Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-18T02:17:52.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Kongzi and Ruism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Bryan van Norden
Affiliation:
Vassar College, New York
Get access

Summary

When it comes to reading the Analects, there are those who read it and it has absolutely no effect; there are those who read it and find one or two sentences that they like; there are those who read it and know enough to be fond of it; and there are those who read it and then are “unaware of their hands waving in accordance with it, their feet dancing in tune with it.”

– Master Cheng

When I began to read Confucius, I found him to be a prosaic and parochial moralizer; his collected sayings, the Analects, seemed to me an archaic irrelevance. Later, and with increasing force, I found him a thinker with profound insight and with an imaginative vision of man equal in its grandeur to any I know.

– Herbert Fingarette

Kǒngzǐ 孔子 (552 or 551 to 479 B.C.E.) provides the intellectual background against which all later thinkers react, and he started a movement that continues to be socially and philosophically influential more than two thousand years later. (This movement is called the Rújiā 儒家, the “School of the Ru,” in Chinese, but has traditionally been called “Confucianism” in English, after the Jesuit Latinization of Kongzi's name, “Confucius.”)

Kongzi was born into a society in crisis. The central authority of the Zhou Dynasty had disintegrated. Though there was still a Zhou king, he reigned but did not rule. Actual power had devolved upon the individual states, typically dukedoms, into which the kingdom was divided.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Kongzi and Ruism
  • Bryan van Norden, Vassar College, New York
  • Book: Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy
  • Online publication: 25 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497995.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Kongzi and Ruism
  • Bryan van Norden, Vassar College, New York
  • Book: Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy
  • Online publication: 25 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497995.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Kongzi and Ruism
  • Bryan van Norden, Vassar College, New York
  • Book: Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy
  • Online publication: 25 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497995.004
Available formats
×