Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:37:13.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Marc Hertogh
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Simon Halliday
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact
International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives
, pp. 285 - 301
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, S. R., Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1995)
Alon, G., ‘The Ministers Committee Granted the GSS Permission to “Make Interrogation Methods More Efficient”’, Ha'aretz, 14 November 1994
Alon, G., ‘Permits for GSS to Apply “Intensified Physical Pressures” Renewed for Three More Months’, Ha'aretz, 13 April 1995
Alon, G., ‘The Debate Concerning the Inclusion of GSS Interrogations in Statute Not Changed’, Ha'aretz, 8 September 1999, p. A-3
Alon, G., ‘A Law to Overrule the HCJ GSS Decision to be Brought before the Knesset after the Holiday’, Ha'aretz, 9 September 1999, p. A-3
Alon, G. and E. Rabin, ‘Justice Landau Says “He Feels Betrayed” by the Violations of the Rules of Conduct by the GSS’, Ha'aretz, 9 January 1995
Ayres, I. and J. Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992)
Baldwin, R. and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999)
Baldwin, R. and Hawkins, K., ‘Discretionary Justice: Davis Reconsidered’ [1984] Public Law 570Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., and Houghton, J., ‘Circular Arguments: The Status and Legitimacy of Administrative Rules’ [1985] Public Law 239Google Scholar
Barak-Erez, D., ‘Judicial Review of Politics: The Israeli Case’ (2002) 29 Journal of Law and Society 611–31
Barak-Erez, D., ‘From an Unwritten Constitution to a Written Constitution: The Israeli Challenge in American Perspective’ (1995) 26 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 309Google Scholar
Bartlett, P. and R. Sandland, Mental Health Law: Policy and Practice (London, Blackstone, 2000)
Baum, L. A., ‘Implementation of Judicial Decisions: An Organizational Analysis’ (1976) 4 American Politics Quarterly 86Google Scholar
Becker, H. and Geer, B., ‘Participant Observation and Interviewing: A Comparison’ (1957) 16 Human Organisation 28Google Scholar
Becker, T. L. (ed.), The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions: Empirical Studies (New York, Oxford University Press, 1969)
Becker, T. L. and M. M. Feeley (eds.), The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions: Empirical Studies (2nd edn, New York, Oxford University Press, 1973)
Beetham, D., Bureaucracy (2nd edn, Buckingham, Open University Press, 1996)
Ben, A., ‘PM Barak Suggests: Senior Officials Would Be Authorized to Approve “Special Interrogation Techniques” for the GSS in Cases of Immediate Danger’, Ha'aretz, 9 September 1999, p. A-3
‘Ben-Yair: Some Special Permits to GSS Investigators are Illegal’, Ha'aretz, 3 August 1995
Bennion, F., Statutory Interpretation (2nd edn, London, Butterworths, 1992)
Bickel, A. M., The Least Dangerous Branch – The Supreme Court and the Bar of Politics (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1962)
Bisharat, G. E., ‘Courting Justice? Legitimization in Lawyering under Israeli Occupation’ (1995) 20 Law and Social Inquiry 349Google Scholar
Bishop, J. Jr, ‘Control of Terrorism and Insurrection: The British Laboratory Experience’ (1978) 42 Law and Contemporary Problems 140Google Scholar
Black, J., ‘Constitutionalising Self-Regulation’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Review 24Google Scholar
Black, J., Rules and Regulators (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997)
Black, J., ‘Reviewing Regulatory Rules’ in J. Black, P. Muchlinski and P. Walker (eds.), Commercial Regulation and Judicial Review (Oxford, Hart, 1998)
Black, J., ‘Regulatory Conversations’ (2002) 29 Journal of Law and Society 163Google Scholar
Blair, P., Federalism and Judicial Review in West Germany (Oxford, Clarendon, 1981)
Bracha, B., ‘The Protection of Human Rights in Israel’ (1982) 12 Israel Yearbook of Human Rights 110Google Scholar
Bracha, B.Judicial Review of Security Powers in Israel: A New Policy of the Courts’ (1991) 28 Stanford Journal of International Law 39Google Scholar
Brewaer, P., Ethnography (Open University Press, Buckingham, 2000)
Breyer, S., ‘Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy’ (1986) 38 Administrative Law Review 363Google Scholar
Breyer, S., R. B. Stewart, C. R. Sunstein and M. L. Spitzer, Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Texts, and Cases, (4th edn, New York, Aspen Publishers, 1999)
Bridges, L., C. Game, J. McBridge, O. Lomas and S. Ranson, Legality and Local Politics (Aldershot, Gower, 1987)
Bridges, L., G. Meszaros and M. Sunkin, Judicial Review in Perspective (London, Cavendish, 1995)
Bridges, L., Meszaros, G. and Sunkin, M.Regulating Judicial Review’ [2000] Public Law 651Google Scholar
Brugger, W., ‘May Government Ever Use Torture? Two Responses from German Law’ (2000) 48 American Journal of Comparative Law 661Google Scholar
Bryant, D., ‘The Office of Master in Chancery: Colonial Development’ (1954) 48 American Bar Association Journal 595Google Scholar
Bryant, D., ‘The Office of Master of Chancery: Early English Development’ (1954) 40 American Bar Association Journal 498Google Scholar
B'Tselem (the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories), The Interrogation of Palestinians During the Intifada: Ill-Treatment, ‘Moderate Physical Pressure’ or Torture: Comprehensive Report 1991 (Jerusalem, IICHROT, 1991)
