Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T01:02:02.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Services post-Hong Kong – initial experiences with plurilaterals

from PART 3 - The limits of request–offer negotiations: Plurilateral and alternative approaches to services liberalisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Marion Panizzon
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Nicole Pohl
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Pierre Sauvé
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

During the first half of 2006 WTO Members held three rounds of plurilateral negotiations on services based on more than twenty plurilateral requests. Despite some talk about refocusing on bilaterals, the process has been considered useful for shedding light on technical issues and on specific negotiating positions, outlining the contours of what could be a possible package in the Doha Work Programme's (DWP) services area. In the words of Ambassador Fernando de Mateo, Chair of the Council for Trade in Services, Special Session (CTS-SS), ‘[t]he level of engagement in the plurilateral negotiations has been better than expected… The overall assessment was that the meetings were useful… [the process of] preparing and discussing collective requests has been positive.’

This chapter discusses the DWP's plurilateral services negotiations. It first looks at the Hong Kong (HK) Ministerial text on plurilaterals; secondly, it discusses the origins of services plurilaterals, including the broader context of benchmarking and the so-called failure of bilateral negotiating methods; thirdly, the paper looks at initial experiences and patterns emerging in three rounds of plurilateral meetings. The paper concludes by asking whether plurilaterals met the expectations and objectives envisaged.

The Hong Kong language on plurilaterals

WTO Members conducted plurilateral negotiations according to the HK Ministerial Declaration. Annex C of the HK text sets forth various methods for negotiating specific commitments. Before HK, no other Ministerial Declaration had resulted in a ‘services text’ with a comparable level of detail.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hardstaff, Peter, ‘Benchmarking in GATS: Exposing the EU Aggressive Service Agenda’, World Development Movement, November 2005, www.ourworldisnotforsale.org/showarticle.asp?search=943.
Jara, Alejandro and Dominguez, M. del Carmen, ‘Liberalization of Trade in Services and Trade Negotiations’, Journal of World Trade 40(1) (2006).Google Scholar
Kwa, Aileen, ‘Plurilateral Request-Offer Approaches in General Agreement on Trade in Services Draft Text: Entry Point for Dangerous Sectoral Negotiations’, Focus on the Global South, November 2005.
Mashayekhi, Mina and Türk, Elisabeth, ‘World Trade Organization Services Negotiations & Development: A Post-Hong Kong Review’, Bridges Monthly, Year 10, No. 1, pp. 3–5.
Mashayekhi, Mina and Türk, Elisabeth, ‘The World Trade Organization Services Negotiations: Some Strategic Considerations’, Working Paper No. 14, South Centre, T.R.A.D.E., January 2003.
Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘Regulatory Authorities and World Trade Organization Negotiations on Services’, Trade Policy Analyses 8(9), Cordell Hull Institute (April 2006).Google Scholar
Sauvé, Pierre and Irace, Mary, ‘The Doha Development Agenda and GATS, the Benefits of Open Services Markets’, A Report for the National Foreign Trade Council, July 2006.
Self, Richard, ‘Energizing the Negotiations on Services in the Doha Round’, Trade Policy Analyses 8(10), Cordell Hull Institute (April 2006).Google Scholar
Sinclair, Scott, ‘Crunch Time in Geneva: Benchmarks, Plurilaterals, Domestic Regulation and other Pressure Tactics in the General Agreement on Trade in Services Negotiations’, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, June 2006.
,South Centre, ‘Comments on Chairman Draft Ministerial Text on Services’, JOB(05)/262/Rev.1, November 2005, South Centre.
Thompson, Rachel, ‘Formula Approaches to Improving General Agreement on Trade in Services Commitments’, in Sauvé, Pierre and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000 – New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Brookings Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar
,UN Conference on Trade and Development, Meeting of the Trade And Development Board, October 2005, President's Summary TD/B/52/L.6.
Vastine, Robert, ‘Services Negotiations in the Doha Round: Promise and Reality’, October 2005.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×