Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:20:59.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Measurement of the clustering and dispersion of innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Anne P Carter
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics Emerita Brandeis University
Karen R. Polenske
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The chapters in this volume deal with the interplay of two characteristic features of today's global economy: rapid technological change and shifts in the loci of economic activity. As might be expected, no two authors interpret the terms “location” and “innovation” identically. Both domains are very broad and complex and authors single out particular facets for separate study. It is striking that most of them focus on research and the creation, acquisition, and sharing of knowledge, rather than dealing directly with changes in the production process and in the kinds of products on the market. Perhaps this should be taken as a reminder that we have indeed entered the era of the “knowledge economy.”

Economists might see this emphasis on information and communication as a focus on the first of Schumpeter's three major phases of technological change, namely invention. Seeing technological change as the primary focus of capitalism, Schumpeter draws sharp distinctions among invention, creating the idea behind a change in the production process; innovation, implementing that idea in the market environment for the first time; and diffusion, the spread of implementation to sites beyond the original one.

Schumpeter saw the innovator as the visionary and the primary risktaker in the chain of individuals responsible for technological change (Schumpeter 1926). His inventor was an inspired individual with a new idea, but was not an economic actor. Today, invention is likely to be purposive economic activity involving significant investment and risk.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P., 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PressGoogle Scholar
Carr, N., 1999. “Visualizing Innovation,” Harvard Business Review, 17(5)Google Scholar
Carter, A., 1970. Structural Change in the American Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, C., 1953. History of the Cowles Commission, 1932–52, at http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/reports/1932-52b.htm
Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, 1947. Report for 1947, Chicago, see also at http://209.41.24.153/rmt/rmt114k.htm
DeBresson, C., 1996. Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity, Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, N., 1987. Innovation and Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: BallingerGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, A., 2001. “The Challenge of Measuring and Modeling a Dynamic Economy,” Presented at the Washington Economic Policy Conference of the National Association for Business Economics, Washington, DC, March 27, 2001, at http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2001/20010327.default.htm
Griliches, Z., 1957. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technical Change,” Econometrica, 25(4): 501–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. “Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint,” American Economic Review, 84(1): 1–23
Leontief, W., 1941. The Structure of American Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1953. “Structural Change,” in Leontief, W.et al., Studies in the Structure of the American Economy, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
1967. “An Alternative to Aggregation in Input-Output Analysis and National Accounts,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(3): 412–419CrossRef
1971. “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts,” American Economic Review, 61(2): 1–7
Mansfield, E., 1968. Industrial Research and Technological Innovation. New York: W.W. NortonGoogle Scholar
Moore, G., 1965. “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits,” Electronics, 38(8): 114–117Google Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1997. Oslo Manual (revised), at http://www1.oecd.org/dsti/sti/stat-ana/prod/eas_oslo.htm
Rochester and Genesee Valley Museum, 2002. “Statement,” at http://www1.rgvrrm.mus.ny.us/diesels.htm
Romer, P., 1994. “The Origins of Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1): 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxenian, A., 1991. “The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley,” Research Policy, 20: 423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemo, D. J., 1996. “Is VW's New Plant Lean or Just Mean?,” New York Times, December 19Google Scholar
Scherer, F. M., 1982. “Inter-industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4): 627–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmookler, J., 1961. “Changes in Industry and in the State of Knowledge as Determinants of Industrial Invention,” in Nelson, R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Change in Economic Activity, New York: Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research: 195–228Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J., 1926. The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Smaglik, P., 2002. “New York: Building Cooperation,” Nature, 419: 4–5Google ScholarPubMed
Solow, R. M., 1957. “Technological Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippel, E., 1986. The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×