B'Tselem The Death of Mustafa Barakat (Jerusalem, IICHROT, 1992)
B'Tselem Torture During Interrogations: Testimony of Palestinian Detainees, Testimony of Interrogators (Jerusalem, IICHROT, 1994)
B'Tselem Legitimizing Torture (Jerusalem, IICHROT, 1997)
Buck, T., ‘Judicial Review and the Discretionary Social Fund’ in T. Buck (ed.), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London, Pinter, 1998)
Buck, T., The Social Fund (2nd edn, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2000)
Bulmer, M., ‘Facts, Concepts, Theories and Problems’ in M. Bulmer (ed.), Social Research Methods (London, Macmillan, 1984)
Bumiller, K., The Civil Rights Society (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, l984)
Burger, C., ‘Away from the Courthouse and into the Field: The Odyssey of a Special Master’ (1978) 78 Colorado Law Review 707Google Scholar
Campbell, A., and Glass, K. C., ‘The Legal Status of Clinical and Ethics Policies, Codes, and Guidelines in Medical Practice and Research’ (2001) 46 McGill Law Journal 473Google Scholar
Campbell, T., K. D. Ewing and A. Tomkins, Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)
Cane, P., ‘Merits Review and Judicial Review: The AAT as Trojan Horse’ (2000) 28 Federal Law Review 213Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, B., ‘Bureaucratic Decisions and the Composition of Lower Courts’ (2003) 47 American Journal of Political Science 205Google Scholar
Canon, B. C., ‘Is the Exclusionary Rule in Failing Health? Some New Data and a Plea Against a Precipitous Conclusion’ (1974) 62 Kentucky Law Journal 651Google Scholar
Canon, B. C., ‘Courts and Policy: Compliance, Implementation and Impact’ in J. B. Gates and C. A. Johnson (eds.), The American Courts: A Critical Assessment (Washington, DC, CQ Press, 1991)
Canon, B. C. and C. A. Johnson, Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact (2nd edn, Washington, DC, CQ Press, 1999)
Cassels, J., ‘Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation in India: Attempting the Impossible?’ (1989) 37 American Journal of Comparative Law 495Google Scholar
Chilton, B., Prisons Under the Gavel: The Federal Court Takeover of Georgia Prisons (Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 1991)
Clark, M. L., ‘Note: Israel's High Court of Justice Ruling on the General Security Service Use of “Moderate Physical Pressure”: An End to the Sanctioned Use of Torture?’ (2000) 11 Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 145Google Scholar
Collins, H., Marxism and Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1982)
Cooper, D., ‘Local Government Legal Consciousness in the Shadow of Juridification’ (1995) 4 Journal of Law and Society 506Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R., ‘Judicial Review and Legal Theory’ in Richardson and H. G. Genn (eds.), Administrative Law and Government Action (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994)
Craig, P., Administrative Law (4th edn, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1998)
Cranston, R., ‘Reviewing Judicial Review’ in G. Richardson and H. Genn (eds.), Administrative Law and Government Action (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994)
Creyke, R. and J. McMillan (eds.), The Kerr Vision of Australian Administrative Law – At the Twenty-Five Year Mark (Canberra, ANU Centre for International and Public Law, 1998)
Creyke, R., and McMillan, J.Executive Perceptions of Administrative Law – An Empirical Study’ (2002) 9 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 163Google Scholar
Creyke, R., J. McMillan and D. Pearce, ‘Success at Court – Does the Client Win?’ in J. McMillan (ed.), Administrative Law under the Coalition Government (Canberra, Australian Institute of Administrative Law, 1997)
Crouch, B. W. and J. Marquart, ‘Ruiz: Intervention and Emergent Order in Texas Prisons’ in J. J. DiIulio (ed.), Courts, Corrections and the Constitution: The Impact of Judicial Intervention in Prisons and Jails (New York, Oxford University Press, 1990)
Curtis, L., ‘The Vision Splendid: A Time for Re-appraisal’ in R. Creyke and J. McMillan (eds.), The Kerr Vision of Australian Administrative Law – At the Twenty-Five Year Mark (Canberra, ANU Centre for International and Public Law, 1998)
Daintith, T. and A. Page, The Executive in the Constitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press 1999)
Davis, K. C., Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 1969)
De Smith, S. A., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (4th edn, London, J. M. Evans, 1980)
De Smith, S. A., H. Woolf and J. A. Jowell, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th edn, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1995)
De Waard, B. (ed.), Negotiated Decision-Making (The Hague, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2000)
Denscombe, M., The Good Research Guide (Buckingham, Open University Press, 1998)
Dershowitz, A. M., ‘Is It Necessary to Apply “Physical Pressure” to Terrorists and to Lie about It?’ (1989) 23 Israeli Law Review 192Google Scholar
des Rosier, N. and Feldthussen, B., ‘Discretion in Social Assistance Legislation’ (1992) 8 Journal of Law and Social Policy 204Google Scholar
Desai, A. H. and S. Muralidhar, ‘Public Interest Litigation: Potential and Problems’ in B. N. Kirpal (ed.), Supreme But Not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of India (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000)
Dewees, D., D. Duff and M. Trebilcock, Exploring the Domain of Accident Law: Taking the Facts Seriously (New York, Oxford University Press, 1996)
