Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T03:07:05.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Chemotaxonomy and pharmacology of Gentianaceae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

Lena Struwe
Affiliation:
New York Botanical Garden
Victor A. Albert
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

The occurrence of taxonomically informative types of compounds in the family Gentianaceae, namely iridoids, xanthones, mangiferin, and C-glucoflavones, has been recorded. The properties, biosynthesis, and distribution of each group of compounds are described. The iridoids (mainly secoiridoid glucosides) appear to be present in all species investigated, with a predominance of swertiamarin and/or gentiopicroside; c. 90 different compounds have been reported from 127 species in 24 genera. Xanthones are not universally present in Gentianaceae, but about 100 different compounds have been reported from 121 species in 21 genera. A coherent theory for the biosynthesis of xanthones, based partly on published biosynthetic results and partly on biosynthetic reasoning, is postulated and used to group the compounds into biosynthetic categories. Arranging the genera according to the xanthones present gives rise to four groups. Group 1 (Anthocleista, Blackstonia, Gentianopsis, Macrocarpaea, and Orphium) includes the taxa containing only few and biosynthetically primitive xanthones. Group 2 (Comastoma, Gentiana, Gentianella, Lomatogonium, Swertia, and, tentatively, Tripterospermum) contains xanthones with an intermediate degree of biosynthetic advancement. Group 3 (Frasera, Halenia, and Veratrilla) has the most advanced compounds, with the xanthones found in group 2 being the biosynthetic precursors. Group 4 (Canscora, Centaurium, Chironia, Eustoma, Hoppea, Ixanthus, and, with some reservation, Schultesia) contains another set of biosynthetically advanced compounds. A comparison of the above groups with strict consensus trees based on molecular data (trnL intron and matK sequences) and the new classification proposed by Struwe et al. (2002) shows very good correlation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gentianaceae
Systematics and Natural History
, pp. 573 - 632
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×