References

Mark Ethan Grotelueschen

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511511585.012

Army Service School. Instructions for the Training of Divisions for Offensive Action.Fort Leavenworth, Kans.: Army Service Schools Press, 1917.

GHQ, AEF. Notes on Recent Operations, No. 1. France, 7 August, 1918.

GHQ, AEF. Notes on Recent Operations, No. 3. France, 12 October, 1918.

GHQ, AEF. Notes on Recent Operations, No. 4. France, 22 November, 1918.

Headquarters, Department of the Army, FM 100-5 Operations. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 14 June 1993.

Headquarters, Department of the Army, FM 101-5-1 Operational Terms and Graphics.Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1997.

Infantry School, U.S. Army. Infantry in Battle. Washington, D. C.: The Infantry School Press, 1934.

Pershing, John J.Combat Instructions. AEF Document No. 1348. France: GHQ, AEF, 5 September 1918.Google Scholar

U.S. Army, Chief of Field Artillery. The School of the Battery Commander: 75m/m gun and 155m/m howitzer. From the pamphlet at the Saumer Artillery School, France. Fort Sill, Okla.: November 1918.

U.S. Army Field Artillery School. Right of the Line: A History of the American Field Artillery.Fort Sill, Okla.: U.S. Army Field Artillery School, 1977.

U.S. Army, 1st Division. World War Records of the First Division A. E. F. (Regular). 25 vols. Washington, D. C.: Army War College, 1930.

U.S. Army, 2nd Division. Records of the Second Division (Regular). 10 vols., (some in several parts). Washington, D. C.: Army War College, 1924.

U.S. Department of the Army, Historical Division. United States Army in the World War 1917–1919. 17 vols. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1948. Reprint, Center for Military History, 1990.

U.S. Infantry Association. Infantry Drill Regulations, United States Army 1911, with Changes 1–18.Philadelphia: J. B.Lippincott, 1917.

U.S. War Department. Document No. 394, Infantry Drill Regulations, United States Army, 1911.Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1911.

U.S. War Department. Field Service Regulations: United States Army, 1914, Corrected to July 1, 1914.Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1914.

U.S. War Department. Field Service Regulations: United States Army, 1914 (with Changes Nos. 1 to 7).Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1917.

U.S. War Department. Field Service Regulations: United States Army, 1914, Corrected to July 31, 1918.Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1918.

U.S. War Department. Field Service Regulations: United States Army, 1923. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1924.

U.S. War Department. Order of Battle of the United States Land Forces in the World War. 3 vols. Washington, D. C.: U.S. GPO, 1937. Reprint, Center for Military History, 1988.

U.S. War Department. Provisional Field and Service Regulations for Field Artillery (Horse and Light), 1916, Corrected to April 15, 1917. New York: Military Publishing Company, 1917.

Anderson, John B. “Are We Justified in Discarding ‘Pre-War’ Methods of Training?” Field Artillery Journal 9 (April–June, 1919): 222–30.Google Scholar

“Bayonet Training.” Infantry Journal 13 (May 1917): 733–50.

Bishop, H. G. “What of the Future?” Field Artillery Journal 12 (September–October 1922): 366, 369–72.Google Scholar

Briggs, Allan L. “Bayonet Training.” Infantry Journal 14 (October 1917): 336–40.Google Scholar

Broad, C. N. F. “The Development of Artillery Tactics – 1914–1918, Part I.” Field Artillery Journal 12 (September–October 1922): 375–96.Google Scholar

Brown, T. W. “The Infantry School at Camp Benning.” Infantry Journal 15 (May 1919): 861–77.Google Scholar

Burdick, Henry H. “Development of the Half-Platoon as an Elementary Unit.” Infantry Journal 15 (April 1919): 799–807.Google Scholar

Burr, W. E. “Some Aspects of Field Artillery.” Field Artillery Journal 12 (May–June 1922): 180–1.Google Scholar

Cherfils, Gen., French Army. “Infantry Fire in the Present War.” Infantry Journal 12 (November 1915): 347–49.

“Current Field Artillery Notes.” Field Artillery Journal 7 (April–June, 1917): 198–204.

