Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T11:23:34.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Productivity and costs in public production of services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Jørn Rattsø
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Torben M. Andersen
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Per Molander
Affiliation:
Studieförbundet Näringsliv och Samhälle
Get access

Summary

Introduction

During the last two decades there has been a global trend of management reforms in the public sector and of attempting to scale down the public sector with privatisation and contracting out of public service production. Most countries have experienced fiscal pressure and imbalance, and have had the additional motivation for reform that public sector production is assumed inefficient. Government failure has substituted for market failure as the main concern. The reforms aim at overcoming the monopoly producer model and the associated agency problems in public institutions.

The analysis of productivity and costs in public service production must be based on an understanding of the decision problems of governments. We will use the principal-agent model as a framework and two aspects are important. The first concerns the principal, basically the electorate, but represented in various forms in political institutions. Collective decisions represent a challenge of preference aggregation, and characteristics of the political structure have been shown to influence the outcome. The problem is worsened in situations when public spending is separated from financing, the typical case with free or subsidised public services. The ‘common pool’ problem is discussed in the introduction by Torben Andersen and Per Molander, and the challenges of political decision-making are left out here.

This chapter addresses the second aspect: incentives for the agency, the actual provider of the services. When production is delegated to government agencies, well-known agency problems arise because of conflicting interests and limited information.

Type
Chapter
Information
Alternatives for Welfare Policy
Coping with Internationalisation and Demographic Change
, pp. 105 - 130
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Industry Commission, 1996, Competitive Tendering and Contracting Out by Public Sector Agencies, report No. 48, Melbourne
Boadway, R., Horiba, I. and Jha, R., 1999, ‘The provision of public services by government funded decentralization agencies’, Public Choice, 100, 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonesrønning, H. and Ratts⊘, J. 1994, ‘Efficiency variation among the Norwegian high schools: consequences of equalization policy’, Economics of Education Review, 13 (4), 289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borge, L.-E. and Ratts⊘, J., 2001a, ‘Design of budgetary processes for cost control: an empirical analysis’, mimeo, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Borge, L.-E. and Ratts⊘, J. 2001b, ‘Property taxation as incentive for cost control: empirical analysis of utility services in Norway’, mimeo, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J., 1977, ‘Towards a tax constitution for Leviathan’, Journal of Public Economics, 8, 255–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. O. 2001, ‘Sources of funds and quality effects in higher education’, Economics of Education Review, 20 (3), 289–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E., 1978, ‘Measuring the efficiency of decision making units’, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, H., McMahon, M. and Volkwein, H., 1991, ‘The cost structure of American research universities’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73 (3), 424–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domberger, S. and Jensen, P., 1997, ‘Contracting out by the public sector: theory, evidence, prospects’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13, 67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dranove, D., Shanley, M. and Simon, C., 1992, ‘Is hospital competition wasteful?’, Rand Journal of Economics, 23, 247–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncombe, W. and Miner, J., 1997, ‘Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency’, Public Choice, 93, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falch, T. and Rattsø, J., 1999, ‘Local public choice of school spending: disaggregating the demand function for educational services’, Economic of Education Review, 18, 361–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, J., Hadley, J. and Zuckerman, S., 1987, ‘How did Medicare's prospective payments system affect hospitals?’, New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 867–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. 1996, ‘The incentive effects of property taxes on local government’, Public Choice, 89, 93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. and Wilson, J., 1999, ‘Tax structure and government behavior: implications for tax policy’, mimeo, University of Michigan and Michigan State University
Gouyette, C. and Pestieau, P., 1999, ‘Efficiency of the welfare state’, Kyklos, 52, 537–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, T. P. 1997, ‘Agenda setting power and moral hazard in principal-agent relationships: evidence from hospital-budgeting in Norway’, European Journal of Political Research, 31, 287–314, also in J. Rattsø (ed.), Fiscal federalism and state–local finance: the Scandinavian approach, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998
Hanushek, E., 1986, ‘The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools’, Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141–77Google Scholar
Hassapis, C. 1996, ‘Are bureaucrats efficient? An application to the provision of AFDC’, Public Choice, 86, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, K., Razzolini, L. and Ross, L., 1998, ‘Bureaucratic choice and nonoptimal provision of public goods: theory and evidence’, Public Choice, 94, 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoxby, C., 1999, ‘The productivity of schools and other local public goods producers’, Journal of Public Economics, 74, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoxby, C. 2000, ‘Does competition between private and public schools benefit students and taxpayers?’, American Economic Review, 90 (5), 1209–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoxby, C., –2001, ‘School choice and school productivity’, paper presented at conference on school choice, Islamorada, Florida, February
Kalseth, J. and Rattsø, J., 1995, ‘Spending and overspending in local government administration: a minimum requirement approach applied to Norway’, European Journal of Political Economy, 11, 239–51, also in J. Rattsø (ed.), Fiscal federalism and state–local finance: the Scandinavian approach, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998
Kalseth, J. and Rattsø, J., –1998, ‘Political control of administrative spending: the case of local governments in Norway’, Economics and Politics 10 (1), 63–83, also in J. Rattsø (ed.), Fiscal federalism and state–local finance: the Scandinavian approach, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998
Kittelsen, S. and Førsund, F., 1992, ‘Efficiency analysis of Norwegian district courts’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 277–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koshal, R. and Koshal, M., 1999, ‘Economies of scale and scope in higher education: a case of comprehensive universities’, Economics of Education Review, 18 (2), 267–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., 1997, ‘Privatization in the United States’, Rand Journal of Economics, 28 (3), 447–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migue, J. and Belanger, G., 1974, ‘Towards a general theory of managerial discretion’, Public Choice, 17, 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, D., 1997, ‘The effects of Catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement’, Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 98–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niskanen, W., 1971, Bureaucracy and representative government, Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
Oates, W., 1996, ‘Estimation the demand for public goods: the collective choice and contingent valuation approaches’, in D. Bjornstad and J. Khan (eds.), The contingent valuation of environmental resources, Aldershot: Edward Elgar
Ozcan, Y., Luke, R. and Hagsever, C., 1992, ‘Ownership and organizational performance: a comparison of technical efficiency across hospital types’, Medical Care, 30, 781–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pestieau, P. and Tulkens, H., 1993, ‘Assessing and explaining the performance of public enterprises’, Finanzarchiv, 50, 293–323Google Scholar
Poterba, J., 1995, ‘Balanced budget rules and fiscal policy: evidence from the states’, National Tax Journal, 48, 329–36Google Scholar
Ray, S., 1991, ‘Resource-use efficiency in public schools: a study of Connecticut data’, Management Science, 37 (12), 1620–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, F., 2000, ‘Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behaviour’, in A. Culyer and J. Newhouse (eds.), Handbook of health economics, Oxford: Elsevier, 1141–74
Thorpe, K., Florence, C. and Seiber, C., 2000, ‘Hospital conversions, margins, and the provision of uncompensated care’, Health Affairs, 19, 187–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagen, J. and Harden, I., 1994, ‘National budget processes and fiscal performance’, European Economy, 3, 311–418Google Scholar
Wilson, J. and Gordon, R., 2000, ‘Expenditure competition’, mimeo, Michigan State University and University of Michigan
Zansig, B. 1997, ‘Measuring the impact of competition in local government education markets on the cognitive achievement of students’, Economics of Education Review, 16 (4), 431–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×