Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:06:21.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Alan Fogel
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Andrea Garvey
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Hui-Chin Hsu
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Delisa West-Stroming
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Change Processes in Relationships
A Relational-Historical Research Approach
, pp. 256 - 273
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, I. & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. (1993). Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion, and civility. Social Science and Medicine, 37, 969–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonovsky, A. & Sagy, S. (1990). Confronting developmental tasks in the retirement transition. The Gerontologist, 30, 362–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 107–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahktin, M. M. (1981). The dialogical imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bahktin. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bahktin, M. M. (1988). Discourse in the novel. In Mercer, N. (ed.), Language and literacy from an educational perspective, Vol I, (pp. 47–57). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3 1/2– and 4 1/2–month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., Konner, M., & Barr, R. G. (1990). !Kung infancy: The social context of object exploration. Child Development, 61(3), 794–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1955). The message: “This is play”. In Schaffner, B. (ed.), Group processes (Vol. II). Madison, NJ: Madison Printing Co.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. A. (1994). A dialogic approach to relationship maintenance. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (eds.) Communication and relational maintenance, (pp. 233–254). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. A. & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, N. (1969). The Bayley Scale of infant development. (Manual). Stanford, CA: Psychological Corporation.
Beebe, B. & Lachmann, F. M. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Beek, P. J., Hopkins, B., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1993). Complex systems approaches to the development of action. The development of coordination in infancy. (pp. 497–515). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's way of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Goode, M. K., & Most, R. K. (1980). Maternal stimulation and infant exploratory competence: Cross-sectional, correlational, and experimental analyses. Child Development, 51, 1168–1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergman, L. R. (2000). The application of a person-oriented approach: Types and clusters. In Bergman, L. R., Cairns, R. B., Nilsson, L., & Nystedt, L. (eds.), Developmental science and the holistic approach. (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Block, J. H. & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In Collins, W. Andrew (ed.), Development of cognition, affect, and social relations: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, XII, (pp. 39–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. (1981). Two kinds of perceptual organization near the beginning of life. In Collins, W. A. (ed.), Aspects of the development of competence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Krinsky, S. J., & Berasich, A. A. (1986). Fine orientation discrimination and shape constancy in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. I: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1997). Walking between the worlds: The science of compassion. Bellevue, WA: Radio Bookstore Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. S. (1994). Darwin's intertextual baby: Erasmus Darwin as precursor in child psychology. Reply. Human Development, 37(2), 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighi, A. (1997). Patterns of mother-infant interaction and contingency learning in full-term infants. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 37–45.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bril, B. (1986). Motor development and cultural attitudes. Whiting, H. T. A. & Wade, M. G., (eds.), Themes in motor development. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromberg, P. (1991). On knowing one's patient inside out: the aesthetics of unconscious communication. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1(4), 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D. B. (1986). The case-study method in psychology and related disciplines. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1982). The organization of action and the nature of the adult-infant transaction. In Tronick, E. Z. (ed.), Social interchange in infancy, (pp. 23–35). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, D. K. (1987). The role of movement in object perception by infants. In McKenzie, B. E. and Day, R. H. (eds.), Perceptual development in early infancy: Problems and issues, (pp. 143–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bushnell, M. H. (1982). Visual and tactual knowledge in 8-, 9 1, 2– and 11-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 5, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, E. W. (1985). The decline of visually guided reaching during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, E. W. & Boudreau, J. P. (1991). The development of haptic perception during infancy. In Heller, M. A. & Schiff, W. (eds.), The psychology of touch, (pp. 139–166). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. (1981). The origins of auditory-visual perception and visual proprioception in human development. In Walk, R. D. & Pick, H. L. (eds.), Intersensory perception and sensory integration, (pp. 37–69). Plenum Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bütz, M. R., Duran, E., & Tong, B. R. (1995). Cross-cultural chaos. In Robertson, R. & Combs, A. (eds.), Chaos theory in psychology and the life sciences. (pp. 319–329). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Camaioni, L., Aureli, T., Bellagamba, F., & Fogel, A. (2003). A longitudinal examination of the transition to symbolic communication in the second year of life. Infant and Child Development, 12, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. (1991). Primitive mythology. New York, USA: Penguin.Google Scholar
Camras, L. A. (1991). Conceptualizing early infant affect. In Strongman, K. (ed.), International review of studies on emotion, (pp. 16–28). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (1993). Preservation of relational characteristics: Maintenance strategies, equity, and locus of control. In Kalbfleisch, P. J. (ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 237–259). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Caron, A. J., Caron, R. F., & Carlson, V. R. (1979). Infant perception of the invariant shape of objects varying in slant. Child Development, 50, 716–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caruso, D. A. (1993). Dimensions of quality in infants' exploratory behavior: Relationships to problem-solving ability. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A. & Pedrosa, M. I. (1998). Interaction, regulation, and correlation in the context of human development: Conceptual discussion and empirical examples. In Valsiner, J. (Series ed.), Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (vol. eds.), Contemporary studies in child development within culturally structured environments: Vol. IV. Construction of psychological processes in interpersonal communication (pp. 155–180). Stamford, CN: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. & Siegler, R. S. (2000). Across the great divide: Bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65 (2, Whole No. 261).Google ScholarPubMed
Cicourel, A. (1974). Cognitive sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cissna, K. N., Cox, D. E., & Bochner, A. P. (1990). The dialectic of marital and parental relationships within the stepfamily. Communication Monographs, 57, 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, J. F. & Tronick, E. Z. (1987). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: The sequence of dyadic states at 3, 6, and 9 months. Developmental Psychology, 23, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, W. A. (1999). Willard W. Hartup and the new look in social development. In Collins, W. A. & Laursen, B. (eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Vol. XXXVIII. Relationships as developmental contexts (3–11). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Colombo, J. & Mitchell, D. W. (1990). Individual differences in early visual attention: Fixation time and information processing. In Colombo, J. & Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 193–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Danis, A. & Saules, R. (1994). The effect of situation familiarity on the establishment of co-references between mother and infant. Early Development and Parenting, 3(2), 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). The origins of species. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Deutsch, W. (1994). “The observing eye: A century of baby diaries” Commentary. Human Development, 37(1), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, F. (1989). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). The concept of the reflex arc in psychology. Psychology Review, 3, 13–32. Reprinted in W. Dennis (ed.), Readings in the history of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dindia, K. (1994). A multiphasic view of relationship maintenance strategies. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (eds.) Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 91–112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duck, S. (1991). Understanding relationships. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. O. (1993). Toddlers' achievement of coordinated action with conspecifics: A dynamic systems perspective. In Smith, L. B. & Thelen, E. (eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications (pp. 333–357). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Egan, J. (1976). Object-play in cats. In Bruner, J. S., Jolly, A., & Sylva, K. (eds.), Play – its role in development and evolution (pp. 161–165). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In Scherer, K. & Ekman, P. (eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 329–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. (1991). The myth of eternal return: Or, cosmos and history. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In Lecomp, M. D., Millroy, W. L., & Preissle, J. (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201–225). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, J. F. (1979). The origins of facial pattern recognition. In Bornstein, M. H. and Kessen, W. (eds.), Psychological development from infancy: Image to intention. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fenson, C., Kagan, J., Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1976). The developmental progression of manipulative play in the first two years. Child Development, 47, 232–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (1976). The adjustment of reaching behavior to object distance in early infancy. Child Development, 47, 304–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Findji, F., Pecheux, M., & Ruel, J. (1993). Dyadic activities and attention in the infant: A developmental study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E. & Corboz-Warnery, A. (1999). The Primary Triangle: A developmental systems view of mothers, fathers, and infants. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1977). Temporal organization in mother-infant face-to-face interaction. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp. 119–152). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1990). The process of developmental change in infant communicative action: Using dynamic systems theory to study individual ontogenies. In Colombo, J. & Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability and prediction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1992). Co-regulation, perception and action. Human Movement Science, 11, 505–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1996). Infancy: Infant, family, and society, Third Edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1997). Information, creativity, and culture. In Dent-Read, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems. (pp. 413–443). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A. (2001). A relational perspective on the development of self and emotion. In Bosma, H. A. & Kunnen, E. S. (eds.), Identity and emotions: Development through self-organization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A. & Branco, A. U. (1997). Meta-communication as a source of indeterminism in relationship development. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. (pp. 65–92). NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. & Lyra, M. (1997). Dynamics of development in relationships. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. (eds.). The psychological meaning of chaos: Self-organization in human development and psychotherapy. (pp. 75–94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.) (1997). Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fogel, A., Nelson-Goens, G. C., Hsu, H. & Shapiro, A. (2000). Do different infant smiles reflect different positive emotions?Social Development, 9(4) 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A., Nwokah, E., & Karns, J. (1992). Parent-infant games as dynamic social systems. In MacDonald, K. B. (ed.), Parent-child play. (pp. 43–70). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. & Thelen, E. (1987). Development of early expressive and communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Psychology, 23, 747–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenburg, W. K., Dodd, J. B., Fandal, A. W., Kuzuk, E., & Cohrs, M. (1975). DDST: Reference manual (Rev. ed.) Denver: Ladoka Project and Publication Foundation.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaskins, S. (1994). Integrating interpretive and quantitative methods in socialization research. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40(3), 313–333.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1991). The emergence of the relational self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. In Rosenzweig, M. R. & Porter, L. W. (eds.), Annual review of psychology, (pp. 1–41). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Review, Inc.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., Owsley, C. J., Walker, A., & Megaw-Nyce, J. (1979). Development of the perception of invariants: Substance and shape. Perception, 8, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J. & Spelke, E. S. (1983). The development of perception. In Flavell, J. H. & Markman, E. M. (eds.), Mussen, P. H. (Series ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III, Cognitive development (pp. 1–76). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, G. P. (1985). The analysis of human action: Current status and future potential. In Ginsburg, G. P., Brenner, M. L. & Cranach, M. (eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action (pp. 255–279). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1971). In the shadow of man. NY: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Goody, E. N. (1989). Learning, apprenticeship and the division of labor. In Coy, M. W. (ed.), Apprenticeship: From theory to method and back again (pp. 233–256). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gottfried, A. W., Rose, S. A., & Bridger, W. H. (1977). Cross-modal transfer in human infants. Child Development, 48, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual development & evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granott, N. (2002). How microdevelopment creates macrodevelopment: Reiterated sequences, backward transitions, and the zone of current development. In Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 213–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granott, N., Fischer, K. W., & Parziale, J. (2002). Bridging to the unknown: A transition mechanism in learning and development. In Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 131–156). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (2002). Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning. In Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, P. (1978). Children throughout the ages: A history of childhood. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Greenspan, S. I. & Shanker, S. G. (2004). The first idea: How symbols, language, and intelligence evolved from our primate ancestors to modern humans. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Gray, H. (1978). Learning to take an object from the mother. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp.159–182). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haith, M. M., Hazan, C., & Goodman, G. S. (1988). Expectation and anticipation of dynamic visual events by 3.5–month-old babies. Child Development, 59, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, A. (1992). Dialogues as transitional space: A rapprochement of psychoanalysis and developmental psycholinguistics. In Skolnick, N. J. & Warshaw, S. C. (eds.), Relational perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 119–145). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (1972). Infants visual and tactual inspection of objects. Perception, 1, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatwell, Y. (1987). Motor and cognitive functions of the hand in infancy and childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10, 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J. (1987). Balancing for weaknesses and challenging developmental potential: A longitudinal study of mother-infant dyads in apprenticeship interactions. Developmental Psychology, 23, 762–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1985). Expression and negotiation. In Zivin, G. (ed.), The development of expressive behavior: Biology-environment interactions (pp. 103–116). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1987). Interpersonal relationships and child development. Developmental Review, 7, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodapp, R. M., Goldfield, E. C., & Boyatzis, C. J. (1984). The use and effectiveness of maternal scaffolding in mother-infant games. Child Development, 55, 772–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, S., Fogel, A., & Wood, R. M. (1998). Innovation in social games. In Valsiner, J. (Series ed.), Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (Vol. eds.), Contemporary studies in child development within culturally structured environments: Vol. IV. Construction of psychological processes in interpersonal communication, (pp. 35–51). Stamford, CN: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Hsu, H. C. & Fogel, A. (2001). Infant vocal development in a dynamic mother-infant communication system. Infancy, 2 (1), 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. & Fogel, A. (2003). Stability and transitions of mother-infant face-to-face communication during the first six months: A micro-historical approach. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1061–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M. (1990). The influence of positive and negative affect on cognitive organization: Some implications for development. In Stein, N., Leventhal, B., & Trabasso, T. (eds.), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 75–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jansen, G. & Peshkin, A. (1992). Subjectivity in qualitative research. In LeCompte, M. D., Millroy, W. L. & Preissle, J. (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 681–725). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., McCall, R. B., Repucci, N. D., Jordan, J., Levine, J., & Minton, C. (1971). Change and continuity in infancy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Karniol, R. (1989). The role of manual manipulative stages in the infants acquisition of perceived control over objects. Developmental Review, 9, 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, K. (1982). The mental and social life of babies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, K. & Fogel, A. (1980). The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mothers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 16, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, R. T. & Gruber, H. E. (1994). Darwin's intertextual baby: Erasmus Darwin as precursor in child psychology. Commentary. Human Development, 37(2), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H. & Gauda, G. (1987). Eye contact in the first months of life and its developmental consequences, In Rauh, H. & Steinhausen, H. (eds.), Psychobiology and early development (pp. 129–143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellman, P. J. (1984). Perception of three-dimensional form by human infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellman, P. J. & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelso, J. A. S. (2000). Principles of dynamic pattern formation and change for a science of human behavior. In Bergman, L. R., Cairns, R. B., Nilsson, L., & Nystedt, L. (eds.), Developmental science and the holistic approach. (pp. 63–83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1985). Behavioral foundations for the process of frame attunement in face-to-face interaction. In Ginsburg, G. P., Brenner, M. & Cranach, M. (eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, M. L. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Newton, MN: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kopp, C. B. & Vaughn, B. E. (1982). Sustained attention during exploratory manipulation as a predictor of cognitive competence in preterm infants. Child Development, 53, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). On coordination and control in naturally developing systems. In Kelso, J. A. S. & Clark, J. E. (eds.), The development of movement coordination and control (pp. 5–78). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H. & Chapieski, M. L. (1989). Joint attention and infant toy exploration: Effects of Downs Syndrome and prematurity. Child Development, 60, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landry, S. H., Chapieski, M. L., & Schmidt, M. (1986). Effects of maternal attention-directing strategies on preterms' response to toys. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, S. H., Garner, P. W., Swank, P. R., & Baldwin, C. D. (1996). Effects of maternal scaffolding during joint toy play with preterm and full-term infants. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(2), 177–199.Google Scholar
Laszlo, E. (2001). Macroshift. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lave, J. (1988, May). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. Report no. IRL 88–0007, Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
