Republican Rome's Rhetorical Pattern of Political Authority

Sarolta A. Takács

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511511813.003

CHAPTER ONE - Republican Rome's Rhetorical Pattern of Political Authority

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2009

Sarolta A. Takács

Show author details

Sarolta A. Takács: Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Virtual Reality: To Win Fame and Practice Virtue

Rome, pagan or Christian, was a militaristic, patriarchal society. Virtuous behavior, the most noble form of which was self-sacrifice for the good of the state, generated honors. Glory was reaped in battle, and, in turn, produced other honors for the soldier as well as his family and his descendants. All of Rome's leading families claimed such exemplary, virtuous family members. Glory also bestowed remembrance. Words in the form of inscriptions, speeches, or poems, for example, and artistic representations were vehicles of this remembrance.

Because war and battle played such a prominent role in this definition of the self, military glory was at the core of the honors-remembrance-immortality system. Glory initiated and perpetuated the discourse. Each generation experienced the pressure at least to keep up with, if not to outperform, its ancestors. Death masks (imagines), displayed on the walls of homes, were visual reminders of forefathers. They were also periodically displayed in public, especially at a funeral of a family member. The second century BCE historian Polybius, a member of a prominent Greek family who came to Rome as a hostage after the battle of Pydna (168 BCE), writes:

On the occasion of public sacrifices, these masks are displayed and decorated with much care. When any distinguished member of the family dies, the masks are taken to the funeral and are worn by men who are considered most closely to resemble the original ancestor both in height and general bearing.…There could not easily be a more ennobling spectacle for a young man who aspires to win fame and practice virtue.[…]

Type: Chapter
Information: The Construction of Authority in Ancient Rome and Byzantium
The Rhetoric of Empire
, pp. 1 - 39

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511813.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harris, W.V., War and imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 9–53Google Scholar

Flower, H.I., Ancestor masks and aristocratic power in Roman culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Skutsch, O., (ed.), The Annals of Q. Ennius (Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1985

McDonnell, M., Roman Manliness. Virtus and the Roman Republic (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Barton, C. A., Roman honor: The fire in the bones (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 2001), p. 11Google Scholar

Syme, R., Sallust (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 2002), esp. pp. 29–42Google Scholar

Peter, H. W. (ed.), Historicorum Romanorum reliquiae (Stuttgart: Teubner, 1967), p. 70

Tilly, C., “War making and state making as organized crime,” in Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.), Bringing the state back in (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 169–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilmore, D., Aggression and community: Paradoxes of Andalusian culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), p. 23Google Scholar

Coser, L., The functions of social conflict (Glencoe: Free Press, 1956Google Scholar

Kostial, M., Kriegerisches Rom?: Zur Frage von Unvermeidbarkeit und Normalität militärischer Konflikte in der römischen Republik (Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 1995), p. 21: 1Google Scholar

Miller, W., Humiliation: And other essays on honor, social discomfort, and violence (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993), p. 116Google Scholar

Versnel, H.S., Triumphus: An inquiry into the origin, development and meaning of the Roman triumph (Leiden: Brill, 1970)Google Scholar

Steel, C.E.W., Cicero, rhetoric, and empire (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 82–98Google Scholar

Walbank, F.W., A historical commentary on Polybius, vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957), p. 742Google Scholar

Alföldy, G., The social history of Rome, translated by Braund, D. and Pollock, F. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), p. 86Google Scholar

Habermehl, H., “C. Verres,” in Realencyclopädie der Altertumswissenschaften (Pauly-Wissowa) 8a.2 (Stuttgart: Druckenmüller Verlag, 1958), pp. 1561–635Google Scholar

Strasburger, H., Concordia ordinum: Eine Untersuchung zur Politik Ciceros (Borna and Leipzig: R. Noske, 1931)Google Scholar

Meier, C., Res publica amissa: Eine Studie und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988), pp. 84–86Google Scholar

Bartošek, M., Verrinae: Die Bedeutung der Reden Ciceros gegen Verres für die Grundprobleme von Staat und Recht, translated by Dressler, A. (Prague: Univerzita Karlova, 1977)Google Scholar

Linderski, J., “Roman religion in Livy,” in Schuller, W. (ed.), Livius. Aspekte seines Werkes, Xenia 31 (Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz, 1993), esp. pp. 56–59Google Scholar

Takács, S.A., “Forging a past: The Sibylline books and the making of Rome,” in Ryan, J. and Thomas, A. (eds.), Cultures of forgery: Making nations, making selves (New York and London: Routledge, 2003), pp. 15–27Google Scholar

Gelzer, M., Caesar: Politician and statesman, translated by Needham, P. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968), pp. 272–82Google Scholar

Book contents

CHAPTER ONE - Republican Rome's Rhetorical Pattern of Political Authority

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive