Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Everyday IPE: revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy
- Part I Regimes as cultural weapons of the weak
- Part II Global economic change from below
- 5 The everyday social sources of imperial and hegemonic financial orders
- 6 Everyday investor subjects and global financial change: the rise of Anglo-American mass investment
- 7 Peasants as subaltern agents in Latin America: neoliberalism, resistance and the power of the powerless
- Part III Bringing Eastern agents in
- Bibliography
- Index
7 - Peasants as subaltern agents in Latin America: neoliberalism, resistance and the power of the powerless
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Everyday IPE: revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy
- Part I Regimes as cultural weapons of the weak
- Part II Global economic change from below
- 5 The everyday social sources of imperial and hegemonic financial orders
- 6 Everyday investor subjects and global financial change: the rise of Anglo-American mass investment
- 7 Peasants as subaltern agents in Latin America: neoliberalism, resistance and the power of the powerless
- Part III Bringing Eastern agents in
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Eric Hobsbawm long heralded ‘the death of the peasantry’ as the most dramatic and far-reaching social change to mark the twentieth century, resulting from transformations in agricultural production. In his trilogy on the ‘long nineteenth century’ (from the 1780s to 1914), he argued that the peasantry as a social class were destined to fade away, a possibility that became more actual by the late twentieth century. Across Latin America the percentage of peasants halved, or almost halved, in twenty years in Colombia (1951–73), Mexico (1960–80) and Brazil (1960–80) while in the Dominican Republic (1960–81), Venezuela (1961–81) and Jamaica (1953–81) the decline was by almost two-thirds. By the 1970s there was no country in Latin America in which peasants were not a minority with the continents of sub-Saharan Africa, South and continental Southeast Asia and China standing as the only regions of the globe still essentially dominated by rural production (Hobsbawm 1987: 137, 1994: 289–91). For Hobsbawm the epochal significance of this transformation was clear.
The mere fact that the peasantry has ceased to constitute the actual majority of the population in many parts of the world, that it has for practical purposes disappeared in some … and that its disappearance as a class today is quite conceivable in many developed countries, separates the period since the eighteenth century from all previous history since the development of agriculture.
(Hobsbawm 1999: 198)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Everyday Politics of the World Economy , pp. 120 - 138Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
- 1
- Cited by