Lavelli, M. & Fogel, A. (2002). Developmental changes in mother-infant face-to-face communication: Birth to 3 months. Developmental Psychology, 38, 288–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavelli, M., Pantoja, A. P. F., Hsu, H., Messinger, D., & Fogel, A. (2005). Using microgenetic designs to study change processes. In Teti, D. G. (ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental psychology, (pp. 1–50). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lawson, K. R., Parrinello, R. M., & Ruff, H. A. (1992). Maternal behavior and infant attention. Infant Behavior and Development, 15, 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. M., Dowling, E., & Chaudhuri, J. (2005). Methods of contextual assessment and assessing contextual methods: A developmental systems perspective. In Teti, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science. (pp. 183–209). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. (Alphonso Lingos, Trans.), Pittsburgh, PN: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (1995). Cognition-emotion feedback and the self-organization of developmental paths. Human Development, 38, 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (1997). Personality self-organization: Cascading constraints on cognition-emotion interaction. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes (pp.193–216). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. & Junyk, N. (1997). The self-organization of psychological defenses. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. (eds.), The psychological meaning of chaos: Translating theory into practice (pp. 41–73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, A. (1980). The guided reinvention of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lock, A. (2000). Phylogenectic time and symbol creation: Where do zopeds come from? [Special issue]. Culture and Psychology, 6(2), 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1993). The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lockman, J. (2003). Object manipulation in context. In Raeff, C. & Benson, J. B. (eds.), Social and cognitive development in the context of individual, social, and cultural processes. (pp. 149–167). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lockman, J. & McHale, J. (1989). Object manipulation in infancy: Developmental and contextual determinants. In Lockman, J. & Hazen, N. L. (eds.), Action in social context: Perspectives on early development, (pp. 129–171). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyra, M. C. D. P. (1998). Reflections on the dynamics of meaning making: Communication process at the beginning of life. In Valsiner, J. (Series ed.), Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (Vol. eds.), Contemporary studies in child development within culturally structured environments: Vol. IV. Construction of psychological processes in interpersonal communication (pp. 225–242). Stamford, CN: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Lyra, M. D. C. & Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C. (1994). Transformation and construction in social interaction: A new perspective on analysis of the mother-infant dyad. In Valsiner, J. (ed.), Child development within culturally structured environment, Vol. III. (pp. 51–77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Lyra M. C. D. P. & Winegar, L. T. (1997). Processual dynamics of interaction through time: Adult-child interactions and process of development. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. (pp. 93–109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Magnusson, D. (2000). The individual as the organizing principle in psychological inquiry: A holistic approach. In Bergman, L. R., Cairns, R. B., Nilsson, L., & Nystedt, L. (eds.), Developmental science and the holistic approach. (pp. 33–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M. J. & Moes, A. J. (1997). Complexity and psychotherapy: Promising dialogues and practical issues. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. A. (eds.), The psychological meaning of chaos: Translating theory into practice. (pp. 177–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malatesta, C. Z. & Wilson, A. (1988). Emotion cognition interaction in personality development: A discrete emotions, functionalist analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markova, I. (1987). On the interaction of opposites in psychological processes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markova, I. (1990). Why the dynamics of dialogue? In Markova, I. & Foppa, K. (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mathew, A. & Cook, M. (1990). The control of reaching movements by young infants. Child Development, 61, 1238–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCall, M. M. & Wittner, J. (1990). The good news about life history. In Becker, H. S. & McCall, M. M. (eds.), Symbolic interaction and cultural studies. (pp. 46–89). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, R. B. (1974). Exploratory motivation and play in the human infant. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 39 (Serial Number 155).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullum, J. A. & Stayton, V. (1988). Gaze patterns of mothers and infants as indicators of role integration during play and teaching with toys. In Marfo, K. (ed.), Parent-child interaction and developmental disabilities: Theory research and intervention. (pp. 47–63). Praeger.Google Scholar
McKenzie, B. E., Tootell, H. E., & Day, R. H. (1980). Development of visual size constancy during the first year of human infancy. Developmental Psychology, 16, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Melkman, R. (1988). The construction of objectivity: A new look at the first months of life. London: Karger.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W. Jr. (1976). Responsiveness to objects in free-ranging Japanese monkeys. In Bruner, J. S., Jolly, A., & Sylva, K. (eds.), Play – its role in development and evolution, (pp. 174–183). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W. Jr, Davenport, R. K., & Rogers, C. M. (1976). Proto-cultural aspects of chimpanzees' responsiveness to novel objects. In Bruner, J. S., Jolly, A., & Sylva, K. (eds.), Play – its role in development and evolution, (pp. 188–193). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Messinger, D., Fogel, A., & Dickson, K. L. (2001). All smiles are positive, but some smiles are more positive than others. Developmental Psychology, 37, 5, 641–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaels, C. F. & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Montgomery, B. M. (1994). Communication in close relationships. In Weber, A. L. and Harvey, J. H. (eds.) Perspectives on close relationships, pp. 67–87. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Needham, A., Barrett, T., & Peterman, K. (2002). A pick-me-up for infants' exploratory skills: Early simulated experiences reaching for objects using ‘sticky mittens’ enhances young infants' object exploration skills. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1997). Cognitive change as collaborative construction. In Amsel, E. & Renninger, K. A. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application, (pp. 99–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Newell, K. M. & McDonald, P. V. (1993). The evolving perceptual-motor workspace in infancy: Reactions to Zanone, Kelso, and Jeka and Schmuckler. In Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (ed.), The development of coordination in infancy, (pp. 175–199). New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Newman, H. M. (1982). Talk about a past relationship partner: Metacommunicative implications. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 10, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newtson, D. (1993). The dynamics of action and interaction. In Smith, L. B. & Thelen, E. (eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development, (pp. 241–264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Overton, W. F. (2002). Understanding, explanation, and reductionism: Finding a cure for Cartesian anxiety. In Brown, T. & Smith, L. (eds.), Reductionism and the development of knowledge (pp. 29–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. F. (1989). The discriminating nature of infants' exploratory actions. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 885–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantoja, A. P. F. (1996). Relational-historical processes in early mother-infant communication: A qualitative investigation. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Pantoja, A. P. F. (2000). Emotional development from a relational-historical approach: The story of one mother-infant dyad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Pantoja, A. P. F. (2001). A narrative-developmental approach to early emotions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 2(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-01/3-01pantoja-e.htmGoogle Scholar
Pantoja, A. P. F. & Nelson-Goens, G. C. (2000). Desenvolvimento da Vida Emocionaldurante o Segundo Ano de Vida: Narrativas e Sistemas Dinâmicos. Psicologia:Reflexão e Crítica, 13(2), 269–280.Google Scholar
Parrinello, R. M. & Ruff, H. A. (1988). The influence of adult intervention on infants' level of attention. Child Development, 59, 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattee, H. H. (1987). Instabilities and information in biological self-organization. In Yates, F. E. (ed.), Self-organizing systems: The emergence of order. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd edn.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Paz, O. (1988). A tree within. [Tr. E. Weinberger]. New Directions.Google Scholar
Pecheux, M., Findji, F., & Ruel, J. (1992). Maternal scaffolding of attention between 5 and 8 months. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(3), 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perna, P. A. (1997). Reflections on the therapeutic system as seen from the science of chaos and complexity: Implications for research and treatment. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. (eds.), The psychological meaning of chaos:Translating theory into practice. (pp. 253–272). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Ballantine Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Prosser, R., Rasbach, J. R., & Goldstein, H. (1991). ML3 software for two-level analysis: Users' guide. London: University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Rawlins, W. K. (1983). Negotiating close friendships: The dialectic of conjunctive freedoms. Human Communications Research, 9, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1982). An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 98–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinecke, M. A. & Fogel, A. (1994). The development of referential offering in the first year. Early Development and Parenting, 3, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinharz, S. (1984). On becoming a social scientist. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1983). Time and narrative, Vol. I. [Translated by K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, 1984]. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner – researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (1989). Object manipulation and exploration in 2– to 5–month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, P., Blass, E. M., & Hoffmeyer, L. B. (1988). Oropharyngeal control of hand-mouth coordination in newborn infants. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, P. & Bullinger, A. (1994) Posture and functional action in infancy. In Vyt, A, Bloch, H., & Bornstein, M. H. (eds.), Child development in the French tradition. (pp. 15–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: a therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In Amsel, E. & Renninger, K. A. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 265–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Goncu, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(8), 236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolfe-Zikman, S. (1987). Visual and haptic bimodal perception in infancy. In McKenzie, B. E. and Day, R. H. (eds.), Perceptual development in early infancy: Problems and issues (pp.199–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1990). On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In Markovà, I. & Foppa, K. (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 83–104). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., Wallace, I. F., & McCarton, C. (1989). Infant visual attention: Relation to birth status and developmental outcome during the first 5 years. Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 560–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S. A. & Ruff, H. A. (1987). Cross-modal abilities in human infants. In Osofsky, J. D. (ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd edn.). (pp. 318–362). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rosenwald, G. C. & Ochberg, R. L. (eds.) (1992). Storied lives: The cultural politics of self-understanding. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ruel, J. (2000). Dévélopement des capacités attentionnelles du nourrisson entre 2 et 8 mois. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris V, France.
