Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T22:56:25.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Perspectives on entrepreneurship and cluster formation: biotechnology in the US Capitol region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Maryann P. Feldma
Affiliation:
Chair, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, and Professor of Business Economics Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto
Karen R. Polenske
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Two decades ago, Gaithersburg, Frederick, and Rockville, Maryland, were largely commuter communities for US federal government employees. Today, these Washington suburbs host one of the most dynamic and fast-growing biotechnology (biotech) clusters in the United States (Ernst and Young 2001). While analysts have well documented the tendency for an innovative industry to cluster spatially, they have not answered questions about the development of regional industrial clusters, and the role government policy plays in cluster formation and sustainability. In this chapter, I focus on the emergence of a biotech cluster in the Capitol region.

Based on extensive interviews, I posit that three exogenous sets of factors sparked the nascent entrepreneurial talent in the region, creating the sufficient conditions for the emergence of a biotech cluster: (1) pre-existing resources, (2) entrepreneurship and incentives, and (3) infrastructure provided by government. This emergence was hastened by a series of exogenous events that lowered the opportunity cost of entrepreneurship and promoted the formation of new ventures. Although these changes were national policy initiatives, the Capitol region was in a unique position to capture the benefits. State government policies targeted at the biotech industry reinforced rather than led the cluster formation. My hypothesis is that entrepreneurs and new-firm formation are critical elements in the development of innovative clusters, and occur in those places at a time when the preconditions and incentives are supportive.

To support this hypothesis, I document some of the public initiatives that provided resources for the developing Maryland cluster in Section 11.2.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, W., 2002. “An Introduction to Extramural National Institutes of Health,” National Institutes of Health Report, at <http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/intro2oer.htm>
Baptista, R. and Swann, Peter, 1999. “A Comparison of Clustering Dynamics in the US and United Kingdom Computer Industries,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9: 373–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biospace International, 2000. “Senior Vice President Speech before the Senate Subcommittee on Technology”
Black, G., 2002. “Innovative Activity in US Cities: Evidence from the Small Business Innovation Research Program,” Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper
Cortright, J. and H. Mayer, 2001. “High Tech Specialization: A Comparison of High Technology Centers,” The Brookings Institution Survey Series, Washington, DC, January
Eaton, B., Feldman, M., Gerstley, L., Connolly, M., and Mangels, G., 1998. “Biosciences in Maryland: A Closer Look,” MdBioGoogle Scholar
Ernst and Young LLP, 2001. “Venture Capital Climate for Bioscience in Maryland,” report commissioned by MdBio, Inc.
Feldman, M. P., 2000. “Where Science Comes to Life: University Biosciences, Commercial Spin-offs and Regional Economic Development,” Comparative Journal of Public Policy, 2: 345–336Google Scholar
2001. “The Entrepreneurial Event Revisited: An Examination of New Firm Formation in the Regional Context,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10: 861–891CrossRef
Feldman, M. P. and J. L. Francis, 2002. “The Entrepreneurial Spark: Individual Agents and the Formation of Innovative Clusters,” in Curzio, A. Quadrio and Fortis, M. (eds.), Complexity and Industrial Clusters, Heidelberg: Physica-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. “Homegrowth Solutions: Fostering Cluster Formation,” Economic Development Quarterly, 18(2): 127–137CrossRef
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., and Tratjenberg, M., 2001. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools, Working Paper no. 8498, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, at http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J., 1996. “The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long Run Impact of the Small Business Innovation Research Program,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 5753
1997. “Recreating Silicon Valley,” Business History Review,
Leslie, S. and Kargon, R., 1996. “Selling Silicon Valley: Frederick Terman's Model for Regional Advantage,” Business History Review, 70(4): 435–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MdBio, 2002. “MdBio Company Database,” at www.mdbio.org
Schachtel, M. R. and Heacock, S. R., 2002. “Founders of Maryland Bioscience and Medical Instrument Companies,” Report for Maryland Technology Development Corporation (Technology Development Corporation)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A., 1942/1976. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
Townsend, K. K., 2002. “Biotechnology and Humanity at the Crossroads of a New Era,” Speech delivered at the Institute for Emerging Issues Forum, at www.ncsu.edu/iei/forums/2002forum/intro02.htm

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×