Department of Gunnery, School of Fire for Field Artillery. “American Drill Regulations and ‘Artillery Firing.’” Field Artillery Journal 8 (July–September, 1918): 363–9.

Drennan, L. H. “The Psychology of the Bayonet.” Infantry Journal 11 (September–October 1914): 169–71.Google Scholar

Editorial Department, “The Battle of the Future,” Infantry Journal 12 (November–December, 1916): 357–61.

Editorial Department, “The Character of the Present War,” Infantry Journal 12 (November–December, 1916): 352–7.

Editorial Department. Field Artillery Journal 7 (January–March, 1917): 71–4.

Editorial Department. “The Function of Fire.” Infantry Journal 12 (November 1915): 487–91.

Editorial Department. Infantry Journal 12 (December 1915): 513.

Editorial Department. Infantry Journal 21 (September 1922): 341.

Editorial Department. “Rifle and Bayonet.” Infantry Journal 12 (February 1916): 734–6.

Editorial Department. “Some General Deductions.” Infantry Journal 11 (November–December 1914): 433–6.

“Effect of the New Tactics on the Operations of Infantry.” Infantry Journal 11 (September–October 1914): 242–6.

Fleming, A. S. “The Mission of the School of Fire for Field Artillery: Address to Incoming Class by Commandant, Col. A. S. Fleming.” Field Artillery Journal 7 (October–December, 1917): 383–90.Google Scholar

Frink, James L. “Methods of Training Troops.” Infantry Journal 12 (September–October, 1916): 139–55.

“General Pershing's Opinion of Infantry.” Infantry Journal 11 (July–August 1914): 83.

“German Artillery.” Field Artillery Journal 8 (October–December, 1918): 578–85.

Hobbs, Percy. “Bayonet Fighting and Physical Training.” Infantry Journal 14 (August 1917): 79–85.Google Scholar

Irwin, George LeR. “Notes on the Training and Handling of Divisional Artillery in France.” Field Artillery Journal 9 (November–December 1919): 489–507.Google Scholar

Kelly, T. Howard. “Why General Edwards Was Sent Home.” New McClure's (November 1928): 54–5, 120–6.Google Scholar

Lanza, Conrad H. “The Artillery Support of the Infantry in the A. E. F.” Field Artillery Journal 26 (January–March 1936): 62–85.Google Scholar

Lanza, Conrad H. “Counterbattery in the A. E. F.” Field Artillery Journal 26 (July–September 1936): 454–79.Google Scholar

Lanza, Conrad H. “Note on the Artillery in the Battle of Buzancy, November 1, 1918.” Field Artillery Journal 22 (March–April 1932): 157–60.Google Scholar

Locke, E. M. “Artillery in Europe.” Field Artillery Journal 7 (July–September 1917): 294–301.Google Scholar

Malone, Paul B. “Infantry-Artillery.” Field Artillery Journal 10 (January–February 1920): 1, 11.Google Scholar

“Measures Taken by the German Artillery to Carry Out Preparations for Attack Without Betraying the Intentions of the Command.” Field Artillery Journal 8 (July–September 1918): 504–12.

Meredith, Owen R. “If Not, Why Not!” Infantry Journal 21 (October 1922): 419–21.Google Scholar

Moore, J. M. “Bayonet and Bayonet Combat.” Infantry Journal 12 (March 1916): 908–19.Google Scholar

“New Field Artillery Classification.” Field Artillery Journal 7 (January–March 1917): 25–30

“Notes from the Chief of Infantry.” Infantry Journal 21 (November 1922): 563.

“Notes on Artillery.” Field Artillery Journal 7 (April–June 1917): 164–97.

“Notes on the Employment of Artillery and Machine Guns in Offensive Operations.” Field Artillery Journal 9 (April–June 1919): 137.

“Organization of a Rolling Barrage in the German Army: Translation of a German Document.” Field Artillery Journal 8 (July–September 1918): 417–21.

Reilly, Henry J. “Fontainebleau in War Time.” Field Artillery Journal 7 (April–June, 1917): 109–18.Google Scholar

Sawyer, C. N. “The Stiff Bayonet.” Infantry Journal 12 (November 1915): 396–405.Google Scholar

Spaulding, O. L. “Infantry under Artillery Fire.” Infantry Journal 11 (March–April 1915): 641.Google Scholar

“The Scientific Preparation of Fire in the German Army.” Field Artillery Journal 8 (October–December 1918): 527–34.

Upton, L. S. “Bayonet Melee.” Infantry Journal 13 (July–August 1916): 32–5.Google Scholar

Wilbur, William H. “Bayonet Instruction.” Infantry Journal 14 (December 1917): 414–21.Google Scholar

Williams, Roger H. “Bayonet Combat Instruction.” Infantry Journal 11 (November–December 1914): 390–1.Google Scholar

Wise, Jennings C. “Automatic and Semiautomatic Rifle Fire.” Infantry Journal 20 (February 1922): 133–5.Google Scholar

Woolfley, Francis A. “Queen of Infantry Weapons.” Infantry Journal 21 (September 1922): 308.Google Scholar

Adler, J. O., ed. History of the Seventy-Seventh Division, August 25th 1917–November 11th 1918. New York: 77th Division Association, 1919.Google Scholar

Albertine, Connell. The Yankee Doughboy. Boston: Branden Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Alexander, Robert. Memories of the World War, 1917–1918. New York: Macmillan, 1931.Google Scholar

Allen, Hervey. Toward the Flame: A War Diary. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1934, 1968.Google Scholar

Blake, Robert, ed. The Private Papers of Douglas Haig. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1952.Google Scholar

Brannen, Carl Andrew. Over There: A Marine in the Great War. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bullard, Robert L.American Soldiers Also Fought. New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1936.Google Scholar

Bullard, Robert L.Fighting Generals: Illustrated Biographical Sketches of Seven Major Generals in World War I. Ann Arbor, Mich.: J. W. Edwards, 1944.Google Scholar

Bullard, Robert L.Personalities and Reminiscences of the War. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, Page and Co., 1925.Google Scholar

Chambrun, Jaques and Marenches, Charles. The American Army in the European Conflict. New York: Macmillan, 1919.Google Scholar

Clark, George B., ed. His Time in Hell: A Texas Marine in France: The World War I Memoir of Warren R. Jackson. Novato, Calif.: Presidio Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Currie, A. W.Canadian Corps Operations During the Year 1918. Ottawa: Department of Militia and Defence, 1919.Google Scholar

Dickman, Joseph T.The Great Crusade. New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1927.Google Scholar

Evans, Martin Marix, ed. American Voices of World War I: Primary Source Documents, 1917–1920. London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.Google Scholar

Evarts, Jeremiah M.Cantigny: A Corner of the War. n.p., The Scribner Press, 1938.Google Scholar

Foch, Ferdinand. The Memoirs of Marshal Foch. Translated by Bentley, T. Mott. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, Doran, 1931.Google Scholar

Harbord, James G.The American Army in France, 1917–1919. Boston: Little, Brown, 1936.Google Scholar

Harbord, James G.Leaves From a War Diary. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1925.Google Scholar

Langer, William L.Gas and Flame in World War I. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965.Google Scholar

Lejeune, John A.The Reminiscences of a Marine. Philadelphia: Dorrance and Co., 1930.Google Scholar

Liggett, Hunter. A. E. F.: Ten Years Ago in France. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1928.Google Scholar

Liggett, Hunter. Commanding an American Army. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1925.Google Scholar

MacArthur, Douglas. Reminiscences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar

Mackin, Elton E.Suddenly We Didn't Want to Die: Memoirs of a World War I Marine. Novato, Calif.: Presidio Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Mangin, Charles M. E.How the War Ended. Paris: Plon-Nourrit, 1920. Reprinted and Translated at Fort Leavenworth, Kans.: General Service Schools, 1924.Google Scholar

March, Peyton C.The Nation at War. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, Doran, 1932.Google Scholar

Marshall, George C.Memoirs of My Services in the World War, 1917–1918. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976.Google Scholar

Meehan, Thomas F.History of the Seventy-Seventh Division in the War, 1917–1919. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1921.Google Scholar

Miles, L. Wardlaw. History of the 308th Infantry, 1917–1919. New York, n.p., 1927.Google Scholar

Monash, John. The Australian Victories in France in 1918. London: Imperial War Museum, 1993.Google Scholar

Otto, Ernst. The Battle at Blanc Mont. Translated by Lichtenburg, Martin. Annapolis: U.S. Naval Institute, 1930.Google Scholar

Palmer, Frederick. Our Greatest Battle. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1919.Google Scholar

Pershing, John J.My Experiences in the World War. 2 vols. New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1931.Google Scholar

Reilly, Henry J.Americans All: The Rainbow at War. Columbus, Ohio: F. J. Heer, 1936.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry W.A Story of the 305th Machine Gun Battalion. New York: Modern Publishing, 1941.Google Scholar

Snow, William J.Signposts of Experience. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Field Artillery Association, 1941.Google Scholar

Society of the First Division. History of the First Division in the World War, 1917–1919. Philadelphia: John C. Winston, 1931.

Taylor, Emerson Gifford. New England in France: 1917–1919: A History of the Twenty-Sixth Division U. S. A.Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1920.Google Scholar

The Ninth U.S. Infantry in the World War. [Neuwied a. R.: L. Heusersche buchdr. 1919].

Wright, William M. Meuse-Argonne Diary: A Division Commander in World War I. Edited by Ferrell, Robert H.. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Abrahamson, James L.America Arms for a New Century: The Making of a Great Military Power. New York: Free Press, 1981.Google Scholar

American Battle Monuments Commission. American Armies and Battlefields in Europe: A History, Guide, and Reference Book. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1938. Reprint, Center for Military History, 1995.

American Battle Monuments Commission. 1st Division Summary of Operations in the World War. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1944.

American Battle Monuments Commission. 2nd Division Summary of Operations in the World War. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1944.

American Battle Monuments Commission. 26th Division Summary of Operations in the World War. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1944.

American Battle Monuments Commission. 77th Division Summary of Operations in the World War. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1944.

Armstrong, David A.Bullets and Bureaucrats: The Machine Gun and the United States Army, 1861–1916. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Asprey, Robert B.At Belleau Wood. New York: Putnam's Sons, 1965; reprint, Denton, Tex.: University of North Texas Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Asprey, Robert B.The German High Command at War: Hindenburg and Ludendorff Conduct World War I. New York: William Morrow, 1991.Google Scholar

Ayres, Leonard P.The War with Germany. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1919.Google Scholar

Bailey, J. B. A.Field Artillery and Firepower. Oxford: The Military Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Merrill L.Lejeune: A Marine's Life, 1867–1942. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bean, C. E. W.The Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918: Volume VI, The Australian Imperial Force in France During the Allied Offensive, 1918. Sydney: University of Queensland Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Beaver, Daniel R.Newton D. Baker and the American War Effort, 1917–1919. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Bidwell, Shelford, and Graham, Dominick. Fire-Power: British Army Weapons and Theories of War, 1904–1945. London: Allen and Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar

Braim, Paul F.The Test of Battle: The American Expeditionary Forces in the Meuse-Argonne Campaign. Newark: University Press of Delaware, 1987.Google Scholar

Brown, Ronald J.A Few Good Men: The Fighting Fifth Marines: A History of the USMC's Most Decorated Regiment. Novato, Calif.: Presidio Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bruce, Robert. Machine Guns of World War I. London: Windrow and Greene, 1997.Google Scholar

Bruce, Robert B.A Fraternity of Arms: America and France in the Great War (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas), 2003.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Rexmond C.Gas Warfare at Belleau Wood, June 1918. Army Chemical Center, Md.: U.S. Army Chemical Corps Historical Office, 1957.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Rexmond C.The 26th Division in the Aisne-Marne Campaign, July 1918. Army Chemical Center, Md.: U.S. Army Chemical Corps Historical Office, 1957.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Rexmond C.The Use of Gas in the Meuse-Argonne Campaign, September–November 1918. Army Chemical Center, Md.: U.S. Army Chemical Corps Historical Office, 1958.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Rexmond C.The 26th Division East of the Meuse, October 1918. Army Chemical Center, Md.: U.S. Army Chemical Corps Historical Office, 1960.Google Scholar

Coffman, Edward M.The Hilt of the Sword: The Career of Peyton C. March. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Coffman, Edward M.The War to End All Wars: The American Military Experience in World War I. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Cooke, James J.The Rainbow Division in the Great War, 1917–1919. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1994.Google Scholar

Cooke, James J.The U.S. Air Service in the Great War, 1917–1919. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1996.Google Scholar

Cooke, James J.Pershing and His Generals: Command and Staff in the AEF. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1997.Google Scholar

Cooke, James J.The All-Americans at War: The 82nd Division in the Great War, 1917–1918. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1999.Google Scholar

Dancocks, Daniel G.Spearhead to Victory: Canada and the Great War. Edmonton: Hurtig, 1987.Google Scholar

Dastrup, Boyd S.King of Battle: A Branch History of the U.S. Army's Field Artillery. Fort Monroe, Va.: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, 1992.Google Scholar

Dennis, Peter, and Grey, Jeffrey. 1918: Defining Victory. Canberra: Army History Unit, Department of Defence, 1999.Google Scholar

DeWeerd, Harvey A.President Wilson Fights His War: World War I and the American Intervention. New York: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar

Dooly, William G. Jr., Great Weapons of World War I. New York: Walker and Co., 1969.Google Scholar

Doughty, Robert. The Seeds of Disaster: The Development of French Army Doctrine 1919–1939. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1985.Google Scholar

Edmonds, James E.History of the Great War: Military Operations: France and Belgium, 1918. Vols. 3–5. London: HMSO, 1947.Google Scholar

Eisenhower, John S. D.Yanks: The Epic Story of the American Army in World War I. New York: The Free Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Ellis, John. Brute Force: Allied Strategy and Tactics in the Second World War. New York: Viking, 1990.Google Scholar

English, John. On Infantry. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1984.Google Scholar

Falls, Cyril. The Great War, 1914–1918. New York: Capricorn Books, 1961.Google Scholar

Ferrell, Robert H.Woodrow Wilson and World War I, 1917–1921. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.Google Scholar

Ferrell, Robert H.Collapse at Meuse-Argonne: The Failure of the Kansas-Missouri Division. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Kenneth. An Uncertain Trumpet: The Evolution of U.S. Army Infantry Doctrine, 1919–1941. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Finnegan, John Patrick. Against the Specter of a Dragon: The Campaign for American Military Preparedness, 1914–1917. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Grotelueschen, Mark E.Doctrine Under Trial: American Artillery Employment in World War I. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gudmundsson, Bruce I.Stormtroop Tactics: Innovation in the German Army, 1914–1918. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1989.Google Scholar

Gudmundsson, Bruce I.On Artillery. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1993.Google Scholar

Hallas, James H.Squandered Victory: The American Army at St. Mihiel. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1995.Google Scholar

Heller, Charles E.Chemical Warfare in World War I: The American Experience, 1917–1918. Leavenworth Papers No. 10. Fort Leavenworth, Kans.: U.S. Army Combat Studies Institute, 1984.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger H.The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary 1914–1918. London: Arnold, 1997.Google Scholar

Holley, I. B. Jr., General John M. Palmer, Citizen-Soldiers, and the Army of a Democracy. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Holley, I. B. Jr.Ideas and Weapons. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1953. Reprint, Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1997.Google Scholar

Huelfer, Evan Andrew. The “Casualty Issue” in American Military Practice: The Impact of World War I. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2003.Google Scholar

Johnson, David E.Fast Tanks and Heavy Bombers: Innovation in the U.S. Army, 1917–1945. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Johnson, Douglas V., II, and Hillman, Rolfe L. Jr., Soissons, 1918. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Liddell Hart, B. H.The Real War 1914–1918. Boston: Little, Brown, 1930.Google Scholar

Lupfer, Timothy T.The Dynamics of Doctrine: The Changes in German Tactical Doctrine During the First World War. Leavenworth Papers No. 4. Fort Leavenworth, Kans.: Combat Studies Institute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1981.Google Scholar

McClellan, Edwin N.The United States Marine Corps in the World War. Washington, D. C.: GPO, 1920.Google Scholar

Millett, Allan R.The General: Robert L. Bullard and Officership in the United States Army, 1881–1925. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Millett, Allan R.Semper Fidelis: The History of the United States Marine Corps. New York: Macmillan, 1980.Google Scholar

Millett, Allan R.In Many a Strife: General Gerald C. Thomas and the U.S. Marine Corps, 1917–1956. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Millett, Allan R., and Maslowski, Peter. For the Common Defense: A Military History of the United States of America, rev. ed. New York: Free Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nenninger, Timothy K.The Leavenworth Schools and the Old Army. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Nicholson, G. W. L.The Official History of the Canadian Army in the First World War: Canadian Expeditionary Force, 1914–1919. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1962.Google Scholar

Odom, William O.After the Trenches: The Transformation of U.S. Army Doctrine, 1918–1939. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Page, Arthur. Our 110 Days Fighting. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, Page, 1920.Google Scholar

Paschall, Rod. The Defeat of Imperial Germany, 1917–1918. New York: Da Capo Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Pogue, Forrest C.George C. Marshall: Education of a General, 1880–1939. New York: Viking Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Powell, Geoffrey. Plumer: The Soldier's General. London: Leo Cooper, 1990.Google Scholar

Prior, Robin, and Wilson, Trevor. Command on the Western Front: The Military Career of Sir Henry Rawlinson, 1914–18. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Prior, Robin, and Trevor Wilson. Passchendaele: The Untold Story. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1996.

Raines, Edgar F. Jr., Eyes of Artillery: The Origins of Modern U.S. Army Aviation in World War II. Washington, D. C.: Center of Military History, 2000.Google Scholar

Samuels, Martin. Doctrine and Dogma: German and British Infantry Tactics in the First World War. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Samuels, Martin. Command or Control?: Command, Training, and Tactics in the British and German Armies, 1888–1918. London: Frank Cass, 1995.Google Scholar

Schreiber, Shane B.Shock Army of the British Empire: The Canadian Corps in the Last 100 Days of the Great War. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1997.Google Scholar

Sheffield, Gary. Forgotten Victory. London: Headline, 2001.Google Scholar

Sheffield, Gary, and Todman, Dan, eds. Command and Control on the Western Front: The British Army' Experience 1914–1918. Staplehurst, UK: Spellmount, 2004.Google Scholar

Smith, Leonard V.Between Mutiny and Obedience: The Case of the French Fifth Division during World War I. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Smythe, Donald. Guerrilla Warrior: The Early Life of John J. Pershing. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1973.Google Scholar

Smythe, Donald. Pershing: General of the Armies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Spaulding, Oliver, and Wright, John W.. The Second Division, American Expeditionary Force in France, 1917–1919. New York: Hillman Press, 1937.Google Scholar

Stallings, Lawrence. The Doughboys: The Story of the AEF, 1917–1918. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.Google Scholar

Strachan, Hew. The First World War: To Arms. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Terraine, John. To Win a War: 1918, the Year of Victory. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1978.Google Scholar

Thomas, Shipley. The History of the A. E. F.New York: Doran, 1920.Google Scholar

Trask, David F.The AEF and Coalition Warmaking, 1917–1918. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993.Google Scholar

Travers, Tim. The Killing Ground: The British Army, the Western Front and the Emergence of Modern Warfare, 1900–1918. London: Unwin Hyman, 1987.Google Scholar

Travers, Tim. How the War Was Won: Command and Technology in the British Army on the Western Front, 1917–1918. London: Routledge, 1992.CrossRef Google Scholar

Twitchell, Heath Jr., Allen: The Biography of an Army Officer, 1859–1930. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Vandiver, Frank E.Black Jack: The Life and Times of John J. Pershing. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Vetock, Dennis J.Lessons Learned: A History of US Army Lesson Learning. Carlisle Barracks, Penn.: U.S. Army Military History Institute, 1988.Google Scholar

Weigley, Russell F.The American Way of War. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Weigley, Russell F.History of the United States Army. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Wilson, Dale E.Treat 'em Rough! The Birth of American Armor, 1917–1920. Novato, Calif.: Presidio Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Wilson, John B.Maneuver and Firepower: The Evolution of Divisions and Separate Brigades. Washington, D. C.: Center of Military History, 1998.Google Scholar

Woodward, David R.Trial by Friendship: Anglo-American Relations, 1917–1919. Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky, 1993.Google Scholar

Zabecki, David T.Steel Wind: Colonel Georg Bruchmüller and the Birth of Modern Artillery. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1994.Google Scholar

Beattie, Taylor V. “Whittlesey's ‘Lost’ Battalion.” Army History 54 (Winter 2002): 21–9.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger H. “The Dynamics of Necessity: German Military Policy during the First World War.” In Military Effectiveness. Volume I: The First World War, eds. Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 80–115. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger H. “The German Victories, 1917–1918.” In The Oxford Illustrated History of the First World War, ed. Hew Strachan, 253–64. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael. “Men against Fire: The Doctrine of the Offensive in 1914.” In Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age, ed. Paret, Peter, 510–26. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul. “Britain in the First World War.” In Military Effectiveness. Volume I: The First World War, eds. Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 31–79. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar

Kennett, Lee. “The A. E. F. Through French Eyes.” Military Review 52 (November 1972): 3–11.Google Scholar

Millett, Allan R. “Cantigny, 28–31 May 1918.” In America's First Battles, 1776–1965, eds. Heller, Charles E. and Stofft, William A., 149–85. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1986.Google Scholar

Millett, Allan R. “Over Where? The AEF and the American Strategy for Victory, 1917–1918.” In Against All Enemies: Interpretations of American Military History from Colonial Times to the Present, eds. Hagan, Kenneth J. and Roberts, William R., 235–56. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Nenninger, Timothy K. “American Military Effectiveness in the First World War.” In Military Effectiveness. Volume I: The First World War, eds. Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 116–56. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar

Nenninger, Timothy K. “Tactical Dysfunction in the AEF, 1917–1918.” Military Affairs 51 (October 1987): 177–81.

Porch, Douglas. “The French Army in the First World War.” In Military Effectiveness. Volume I: The First World War, eds. Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 190–228. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar

Rainey, James W. “Ambivalent Warfare: The Tactical Doctrine of the AEF in World War I.” Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College 13 (September 1983): 34–46.

Rainey, James W. “The Questionable Training of the AEF in World War I.” Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College 22 (Winter 1992–93): 89–103.Google Scholar

Showalter, “Manœuvre Warfare: The Eastern and Western Fronts, 1914–1915.” In The Oxford Illustrated History of the First World War, ed. Strachan, Hew, 30–45. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Spector, Ronald. “The Military Effectiveness of the US Armed Forces, 1919–1939.” In Military Effectiveness. Volume II: The Interwar Period, eds. Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 70–97. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar

Trask, David F. “The Entry of the USA into the War.” In The Oxford Illustrated History of the First World War, ed. Strachan, Hew, 239–52. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Travers, Tim. “The Allied Victories, 1918.” In The Oxford Illustrated History of the First World War, ed. Strachan, Hew, 278–90. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Williams, T. Harry. “The Military Leadership of North and South.” In Why the North Won the Civil War, ed. Donald, David H., 38–57. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1960. Reprint, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.Google Scholar

Johnson, Douglas Valentine, II. “A Few ‘Squads Left’ and Off to France: Training the American Army in the United States for World War I.” Ph.D. diss., Temple University, 1992.

Rainey, James W. “The Training of the American Expeditionary Force in World War I.” Master's thesis, Temple University, 1981.

Shugart, David A. “On the Way: The U.S. Field Artillery in the Interwar Period,” Ph.D. diss., Texas A&M University, 2002.