Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:17:42.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Mann's microfoundations: addressing neo-Weberian dilemmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Edgar Kiser
Affiliation:
Professor of Sociology University of Washington
John A. Hall
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Ralph Schroeder
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Most historical sociologists study macro-level outcomes, explain them using macro-level causes, and test their arguments using macro-level data. Although all of these scholars realize that individual action brought about these outcomes, and few believe that these individuals are either just bearers of social structure or cultural dopes, explicit discussions of individual motivation and action are rare in historical sociology.

One obvious reason for the lack of focus on micro-level causal mechanisms is that it is especially difficult in historical sociology. When actors are more distant from us in time and space, it is harder both to theorize (make assumptions) about their motives and to get any empirical data about them. The classical sociologist who most explicitly addressed the difficult issue of the motives of historical actors was Max Weber, and contemporary neo-Weberians (along with a handful of rational choice theorists) have been most likely to follow his lead. This chapter explores the microfoundations used by one of the most prominent and accomplished neo-Weberian historical sociologists, Michael Mann.

Weberian historical sociologists who address the problem of microfoundations face two dilemmas. First, how can they use multiple micro-level causal mechanisms (Weber's four types of social action or something similar) without making their arguments tautological? The problem here is the same as that of tautology in rational choice models that do not specify preferences a priori – with many different microfoundations allowed, any action can be ‘explained’ after the fact.

Type
Chapter
Information
An Anatomy of Power
The Social Theory of Michael Mann
, pp. 56 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. 1996. Principals and Agents, Colonialists and Company Men: The Decay of Colonial Control in the Dutch East Indies. American Sociological Review, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, R. 1977. Nation-Building and Citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brustein, W. 1996. The Logic of Evil. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. 1986. Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Collins, R. 1986. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ertman, T. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerth, H. H., and Mills, C. W.. 1946. From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, P. 1993. The Protestant Ethic Revisited: Disciplinary Revolution and State Formation in Holland and Prussia. American Journal of Sociology, 99(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, G., and Biggart, N. Woolsey. 1980. Making the Dilettante an Expert: Personal Staffs in Public Bureaucracies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, G., and Biggart, N. Woolsey.1984. Governor Reagan, Governor Brown. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, M. (ed.). 1983. The Microfoundations of Macrosociology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hintze, O. [1902] 1975. The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze. Ed. Gilbert, F.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiser, E., and Hechter, M.. 1998. The Debate on Historical Sociology: Rational Choice Theory and Its Critics. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiser, E., and J. Baer. Forthcoming. The Causes of Bureaucratization: Toward an Analytical Weberianism. In Adams, J., Clemens, E. and Orloff, A. (eds.), The Remaking of Modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef
McDonald, T. (ed.). 1996. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume I: A History from the Beginning to 1760 AD. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. 1988. States, War, and Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Mann, M. 1993. The Sources of Social Power, Volume II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M.2000. ‘Modernity and Globalization’. Unpublished, given as the Wiles Lectures at Queen's University, Belfast.
Mann, M. 2004. Fascists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Murderous Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norkus, Z. 2001. Max Weber und Rational Choice. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar
North, D. 1991. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. 1986. Analytical Marxism. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, R. 1998. Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1930 [1904–05]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1975 [1903–06]. Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problems of Historical Economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978 [1922]. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×