Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2009
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Principle of Sufficient ReasonA Reassessment, pp. 323 - 330Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
(1977). “Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 109–117; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
(1972). “Must God Create the Best?” Philosophical Review 81 (1972), 317–332; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1993). “Causality and Determination.” In and (eds.), Causation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–104.Google Scholar
, and (1989). Every Planar Map Is Four-Colorable. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975). Summa Contra Gentiles; Book One: God. Translated by Anton C. Pegis. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
(1949). On Being and Essence. Translated by Armand Maurer, C. S. B. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
(1947). Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Brothers.Google Scholar
, and , eds. and trans. (1989). G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
(2001). “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 98, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). “Measures, Explanations and the Past: Should ‘Special’ Initial Conditions Be Explained?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). “Hume's Refutation of the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M. (1964). “Human Freedom and the Self,” The Lindley Lecture, Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas, pp. 3–15; reprinted in Feinberg and Shafer-Landau (2002), pp. 492–499.
, and (2001). “Insufficient Reason in the ‘New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 37 (2001), 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Paul (2001). “A Naturalistic Account of the Universe.” In . (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings. 2d ed. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–241.Google Scholar
(2002). No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
(1998). The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul (1959). “The Cosmological Argument.” In The Rationalist Annual for the Year 1959, London: Pemberton; reprinted in (ed.), The Cosmological Argument. New York: Doubleday, 1967.Google Scholar
(2001). “Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence.” Philosophy of Science 68 (Suppl.) PSA 2000, S313–S324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy. 11th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
(1996). God without the Supernatural: A Defense of Scientific Theism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1984). “An Argument against David Lewis' Theory of Possible Worlds.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999). “Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments.” Journal of Philosophical Research 24, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969). “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 66, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002a). “Divine Omniscience, Human Freedom, and Backward Causation.” Faith and Philosophy 19, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). The Divided Self of William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). “A Response to Oppy and to Davey and Clifton,” Religious Studies 38, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999). “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35 (1999), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). “Prospects for a Sound Stage-3 of Cosmological Arguments.” Religious Studies 36, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960–61). Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmann; reprinted in CD-ROM form, Charlottesville, Va.: InteLex, 2001.Google Scholar
(1987). “Two Criticisms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). “The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 561–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology.” Philo 1, 15–34; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Holland/Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
, and (1983). “The Wave Function of the Universe.” Physical Review D 28, 2960–2975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). “The Principle of Ground,” trans. Keith Hoeller. Man and World 7, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1927). “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982). “On a Revised Version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1986). The Fragments of Parmenides. Bryn Mawr, Pa.: Thomas Library, Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
(1996). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
D., and (1997). “The Cosmological Argument without the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Faith and Philosophy 14, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1973). “Necessity and the Law of Sufficient Reason – III,” Journal of the [Indian] Philosophical Association 14, 99–107.Google Scholar
, and (1976). Set Theory: With an Introduction to Descriptive Set Theory. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Leckey, Martin, and Bigelow, John (1995). “The Necessitarian Perspective: Laws as Natural Entailments.” In (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 92–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). “A Modal Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1979). The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Ithaca, N.Y./London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, Jan (1961). “O determiniźmie.” In (ed.), Z zagadnień logiki i filozofii; trans. Z. Jordan in (ed.), Polish Logic. Oxford: Clarendon, 1967.Google Scholar
Lycan, William (2002). “The Metaphysics of Possibilia.” In Gale (2002b), pp. 303–316.CrossRef
(1998). “Identity, Time, and Necessity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, David (2002). “Comments on Alexander R. Pruss's paper ‘Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit: Arguments New and Old for the Principle of Sufficient Reason.’” Paper presented at the Society for Catholic Analytical Philosophy satellite meeting at the November 2002 meeting of the American Catholic Philosophical Association in Cincinnati.