Ruff, H. A. (1984). Infant's manipulative exploration of objects: Effects of age and object characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 20, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, H. A. (1986). Components of attention during infants' manipulative exploration. Child Development, 57, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruff, H. A. (1990). Individual differences in sustained attention during infancy. Colombo, J. and Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 247–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ruff, H. A. & Kohler, C. J. (1978). Tactual-visual transfer in six-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 1, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, H. A. & Lawson, K. R. (1990). Development of sustained, focused attention in young children during free play. Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, H. A., Lawson, K. R., Parrinello, R., & Weissberg, R. (1990). Long-term stability of individual differences in sustained attention in the early years. Child Development, 61, 60–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, K. D., Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Carrère, S., & Swanson, C. (2000). Theoretical and mathematical modeling of marriage. In Lewis, M. D. & Granic, I. (eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization (pp. 349–372). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, L. (1977). The regulation of exchange in the infant-caretaker system and some aspects of the context-content relationship. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblum, L. (eds.), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language (pp. 133–156). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sander, L. (1995). Identity and the experience of specificity in a process of recognition. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, L. W. (1962). Issues in early mother-child interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarbin, T. R. (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. & Fields, W. M. (2000). Linguistic, cultural and cognitive capacities of bonobos [Special issue]. Culture & Psychology, 6(2), 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsbergh, G. J. P. & van der Kamp, J. (1993). The coordination of infant's reaching, grasping, catching and posture: A natural physical approach. In Savelsburgh, G. J. P. (ed.) The development of coordination in infancy, (pp. 289–317). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Schaffer, H. R. (1984). The child's entry into a social world. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, H. R. & Crook, C. K. (1980). Child compliance and maternal control techniques. Developmental Psychology, 16, 54–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. In Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. (eds.), The mathematical theory of communication. (pp. 29–125). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siegler, R. S. & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigman, M. & Beckwith, L. (1980). Infant visual attentiveness in relation to caregiver-infant interaction and development outcome. Infant Behavior and Development, 3, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. J. (1977). The behavior of communicating: An ethological approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smitsman, A. W. (1997). The development of tool use: Changing boundaries between organism and environment. In Dent-Read, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems. (pp. 301–329). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorenson, E. R. (1979). Early tactile communication and the patterning of human organization: A New Guinea case study. In Bullowa, M. (ed.) Before speech. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (1994). Case Studies. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, V. S. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Steele, D. & Pederson, D. R. (1977). Stimulus variables which affect the concordance of visual and manipulative exploration in six-month-old infants. Child Development, 48, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stern, D. (1998). The process of therapeutic change involving implicit knowledge: Some implications of developmental observations for adult psychotherapy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 300–308.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, E., Blake, J., Vitale, G. & MacDonald, S. (1998). Mother-infant object involvement at 9 and 15 months: Relation to infant cognition and early vocabulary. First Language, 18, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Streri, A. & Pecheux, M. G. (1986a). Cross-model transfer of form in 5–month-old infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streri, A. & Pecheux, M.-G. (1986b). Tactual habituation and discrimination of form in infancy: A comparison with vision. Child Development, 57, 298–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streri, A. & Spelke, E. S. (1989). Effects of motion and figural goodness on haptic object perception in infancy. Child Development, 60, 1111–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Super, C. & Harkness, S. (1982). The development of affect in infancy and early childhood. In Wagner, D. & Stevenson, H. (eds.), Cultural perspectives on child development (pp. 1–19). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. & Huston, T. L. (1987). Mate selection as a social transition. In Perlman, D. & Duck, S. (eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 88–120). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1989). Habituation and maternal encouragement of attention in infancy as predictors of toddler language, play, and representational competence. Child Development, 60, 738–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. (1989). Self-organization in developmental processes. Can systems approaches work? In Gunnar, M. (ed.), Systems in development, (pp. 77–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. (1990). Dynamical systems and the generation of individual differences. In Colombo, J. & Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction, (pp. 19–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publishers.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. & Fogel, A. (1989). Toward an action-based theory of infant development. In Lockman, J. & Hazen, N. (eds.), Action in social context: Perspectives on early development, (pp. 23–64). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., Kelso, J. A. S., & Fogel, A. (1987). Self-organizing systems and infant motor development. Developmental Review, 7, 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56, 6–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorngate, W. (1987). The production, detection, and explanation of behavior patterns. In Valsiner, J. (ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology, (pp. 71–93). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Culture learning. Behavioral and Brain Science, 16, 495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, and consciousness. Volume I. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1977). Descriptive analysis of infant communicative behavior. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies of mother-infant interaction, (pp. 227–270). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1978). The foundations of intersubjectivity: Development of interpersonal and cooperative understanding in infants. The social foundations of language and thought, (pp. 316–342). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(1), 3–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tronick, E. Z. (1998). Dyadically expanded states of consciousness and the process of therapeutic change. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 290–299.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronick, E. Z. (in press). Thoughts on the still-face: Disconnection and dyadic expansion of consciousness. Infancy.
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children's action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1997). Constructing the personal through the cultural: Redundant organization of psychological development. In Amsel, E. & Renninger, K. A. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 27–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
van Geert, P. (1997). Que será, será: Determinism and nonlinear dynamic model building in development. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Geert, P. (1998). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of non-linear dynamics to developmental-science-in-the-making. Developmental Science, 1(1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giffen, K. & Haith, M. H. (1984). Infant visual response to Gestalt geometric forms. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanLear, C. A. Jr., & Trujillo, N. (1986). On becoming acquainted: A longitudinal study of social judgement processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vondra, J. & Belsky, J. (1989). Infant play at one year: Characteristics and early antecedents. In Lockman, J. J. & Hazen, N. L. (eds.), Action in social context: Perspectives on early development (pp. 173–206). NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Eckartsberg, R. (1986). Life-world experience existential phenomenological research approaches in psychology. Current Continental Research, 210. Washington: University Press of America.
Hofsten, C. (1979). Development of visually directed reaching: The approach phase. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5, 160–178.Google Scholar
von Hofsten, C. (1983). Foundations for perceptual development. In Lipsitt, L. (ed.) Advances in infancy research, Vol. II, (pp. 241–264). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Hofsten, C. (1984). Developmental changes in the organization of prereaching movements. Developmental Psychology, 20, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofsten, C. & Ronnqvist, L. (1988). Preparation for grasping an object: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 610–621.Google Scholar
Hofsten, C. & Spelke, E. S. (1985). Object perception and object-directed reaching in infancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J. (1958). The computer and the brain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (N. Minick, Trans.). (pp. 37–285). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. B., Franklin, M. B., & Keegan, R. T. (1994). The observing eye: A century of baby diaries. Human Development, 37, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Weimer, W. B. (1987). Spontaneously ordered complex phenomena and the unity of the moral sciences. In Radnitzky, G. (ed.), Centripetal forces in the sciences, (pp. 257–296). New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Werner, C. M., Altman, I., Brown, B. B., & Ginat, J. (1993). Celebrations in personal relationships: A transactional/dialectical perspective. In Duck, S. (ed.), Social context and relationships (pp. 109–138). Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White, B. L., Castle, P., & Held, R. (1964). Observations on the development of visually-directed reaching. Child Development, 35, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilber, K. (1979). No boundary: Eastern and western approaches to personal growth. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, R. (1967). The I Ching or book of changes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilmot, W. W. (1994). Relationship rejuvenation. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (eds.) Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 255–273). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, J. F. (1973). The study of behavioral development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D. J. (1980). Teaching the young child: Some relationships between social interaction, language and thought. In Olson, D. R. (ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp. 280–298). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. J., Morgan, G. A., Jennings, K. D., Harmon, R. J., Gaiter, J. L. (1982). Infant's persistence at tasks: Relationships to cognitive functioning and early experience. Infant Behavior and Development, 5, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukow-Goldring, P. (1997). A social ecological realist approach to the emergence of the lexicon: Educating attention to amodal invariants in gesture and speech. In Dent-Read, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems, (pp. 199–250). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, I. & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. (1993). Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion, and civility. Social Science and Medicine, 37, 969–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonovsky, A. & Sagy, S. (1990). Confronting developmental tasks in the retirement transition. The Gerontologist, 30, 362–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 107–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahktin, M. M. (1981). The dialogical imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bahktin. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bahktin, M. M. (1988). Discourse in the novel. In Mercer, N. (ed.), Language and literacy from an educational perspective, Vol I, (pp. 47–57). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3 1/2– and 4 1/2–month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., Konner, M., & Barr, R. G. (1990). !Kung infancy: The social context of object exploration. Child Development, 61(3), 794–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1955). The message: “This is play”. In Schaffner, B. (ed.), Group processes (Vol. II). Madison, NJ: Madison Printing Co.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. A. (1994). A dialogic approach to relationship maintenance. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (eds.) Communication and relational maintenance, (pp. 233–254). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. A. & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, N. (1969). The Bayley Scale of infant development. (Manual). Stanford, CA: Psychological Corporation.