Dicey, A. V., An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th edn, New York, St Martin's Press, 1959)
Dolbeare, K. M. and P. E. Hammond, The School Prayer Decisions: From Court Policy to Local Practice (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971)
Dotan, Y., ‘Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers and Human Rights: The Case of the High Court of Justice During the Intifada’ (1999) 33 Law and Society Review 319Google Scholar
Dotan, Y., ‘Public Lawyers and Private Clients: An Empirical Observation on the Relative Success Rates of Cause Lawyers’ (1999) 21 Law and Policy 401Google Scholar
Dotan, Y., ‘Judicial Accountability in Israel: The High Court of Justice and the Phenomenon of Judicial Hyperactivism’ (2002) 8 Israel Studies 87Google Scholar
Dotan, Y. and Hofnung, M., ‘Interest Groups in the High Court of Justice: Measuring Success in Litigation and in Out-of-Court Settlements’ (2001) 23 Law and Policy 1Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Constituting the Rule of Law: Fundamental Values in Administrative Law’ (2002) 27 Queen's Law Journal 445Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Taggart, M., ‘The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalization as Constitutionalization’ (2001) 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 5Google Scholar
Eastman, N. and J. Peay, Law Without Enforcement: Integrating Mental Health and Justice (Oxford, Hart, 1999)
Edelman, L. B., ‘Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law’ (1992) 95 American Journal of Sociology 1401Google Scholar
Edgeworth, B., Law, Modernity, Postmodernity: Legal Change in the Contracting State (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2003)
Ehrlich, E., Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (New Brunswick, NJ, and London, Transaction Publishers, 2002)
Ekland-Olson, S. and Martin, S. J., ‘Organizational Compliance with Court-Ordered Reform’ (1988) 22 Law and Society Review 359Google Scholar
Estreicher, S. and Revesz, R. L., ‘Nonacquiescence by Federal Administrative Agencies’ (1989) 98 Yale Law Journal 679Google Scholar
Ewick, P. and S. Silbey, The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1998)
Feeley, M. M., ‘“Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors”: Review of The Hollow Hope’ (1992) 17 Law and Social Inquiry 745Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. and E. L. Rubin, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons (New York, Cambridge University Press, 1998)
Feldman, D., ‘Judicial Review: A Way of Controlling Government?’ (1988) 66 Public Administration 21Google Scholar
Feller, S. Z., ‘Not Actual “Necessity” But Possibly “Justification”; Not “Moderate” Pressure, But Either “Unlimited” or Not at All’ (1989) 23 Israeli Law Review 201Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. F. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart, Oxford, 2000)
Francis, J. G., The Politics of Regulation: A Comparative Perspective (Oxford, Blackwell, 1993)
Fredman, S., ‘Scepticism Under Scrutiny: Labour Law and Human Rights’ in T. Campbell, K. D. Ewing and A. Tomkins (eds.), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)
Freedman, J. O., Crisis and Legitimacy: The Administrative Process and American Government (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978)
Friedman, A., ‘Antidiscrimination Law: The View from 1989’ in David Kairys (ed.), The Politics of Law (New York, Pantheon Books, 1990)
Gageler, S.,‘The Underpinnings of Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Common Law or Constitution’ (2000) 28 Federal Law Review 303Google Scholar
Galanter, M., ‘The Radiating Effects of Courts’ in K. O. Boyum and L. Mather (eds.), Empirical Theories about Courts (New York, Longman, 1983)
Galligan, D., Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986)
Galligan, D., Due Process and Fair Procedures (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996)
Gambitta, R., ‘Litigation, Judicial Deference and Policy Change’ in R. Gambitta, M. May and J. Foster (eds.), Governing Through Courts (New York, Sage, 1981)
Ganz, G., Quasi-Legislation: Recent Developments in Secondary Legislation (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1987)
Goldsmith (Lord), ‘New Constitutional Boundaries’ (paper delivered by the Attorney General to a Government Legal Service Conference on Current Developments in Administrative Law, London, 22 March 2002)
Gordon, L., Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare (Toronto, The Free Press, 1994)
Griffith, J., ‘The Political Constitution’ (1979) 42 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar
Griffiths, J., ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ (1986) 24 Journal of Legal Pluralism 1–55
Gunther, G., ‘The Subtle Vices of the “Passive Virtues” – A Comment on Principle and Expediency in Judicial Review’ (1964) 64 Columbia Law Review 1Google Scholar
Hadfield, B. and Weaver, E., ‘Trends in Judicial Review in Northern Ireland’ [1993] Public Law 12Google Scholar
Hajjar, L., ‘Cause Lawyering in Transnational Perspective: National Conflict and Human Rights in Israel/Palestine’ (1997) 31 Law and Society Review 473Google Scholar
Halliday, S., ‘Researching the Impact of Judicial Review on Routine Administrative Decision-Making’ in D. Cowan (ed.), Housing, Participation and Exclusion (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1998)