(1985). “Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory.” Physics Today, April 1985, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, Trenton (2004). “Split Brains and the Godhead.” In , , and (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.Google Scholar
(1983). “Why Ever Should Any Existing Individual Exist?” Review of Metaphysics 37, 287–326.Google Scholar
(1997). The Instability of Scepticism. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
(1998). “Whatever Comes to Be Has a Cause of Its Coming to Be: A Thomistic Defense of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” The Thomist 62, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Ed. and . Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004a). “A Restricted Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 40, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). “The Cardinality Objection to David Lewis's Modal Realism.” Philosophical Studies 104 (2001), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). “The Hume-Edwards Principle and the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43, 149–165; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972). The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
(2000a). Nature and Understanding: The Metaphysics and Method of Science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
(2000b). Kant and the Reach of Reason. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1995). Satisfying Reason: Studies in the Theory of Knowledge. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). G. W. Leibniz's Monadology: An Edition for Students. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). “Rationalistic Theology and Some Principles of Explanation.” Faith and Philosophy 1, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970). “Two Criticisms of the Cosmological Argument.” The Monist 54, 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). “Leibniz's Principle of Intelligibility.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 9, 35–49.Google Scholar
(2001). “‘The Transition from Sensibility to Reason In Regressu’: Indeterminism in Kant's Reflexionen.” Kant-Studien 92, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Quentin (2002). “The Incompatibility of STR and the Tensed Theory of Time.” In (ed.), The Importance of Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
(1995). “A Defense of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994a). “Stephen Hawking's Cosmology and Theism.” Analysis 54, 236–243; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
(1969). “A Philosopher Looks at Science.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 7, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). “On the Alleged Causeless Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Dialogue 33, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard G. (1968). “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43 (1968), pp. 199–212; reprinted in Baruch A. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Religion: An Analytic Approach. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, pp. 189–201.CrossRef
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (2003). “The Many-Universes Solution to the Problem of Evil.” In Gale and Pruss (2003), pp. 143–159.
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (1994). Cosmoi: The Best of All Possible Worlds. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1994.
(1997). “On an Insufficient Argument against Sufficient Reason.” Ratio (new series) 10, 76–81.Google Scholar
(1979). “An Argument for God's Existence.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). “Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 109–117; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
(1972). “Must God Create the Best?” Philosophical Review 81 (1972), 317–332; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1993). “Causality and Determination.” In and (eds.), Causation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–104.Google Scholar
, and (1989). Every Planar Map Is Four-Colorable. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975). Summa Contra Gentiles; Book One: God. Translated by Anton C. Pegis. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
(1949). On Being and Essence. Translated by Armand Maurer, C. S. B. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
(1947). Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Brothers.Google Scholar
, and , eds. and trans. (1989). G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
(2001). “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 98, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). “Measures, Explanations and the Past: Should ‘Special’ Initial Conditions Be Explained?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). “Hume's Refutation of the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M. (1964). “Human Freedom and the Self,” The Lindley Lecture, Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas, pp. 3–15; reprinted in Feinberg and Shafer-Landau (2002), pp. 492–499.