Beebe, B. & Lachmann, F. M. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Beek, P. J., Hopkins, B., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1993). Complex systems approaches to the development of action. The development of coordination in infancy. (pp. 497–515). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's way of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Goode, M. K., & Most, R. K. (1980). Maternal stimulation and infant exploratory competence: Cross-sectional, correlational, and experimental analyses. Child Development, 51, 1168–1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergman, L. R. (2000). The application of a person-oriented approach: Types and clusters. In Bergman, L. R., Cairns, R. B., Nilsson, L., & Nystedt, L. (eds.), Developmental science and the holistic approach. (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Block, J. H. & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In Collins, W. Andrew (ed.), Development of cognition, affect, and social relations: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, XII, (pp. 39–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. (1981). Two kinds of perceptual organization near the beginning of life. In Collins, W. A. (ed.), Aspects of the development of competence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Krinsky, S. J., & Berasich, A. A. (1986). Fine orientation discrimination and shape constancy in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. I: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1997). Walking between the worlds: The science of compassion. Bellevue, WA: Radio Bookstore Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. S. (1994). Darwin's intertextual baby: Erasmus Darwin as precursor in child psychology. Reply. Human Development, 37(2), 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighi, A. (1997). Patterns of mother-infant interaction and contingency learning in full-term infants. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 37–45.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bril, B. (1986). Motor development and cultural attitudes. Whiting, H. T. A. & Wade, M. G., (eds.), Themes in motor development. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromberg, P. (1991). On knowing one's patient inside out: the aesthetics of unconscious communication. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1(4), 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D. B. (1986). The case-study method in psychology and related disciplines. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1982). The organization of action and the nature of the adult-infant transaction. In Tronick, E. Z. (ed.), Social interchange in infancy, (pp. 23–35). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, D. K. (1987). The role of movement in object perception by infants. In McKenzie, B. E. and Day, R. H. (eds.), Perceptual development in early infancy: Problems and issues, (pp. 143–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bushnell, M. H. (1982). Visual and tactual knowledge in 8-, 9 1, 2– and 11-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 5, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, E. W. (1985). The decline of visually guided reaching during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, E. W. & Boudreau, J. P. (1991). The development of haptic perception during infancy. In Heller, M. A. & Schiff, W. (eds.), The psychology of touch, (pp. 139–166). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. (1981). The origins of auditory-visual perception and visual proprioception in human development. In Walk, R. D. & Pick, H. L. (eds.), Intersensory perception and sensory integration, (pp. 37–69). Plenum Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bütz, M. R., Duran, E., & Tong, B. R. (1995). Cross-cultural chaos. In Robertson, R. & Combs, A. (eds.), Chaos theory in psychology and the life sciences. (pp. 319–329). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Camaioni, L., Aureli, T., Bellagamba, F., & Fogel, A. (2003). A longitudinal examination of the transition to symbolic communication in the second year of life. Infant and Child Development, 12, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. (1991). Primitive mythology. New York, USA: Penguin.Google Scholar
Camras, L. A. (1991). Conceptualizing early infant affect. In Strongman, K. (ed.), International review of studies on emotion, (pp. 16–28). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (1993). Preservation of relational characteristics: Maintenance strategies, equity, and locus of control. In Kalbfleisch, P. J. (ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 237–259). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Caron, A. J., Caron, R. F., & Carlson, V. R. (1979). Infant perception of the invariant shape of objects varying in slant. Child Development, 50, 716–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caruso, D. A. (1993). Dimensions of quality in infants' exploratory behavior: Relationships to problem-solving ability. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A. & Pedrosa, M. I. (1998). Interaction, regulation, and correlation in the context of human development: Conceptual discussion and empirical examples. In Valsiner, J. (Series ed.), Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (vol. eds.), Contemporary studies in child development within culturally structured environments: Vol. IV. Construction of psychological processes in interpersonal communication (pp. 155–180). Stamford, CN: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. & Siegler, R. S. (2000). Across the great divide: Bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65 (2, Whole No. 261).Google ScholarPubMed
Cicourel, A. (1974). Cognitive sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cissna, K. N., Cox, D. E., & Bochner, A. P. (1990). The dialectic of marital and parental relationships within the stepfamily. Communication Monographs, 57, 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, J. F. & Tronick, E. Z. (1987). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: The sequence of dyadic states at 3, 6, and 9 months. Developmental Psychology, 23, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, W. A. (1999). Willard W. Hartup and the new look in social development. In Collins, W. A. & Laursen, B. (eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Vol. XXXVIII. Relationships as developmental contexts (3–11). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Colombo, J. & Mitchell, D. W. (1990). Individual differences in early visual attention: Fixation time and information processing. In Colombo, J. & Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 193–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Danis, A. & Saules, R. (1994). The effect of situation familiarity on the establishment of co-references between mother and infant. Early Development and Parenting, 3(2), 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). The origins of species. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Deutsch, W. (1994). “The observing eye: A century of baby diaries” Commentary. Human Development, 37(1), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, F. (1989). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). The concept of the reflex arc in psychology. Psychology Review, 3, 13–32. Reprinted in W. Dennis (ed.), Readings in the history of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dindia, K. (1994). A multiphasic view of relationship maintenance strategies. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (eds.) Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 91–112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duck, S. (1991). Understanding relationships. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. O. (1993). Toddlers' achievement of coordinated action with conspecifics: A dynamic systems perspective. In Smith, L. B. & Thelen, E. (eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications (pp. 333–357). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Egan, J. (1976). Object-play in cats. In Bruner, J. S., Jolly, A., & Sylva, K. (eds.), Play – its role in development and evolution (pp. 161–165). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In Scherer, K. & Ekman, P. (eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 329–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. (1991). The myth of eternal return: Or, cosmos and history. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In Lecomp, M. D., Millroy, W. L., & Preissle, J. (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201–225). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, J. F. (1979). The origins of facial pattern recognition. In Bornstein, M. H. and Kessen, W. (eds.), Psychological development from infancy: Image to intention. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fenson, C., Kagan, J., Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1976). The developmental progression of manipulative play in the first two years. Child Development, 47, 232–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (1976). The adjustment of reaching behavior to object distance in early infancy. Child Development, 47, 304–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Findji, F., Pecheux, M., & Ruel, J. (1993). Dyadic activities and attention in the infant: A developmental study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E. & Corboz-Warnery, A. (1999). The Primary Triangle: A developmental systems view of mothers, fathers, and infants. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1977). Temporal organization in mother-infant face-to-face interaction. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp. 119–152). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1990). The process of developmental change in infant communicative action: Using dynamic systems theory to study individual ontogenies. In Colombo, J. & Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability and prediction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1992). Co-regulation, perception and action. Human Movement Science, 11, 505–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1996). Infancy: Infant, family, and society, Third Edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1997). Information, creativity, and culture. In Dent-Read, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems. (pp. 413–443). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A. (2001). A relational perspective on the development of self and emotion. In Bosma, H. A. & Kunnen, E. S. (eds.), Identity and emotions: Development through self-organization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A. & Branco, A. U. (1997). Meta-communication as a source of indeterminism in relationship development. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. (pp. 65–92). NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. & Lyra, M. (1997). Dynamics of development in relationships. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. (eds.). The psychological meaning of chaos: Self-organization in human development and psychotherapy. (pp. 75–94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.) (1997). Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fogel, A., Nelson-Goens, G. C., Hsu, H. & Shapiro, A. (2000). Do different infant smiles reflect different positive emotions?Social Development, 9(4) 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A., Nwokah, E., & Karns, J. (1992). Parent-infant games as dynamic social systems. In MacDonald, K. B. (ed.), Parent-child play. (pp. 43–70). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. & Thelen, E. (1987). Development of early expressive and communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Psychology, 23, 747–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenburg, W. K., Dodd, J. B., Fandal, A. W., Kuzuk, E., & Cohrs, M. (1975). DDST: Reference manual (Rev. ed.) Denver: Ladoka Project and Publication Foundation.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaskins, S. (1994). Integrating interpretive and quantitative methods in socialization research. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40(3), 313–333.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1991). The emergence of the relational self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. In Rosenzweig, M. R. & Porter, L. W. (eds.), Annual review of psychology, (pp. 1–41). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Review, Inc.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., Owsley, C. J., Walker, A., & Megaw-Nyce, J. (1979). Development of the perception of invariants: Substance and shape. Perception, 8, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J. & Spelke, E. S. (1983). The development of perception. In Flavell, J. H. & Markman, E. M. (eds.), Mussen, P. H. (Series ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III, Cognitive development (pp. 1–76). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, G. P. (1985). The analysis of human action: Current status and future potential. In Ginsburg, G. P., Brenner, M. L. & Cranach, M. (eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action (pp. 255–279). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1971). In the shadow of man. NY: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Goody, E. N. (1989). Learning, apprenticeship and the division of labor. In Coy, M. W. (ed.), Apprenticeship: From theory to method and back again (pp. 233–256). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gottfried, A. W., Rose, S. A., & Bridger, W. H. (1977). Cross-modal transfer in human infants. Child Development, 48, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual development & evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granott, N. (2002). How microdevelopment creates macrodevelopment: Reiterated sequences, backward transitions, and the zone of current development. In Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 213–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granott, N., Fischer, K. W., & Parziale, J. (2002). Bridging to the unknown: A transition mechanism in learning and development. In Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 131–156). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (2002). Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning. In Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, P. (1978). Children throughout the ages: A history of childhood. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Greenspan, S. I. & Shanker, S. G. (2004). The first idea: How symbols, language, and intelligence evolved from our primate ancestors to modern humans. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Gray, H. (1978). Learning to take an object from the mother. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp.159–182). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haith, M. M., Hazan, C., & Goodman, G. S. (1988). Expectation and anticipation of dynamic visual events by 3.5–month-old babies. Child Development, 59, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, A. (1992). Dialogues as transitional space: A rapprochement of psychoanalysis and developmental psycholinguistics. In Skolnick, N. J. & Warshaw, S. C. (eds.), Relational perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 119–145). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (1972). Infants visual and tactual inspection of objects. Perception, 1, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatwell, Y. (1987). Motor and cognitive functions of the hand in infancy and childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10, 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J. (1987). Balancing for weaknesses and challenging developmental potential: A longitudinal study of mother-infant dyads in apprenticeship interactions. Developmental Psychology, 23, 762–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1985). Expression and negotiation. In Zivin, G. (ed.), The development of expressive behavior: Biology-environment interactions (pp. 103–116). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1987). Interpersonal relationships and child development. Developmental Review, 7, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodapp, R. M., Goldfield, E. C., & Boyatzis, C. J. (1984). The use and effectiveness of maternal scaffolding in mother-infant games. Child Development, 55, 772–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, S., Fogel, A., & Wood, R. M. (1998). Innovation in social games. In Valsiner, J. (Series ed.), Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (Vol. eds.), Contemporary studies in child development within culturally structured environments: Vol. IV. Construction of psychological processes in interpersonal communication, (pp. 35–51). Stamford, CN: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Hsu, H. C. & Fogel, A. (2001). Infant vocal development in a dynamic mother-infant communication system. Infancy, 2 (1), 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. & Fogel, A. (2003). Stability and transitions of mother-infant face-to-face communication during the first six months: A micro-historical approach. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1061–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M. (1990). The influence of positive and negative affect on cognitive organization: Some implications for development. In Stein, N., Leventhal, B., & Trabasso, T. (eds.), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 75–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jansen, G. & Peshkin, A. (1992). Subjectivity in qualitative research. In LeCompte, M. D., Millroy, W. L. & Preissle, J. (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 681–725). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., McCall, R. B., Repucci, N. D., Jordan, J., Levine, J., & Minton, C. (1971). Change and continuity in infancy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Karniol, R. (1989). The role of manual manipulative stages in the infants acquisition of perceived control over objects. Developmental Review, 9, 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, K. (1982). The mental and social life of babies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, K. & Fogel, A. (1980). The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mothers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 16, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, R. T. & Gruber, H. E. (1994). Darwin's intertextual baby: Erasmus Darwin as precursor in child psychology. Commentary. Human Development, 37(2), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H. & Gauda, G. (1987). Eye contact in the first months of life and its developmental consequences, In Rauh, H. & Steinhausen, H. (eds.), Psychobiology and early development (pp. 129–143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellman, P. J. (1984). Perception of three-dimensional form by human infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellman, P. J. & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelso, J. A. S. (2000). Principles of dynamic pattern formation and change for a science of human behavior. In Bergman, L. R., Cairns, R. B., Nilsson, L., & Nystedt, L. (eds.), Developmental science and the holistic approach. (pp. 63–83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1985). Behavioral foundations for the process of frame attunement in face-to-face interaction. In Ginsburg, G. P., Brenner, M. & Cranach, M. (eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, M. L. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Newton, MN: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kopp, C. B. & Vaughn, B. E. (1982). Sustained attention during exploratory manipulation as a predictor of cognitive competence in preterm infants. Child Development, 53, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). On coordination and control in naturally developing systems. In Kelso, J. A. S. & Clark, J. E. (eds.), The development of movement coordination and control (pp. 5–78). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H. & Chapieski, M. L. (1989). Joint attention and infant toy exploration: Effects of Downs Syndrome and prematurity. Child Development, 60, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landry, S. H., Chapieski, M. L., & Schmidt, M. (1986). Effects of maternal attention-directing strategies on preterms' response to toys. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, S. H., Garner, P. W., Swank, P. R., & Baldwin, C. D. (1996). Effects of maternal scaffolding during joint toy play with preterm and full-term infants. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(2), 177–199.Google Scholar
Laszlo, E. (2001). Macroshift. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lave, J. (1988, May). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. Report no. IRL 88–0007, Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
Lavelli, M. & Fogel, A. (2002). Developmental changes in mother-infant face-to-face communication: Birth to 3 months. Developmental Psychology, 38, 288–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavelli, M., Pantoja, A. P. F., Hsu, H., Messinger, D., & Fogel, A. (2005). Using microgenetic designs to study change processes. In Teti, D. G. (ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental psychology, (pp. 1–50). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lawson, K. R., Parrinello, R. M., & Ruff, H. A. (1992). Maternal behavior and infant attention. Infant Behavior and Development, 15, 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. M., Dowling, E., & Chaudhuri, J. (2005). Methods of contextual assessment and assessing contextual methods: A developmental systems perspective. In Teti, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science. (pp. 183–209). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. (Alphonso Lingos, Trans.), Pittsburgh, PN: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (1995). Cognition-emotion feedback and the self-organization of developmental paths. Human Development, 38, 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (1997). Personality self-organization: Cascading constraints on cognition-emotion interaction. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes (pp.193–216). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. & Junyk, N. (1997). The self-organization of psychological defenses. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. (eds.), The psychological meaning of chaos: Translating theory into practice (pp. 41–73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, A. (1980). The guided reinvention of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lock, A. (2000). Phylogenectic time and symbol creation: Where do zopeds come from? [Special issue]. Culture and Psychology, 6(2), 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1993). The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lockman, J. (2003). Object manipulation in context. In Raeff, C. & Benson, J. B. (eds.), Social and cognitive development in the context of individual, social, and cultural processes. (pp. 149–167). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lockman, J. & McHale, J. (1989). Object manipulation in infancy: Developmental and contextual determinants. In Lockman, J. & Hazen, N. L. (eds.), Action in social context: Perspectives on early development, (pp. 129–171). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyra, M. C. D. P. (1998). Reflections on the dynamics of meaning making: Communication process at the beginning of life. In Valsiner, J. (Series ed.), Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (Vol. eds.), Contemporary studies in child development within culturally structured environments: Vol. IV. Construction of psychological processes in interpersonal communication (pp. 225–242). Stamford, CN: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Lyra, M. D. C. & Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C. (1994). Transformation and construction in social interaction: A new perspective on analysis of the mother-infant dyad. In Valsiner, J. (ed.), Child development within culturally structured environment, Vol. III. (pp. 51–77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Lyra M. C. D. P. & Winegar, L. T. (1997). Processual dynamics of interaction through time: Adult-child interactions and process of development. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. (pp. 93–109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Magnusson, D. (2000). The individual as the organizing principle in psychological inquiry: A holistic approach. In Bergman, L. R., Cairns, R. B., Nilsson, L., & Nystedt, L. (eds.), Developmental science and the holistic approach. (pp. 33–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M. J. & Moes, A. J. (1997). Complexity and psychotherapy: Promising dialogues and practical issues. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. A. (eds.), The psychological meaning of chaos: Translating theory into practice. (pp. 177–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malatesta, C. Z. & Wilson, A. (1988). Emotion cognition interaction in personality development: A discrete emotions, functionalist analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markova, I. (1987). On the interaction of opposites in psychological processes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markova, I. (1990). Why the dynamics of dialogue? In Markova, I. & Foppa, K. (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mathew, A. & Cook, M. (1990). The control of reaching movements by young infants. Child Development, 61, 1238–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCall, M. M. & Wittner, J. (1990). The good news about life history. In Becker, H. S. & McCall, M. M. (eds.), Symbolic interaction and cultural studies. (pp. 46–89). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, R. B. (1974). Exploratory motivation and play in the human infant. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 39 (Serial Number 155).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullum, J. A. & Stayton, V. (1988). Gaze patterns of mothers and infants as indicators of role integration during play and teaching with toys. In Marfo, K. (ed.), Parent-child interaction and developmental disabilities: Theory research and intervention. (pp. 47–63). Praeger.Google Scholar
McKenzie, B. E., Tootell, H. E., & Day, R. H. (1980). Development of visual size constancy during the first year of human infancy. Developmental Psychology, 16, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Melkman, R. (1988). The construction of objectivity: A new look at the first months of life. London: Karger.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W. Jr. (1976). Responsiveness to objects in free-ranging Japanese monkeys. In Bruner, J. S., Jolly, A., & Sylva, K. (eds.), Play – its role in development and evolution, (pp. 174–183). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W. Jr, Davenport, R. K., & Rogers, C. M. (1976). Proto-cultural aspects of chimpanzees' responsiveness to novel objects. In Bruner, J. S., Jolly, A., & Sylva, K. (eds.), Play – its role in development and evolution, (pp. 188–193). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Messinger, D., Fogel, A., & Dickson, K. L. (2001). All smiles are positive, but some smiles are more positive than others. Developmental Psychology, 37, 5, 641–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaels, C. F. & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Montgomery, B. M. (1994). Communication in close relationships. In Weber, A. L. and Harvey, J. H. (eds.) Perspectives on close relationships, pp. 67–87. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Needham, A., Barrett, T., & Peterman, K. (2002). A pick-me-up for infants' exploratory skills: Early simulated experiences reaching for objects using ‘sticky mittens’ enhances young infants' object exploration skills. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1997). Cognitive change as collaborative construction. In Amsel, E. & Renninger, K. A. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application, (pp. 99–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Newell, K. M. & McDonald, P. V. (1993). The evolving perceptual-motor workspace in infancy: Reactions to Zanone, Kelso, and Jeka and Schmuckler. In Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (ed.), The development of coordination in infancy, (pp. 175–199). New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Newman, H. M. (1982). Talk about a past relationship partner: Metacommunicative implications. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 10, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newtson, D. (1993). The dynamics of action and interaction. In Smith, L. B. & Thelen, E. (eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development, (pp. 241–264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Overton, W. F. (2002). Understanding, explanation, and reductionism: Finding a cure for Cartesian anxiety. In Brown, T. & Smith, L. (eds.), Reductionism and the development of knowledge (pp. 29–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. F. (1989). The discriminating nature of infants' exploratory actions. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 885–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantoja, A. P. F. (1996). Relational-historical processes in early mother-infant communication: A qualitative investigation. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Pantoja, A. P. F. (2000). Emotional development from a relational-historical approach: The story of one mother-infant dyad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Pantoja, A. P. F. (2001). A narrative-developmental approach to early emotions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 2(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-01/3-01pantoja-e.htmGoogle Scholar
Pantoja, A. P. F. & Nelson-Goens, G. C. (2000). Desenvolvimento da Vida Emocionaldurante o Segundo Ano de Vida: Narrativas e Sistemas Dinâmicos. Psicologia:Reflexão e Crítica, 13(2), 269–280.Google Scholar
Parrinello, R. M. & Ruff, H. A. (1988). The influence of adult intervention on infants' level of attention. Child Development, 59, 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattee, H. H. (1987). Instabilities and information in biological self-organization. In Yates, F. E. (ed.), Self-organizing systems: The emergence of order. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd edn.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Paz, O. (1988). A tree within. [Tr. E. Weinberger]. New Directions.Google Scholar
Pecheux, M., Findji, F., & Ruel, J. (1992). Maternal scaffolding of attention between 5 and 8 months. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(3), 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perna, P. A. (1997). Reflections on the therapeutic system as seen from the science of chaos and complexity: Implications for research and treatment. In Masterpasqua, F. & Perna, P. (eds.), The psychological meaning of chaos:Translating theory into practice. (pp. 253–272). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Ballantine Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Prosser, R., Rasbach, J. R., & Goldstein, H. (1991). ML3 software for two-level analysis: Users' guide. London: University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Rawlins, W. K. (1983). Negotiating close friendships: The dialectic of conjunctive freedoms. Human Communications Research, 9, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1982). An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 98–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinecke, M. A. & Fogel, A. (1994). The development of referential offering in the first year. Early Development and Parenting, 3, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinharz, S. (1984). On becoming a social scientist. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1983). Time and narrative, Vol. I. [Translated by K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, 1984]. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner – researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (1989). Object manipulation and exploration in 2– to 5–month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, P., Blass, E. M., & Hoffmeyer, L. B. (1988). Oropharyngeal control of hand-mouth coordination in newborn infants. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, P. & Bullinger, A. (1994) Posture and functional action in infancy. In Vyt, A, Bloch, H., & Bornstein, M. H. (eds.), Child development in the French tradition. (pp. 15–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: a therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In Amsel, E. & Renninger, K. A. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 265–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Goncu, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(8), 236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolfe-Zikman, S. (1987). Visual and haptic bimodal perception in infancy. In McKenzie, B. E. and Day, R. H. (eds.), Perceptual development in early infancy: Problems and issues (pp.199–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1990). On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In Markovà, I. & Foppa, K. (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 83–104). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., Wallace, I. F., & McCarton, C. (1989). Infant visual attention: Relation to birth status and developmental outcome during the first 5 years. Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 560–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S. A. & Ruff, H. A. (1987). Cross-modal abilities in human infants. In Osofsky, J. D. (ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd edn.). (pp. 318–362). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rosenwald, G. C. & Ochberg, R. L. (eds.) (1992). Storied lives: The cultural politics of self-understanding. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ruel, J. (2000). Dévélopement des capacités attentionnelles du nourrisson entre 2 et 8 mois. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris V, France.