Halliday, S., ‘The Influence of Judicial Review on Bureaucratic Decision-Making’ [2000] Public Law 110Google Scholar
Halliday, S., ‘Internal Review and Administrative Justice’ (2001) 23 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 473Google Scholar
Halliday, S., Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law (Oxford, Hart, 2004)
Hammersley, M. and P. Atkinson, Ethnography: Principles in Practice (2nd edn, London, Routledge, 1995)
Hammond, A., ‘Judicial Review: The Continuing Interplay Between Law and Policy’ [1998] Public Law 34Google Scholar
Handler, J., The Conditions of Discretion: Autonomy, Community Bureaucracy (New York, Russell Sage, 1986)
Handler, J., ‘Dependent People, the State and the Modern/Postmodern Search for the Dialogic Community’ (1988) 35 UCLA Law Review 999Google Scholar
Harel, A., ‘Criticism by the GSS: We Were Left with Responsibility But No Power’, Ha'aretz, 8 September 1999
Harel, A., ‘The GSS Used “Exceptional Methods of Interrogation” in 90 Cases since the HCJ Ruling in 1999’, Ha'aretz, 25 July 2002
Harlow, C., ‘Administrative Reaction to Judicial Review’ [1976] Public Law 116Google Scholar
Harlow, C. and R. Rawlings, Pressure Through Law (London, Routledge, 1992)
Harlow, C. and R. Rawlings, Law and Administration (2nd edn, London, Butterworths, 1997)
Hawkins, K., Environment and Enforcement (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984)
Hawkins, K., ‘The Uses of Legal Discretion: Perspectives from Law and Social Science’ in K. Hawkins (ed.), The Uses of Discretion (Oxford, Clarendon, 1992)
Hawkins, K., Law as a Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002)
Hawkins, K. and J. Thomas, Enforcing Regulation (Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1984)
Hay, D., ‘Property, Authority, and Criminal Justice’ in D. Hay (ed.), Albion's Fatal Tree (New York, Pantheon, 1973)
Hennesey, P., Whitehall (2nd edn, London, Fontana, 1990)
Hertogh, M., ‘Coercion, Cooperation, and Control: Understanding the Policy Impact of Administrative Courts and the Ombudsman in the Netherlands’ (2001) 23 Law and Policy 47Google Scholar
Hertogh, M., ‘The Living Rechtsstaat: A Bottom-Up Approach to Legal Ideals and Social Reality’ in W. van der Burg and S. Taekema (eds.), The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality, and Politics (New York, Peter Lang, forthcoming 2004)
Hiebert, J., ‘Determining the Limits of Charter Rights: How Much Discretion Do Governments Retain?’ (Toronto University, PhD Dissertation, 1991)
Hofnung, M., Democracy, Law and National Security in Israel (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1996)
Hogg, P. and Bushell, A., ‘The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing After All)’ (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 75Google Scholar
Hood, C., C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation Inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999)
Houle, F., “La zone fictive de l'infra-droit: l'integration des regles administratives dans la categorie des texts reglementaires” (2001) 47 McGill Law Journal 161Google Scholar
Hunter, S. and R. W. Waterman, Enforcing the Law: The Case of the Clean Water Acts (Armonk, NY, M. E. Sharpe, 1996)
Hutter, B., Compliance: Regulation and Environment (Oxford, Clarendon, 1997)
James, S., ‘The Political and Administrative Consequences of Judicial Review’ (1996) 74 Public Administration 613Google Scholar
Janisch, H., ‘The Choice of Decision-Making Method: Adjudication, Policies and Rule-Making’ in Administrative Law: Principles, Practices and Pluralism (Scarborough, Ont., Carswell, 1992)
Joerges, C. and Neyer, J., ‘From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal 273Google Scholar
Johnson, C. A., ‘Judicial Decisions and Organizational Change’ (1979) 11 Administration and Society 27Google Scholar
Johnson, R., The Dynamics of Compliance (Evanston IL, Northwestern University Press, 1967)
Jowell, J., ‘The Rule of Law Today’ in J. Jowell and D. Oliver (eds.), The Changing Constitution (4th edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000)
‘Judge Over Your Shoulder: Judicial Review: Balancing the Scales’ (Cabinet Office, London, 1994)
Kadish, S., ‘Torture, the State and the Individual’ (1989) 23 Israeli Law Review 343Google Scholar
Kagan, R. A., Regulatory Justice: Implementing a Wage-Price Freeze (New York, Russell Sage, 1978)
Kagan, R. A., ‘Adversarial Legalism and American Government’ in M. Landy and M. A. Levin (eds.), The New Politics of Public Policy (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995)
Kagan, R. A., Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2001)
Katzmann, R., Institutional Disability: The Saga of Transportation Policy for the Handicapped (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 1986)
Kelly, J., ‘Bureaucratic Activism and the Charter of Rights: The Department of Justice and Its Entry into the Centre of Government’ (1999) 42 Canadian Public Administration 478Google Scholar
Kerr, J. R., Commonwealth Administrative Review Committee Report August 1971, Parliamentary Paper No. 144 of 1972 (Canberra, Government Press, 1971)
Kerry, M., ‘Administrative Law and Judicial Review’ (1986) 64 Public Administration 163Google Scholar
Kimerling, B., ‘Bagatz Should Withdraw from the Occupied Territories’, Ha'aretz, 29 January 1993, p. B-3
King, M., ‘The “Truth” about Autopoiesis’ (1993) 20 Journal of Law and Society 218Google Scholar
