Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:01:55.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Stakeholder interests, conflicts, and co-operation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2009

Karl F. Nordstrom
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Obtaining public support

Public support and accountability are becoming increasingly important in environmental restoration (Hickman and Cocklin 1992; Higgs 2003; van der Meulen et al. 2004), and the politics of sustainability may rest more on human perceptions and values than on the intrinsic worth of natural systems (Doody 2001). Protecting or restoring locations subject to intensive development pressure will be difficult without considering humans as part of the solution. As a result, restoration goals may require change in the attitudes and actions of scientists, restoration advocates, and environmental regulators as well as in residents, tourists, and businesses.

Tourists and local residents can place greater value on human-altered elements of nature than on naturally functioning habitats and species, giving introduced species preference over the natural dune landscape (van der Mulen et al. 2004). Stakeholders may also place greater value on human-induced stability than natural dynamism, indicating that acceptance of sand movement as a natural process of dune evolution may require a fundamental change in attitude (Doody 2001). The desire to maintain the status quo can override actions to improve natural environments. Re-mobilizing the protective dune near Markgrafenheide, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Chapter 4) is an implementable option because it is acceptable to local stakeholders, but state managers were unsuccessful in overcoming resistance to a similar project on a nearby island, where residents preferred a familiar landscape to an unknown dynamic one (Nordstrom et al. 2007c). This reluctance to accept change has been noted elsewhere (Leafe et al. 1998; Tunstall and Penning-Rowsell 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×