Ruff, H. A. (1984). Infant's manipulative exploration of objects: Effects of age and object characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 20, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, H. A. (1986). Components of attention during infants' manipulative exploration. Child Development, 57, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruff, H. A. (1990). Individual differences in sustained attention during infancy. Colombo, J. and Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction (pp. 247–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ruff, H. A. & Kohler, C. J. (1978). Tactual-visual transfer in six-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 1, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, H. A. & Lawson, K. R. (1990). Development of sustained, focused attention in young children during free play. Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, H. A., Lawson, K. R., Parrinello, R., & Weissberg, R. (1990). Long-term stability of individual differences in sustained attention in the early years. Child Development, 61, 60–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, K. D., Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Carrère, S., & Swanson, C. (2000). Theoretical and mathematical modeling of marriage. In Lewis, M. D. & Granic, I. (eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization (pp. 349–372). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, L. (1977). The regulation of exchange in the infant-caretaker system and some aspects of the context-content relationship. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblum, L. (eds.), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language (pp. 133–156). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sander, L. (1995). Identity and the experience of specificity in a process of recognition. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, L. W. (1962). Issues in early mother-child interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarbin, T. R. (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. & Fields, W. M. (2000). Linguistic, cultural and cognitive capacities of bonobos [Special issue]. Culture & Psychology, 6(2), 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsbergh, G. J. P. & van der Kamp, J. (1993). The coordination of infant's reaching, grasping, catching and posture: A natural physical approach. In Savelsburgh, G. J. P. (ed.) The development of coordination in infancy, (pp. 289–317). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Schaffer, H. R. (1984). The child's entry into a social world. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, H. R. & Crook, C. K. (1980). Child compliance and maternal control techniques. Developmental Psychology, 16, 54–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. In Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. (eds.), The mathematical theory of communication. (pp. 29–125). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siegler, R. S. & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigman, M. & Beckwith, L. (1980). Infant visual attentiveness in relation to caregiver-infant interaction and development outcome. Infant Behavior and Development, 3, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. J. (1977). The behavior of communicating: An ethological approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smitsman, A. W. (1997). The development of tool use: Changing boundaries between organism and environment. In Dent-Read, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems. (pp. 301–329). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorenson, E. R. (1979). Early tactile communication and the patterning of human organization: A New Guinea case study. In Bullowa, M. (ed.) Before speech. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (1994). Case Studies. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, V. S. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Steele, D. & Pederson, D. R. (1977). Stimulus variables which affect the concordance of visual and manipulative exploration in six-month-old infants. Child Development, 48, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stern, D. (1998). The process of therapeutic change involving implicit knowledge: Some implications of developmental observations for adult psychotherapy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 300–308.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, E., Blake, J., Vitale, G. & MacDonald, S. (1998). Mother-infant object involvement at 9 and 15 months: Relation to infant cognition and early vocabulary. First Language, 18, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Streri, A. & Pecheux, M. G. (1986a). Cross-model transfer of form in 5–month-old infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streri, A. & Pecheux, M.-G. (1986b). Tactual habituation and discrimination of form in infancy: A comparison with vision. Child Development, 57, 298–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streri, A. & Spelke, E. S. (1989). Effects of motion and figural goodness on haptic object perception in infancy. Child Development, 60, 1111–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Super, C. & Harkness, S. (1982). The development of affect in infancy and early childhood. In Wagner, D. & Stevenson, H. (eds.), Cultural perspectives on child development (pp. 1–19). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A. & Huston, T. L. (1987). Mate selection as a social transition. In Perlman, D. & Duck, S. (eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 88–120). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1989). Habituation and maternal encouragement of attention in infancy as predictors of toddler language, play, and representational competence. Child Development, 60, 738–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. (1989). Self-organization in developmental processes. Can systems approaches work? In Gunnar, M. (ed.), Systems in development, (pp. 77–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. (1990). Dynamical systems and the generation of individual differences. In Colombo, J. & Fagen, J. (eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, prediction, (pp. 19–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publishers.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. & Fogel, A. (1989). Toward an action-based theory of infant development. In Lockman, J. & Hazen, N. (eds.), Action in social context: Perspectives on early development, (pp. 23–64). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., Kelso, J. A. S., & Fogel, A. (1987). Self-organizing systems and infant motor development. Developmental Review, 7, 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56, 6–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorngate, W. (1987). The production, detection, and explanation of behavior patterns. In Valsiner, J. (ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology, (pp. 71–93). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Culture learning. Behavioral and Brain Science, 16, 495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, and consciousness. Volume I. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1977). Descriptive analysis of infant communicative behavior. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies of mother-infant interaction, (pp. 227–270). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1978). The foundations of intersubjectivity: Development of interpersonal and cooperative understanding in infants. The social foundations of language and thought, (pp. 316–342). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(1), 3–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tronick, E. Z. (1998). Dyadically expanded states of consciousness and the process of therapeutic change. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 290–299.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronick, E. Z. (in press). Thoughts on the still-face: Disconnection and dyadic expansion of consciousness. Infancy.
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children's action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1997). Constructing the personal through the cultural: Redundant organization of psychological development. In Amsel, E. & Renninger, K. A. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 27–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
van Geert, P. (1997). Que será, será: Determinism and nonlinear dynamic model building in development. In Fogel, A., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Geert, P. (1998). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of non-linear dynamics to developmental-science-in-the-making. Developmental Science, 1(1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giffen, K. & Haith, M. H. (1984). Infant visual response to Gestalt geometric forms. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanLear, C. A. Jr., & Trujillo, N. (1986). On becoming acquainted: A longitudinal study of social judgement processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vondra, J. & Belsky, J. (1989). Infant play at one year: Characteristics and early antecedents. In Lockman, J. J. & Hazen, N. L. (eds.), Action in social context: Perspectives on early development (pp. 173–206). NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Eckartsberg, R. (1986). Life-world experience existential phenomenological research approaches in psychology. Current Continental Research, 210. Washington: University Press of America.
Hofsten, C. (1979). Development of visually directed reaching: The approach phase. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5, 160–178.Google Scholar
von Hofsten, C. (1983). Foundations for perceptual development. In Lipsitt, L. (ed.) Advances in infancy research, Vol. II, (pp. 241–264). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Hofsten, C. (1984). Developmental changes in the organization of prereaching movements. Developmental Psychology, 20, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofsten, C. & Ronnqvist, L. (1988). Preparation for grasping an object: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 610–621.Google Scholar
Hofsten, C. & Spelke, E. S. (1985). Object perception and object-directed reaching in infancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J. (1958). The computer and the brain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (N. Minick, Trans.). (pp. 37–285). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. B., Franklin, M. B., & Keegan, R. T. (1994). The observing eye: A century of baby diaries. Human Development, 37, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Weimer, W. B. (1987). Spontaneously ordered complex phenomena and the unity of the moral sciences. In Radnitzky, G. (ed.), Centripetal forces in the sciences, (pp. 257–296). New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Werner, C. M., Altman, I., Brown, B. B., & Ginat, J. (1993). Celebrations in personal relationships: A transactional/dialectical perspective. In Duck, S. (ed.), Social context and relationships (pp. 109–138). Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White, B. L., Castle, P., & Held, R. (1964). Observations on the development of visually-directed reaching. Child Development, 35, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilber, K. (1979). No boundary: Eastern and western approaches to personal growth. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, R. (1967). The I Ching or book of changes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilmot, W. W. (1994). Relationship rejuvenation. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (eds.) Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 255–273). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, J. F. (1973). The study of behavioral development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D. J. (1980). Teaching the young child: Some relationships between social interaction, language and thought. In Olson, D. R. (ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp. 280–298). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. J., Morgan, G. A., Jennings, K. D., Harmon, R. J., Gaiter, J. L. (1982). Infant's persistence at tasks: Relationships to cognitive functioning and early experience. Infant Behavior and Development, 5, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukow-Goldring, P. (1997). A social ecological realist approach to the emergence of the lexicon: Educating attention to amodal invariants in gesture and speech. In Dent-Read, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems, (pp. 199–250). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×