Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T13:31:19.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - From union to independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2009

Stephen White
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Graeme Gill
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Darrell Slider
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Get access

Summary

Despite the considerable efforts of Mikhail Gorbachev to hold the country together, in December 1991 the Soviet Union formally dissolved into fifteen independent states. In part this occurred because of the reluctance of Gorbachev and other central authorities to loosen their control over the republics, despite the rapid change in the politics of the republics brought about by the 1990 elections. Gorbachev routinely described leaders and movements in republics that sought independence as ‘separatists’ who were working against the ‘true’ interests of their people – ignoring the fact that, in many republics, the drive for independence enjoyed broad popular support. The political future of leaders in these republics would have been jeopardised if they compromised on the secession question. In the end, concessions offered by Gorbachev to preserve the union were inadequate, and the failed coup of August 1991 accelerated the process of disintegration by further discrediting central institutions.

Soviet ‘federalism’

The Soviet system, while formally federal in the configuration of fifteen republics, was actually an uneasy combination of an extremely centralised unitary state with some dispersal of power and a federal structure. The federal structure was, even outwardly, incomplete. The lack of true federalism was best exemplified by Russia, by far the largest republic, which had few of the institutions that existed in other republics. A Russian communist party was not created until 1990, and the CPSU central apparatus was responsible for overseeing developments there. Russian ministries were relatively weak appendages of central Soviet ministries.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Transition
Shaping a Post-Soviet Future
, pp. 79 - 97
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×