Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T00:16:11.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Northwestern Ohio: re-industrialization and emission reduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2009

Samuel A. Aryeetey-Attoh
Affiliation:
Professor of Geography and Chair of the Department of Geography and Planning The University of Toledo
Peter S. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Associate Professor Department of Geography and Planning, The University of Toledo
William A. Muraco
Affiliation:
Research Professor & Professor Emeritus University of Toledo
Neil Reid
Affiliation:
Associate Professor Department of Geography and Planning, The University of Toledo
Get access

Summary

Toledo and its region attracted the attention of the Global Change and Local Places project because of their centrality in the traditional urban–industrial heartland of the United States. The area has undergone profound changes during the Global Change and Local Places study period. Its heavy involvement in fossil-fuel use in industry and the greenhouse gas emissions from such establishments place Northwestern Ohio at the core of the national search for ways to reduce greenhouse gases.

From 1970 to 1990, the 23-county study region of Northwestern Ohio accomplished a 26% decline in greenhouse gas emissions because of a complex combination of technological and structural forces. Perhaps the key ingredient was the industrial sector's responses to federal and state enforcement of more stringent air pollution controls mandated by the Clean Air Act. A second factor resulting in reduced emissions was local industrial restructuring brought about by changes in the broad region's general economy. Intensive intra-regional competition developed in the 1990s between greenfield industrial developments in the rural and suburban counties and to a lesser degree renewal efforts for brownfield redevelopment in core urban areas (Bielen 1998). That regional competition led to redistribution of greenhouse gas emissions from core urban zones to suburban and rural areas. Industrial restructuring will most likely continue to determine the magnitudes and locations of future greenhouse gas emissions in Northwestern Ohio. Adoption of energy-efficient production technologies will temper growth in greenhouse gas emissions despite continued industrial growth.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Change and Local Places
Estimating, Understanding, and Reducing Greenhouse Gases
, pp. 103 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansari, A. and Modarress, B.. 1987. The Potential Benefits of Just-in-time Manufacturing for U.S. Manufacturing. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 28: 30–5Google Scholar
Ballew, P. D. and Schnorbus, R. H.. 1993. Auto industry restructuring and the Midwest economy. Chicago Fed Letter, 70: 1–4Google Scholar
Bergman, W. and Strauss, W.. 1994. The Revival of the Rust Belt: Fleeting Fancy or Durable Good? Chicago Fed Letter, 80: 1–3Google Scholar
Bielen, M. 1998. Brownfields and Greenfields. Newswaves, 1 (1): 1–2Google Scholar
Freeman, D. 1998. Personal Interview with D. Freeman, Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments Transportation Planner, Toledo, OH. 16 December
Gober, P. 1993. Americans on the Move. Population Bulletin, 48Google Scholar
Kenney, M. and Florida, R.. 1991. How Japanese Industry is Rebuilding the Rust Belt. Technology Review, February–March: 25–33Google Scholar
Klier, T. 1981, Assessing the Midwest Economy – A Longer View. Chicago Fed Letter, 107: 1–3Google Scholar
MacKnight, S. 1992. Japan's Expanding U.S. Manufacturing Presence. Washington: Japan Economic Institute
Reid, N. 1995. Just-in-Time Inventory Control and the Economic Integration of Japanese-Owned Manufacturing Plants with the County, State, and National Economies of the United States. Regional Studies, 29 (4): 345–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledo Area Chamber of Commerce. 1991. Office Space & Industrial Parks. Toledo: The Toledo Area Chamber of Commerce
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1964. Counties Employees Payroll and Establishments by Industry. County Business Patterns 1964: Ohio. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1981a. 1977 Census of Manufactures, Geographic Area Statistics, Part 2, General Summary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1981b. 1977 Census of Manufactures, Subject Statistics. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1986. Counties Employees Payroll and Establishments by Industry. County Business Patterns 1986: Ohio. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1985. 1982 Census of Manufactures, Geographic Area Series, Ohio. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1990. 1987 Census of Manufactures, Geographic Area Series, Ohio. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1994a. Counties Employees Payroll and Establishments by Industry. County Business Patterns 1994: Ohio. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1994b. Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1996. 1992 Census of Manufactures, Geographic Area Series, Ohio. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1997a. Annual Survey of Manufactures, Geographic Area Statistics. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1997b. County Business Patterns 1995, Ohio. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office
United States Department of Energy. 1995
United States Department of Energy. 1996. Climate Challenge Participation Accord
Woods & Poole Economics, Inc. 1998. County Projections to 2025: Complete Economic and Demographic Data and Projections, 1970 to 2025, for Every County, State, and Metropolitan Area in the U.S. Washington, DC: Woods & Poole Economics. http://www.woodsandpoole.com/

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×