Kirp, D. L. and Babcock, G., ‘Judge and Company: Court-Appointed Masters, School Desegregation, and Institutional Reform’ (1981) 32 Alabama Law Review 313Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. (ed.), Modern Governance: New Government–Society Interactions (London, Sage Publications, 1993)
Kremnitzer, M., ‘The Landau Commission Report – Was the Security Service Subordinated to the Law, or the Law to the “Needs” of the Security Service?’ (1989) 23 Israeli Law Review 216Google Scholar
Kremnitzer, M. and Segev, R., ‘Using Force During Investigations by the GSS – The Lesser Evil?’ (1998) 4 Mishpat Umimshal 667 (Hebrew)Google Scholar
Kretzmer, D., ‘Judicial Review of Demolition and Sealing of Houses in the Occupied Territories’ in I. Zamir (ed.), Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, Harry Sacher Institute, 1993) (Hebrew)
Kuttab, J., ‘Avenues Open for Defence of Human Rights in the Israeli Occupied Territories’ in E. Playfair (ed.), International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories: Two Decades of Israeli Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992)
Leading Cases’ (2001) 115 Harvard Law Review 518
Lempert, R., ‘Strategies of Research Design in the Legal Impact Study: The Control of Plausible Rival Hypotheses’ (1966) 1 Law and Society Review 111Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. and Verhoeven, A., ‘Toward a Legal Framework for Executive Rule-Making in the EU? The Contribution of the New Comitology Decision’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 645Google Scholar
Leo, R. A., ‘Miranda's Revenge: Police Interrogation as a Confidence Game’ (1996) 30 Law and Society Review 259Google Scholar
Levine, D. I., ‘The Authority for the Appointment of Remedial Special Masters in Federal Institutional Reform Litigation: The History Reconsidered’ (1984) 17 University of California Davis Law Review 753Google Scholar
Lipsky, M., Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York, Russell Sage, 1980)
Little, M., No Car, No Radio, No Liquor Permit: The Moral Regulation of Single Mothers in Ontario, 1920–1997 (Toronto, Oxford University Press, 1998)
Little, M. and Morrison, I., ‘The Pecker Detectors are Back’ (1999) 34 Journal of Canadian Studies 110Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., ‘The Changing Face of Prison Discipline’ in E. Player and M. Jenkins (eds.), Prisons After Woolf: Reform Through Riot (London, Routledge, 1994)
Livingstone, S., ‘The Impact of Judicial Review on Prisons’ in B. Hadfield (ed.), Judicial Review: A Thematic Approach (Dublin, Gill and Macmillan, 1995)
Livingstone, S. and T. Owen, Prison Law (2nd edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999)
Loughlin, M., Public Law and Political Theory (Oxford, Clarendon, 1992)
Loughlin, M.The Underside of the Law: Judicial Review and the Prison Disciplinary System’ (1993) 46 Current Legal Problems 43Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., Legality and Locality: The Role of Law in Central–Local Government Relations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996)
Loughlin, M. and Quinn, P. M., ‘Prisons, Rules and Courts: A Study in Administrative Law’ (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 497Google Scholar
Loveland, I. D., Housing Homeless Persons: Administrative Law and the Administrative Process (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995)
Luhmann, N., Social Systems (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1995; originally published in German, 1984)
Majone, G., ‘Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance’ (2001) 2 European Union Politics 103Google Scholar
Maranville, D., ‘Nonacquiescence: Outlaw Agencies, Imperial Courts and the Perils of Pluralism’ (1986) 39 Vanderbilt Law Review 471Google Scholar
Mashaw, J., Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983)
Mashaw, J., Due Process in the Administrative State (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1985)
Mashaw, J., Greed, Chaos and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997)
Mashaw, J., ‘Small Things Like Reasons Are Put in a Jar: Reason and Legitimacy in the Administrative State’ (2001) 70 Fordham Law Review 17–35
Mashaw, J. and D. Harfst, The Struggle for Auto Safety (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1990)
Mason, A., ‘Administrative Law Reform: The Vision and the Reality’ (2001) 8 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 135Google Scholar
Mautner, M., The Decline of Formalism and the Rise of Values in Israeli Law (Tel Aviv, Dyonon, 1994) (Hebrew)
McBarnet, D. and C. Whelan, ‘The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control’ (1991) 54 Modern Law Review 848–73
McCann, M. W., ‘“Reform Litigation on Trial”: Review of The Hollow Hope’ (1992) 17 Law and Social Inquiry 715Google Scholar
McCann, M. W., Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (Chicago, University of Chicago, 1994)
McCann, M. W., ‘Causal Versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being So Positive …)’ (1996) 21 Law and Social Inquiry 457Google Scholar
McCann, M. W., ‘Law and Political Struggles for Social Change: Puzzles, Paradoxes, and Promises in Future Research’ in D. A. Schultz (ed.), Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change (New York, Peter Lang, 1998)
McCubbins, M. D. and Schwartz, T., ‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms’ (1984) 28 American Journal of Political Science 165Google Scholar
Medalie, R., Zeitz, L. and Alexander, P., ‘Custodial Interrogation in Our Nation's Capital: The Attempt to Implement Miranda’ (1968) 66 Michigan Law Review 1347Google Scholar
