Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables, Figure, Appendices
- Notes on Contributors
- Editors' Preface
- Table of Treaties
- Table of Cases
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 The UN human rights treaty system: A system in crisis?
- A The UN human rights monitoring system in action
- B National influences and responses
- C Regional and sectoral comparisons
- D Common challenges for the treaty bodies
- E Looking to the future
- Index
1 - The UN human rights treaty system: A system in crisis?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables, Figure, Appendices
- Notes on Contributors
- Editors' Preface
- Table of Treaties
- Table of Cases
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 The UN human rights treaty system: A system in crisis?
- A The UN human rights monitoring system in action
- B National influences and responses
- C Regional and sectoral comparisons
- D Common challenges for the treaty bodies
- E Looking to the future
- Index
Summary
The evolution of the United Nations treaty system
In 1945, almost for the first time, the United Nations Charter announced the idea of human rights as real rights at the universal level. That required the development of substantive human rights standards, a process commenced with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 and substantially extended through the two International Covenants in 1966, the Racial Discrimination Convention in the same year, and a large number of other instruments, general or specific in scope. All this has been in addition to the development of human rights standards and structures at regional level.
The articulation of new universal standards and new treaties has not ceased (although norm fatigue and avoiding the most obvious forms of duplication must, presumably, mean that it will become progressively more selective). But the need for their implementation remains, as much for the older standards and treaties as for the newer. Here the approach adopted at the universal level in 1966 had the following features:
the establishment of specialist bodies charged with the oversight of treaty performance, each concerned with a specific treaty;
regular reporting obligations for states parties, on the assumption that the examination of reports would lead to a dialogue between each state and the relevant treaty body, and to progressive improvements in compliance, associated with limited reliance on state-to-state or individual complaints procedures;
the absence of decision-making powers of a judicial or quasi-judicial character vested in the treaty bodies.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring , pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
- 7
- Cited by