Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T02:25:33.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Modeling and Reworking Childhood Experiences: Involved Fathers' Representations of Being Parented and of Parenting a Preschool Child

from Part Two - Research Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Inge Bretherton
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison
James David Lambert
Affiliation:
Edgewood College
Barbara Golby
Affiliation:
Elmhurst Hospital
Ofra Mayseless
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

Abstract

We examine intergenerational parenting representations of 49 highly educated, married fathers from dual career families who shared childrearing with their wives. Responding to the Parent Attachment Interview, the men discussed similarities and differences between their remembered childhood relationships with mother and father and their current relationship with a preschool son (N = 27) or daughter (N = 22). Rather than globally identifying with one parent (whether father or mother), a relatively high percentage of the men were selective in the positive qualities they modeled and the disappointing qualities they rejected in either or both parents. Overall, they described more intergenerational differences (reworking of the remembered relationships from childhood) than similarities (modeling themselves after their parents). Concerning similarities, men in our study were much more likely to adopt their mothers than their fathers as influential models with respect to affection/attachment/communication and, to a slightly lesser extent, discipline practices. In the domain of joint father–child activities, the percentage of men who saw themselves as similar to their fathers was higher. Findings are discussed from the perspective of attachment theory and societal change in fatherhood ideals.

The notion that parent–child relationship patterns and representations are transmitted across generations has a long history in the clinical literature on child maltreatment and parental depression. In an influential synthesis of this literature, Belsky (1984; p. 83) hypothesized that “determinants of parenting highlighted by child abuse research might also play a role influencing parenting that falls within the normal range of functioning.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Parenting Representations
Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications
, pp. 177 - 207
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. P. & Blackwelder, S. P. (1993). Fathering in the 20th century. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 975–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, R. C. & Baruch, G. K. (1988). Correlates of fathers' participation in family work. In Bronstein, P. & Cowan, C. P. (Eds.), Fatherhood Today: Men's Changing Role in the Family. New York: Wiley, pp. 66–78.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. J., Kroupina, M. G., Schwade, J. A., Dropknik, P. L., & Wewerka, S. S. (1998). If memory serves, will language? Later verbal accessibility of early memories. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 655–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J. & Jaffee, S. R. (in press). The multiple determinants of parenting. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology. (Volume 3: Risk, disorder and adaptation). New York: Wiley.
Benokraitis, N. (1985). Fathers in the dual earner family. In Hanson, S. and Bozett, F. (Eds.), Dimensions of Fatherhood. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 243–68.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1971). Lives through Time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (l973). Attachment and Loss: Volume 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Volume 3. Loss. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I., Biringen, Z., & Ridgeway, D. (1989). The Parent Attachment Interview. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I., Biringen, Z., Ridgeway, D., Maslin, C., & Sherman, M. (1989). Attachment: The parental perspective. Infant Mental Health Journal, 10, 203–21.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, I., Lambert, J. D., & Golby, B. (2005). Involved fathers of preschool children as seen by themselves and their wives: Accounts of attachment, socialization, and companionship. Attachment and Human Development, 7, 229–51.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. & Ridgeway, D. (1990). Attachment story completion task to assess young children's internal working models of child and parent in the attachment relationship. In Greenberg, M. T., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (Eds.), Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 300–5.Google Scholar
Byng-Hall, J. (1995). Rewriting Family Scripts. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., Pears, K. C., Patterson, G. R., & Owen, L. D. (2003). Continuity of parenting practices across generations in an at-risk sample: A prospective comparison of direct and mediated associations. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltrane, S. (1996). Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework and Gender Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, C. P. & Cowan, P. A. (1987). Men's involvement in parenthood: Identifying the antecedents and understanding the barriers. In Berman, P. W. & Pedersen, F. A. (Eds.), Men's Transition to Parenthood: Longitudinal Studies of Early Family Experiences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 145–74.Google Scholar
Cowan, P. (1988). Becoming a father, a time of change, and opportunity for development. In Bronstein, P. & Cowan, C. P. (Eds.), Fatherhood Today: Men's Changing Role in the Family. New York: Wiley, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Daly, K. (1993). Reshaping fatherhood: Finding the models. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 510–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling-Fisher, C. S. & Tiedje, L. B. (1990). The impact of maternal employment characteristics on fathers' participation in child care. Family Relations, 39, 20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, K. & Morman, M. T. (2000). Affection received from fathers as a predictor of men's affection with their own sons: Tests of the modeling and compensation hypotheses. Communication Monographs, 67, 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). Adult attachment interview for adults. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Grossmann, K., Grossmann, K. E., Fremmer-Bombik, E., Kindler, H., Scheuerer-Englisch, H., & Zimmermann, P. (2002). The uniqueness of the child-father attachment relationship: Fathers' sensitive and challenging play as a pivotal variable in a 16-year longitudinal study. Social Development, 11, 307–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. In Cassidy, J. and Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. New York: Guilford, pp. 395–433.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L. & Daly, K. (2003). Qualitative methods for inductive (theory-generating) research. In Kuczynski, L. (Ed). Handbook of Dynamics in Parent-Child Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 373–92.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. (1986). Becoming a Father. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Main, M. (1995). Attachment: Overview, with implications for clinical work. In Goldberg, S., Muir, R., & Kerr, J. (Eds.), Attachment Theory: Social, Developmental and Clinical Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 427–74.Google Scholar
Main, M., Kaplan, K., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In Bretherton, I. and Waters, E. (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, Serial No. 209 (1–2), 66–104.Google Scholar
Main, M. & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized-disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In Greenbert, M. T., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (Eds.), Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 121–60.Google Scholar
Manion, J. (1977). A study of fathers and infant caretaking. Birth and the Family Journal, 4, 174–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1993). The psychological and social origins of autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 4, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newson, J. & Newson, E. (1963). Infant Care in an Urban Community. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Olson, S. F., Martin, P., & Halvorson, C. F. Jr. (1999). Personality, marital relationships, and parenting in two generations of mothers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 457–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palkowitz, R. (2002a). Involved Fathering and Men's Adult Development: Provisional Balances. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Palkowitz, R. (2002b). Involved fathering and child development: Advancing our understanding of good fathering. In Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. & Cabrera, N. (Eds.), Handbook of Father Involvement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 119–39.Google Scholar
Pleck, J. (1987). American fathering in historical perspective. In Kimmel, M. S. (Ed.), Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
Radojevic, M. (1994). Mental representations of attachment among prospective Australian fathers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 28, 505–11.CrossRef
Roisman, G., Padron, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned-secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect. Child Development, 73, 1204–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, G. (1982). Shared-caregiving families: An Australian study. In Lamb, M. E. (Ed.), Nontraditional Families. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 139–71.Google Scholar
Sagi, A. (1982). Antecedents and consequences of various degrees of paternal involvement in childrearing: The Israeli project. In Lamb, M. E. (Ed.), Nontraditional Families. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 203–32.Google Scholar
Schuengel, C., IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (1999). Frightening, frightened and/or dissociated behavior, unresolved loss, and infant disorganization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., Conger, R. D., & Wu, C. I. (1991). Intergenerational transmission of harsh parenting. Developmental Psychology, 27, 159–71.CrossRef
Snarey, , J. (1993). How Fathers Care for the Next Generation: A Four-decade Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, H., Steele, M., & Fonagy, P. (1996). Associations among attachment classifications of mothers, fathers, and their infants: Evidence for a relationship-specific perspective. Child Development, 67, 541–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T., Feeeman-Gallant, A., Lizotte, A., Krohn, M., & Smith, C. (2003). Linked lives: The intergenerational transmission of antisocial behaviour. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 171–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IJzendoorn, M., & Wolff, M. (1997). In search of the absent father: Meta-analysis of infant-father attachment. Child Development, 68, 604–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×