Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:59:42.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

5 - Yang–Mills theories

Rodolfo Gambini
Affiliation:
Universidad de la República, Uruguay
Jorge Pullin
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Introductiong

Since the unification of the electromagnetic and weak interactions through the Glashow–Salam–Weinberg model [75], Yang–Mills theories [76] have been widely accepted as correctly describing elementary particle physics. This belief was reinforced when they proved to be renormalizable [77, 78]. Moreover, the discovery of color symmetry as the underlying gauge invariance associated with strong interactions raised the possibility that all interactions of nature could possibly be cast as Yang–Mills theories. This spawned interest in grand unified models and some partial successes were achieved in this direction.

A crucial ingredient in the description of elementary particle physics through gauge theories is the maintenance of the gauge invariance of physical results and the underlying theory and this is also crucial in order to be able to prove renormalizability.

The success of the electroweak model is yet to be achieved by the quark model of strong interactions. The reason is that perturbative techniques, which were adequate for the electroweak model, are only appropriate in the high energy regime of strong interactions. This motivated the interest in non-perturbative techniques, especially to prove the existence of a confining phase. A great effort took place in the late 1970s and suggestive arguments were put forward but a rigorous proof of quark confinement is still lacking.

In several of these attempts the use of loops played an important role. Loops were used in a variety of contexts and approaches including the one we are focusing on in this book, the loop representation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×