Melnick, R. Shep, Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 1983)
Melnick, R. Shep, Between the Lines Interpreting Welfare Rights (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 1994)
Merrill, T. and Hickman, K., ‘Chevrons Domain’ (2001) 89 Georgetown Law Journal 833Google Scholar
Mezey, S., No Longer Disabled: The Federal Courts and the Politics of Social Security Disability (New York, Greenwood Press, 1988)
Mezey, S., Pitiful Plaintiffs: Child Welfare Litigation and the Federal Courts (Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000)
‘Ministers to Discuss a Middle Course with Ben-Yair to Enable the Extension of Special Permission to the GSS’, Ha'aretz, 6 August 1995
Moe, T., ‘The New Economics of Organization’ (1984) 28 American Journal of Economics 739Google Scholar
Morag-Levine, N., ‘The Politics of Imported Rights: Transplantation and Transformation in an Israeli Environmental Cause-Lawyering Organization’ in A. Sarat and R. S. Scheingold (eds.), Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)
Muir, W. K., Jr, Prayer in Public Schools: Law and Attitude Change (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1967)
Mullan, D., Administrative Law (Toronto, Irwin, 2001)
Mullen, T., K. Pick and T. Prosser, Judicial Review in Scotland (Chichester, Wiley, 1996)
Murphy, W., ‘Lower Court Checks on Supreme Court Power’ (1959) 53 American Political Science Review 1017Google Scholar
Nathan, V., ‘The Use of Special Masters in Institutional Reform Litigation’ (1979) 10 Toledo Law Review 464Google Scholar
Negbi, M., Justice under Occupation (Jerusalem, Kana, 1981) (Hebrew)
Nehl, H. P., Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law (Oxford, Hart, 1999)
Nir, O., ‘Harizat Died from Torture – A Well-Known Method of the GSS’, Ha'aretz, 30 April 1995
Obadina, D., ‘Judicial Review and Gypsy Site Provision’ in T. Buck (ed.), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London, Pinter, 1998)
Ogus, A. I., Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994)
Leary, R., ‘The Impact of Federal Court Decisions on the Policies and Administration of the US Environmental Protection Agency’ (1989) 41 Administrative Law Review 569Google Scholar
Patric, G., ‘The Impact of a Court Decision: Aftermath of the McCullom Case’ (1957) 6 Journal of Public Law 455Google Scholar
Peay, J., Decisions and Dilemmas: Working with Mental Health Law (Oxford, Hart, 2003)
Pressman, J. and A. Wildavsky, Implementation (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1975)
Prosser, T., ‘Politics and Judicial Review: The Atkinson Case and its Aftermath’ [1979] Public Law 59Google Scholar
Prosser, T., Test Cases for the Poor: Legal Techniques in the Politics of Social Welfare (London, Child Poverty Action Group, 1983)
Public Law Project, The Impact of the Human Rights Act on Judicial Review: An Empirical Research Study (Oxford, Nuffield Foundation, 2003)
Rawlings, R., ‘Litigation as Political Action’ in I. Loveland (ed.), A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996)
Regular, A., ‘The Poetics of Shaking’, Kol Ha'ir, 11 September 2001
Reinfeld, M., Y. Melman and M. Nesher, ‘Mordechei Kedar, “Mr X”, Petitioned the HCJ Demanding a Re-trial’, Ha'aretz, 5 January 1996
Richardson, G., Law, Process and Custody: Prisoners and Patients (London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1993)
Richardson, G. and Machin, D., ‘A Clash of Values? Mental Health Review Tribunals and Judicial Review’ (1999) 1 Journal of Mental Health Law 3Google Scholar
Richardson, G. and Machin, D., ‘Doctors on Tribunals: A Confusion of Roles’ (2000) 176 British Journal of Psychiatry 110Google Scholar
Richardson, G. and Machin, D., ‘Judicial Review and Tribunal Decision Making: A Study of the Mental Health Review Tribunal’ [2000] Public Law 494Google Scholar
Richardson, G. and Sunkin, M., ‘Judicial Review: Questions of Impact’ [1996] Public Law 79Google Scholar
Richardson, U. H., ‘Administrative Policy-Making: Rule of Law or Bureaucracy?’ in D. Dyzenhaus (ed.), Recrafting the Rule of Law (London, Oxford University Press, 1999)
Ringquist, E. J. and Emmert, C. E., ‘Judicial Policy-Making in Published and Unpublished Decisions: The Case of Environmental Civil Litigation’ (1999) 52 Political Research Quarterly 7Google Scholar
Roach, K., ‘Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues Between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures’ (2001) 80 Canadian Bar Review 481Google Scholar
Robson, P., ‘Judicial Review and Social Security’ in T. Buck (ed.), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London, Pinter, 1998)
Rodgers, H. R. Jr, and C. S. Bullock, Law and Social Change: Civil Rights Laws and Their Consequences (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1972)
Rosenberg, G. N., The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago, Chicago University, 1991)
Rosenberg, G. N., ‘Hollow Hopes and Other Aspirations: A Reply to Feeley and McCann’ (1992) 17 Law and Social Inquiry 761Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. N., ‘“Positivism, Interpretivism, and the Study of Law”: Review of Rights at Work’ (1996) 21 Law and Social Inquiry 435Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. N., ‘Knowledge and Desire: Thinking About Courts and Social Change’ in D. A. Schultz (ed.), Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change (New York, Peter Lang, 1998)
Rubinstein, A. and B. Medina, The Constitutional Law of the State of Israel (5th edn, Tel Aviv, Schocken, 1996)
Ryder, B., ‘Case Comment on Little Sisters’ (2001) 39 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 207Google Scholar
Sadurski, W., ‘Rights-Based Constitutional Review in Central and Eastern Europe’ in T. Campbell, K. D. Ewing and A. Tomkins (eds.), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)
Sadurski, W., ‘Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights’ (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 275Google Scholar
Sainsbury, W., ‘Social Security Decision-Making and Appeals: Chequered History, Uncertain Future?’ in N. Harris (ed.), Social Security Law in Context (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000)
Sathe, S. P., Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002)
Schuck, P. H., Suing Government: Citizen Remedies for Official Wrongs (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983)
Schuck, P. H. and Elliott, E. D., ‘Studying Administrative Law: A Methodology for, and Report on, New Empirical Research’ (1990) 40 Administrative Law Review 519Google Scholar
Schuck, P. H. and Elliott, E. D., ‘To the Chevron Station: An Empirical Study of Federal Administrative Law’ (1990) Duke Law Journal 984Google Scholar
Schultz, D. A. (ed.), Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change (New York, Peter Lang, 1998)
Schultz, D. A. and S. E. Gottlieb, ‘Legal Functionalism and Social Change: A Reassessment of Rosenberg's The Hollow Hope’ in D. A. Schultz (ed.), Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change (New York, Peter Lang, 1998)
Scott, C., ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’ (2000) 27 Journal of Law and Society 38Google Scholar
Shaked, R., ‘New Model of Investigation’, Yeditoth Aharonot, 7 September 1999
Shamgar, M., ‘The Observance of International Law in the Administrative Territories’ (1971) 1 Israeli Yearbook of Human Rights 262Google Scholar
Shamir, R., ‘“Landmark Cases” and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel's High Court of Justice’ (1990) 24 Law and Society Review 781Google Scholar
Shapiro, M., The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies (New York, Macmillan, 1968)
Shapiro, M., Who Guards the Guardians? Judicial Control of Administration (Athens, GA, University of Georgia Press, 1988)
Shapiro, M., ‘The European Court of Justice’ in P. Craig and G. de Búrca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999)
Shapiro, M., ‘The Institutionalization of European Administrative Space’ in A. Stone Sweet, W. Sandholtz and N. Fligstein, The Institutionalization of Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002)
Shapiro, M. and A. Stone Sweet, On Law, Politics and Judicialization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002)
Simon, W., ‘Legality, Bureaucracy and Class in the Welfare System’ (1983) 92 Yale Law Journal 1198Google Scholar
Skolnick, J., Justice Without Trial (New York, Wiley, 1966)
Slotnick, E. and J. A. Segal, Television News and the Supreme Court: All the News That's Fit to Air? (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998)
Smith, J. L. and Tiller, E., ‘The Strategy of Judging: Evidence from Administrative Law’ (2002) 31 Journal of Legal Studies 61Google Scholar
‘So What Have Our Judges Got Against Britain?’, Daily Mail, 20 February 2003
Songer, D. R., Segal, J. A. and Cameron, C. M., ‘The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal–Agent Model of Supreme Court–Circuit Court Interactions’ (1994) 38 American Journal of Political Science 673Google Scholar
Sorauf, F., ‘Zorach v. Clauson: The Impact of a Supreme Court Decision’ (1959) 53 American Political Science Review 777Google Scholar
Sossin, L., ‘The Politics of Discretion: Toward a Critical Theory of Public Administration’ (1992) 36 Canadian Public Administration 364Google Scholar
Sossin, L., ‘Redistributing Democracy: Authority, Discretion and the Possibility of Engagement in the Welfare State’ (1994) 26 Ottawa Law Review 1Google Scholar
Sossin, L., Boundaries of Judicial Review (Toronto, Carswell, 1999)
Sossin, L., ‘Regulating Virtue: A Purposive Approach to the Administration of Charities in Canada’ in J. Phillips, B. Chapman and D. Stevens (eds.), Charities: Between State and Market (Kingston, Ont., McGill-Queen's Press, 2001)
Sossin, L., ‘An Intimate Approach to Fairness, Impartiality and Reasonableness in Administrative Law’ (2002) 28 Queen's Law Journal 809Google Scholar
Sossin, L., ‘Discretion Unbound: Reconciling the Charter and Soft Law’ (2002) 45 Canadian Public Administration 465Google Scholar
Sossin, L., ‘Law and Intimacy in the Bureaucrat–Citizen Relationship’ in N. des Rosiers (ed.), No Person is an Island: Personal Relationships of Dependence and Independence (Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press, 2002)
Sossin, L., ‘Le juridique et l'intime dans le rapport entre fonctionnaires et citoyens’ in N. des Rosiers (ed.), Les rapports de dependance et d'interdependance (Quebec City, Les Presses de l'Universite Laval, 2002)
Sossin, L., ‘The Rule of Policy: Baker and the Impact of Judicial Review on Administrative Discretion’ in D. Dyzehaus et al. (eds.), The Unity of Public Law (London, Hart, 2003)
Sossin, L. and Smith, C., ‘Hard Choices and Soft Law: Ethical Codes, Policy Guidelines and the Role of the Courts in Regulating Government’ (2003) 40 Alberta Law Review 867Google Scholar
St Amand, M. G., ‘Note: Public Committee Against Torture v. The State of Israel: Landmark Human Rights Decision by the Israeli High Court of Justice or Status Quo Maintained?’ (2000) 25 North Carolina Journal of International and Commercial Regulation 655Google Scholar
Sterett, S. M., Creating Constitutionalism? The Politics of Legal Expertise and Administrative Law in England and Wales (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1997)
Stewart, R.,‘The Reformation of American Administrative Law’ (1975) 88 Harvard Law Review 1667Google Scholar
Stewart, R., ‘Vermont Yankee and the Evolution of Administrative Procedure’ (1978) 91 Harvard Law Review 1805Google Scholar
Stover, R. and Brown, D., ‘Understanding Compliance and Noncompliance with the Law: The Contributions of Utility Theory’ (1975) 56 Social Science Quarterly 363Google Scholar
Sunkin, M., ‘Judicial Review's Liveability’ (1989) Legal Action 10Google Scholar
Sunkin, M., ‘Withdrawing: A Problem in Judicial Review?’ in P. Leyland and T. Woods (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London, Blackstone Press, 1997)
Sunkin, M. and Sueur, A., ‘Can Government Control Judicial Review’ (1991) 44 Current Legal Problems 161Google Scholar
Sunkin, M. and Pick, K., ‘The Changing Impact of Judicial Review: The Independent Review Service of the Social Fund’ [2001] Public Law 753Google Scholar
Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford, Hart, 1997)
Tamanaha, B. Z., ‘The Folly of the “Social Scientific” Concept of Legal Pluralism’ (1993) 20 Journal of Law and Society 192Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’ (1983) 17 Law and Society Review 239Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the ‘Essence’ of the Legal System (Florence, European University Institute, 1987)
Teubner, G., ‘Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions’ in G. Teubner (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust and Social Welfare Law (Berlin, de Gruyter, 1987)CrossRef
Teubner, G., Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1993)
Teubner, G., A. Bankowska, R. Adler and Z. Bankowski, Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford, Blackwell, 1993)
Thompson, E. P., Whigs and Hunters (New York, Pantheon, 1977)
Tribe, L. H., American Constitutional Law (3rd edn, New York, Foundation Press, 2000)
Tushnet, M., Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999)
Tushnet, M., ‘Scepticism about Judicial Review: A Perspective from the United States’ in T. Campbell, K. D. Ewing and A. Tomkins (eds.), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001)
Vining, J., The Authoritative and the Authoritarian (Chicago, University of Chicago, 1986)
Von Hirsch, A., A. Ashworth and M. Wasik, Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew Von Hirsch (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998)
Wade, H. W. R. and C. F. Forsyth, Administrative Law (8th edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000)
Wald, M. S., Ayers, R., Hess, R., Schanz, M. and Whitebread, C., ‘Interrogations in New Haven: The Impact of Miranda’ (1967) 76 Yale Law Journal 1519Google Scholar
Walker, S. and Fridel, L., ‘The Forces of Change in Police Policy: The Impact of Tennessee v. Garner on Deadly Force Policy’ (1993) 11 American Journal of Police 97Google Scholar
Wasby, S. L., The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives (Homewood, IL, Dorsey Press, 1970)
Wasby, S. L., ‘Toward Impact Theory: An Inventory of Hypotheses’ in T. L. Becker and M. M. Feeley (eds.), The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions: Empirical Studies (2nd edn, New York, Oxford University Press, 1973)
Wasby, S. L., Small Town Police and the Supreme Court: Hearing the Word (Lexington, MA, D. C. Heath, 1976)
Waterman, R. W. and Rouse, A., ‘The Determinants of the Perceptions of Political Control of the Bureaucracy and Venues of Influence’ (1999) 9 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 527Google Scholar
Way, F. H. Jr, ‘Survey Research on Judicial Decisions: The Prayer and Bible Reading Cases’ (1968) 21 Western Political Quarterly 189Google Scholar
Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (New York, Free Press, 1947)
Wexler D. B. and B. W. Winick (eds.), Law as a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence (Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 1996)
Zamir, I., ‘Rule of Law and the Control of Terrorism’ (1998) 8 Tel Aviv University Studies in Law 81Google Scholar
Zuckerman, A., ‘Coercion and the Individual Ascertainment of the Truth’ (1989) 23 Israeli Law Review 357Google Scholar
Zysblat, A., ‘Protecting Fundamental Human Rights in Israel without a Written Constitution’ in I. Zamir and A. Zysblat (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marc Hertogh, Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands, Simon Halliday, University of Oxford
  • Book: Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact
  • Online publication: 29 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493782.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marc Hertogh, Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands, Simon Halliday, University of Oxford
  • Book: Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact
  • Online publication: 29 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493782.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marc Hertogh, Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands, Simon Halliday, University of Oxford
  • Book: Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact
  • Online publication: 29 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493782.012
Available formats
×