Kant, I., Kants Gesammelte Schriften [Kant's Collected Writings, Akademie Edition], vols. 1–29 (Berlin: DeGruyter/Reimer, 1902–). Citations to Kant's works that are not otherwise referenced are to this edition.

Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp Smith, trans. (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Kant, I., Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, P. Carus, trans. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1977).Google Scholar

Kant, I., Critique of Judgment, W. Pluhar, trans.(Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987).Google Scholar

Kant, I., Lectures on Logic, M. Young, trans.(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, M. J. Gregor, trans.(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, P. Guyer and A. Wood, trans. and eds.(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason, M. J. Gregor, trans.(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I., Critique of the Power of Judgment, P. Guyer and E. Matthews, trans. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I., Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime, J. T. Goldthwait, trans.(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Allison, H. E., Kant's Transcendental Idealism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983, 2004).Google Scholar

Allison, H. E., Kant's Theory of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, H. E., “Is the Critique of Judgment Post-Critical?” in The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy, Sedgwick, Sally, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Allison, H. E., Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, H. E., “Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg,” Inquiry 46 no. 2 (2003): 182–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, K., “New Views on Kant's Judgment of Taste,” in Kant's Ästhetik, , H. Parret, ed. (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998).Google Scholar

Ameriks, K., Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, K., “On Being Neither Post- Nor Anti-Kantian,” Inquiry 46 no. 2 (2003): 272–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariew, R. and Garber, D., G. W. Leibniz, Philosophical Essays (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Metaphysics, J. Annas, ed. and trans. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Ayers, M., Locke (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

Bennett, J., Kant's Analytic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Berkeley, G., Principles of Human Knowledge, , H. Robinson, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. M., The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Brandom, R., Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Brittan, G. Jr., “Kant's Two Grand Hypotheses,” in Kant's Philosophy of Physical Science, , R. E. Butts, ed.(Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986).Google Scholar

Broughton, J., “Explaining General Ideas,” Hume Studies 26 no. 2 (2000): 279–89.Google Scholar

Budd., M., “The Pure Judgment of Taste as an Aesthetic Reflective Judgment,” British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2001): 247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, T. and Guyer, P. (eds.), Essays in Kant's Aesthetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Crawford, D., Kant's Aesthetic Theory (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, D., “The Unity of Kant's Critical Philosophy,” in The Emergence of German Idealism, , M. Baur and , D. O. Dahlstrom, eds. (Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Davidson, D., “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,” in Essays on Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Davidson, D., “Intellectual Autobiography,” in The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, , L. Hahn, ed. (Peru, IL: Open Court, 1999).Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., Kant's Critical Philosophy, H. Tomilson and B. Habberjam, trans. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990).Google Scholar

de Man, P., “Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant,” in The Textual Sublime, , H. Silverman and , G. Aylesworth, eds. (Albany: SUNY Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Descartes, R., Meditations on First Philosophy, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. II, J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch, trans. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Elgin, C. Z., Considered Judgment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Forbes, G., “Skepticism and Semantic Knowledge,” in Rule-Following and Meaning, , A. Miller and , C. Wright, eds. (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, 2002).Google Scholar

Förster, E., Kant's Final Synthesis (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Foucault, M., “Qu'est-ce que les lumières?” in Foucault, Dits et Ecrits, D. Defert and F. Ewald, eds. (Paris: Gallimard, 4 vols., 1994), IV, 562–78.Google Scholar

Friedman, M., Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G., Truth and Method, 2nd rev. ed. (New York: Crossroads, 1992).Google Scholar

Gardner, S., Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason (New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Garrett, D., Cognition and Commitment in Hume's Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Gasché, R., The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant's Aesthetics (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Ginsborg, H., The Role of Taste in Kant's Theory of Cognition (New York: Garland, 1990a).Google Scholar

Ginsborg, H., “Reflective Judgment and Taste,” Noûs 24 (1990b): 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, H., “On the Key to the Critique of Taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1991): 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, H., “Lawfulness without a Law,” Philosophical Topics 25 no. 1 (1997a): 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, H., “Kant on Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in Reclaiming the History of Ethics, , A. Reath, , B. Herman, and , C. Korsgaard, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997b).Google Scholar

Ginsborg, H., “Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure,” Inquiry 46 no. 2 (2003): 164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, N., Languages of Art (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1968).Google Scholar

Goodman, N., Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1978).Google Scholar

Gracyk, T., “Sublimity, Ugliness, and Formlessness in Kant's Aesthetic Theory,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (1986): 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., Kant and the Claims of Taste (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Guyer, P., Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity,” Noûs 24 (1990a): 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., “Kant's Conception of Empirical Law,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 64 (1990b): 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., “Kant's Conception of Fine Art,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (1994): 175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., Kant and the Experience of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Guyer, P., Kant and the Claims of Taste, 2nd rev. ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997a).Google Scholar

Guyer, P., “From Jupiter's Eagle to Warhol's Boxes: The Concept of Art from Kant to Danto,” Philosophical Topics 25 (1997b): 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., “The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant's Conception of the System of Philosophy,” in The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy, S. Sedgwick, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000a).Google Scholar

Guyer, P., Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., “The Form and Matter of the Categorical Imperative,” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, , V. Gerhardt, , R. Horstman, and , R. Schumacher, eds. (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001a).Google Scholar

Guyer, P., “From Nature to Morality: Kant's New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’,” in Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants, H. F. Fulda and J. Stolzenberg, eds. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2001b).

Guyer, P., “Ends of Reason and Ends of Nature: The Place of Teleology in Kant's Ethics,” Journal of Value Inquiry 36 nos. 2/3 (2002a): 161–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., “Free and Adherent Beauty: A Modest Proposal,” British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2002b): 357–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., “Kant on the Theory and Practice of Autonomy,” in Autonomy, , E. F. Paul, , F. D. Miller, and , J. Paul, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003a).Google Scholar

Guyer, P., “Kant's Principles of Reflecting Judgment,” in Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays, , P. Guyer, ed. (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003b).Google Scholar

Guyer, P., “Kant on the Purity of the Ugly,” in Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P., Kant (New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Werke, , E. Moldenhauer and Michel, K. Markus, eds. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 20 vols., 1970–1).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit, A. V. Miller, trans. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Heidegger, M., Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 5th ed. R. Taft, trans. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Heidegger, M., Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, P. Emad and K. Maly, trans. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Henrich, D., Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World: Studies in Kant (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, , L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Johnson, M., “Imagination in Moral Judgment,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1985): 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemal, S., Kant's Aesthetic Theory, 2nd ed. (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp Smith, N., The Philosophy of David Hume (London: Macmillan, 1940).Google Scholar

Kern, A., Schöne Lust: Eine Theorie der ästhetischen Erfahrung nach Kant (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrhamp, 2000).Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C., “Reflective Endorsement,” in The Sources of Normativity, O. O'Neill, ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, R., “The Antinomies of Impure Reason: Rousseau and Kant on the Metaphysics of Truth-Telling,” Inquiry 48 no. 3 (2005): 203–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, R. and Lance, M., ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: Explorations in Pragmatism and Metaphysics, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Larmore, C., “Back to Kant? No Way,” Inquiry 46 no. 2 (2003): 260–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locke, J., An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, , R. Woolhouse, ed. (London: Penguin, 1997).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, B., Kant et le Pouvoir de Juger (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, B., Kant and the Capacity to Judge (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Longuenesse, B., “Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste,” Inquiry 46 no. 2 (2003): 154–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F., Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

MacBeth, D., “Empirical Knowledge: Kantian Themes and Sellarsian Variations,” Philosophical Studies 101, nos. 2/3 (2000): 113–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maier, A., Kants Qualitätskategorien (Berlin: Pan-Verlag Kurt Metzner GMBH, 1930).Google Scholar

Makkreel, R., Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Makkreel, R., “Kant, Dilthey, and the Idea of a Critique of Historical Judgment,” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 10 (1996): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCumber, J., The Company of Words: Hegel, Language, and Systematic Philosophy (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

McCumber, J., “Schiller, Hegel, and the Aesthetics of German Idealism,” in The Emergence of German Idealism, , M. Baur and , D. O. Dahlstrom, eds. (Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1999).Google Scholar

McCumber, J., “Making Kant Empirical: The Temporal Turn in German Idealism,” Research in Phenomenology 32 (2002): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, J., Mind and World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

McDowell, J., “Having the World in View: Kant, Sellars, and Intentionality,” Journal of Philosophy 95 no. 9 (1998): 431–50.Google Scholar

Newton, I., The Mathematical Works of Isaac Newton, vol. 1, D. Whiteside, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Norris, C., “McDowell on Kant: Redrawing the Bounds of Sense,” Metaphilosophy 31 no. 4 (2000): 382–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, C., “Kant's Changing Conception of the Causality of the Will,” International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1996): 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parsons, C., “Kant's Philosophy of Arithmetic,” in Kant on Pure Reason, , R. C. S. Walker, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Pillow, K., Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Pillow, K., “Jupiter's Eagle and the Despot's Hand Mill: Two Views on Metaphor in Kant,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (2001): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pippin, R., “The Schematism and Empirical Concepts,” Kant-Studien 67 (1976): 156–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pippin, R., Kant's Theory of Form (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Plato, , Phaedrus, R. Waterfield, trans. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Reinhold, K., Versuch einer neuen Theorie des menschlichen Vorstellungsvermögens (Prague and Jena, 1789).Google Scholar

Rush, F. Jr., “The Harmony of the Faculties,” Kant-Studien 92 no. 1 (2001): 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saville, A., Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writings of Lessing, Kant, and Schiller (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).Google Scholar

Schaper, E., “Free and Dependent Beauty,” in Studies in Kant's Aesthetics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Schiller, F., On the Aesthetic Education of Man, E. M. Wilkinson and L. A. Willoughby, trans. and eds., German text with English translation facing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, A., The World as Will and Representation, E. F. J. Payne, trans. (Indian Hills: The Falcon Wing's Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Seel, G., “Über den Grund der Lust an schönen Gegenständen: Kritische Fragen an die Ästhetik Kants,” in Kant: Analysen – Probleme – Kritik,, H. Oberer and , G. Seel, eds. (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1988).Google Scholar

Sellars, W., “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar

Sellars, W., Science and Metaphysics: Variation on Kantian Themes (Atascadero: Ridgeview, 1992).Google Scholar

Silverman, H. J. and Aylesworth, G. E. (eds.), The Textual Sublime: Deconstruction and Its Differences (Albany: SUNY Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Stern, C., “Kant's Theory of Empirical Concept Formation,” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8 no. 2 (1977): 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stolzenberg, J., “Das Freie Spiel der Erkenntniskräfte: Zu Kants Theorie des Geschmacksurteils,” in Kants Schlüssel zur Kritik des Geschmacks: Ästhetische Erfahrung heute – Studien zur Aktualität von Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft, Sonderheft des Jahrgangs 2000 der Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, , U. Franke, ed. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2000).Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F., The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar

Uehling, T. E. Jr.The Notion of Form in Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (The Hague: Mouton, 1971).Google Scholar

Warren, D., Reality and Impenetrability in Kant's Philosophy of Nature (New York, Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar

Wicks, R., “Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997): 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1963).Google Scholar

Zammito, J., The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar