Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:02:14.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Prostitute movements face elite apathy and gender-biased universalism in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Amy G. Mazur
Affiliation:
Associate Professor Department of Political Science/Criminal Justice Program, Washington State University, Pullman, USA
Joyce Outshoorn
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Prostitution policy experts in France identify three different regimes of prostitution policy: regulatory, prohibitionist and abolitionist (e.g. LeGardinier 1989, 1997; Louis 1991). Since 1960, France has followed an abolitionist approach to prostitution. For most French policy experts and practitioners, this approach includes policies that seek to eliminate any official regulation of prostitution, to punish the organisation of prostitution including public solicitation and pimping, to prevent the social conditions that lead to prostitution, and to help prostitutes leave prostitution. Individual prostitution itself is not illegal. There is disagreement, however, over whether an abolitionist regime should eliminate prostitution or its regulation (e.g. Cabiria 1999: 23–5).

Up until 1960, France took a regulatory approach to prostitution. In 1946, the law Richard closed state-run bordellos or maisons closes, but maintained the monitoring of prostitutes. In 1960, France signed the 1949 UN Treaty on the ‘Elimination of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others’. From 1960 to 1965, twenty-five policy statements were adopted to establish the framework for the abolitionist regime (Femmes et Monde 1987: 77). Individual policy-makers and politicians have periodically argued to reopen state-run bordellos in the interest of public health and order. The last major public debate on re-opening the maisons closes took place in 1990. In 2000, the variety of policy actors involved with prostitution policy considered neither regulatory nor prohibition regimes a viable alternative. Recent public opinion polls echo the elite consensus.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Prostitution
Women's Movements, Democratic States and the Globalisation of Sex Commerce
, pp. 123 - 143
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×