Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology, 8, 2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, W. F. & Bishop, J. G. (2000). Trophic interactions during primary succession: herbivores slow a plant re-invasion of Mount St. Helens. The American Naturalist, 155, 238–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Founone, H., Duponnois, R., Meyer, J. M., et al. (2002). Interaction between ectomycorrhizal symbiosis and fluorescent pseudomonads on Acacia holosericea: isolation of mycorrhizal helper bacteria (MHB) from a Soudano–Sahelian soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 41, 37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. A. (2003). Measurements of the soil microbial community for estimating the success of restoration. European Journal of Soil Science, 54, 801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. A. & Birch, P. (1989). Soil microbial activity in opencast coal mine restorations. Soil Use and Management, 5, 155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. A. & Birch, P. (1990). Application of the principles of microbial ecology to the assessment of surface mine reclamation. Proceedings of the 1990 Mining and Reclamation Conference, American Society of Surface Mining and Reclamation, Charleston, WV, April 1990. (Ed. by , J. Skousen, , J. Sencindiver & , D. Samuel), Part I, pp. 111–120. Morgantown, WV: University of West VirginiaGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. A., Birch, P. & Palmer, J. (1996). Land Restoration and Reclamation; Principles and Practice. Harlow: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Hemerik, L. & Brussaard, L. (2002). Diversity of soil macro-invertebrates in grasslands under restoration succession. European Journal of Soil Biology, 38, 145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. & Harris, J. A. (2001). Restoration ecology: repairing the Earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology, 9, 239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodkinson, I. D., Webb, N. R. & Coulson, S. J. (2002). Primary community assembly on land: the missing stages. Why are the heterotrophic organisms always there first?Journal of Ecology, 90, 569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insam, H. & Domsch, K. H. (1988). Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass on chronosequences of reclamation sites. Microbial Ecology, 15, 177–188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insam, H. & Haselwandter, K. (1989). Metabolic quotient of the soil microflora in relation to plant succession. Oecologia, 79, 174–178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, N. C. (1998). Responses of Salsola kali and Panicum virgatum to mycorrhizal fungi, phosphorus and soil organic matter: implications for reclamation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klironomos, J. N. (2002). Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature, 417, 67–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, J. H. (1987). Are there assembly rules for successional communities? Colonization, Succession and Stability (Ed. by , A. J. Gray, , M. J. Crawley & , P. J. Edwards), pp. 225–244. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Maly, S., Korthals, G. W., Dijk, C., Putten, W. H. & Boer, W. (2000). Effect of vegetation manipulation of abandoned arable land on soil microbial properties. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 31, 121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maron, J. L. (1998). Insect herbivory above- and belowground: individual and joint effects on plant fitness. Ecology, 79, 1281–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, K. E. & Bever, J. D. (1998). Maintenance of diversity within plant communities: soil pathogens as agents of negative feedback. Ecology, 75, 1595–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummey, D. L., Stahl, P. D. & Buyer, J. S. (2002). Soil microbiological properties 20 years after surface mine reclamation: spatial analysis of reclaimed and undisturbed sites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34, 1717–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohtonen, R., Fritze, H., Pennanen, T., Jumpponen, A. & Trappe, J. (1999). Ecosystem properties and microbial community changes in primary succession on a glacier forefront. Oecologia, 119, 239–246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, A. D., McNaughton, S. J., Cantu, J. M., Dale, V. H. & White, D. C. (2001). Soil microbial biomass and community composition along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient within a long-leaf pine habitat. Ecological Indicators, 12, 1–9Google Scholar
Preston-Mafham, J., Boddy, L. & Randerson, P. F. (2002). Analysis of microbial community functional diversity using sole-carbon-source utilisation profiles: a critique. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 42, 1–14Google ScholarPubMed
Requena, N., Perez-Solis, E., Azcon-Aguilar, C., Jeffries, P. & Barea, J.-M. (2001). Management of indigenous plant–microbe symbiosis aids restoration of desertified ecosystems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 495–498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritz, K., McHugh, M. & Harris, J. (2004). Biological diversity and function in soils: contemporary perspectives and implications in relation to the formulation of effective indicators. Agricultural Soil Erosion and Soil Biodiversity: Developing Indicators for Policy Analyses (Ed. by , R. Francaviglial), pp. 563–572. OECD: ParisGoogle Scholar
Ruzek, L., Vorisek, K. & Sixta, J. (2001). Microbial biomass-C in reclaimed soil of the Rhineland (Germany) and the north Bohemian lignite mining areas (Czech republic): measured and predicted values. Restoration Ecology, 9, 370–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schipper, L. A., Degens, B. P., Sparling, G. P. & Duncan, L. C. (2001). Changes in microbial heterotrophic diversity along five plant successional sequences. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 2093–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scullion, J. & Malik, A. (2000). Earthworm activity affecting organic matter, aggregation and microbial activity in soils restored after opencast mining for coal. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scullion, J., Mohammed, A. R. A. & Richardson, H. (1988). Changes in earthworm populations following cultivation of undisturbed and former opencast coal mining land. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 20, 289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Ecological Restoration (2002). The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration. http://www.ser.org
Sutherland, W. J. (2002). Restoring a sustainable countryside. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 148–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Heijden M. G. A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., et al. (1998). Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature, 396, 69–72Google Scholar
Putten, W. H., Dijk, C. & Peters, B. A. M. (1993). Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation. Nature, 362, 53–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, L. R. & del Moral, R. (2003). Primary Succession and Ecosystem Rehabilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whisenant, S. G. (1999). Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process-Oriented, Landscape-Scale Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, G. W., Bardgett, R. D., Cook, R., et al. (1997). Faunal and microbial diversity in three Welsh grassland soils under conventional and organic management regimes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, B., Crowley, D., Sparovek, G., Melo, W. J. & Borneman, J. (2000). Bacterial functional redundancy along a soil reclamation gradient. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 4361–4365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeller, V., Bardgett, R. D. & Tappeiner, U. (2001). Site and management effects on soil microbial properties of sub-alpine meadows: a study of land abandonment along a north–south gradient in the European Alps. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelles, L. (1999). Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipo-polysaccharides in characterization of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biology and Fertility of Soil, 29, 111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×