, and (2001). “Insufficient Reason in the ‘New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 37 (2001), 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Paul (2001). “A Naturalistic Account of the Universe.” In . (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings. 2d ed. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–241.Google Scholar
(2002). No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
(1998). The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul (1959). “The Cosmological Argument.” In The Rationalist Annual for the Year 1959, London: Pemberton; reprinted in (ed.), The Cosmological Argument. New York: Doubleday, 1967.Google Scholar
(2001). “Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence.” Philosophy of Science 68 (Suppl.) PSA 2000, S313–S324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy. 11th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
(1996). God without the Supernatural: A Defense of Scientific Theism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1984). “An Argument against David Lewis' Theory of Possible Worlds.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999). “Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments.” Journal of Philosophical Research 24, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969). “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 66, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002a). “Divine Omniscience, Human Freedom, and Backward Causation.” Faith and Philosophy 19, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). The Divided Self of William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). “A Response to Oppy and to Davey and Clifton,” Religious Studies 38, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999). “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35 (1999), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). “Prospects for a Sound Stage-3 of Cosmological Arguments.” Religious Studies 36, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960–61). Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmann; reprinted in CD-ROM form, Charlottesville, Va.: InteLex, 2001.Google Scholar
(1987). “Two Criticisms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). “The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 561–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology.” Philo 1, 15–34; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Holland/Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
, and (1983). “The Wave Function of the Universe.” Physical Review D 28, 2960–2975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). “The Principle of Ground,” trans. Keith Hoeller. Man and World 7, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1927). “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982). “On a Revised Version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1986). The Fragments of Parmenides. Bryn Mawr, Pa.: Thomas Library, Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
(1996). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
D., and (1997). “The Cosmological Argument without the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Faith and Philosophy 14, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1973). “Necessity and the Law of Sufficient Reason – III,” Journal of the [Indian] Philosophical Association 14, 99–107.Google Scholar
, and (1976). Set Theory: With an Introduction to Descriptive Set Theory. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Leckey, Martin, and Bigelow, John (1995). “The Necessitarian Perspective: Laws as Natural Entailments.” In (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 92–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). “A Modal Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1979). The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Ithaca, N.Y./London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, Jan (1961). “O determiniźmie.” In (ed.), Z zagadnień logiki i filozofii; trans. Z. Jordan in (ed.), Polish Logic. Oxford: Clarendon, 1967.Google Scholar
Lycan, William (2002). “The Metaphysics of Possibilia.” In Gale (2002b), pp. 303–316.CrossRef
(1998). “Identity, Time, and Necessity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, David (2002). “Comments on Alexander R. Pruss's paper ‘Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit: Arguments New and Old for the Principle of Sufficient Reason.’” Paper presented at the Society for Catholic Analytical Philosophy satellite meeting at the November 2002 meeting of the American Catholic Philosophical Association in Cincinnati.
(1985). “Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory.” Physics Today, April 1985, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, Trenton (2004). “Split Brains and the Godhead.” In , , and (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.Google Scholar
(1983). “Why Ever Should Any Existing Individual Exist?” Review of Metaphysics 37, 287–326.Google Scholar
(1997). The Instability of Scepticism. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
(1998). “Whatever Comes to Be Has a Cause of Its Coming to Be: A Thomistic Defense of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” The Thomist 62, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Ed. and . Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004a). “A Restricted Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 40, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). “The Cardinality Objection to David Lewis's Modal Realism.” Philosophical Studies 104 (2001), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). “The Hume-Edwards Principle and the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43, 149–165; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972). The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
(2000a). Nature and Understanding: The Metaphysics and Method of Science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
(2000b). Kant and the Reach of Reason. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1995). Satisfying Reason: Studies in the Theory of Knowledge. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). G. W. Leibniz's Monadology: An Edition for Students. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). “Rationalistic Theology and Some Principles of Explanation.” Faith and Philosophy 1, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970). “Two Criticisms of the Cosmological Argument.” The Monist 54, 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). “Leibniz's Principle of Intelligibility.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 9, 35–49.Google Scholar
(2001). “‘The Transition from Sensibility to Reason In Regressu’: Indeterminism in Kant's Reflexionen.” Kant-Studien 92, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Quentin (2002). “The Incompatibility of STR and the Tensed Theory of Time.” In (ed.), The Importance of Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
(1995). “A Defense of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994a). “Stephen Hawking's Cosmology and Theism.” Analysis 54, 236–243; reprinted in Gale and Pruss (2003).Google Scholar
(1969). “A Philosopher Looks at Science.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 7, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). “On the Alleged Causeless Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Dialogue 33, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard G. (1968). “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43 (1968), pp. 199–212; reprinted in Baruch A. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Religion: An Analytic Approach. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, pp. 189–201.CrossRef
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (2003). “The Many-Universes Solution to the Problem of Evil.” In Gale and Pruss (2003), pp. 143–159.
Turner, Donald Albert, Jr. (1994). Cosmoi: The Best of All Possible Worlds. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1994.
(1997). “On an Insufficient Argument against Sufficient Reason.” Ratio (new series) 10, 76–81.Google Scholar
(1979). “An Argument for God's Existence.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar