Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:36:02.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Ben Rampton
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language in Late Modernity
Interaction in an Urban School
, pp. 410 - 434
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, N. & Warde, A., with Deem, R., Penna, S., Soothill, K., Urry, J., Sayer, A. & Walby, S.. 2000. Contemporary British Society. 3rd Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Abrahams, R. 1976. Talking Black. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Abrahams, R. 1984. Goffman reconsidered: pros and players. Raritan: A Quarterly Review. 3(4): 76–94.Google Scholar
Agha, A. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication. 23: 231–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. (ed.) 1988. Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, E. 1990. Speaking with Style: The Sociolinguistic Skills of Children. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. 1977. The antimonies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review. 100: 1–78.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J, & Scholz, A.. 2003. Spaghetti Funk: appropriations of hip-hop culture and rap music in Europe. Popular Music and Society. 26(4): 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C. 1998. Identity ascriptions in their time and place: ‘Fagin’ and ‘the terminally dim’. In Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds.) Identities in Talk. London: Sage. 71–86.Google Scholar
Antaki, C. & S. Widdicombe. 1998. Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds.) Identities in Talk. London: Sage. 1–14.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1990 Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In Featherstone, M., (ed.) Theory, Culture and Society. London: Sage 295–310.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. & Breckenridge, C.. 1988. Why public culture. Public Culture Bulletin. 1: 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, J. 2001. Codeswitching and collusion: classroom interaction in Botswana primary schools. In Heller, M. and Martin-Jones, M. (eds.) Voices of Authority. Westport, CT: Ablex 57–76.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P. 1985. Language, Structure and Reproduction: An Introduction to the Sociology of Basil Bernstein. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Audit Commission. 2000. Money Matters: School Funding and Resource Management. London: Audit Office. http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk.
Auer, J. 1990. A discussion paper on code-alternation. ESF Network on Code-switching and Language Contact: Papers for the Workshop on Concepts, Methodology and Data. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation. 69–91.Google Scholar
Auer, P. (ed.) 1998. Codeswitching in Conversation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auer, P. & Ý. Dirim. 2003. Socio-cultural orientation, urban youth styles and the spontaneous acquisition of Turkish by non-Turkish adolescents in Germany. In Androutsopoulos, J. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.) Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, L. 1996. New Ethnicities and Urban Culture. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
Baker, P. & Eversley, J.. 2000. Multilingual Capital. London: Battlebridge Publications.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1968. Rabelais and his World. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1986. The problem of speech genres. In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 60–102.Google Scholar
Barber, M. 1997. A Reading Revolution: How We can Teach Every Child to Read Well. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Barnes, D., Britten, J. & Rosen, H.. 1969. Language, the Learner and the School. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Basso, K. 1979. Portraits of ‘the White Man’: Linguistic Play and Cultural Symbols among the Western Apache. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. [1975] 2001. Verbal art as performance. American Anthropologist. 77: 290–311. (Also in A. Duranti (ed.) 2001 Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell 165–188.)
Bauman, R. 1986. Story, Performance and Event: Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. 1987. The role of performance in the Ethnography of Speaking. Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psycho-social Studies 11. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bauman, R.1989. Performance. In Barnouw, E. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Communications Volume 3. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 262–266.Google Scholar
Bauman, R.1996. Transformations of the Word in the production of Mexican festival drama. In Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. (eds.) Natural Histories of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 301–328.Google Scholar
Bauman, R.2001. Genre. In Duranti, A. (ed.) Key Terms in Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell. 79–82.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. & Briggs, C.. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology. 19: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. & J. Sherzer. 1989. Introduction to the second edition. In Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ix–xxvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.). 1974. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. 1992. Intimations of Post-modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. 1998. Globalisation: The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bausinger, H. 1984. Media, technology and daily life. Media, Culture and Society 6: 343–351.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. 2002. A juggling act: a feminist post-structuralist analysis of girls' and boys’ talk in the secondary classroom. Gender and Education 14(1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. 1995. Beyond Translation: Essays towards a Modern Philology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. 1971. Footnote. In Wax, M., Diamond, S. and Gearing, F. (eds.). Anthropological Perspectives on Education. New York, NY: Basic Books. 3–27.Google Scholar
Bell, A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society. 13(2): 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A.2001. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. (eds.) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 139–169.Google Scholar
Berger, P. & Luckman, T.. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1975. Ritual in education. In Class, Codes and Control Volume 3: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1971a. Class, Codes and Control Volume 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B.1971b. On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In Young, M. F. D. (ed.) Knowledge and Control. London: Collier-Macmillan. 47–69.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.1999. Official knowledge and pedagogic identities. In Christie, F. (ed.) Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness. London: Continuum. 246–261.Google Scholar
Besnier, N. 1990. Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology. 19: 419–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beynon, J. 1985. Initial Encounters in the Secondary School. Lewes: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Billig, M. 1999. Freudian Repression: Conversation Creating the Unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, T. 1999. E-Commerce: (Speech by the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, 13.9.99).
Blakemore, D. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 1975. Introduction. In Bloch, M. (ed.) Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. New York, NY: Academic Press. 1–28.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 1998. How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches to Cognition, Memory, and Literacy. Colorado, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Blom, J. P. & J. Gumperz. 1972. Social meaning in linguistic structure: Codeswitching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 407–434.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2004. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., J. Collins, M. Heller, B. Rampton, S. Slembrouck & J. Verschueren (eds.). 2003. Ethnography, Discourse and Hegemony. Special issue of Pragmatics 13(1).
Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interaction. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boaks, P. 1998. Languages in schools. In Moys, A. (ed.) Where Are We Going with Languages?London: Nuffield Foundation. 34–43.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.-C.. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture: 2nd Edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourne, J. 1988. ‘Natural acquisition’ and a ‘masked pedagogy’. Applied Linguistics. 9(1). 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, H. 1996. Fractured Identities: Changing Patterns of Inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brah, A. 1996. Cartographies of Diaspora. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Branaman, L. & Rhodes, N.. 1998. A National Survey of Foreign Language Instruction in Elementary and Secondary Schools. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brandt, G. 1986. The Realisation of Anti-racist Teaching. Lewes: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. 1993. Personal sentiments and polyphonic voices in Warao women' ritual wailing. American Anthropologist. 95(4): 929–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S.. 1987. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. 1999. You da man: narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 3(4): 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, M. 1990. The limits of Wright' analytic Marxism and an alternative. In Wright, E. (ed.) The Debate on Classes. London: Verso. 78–99.Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. et al. 1991. Ethnography Unbound. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. 1990. Demythologising sociolinguistics: Why language does not reflect society. In Joseph, J. and Taylor, T. (eds.) Ideologies of Language. London: Routledge. 79–96.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.1996. The language–gender interface: challenging co-optation. Bergvall, V., Bing, J. and Freed, A. (eds.) Rethinking Language and Gender Research. London: Longman. 31–53.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B. & Richardson, K.. 1992. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. & Kulick, D.. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candela, A. 1999. Students' power in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education 10(2): 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, B. & Sealey, A.. 2000. Language, structure and agency: what can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics?Journal of Sociolinguistics. 4(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. 1992. LINC: The final chapter?BAAL Newsletter. 42: 16–19.Google Scholar
Carter, R.1999. Standard grammars, spoken grammars: some educational implications. In Bex, T. and Watts, R. (eds.) Standard English: The Widening Debate. London: Routledge. 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. 1985. Classroom discourse. In Wittrock, M. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching. 3rd Edition. London: Macmillan. 432–463.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. 1989. Contributions of the Bakhtin circle to ‘communicative competence’. Applied Linguistics 10(2): 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C., John, V. & Hymes, D. (eds.). 1972. Functions of Language in the Classroom. Columbia, MO: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Chick, K. & N. Hornberger. 2001. Co-constructing school safetime: safetalk practices in Peruvian and South African classrooms. In Heller, M. and Martin-Jones, M. (eds.) Voices of Authority. Westport, CT: Ablex. 31–56.Google Scholar
Clark, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. T. 1998. ‘Can Anyone Say what is Reasonable?’: Promoting, Accommodating to, and Resisting Elite Rhetorical Inquiry in a High-School Classroom. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Clark, J. T.2003. Abstract inquiry and the patrolling of black/white borders through linguistic stylisation. In Harris, R. and Rampton, B. (eds.) Language, Ethnicity and Race: A Reader. London: Routledge. 303–313.Google Scholar
Coggle, P. 1993. Do You Speak Estuary English?London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. 1987. Structuration theory. In Giddens, A. and Turner, J. (eds.) Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. 273–308.Google Scholar
Cohen, P. 1988. The perversions of inheritance: studies in the making of multi-racist Britain. In Cohen, P. and Bains, H. S., (eds.) Multi-Racist Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 9–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, R. 1997. Diasporas in the age of globalization. Chapter 7. in Global Diasporas: An Introduction. London: University College London Press. 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. 1987. Conversation and knowledge in bureaucratic settings. Discourse Processes 10: 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J.1996. Socialisation to text: structure and contradiction in schooled literacy. In Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. (eds.) Natural Histories of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 203–228.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. & Comaroff, J.. 1992. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Colorado, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cook, G. 2000. Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corfield, P. (ed.) 1991. Language, History and Class. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (ed.) 1997. The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coupland, J., Coupland, N. and Robinson, J. 1992. ‘How are you?’: Negotiating phatic communion. Language in Society 21(2): 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. 1995. Pronunciation and the rich points of culture. In Windsor-Lewis, J. (ed.) Studies in English and General Phonetics: In Honour of J. D. O'Connor. London: Routledge. 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. 1997. Language, ageing and ageism: a project for applied linguistics?International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 7(1): 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. 1998. What is sociolinguistic theory?Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(1): 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. 2001a. Dialect stylisation in radio talk. Language in Society 30(3): 345–376.Google Scholar
Coupland, N.2001b. Introduction: sociolinguistic theory and social theory. In Coupland, N., Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman. 1–26.Google Scholar
Coupland, N.2001c. Age in social and sociolinguistic theory. In Coupland, N., Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman. 185–211.Google Scholar
Coupland, N., Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. (eds.). 2001. Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Crapanzo, V. 1993. Text, transference and indexicality. In Lucy, J. (ed.) Reflexive Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T. 1989. The Politics of Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, C. 1999. Yorkville crossing: white teens, hip hop and African American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 3(4): 428–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerniewska, P. 1992. Learning about Writing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davies, N. 2000. The School Report: Why Britain' Schools are Failing. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Delamont, S. 1983. Interaction in the Classroom 2nd edition. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Delamont, S. & Atkinson, P.. 1995. Fighting Familiarity: Essays on Education and Ethnography. Kresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
DFE (Department for Education). 1995a. English in the National Curriculum. London: HMSO.
DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). 1998. The National Literacy Strategy: Framework for Teaching. London: DfEE.
DfEE (Department for Education and Employment)1999. Minority Ethnic Pupils in Maintained Schools by Local Education Authority Area in England – January 1999 (Provisional). DfEE Statistical First Release (SFR 15/1999). Government Statistical Service. http://www.dfee.gov.uk.
DES (Department for Education and Science) 1985. Education for All: The Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups (Chair: Lord Swann). London: HMSO.
DES (Department for Education and Science)1988. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English Language. (Chair: Sir John Kingman). London: HMSO.
DES (Department for Education and Science)1989. English for Ages 5 to 16. London: HMSO. (Also in B. Cox 1991. Cox on Cox: An English Curriculum for the 1990s. London: Hodder and Stoughton.)
DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2002. Languages for All: Languages for Life: A Strategy for England. London: DfES Publications.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills).2003. 14–19 Opportunity and Excellence. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/14-19/index.shtml.
Dobson, A. 2002. MFL Inspected: Reflections on Inspection Findings 1996/97. London: CILT.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, W. 1984. Language and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Downes, W. 2000. The language of felt experience: emotional, evaluative, intuitive. Language and Literature. 9(2): 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P. 1987. Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25: 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P. & Holt, E.. 1988. Complainable matters: the use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems 35(4): 398–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. 1986. Self-evidence and ritual speech. In Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.) Evidentiality. New Jersey, NJ: Ablex. 313–336.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. 1988. Ethnography of speaking: toward a linguistics of the praxis. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Volume 4. Language: The Sociocultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 210–228.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A.2001. Linguistic anthropology: History, ideas, and issues. In Duranti, A. (ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. 2003. Language as culture in US anthropology. Current Anthropology. 44(3): 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1912. The elementary forms of religious life. In Pickering, W., Durkheim on ReligionLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E.1972. Selected Writings (edited by Giddens, A.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 1984. The Function of Criticism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S.. 1992. Think practically and look locally: language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology. 21: 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, U. 1992. A guide to the neo-television of the 1980s. In Baranski, Z. and Lumley, R. (eds.) Culture and Conflict in Post-War Italy. London: Macmillan. 245–255.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. & Westgate, D.. 1994 Investigating Classroom Talk (2nd edition). Lewes: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. & Mercer, N.. 1987. Common Knowledge. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. 2001. Co-membership and wiggle room: some implications of the study of talk for the development of social theory. In Coupland, N., Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman. 152–182.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. & Shultz, J.. 1982. The Counsellor as Gatekeeper. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. 1969. The development of ritualisation. In Cutler, D. (ed.) The World Year Book of Religion: The Religious Situation. Volume 1. London: Evans. 711–733.Google Scholar
Esarte-Sarries, V. & Byram, M.. 1989. The perception of French people by English students. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 2: 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (ed.) 1992a. Critical Language Awareness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (ed.)1992b. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (ed.)1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. 1990. The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. 1976. ‘The Collect as a form of discourse’ and ‘The structure and use of politeness formulas’. In C. Ferguson 1996. Sociolinguistic Perspectives (edited by Huebner, T.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 124–132 and 133–147.Google Scholar
Fiddick, J. 1999. Immigration and Asylum. Research Paper 99/16. London: House of Commons Library.
Finnegan, E. & D. Biber. 2001. Register variation and social dialect variation: the Register Axiom. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. (eds.) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235–267.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. 2001. ‘Not the message’: media, meanings and magicality. In Knoblauch, H. and Kotthoff, H. (eds.) Verbal Art across Cultures. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 33–62.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. 1985. Studying technology and social life. Urban Affairs Annual Review 28: 284–300.Google Scholar
Foley, D. 1990. Learning Capitalist Culture. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Foley, W. 1997. Anthropological Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1962. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 by Michel Foucault. (edited by Gordon, C.). Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1982. The subject and power. In Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermaneutics. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 208–226.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (eds.). 1999. Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 1988. Notes on critical linguistics. In Steele, R. and Threadgold, T. (eds.) Language Topics Volume 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frazer, E. & Lacey, N.. 1993. The Politics of Community. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
French, P. & M. MacLure. 1983. Teachers' questions, pupils' answers: an investigation of questions and answers in the infant classroom. In Stubbs, M. and Hillier, W. (eds.) Readings on Language, Schools and Classrooms. London: Methuen. 193–211.Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1996a. Music and identity. In Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (eds.) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage. 108–128.Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1996b. Performing Rites: Evaluating Popular Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. 1984. Black girls in a London comprehensive school. In Hammersley, M. and Woods, P. (eds.) Life in School: The Sociology of Pupil Culture. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. 77–88.Google Scholar
Furlong, V. 1976. Interaction sets in the classroom: towards a study of pupil knowledge. In Hammersley, M. and Woods, P. (eds.) The Process of Schooling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 160–169.Google Scholar
Furlong, V. 1985. The Deviant Pupil. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S. & Irvine, J.. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: how ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4): 967–1001.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1989. Language and political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology. 18: 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S.[1991] 2001. Language, gender and power: An anthropological review. In Duranti, A. (ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. & Woolard, K. (eds.). 2001. Languages and Publics. Manchester: St Jerome Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, M. 1992. The Dialogics of Critique. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, P., Coupland, N., & Williams, A.. (1999). Evaluating dialect in discourse: teachers' and teenagers' responses to young English speakers in Wales. Language in Society 28(3): 321–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J., Hull, G. and Lankshear, C.. 1996. The New Work Order. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1990. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. 1988. Authorship in the writing classroom. In Castell, S., Luke, A. and Luke, C. (eds.) Language, Authority and Criticism. Lewes: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H. & Powesland, P.. 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gillborn, D. 1997. Ethnicity and educational performance in the United Kingdom: racism, ethnicity, and variability in achievement. Anthropology and Education Quarterly. 28(3): 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillborn, D. & Gipps, C.. 1996. Recent Research on the Achievement of Ethnic Minority Pupils. London: OFSTED.Google Scholar
Gillborn, D. & Mirza, H.. 2000. Educational Inequality. Mapping Race, Class and Gender: a Synthesis of Research Evidence. London: OFSTED.Google Scholar
Gillespie, M. 1995. Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilroy, P. 1987. There Ain't no Black in the Union Jack. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Gilroy, P. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. 1970. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English (2nd Edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1983. The interaction order. American Sociological Review. 48: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. & M. Goodwin. 1987. Children' arguing. In Grimshaw, A. (ed.) Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 200–248.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. 1990. He-Said-She-Said. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. & C. Goodwin. [2000] 2001. Emotion within situated activity. In Duranti, A. (ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulbourne, H. 1998. Race Relations in Britain Since 1945. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabiner, Lord. 2000. The Informal Economy. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Grahame, P. & Jardine, D. 1990. Deviance, resistance, and play: a study in the communicative organization of trouble in class. Curriculum Inquiry. 20(3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, R. 1985. Research in Ritual Studies. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.1986. Interactional sociolinguistics in the study of schooling. In Cook-Gumperz, J. (ed.) The Social Construction of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 45–68.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.1999. On interactional sociolinguistic method. In Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds.) Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. & J. Cook-Gumperz. 1982. Introduction: language and the communication of social identity. In Gumperz, J. (ed.) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–21.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J., Jupp, T. & Roberts, C.. 1979. Crosstalk: A Study of Cross-cultural Communication. Southall, Middlesex: National Centre for Industrial Language Training.Google Scholar
Günthner, S. & Knoblauch, H.. 1995. Culturally patterned speaking practices – The analysis of communicative genres. Pragmatics 5(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B. & Larson, J.. 1995. Script, counterscript and underlife in the classroom. Harvard Educational Review. 65(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. 1988. New ethnicities. In Rattansi, A. and Donald, J., (eds.), 1992. ‘Race’, Culture and Difference. London: Sage/The Open University. 252–259.Google Scholar
Hall, S.1990. Cultural identity and diaspora. In Rutherford, J. (ed.) Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart. 222–237.Google Scholar
Hall, S.1996. Introduction: who needs identity? In Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (eds.) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage. 1–17.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. 1974. The organisation of pupils' participation. Sociological Review. August 359–368.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M.1976. The mobilisation of pupil attention. In Hammersley, M. and Woods, P.. (eds.) The process of Schooling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 104–115.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. 1992. What' Wrong with Ethnography?London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P.. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice (Second Edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. & G. Turner. 1984. Conformist pupils? In Hammersley, and Woods, P. (eds.) Life in School: The Sociology of Pupil Culture. Milton Keynes: Open University Press 161–175.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. & Woods, P.. (eds.). 1984. Life in School. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Handelman, D. 1977. Play and ritual: complementary forms of metacommunication. In Chapman, A. and Foot, H. (eds.) It' a Funny Thing, Humour. Oxford: Pergamon. 185–192.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. 1987. Discourse genres as a theory of practice. American Ethnologist. 14(4): 668–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. 1996. Language and Communicative Practices. Colorado, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, U. 1987. The world in creolisation. Africa 57(5): 546–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannerz, U. 1992a. Cultural Complexity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, U.1992b. The global ecumene as a network of networks. In Kuper, A. (ed.) Conceptualising Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 34–56.Google Scholar
Hannerz, U. 1996. Transnational Connections. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, R. 1997. Romantic bilingualism: time for a change? In Leung, C. and Cable, C.. (eds.) English as an Additional Language: Changing Perspectives. Watford: National Association for Language Development in the Curriculum (NALDIC). 14–27.Google Scholar
Harris, R.2002. Notes on classroom data analysis. Manuscript King' College London.
Harris, R.2004. New Ethnicities and Language Use. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Sociology, Goldsmiths' College, London University.
Harris, R., C. Leung & B. Rampton. 2001. Globalisation, diaspora and language education in England. In Block, D. and Cameron, D.Globalisation and Language Teaching. London: Routledge. 29–46.Google Scholar
Harris, R. & Rampton, B. (eds.). 2003. The Language, Ethnicity and Race Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartley, D. 1997. Re-schooling society. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Heap, J. 1985. Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: reading lessons. Curriculum Inquiry 15(3): 245–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. 1982. What no bedtime story means: narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society 11(1): 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. 1983. Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 1989. Speech economy and social selection in educational contexts. Discourse Processes. 12: 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. 1995. Language choice, social institutions and symbolic domination. Language in Society. 24(3): 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. 1999. Linguistic Minorities and Modernity: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F. & Taylor, S.. 1999. Working with/against globalization in education. Journal of Education Policy. 14(1): 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. 1984a. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.1984b. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 299–345.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.1997. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data. In Silverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, Practice. London: Sage. 161–182.Google Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D. 2002. Popular music audiences and everyday life. In Hesmondhalgh, D. and Negus, K. (eds.) Popular Music Studies. London: Edward Arnold. 117–130.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. 1986. White Talk Black Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R.1992. Language, youth, and the destabilisation of ethnicity. In Palmgren, C., Lovgren, K. and Bolin, G. (eds.) Ethnicity in Youth Culture. Stockholm: Youth Culture at Stockholm University. 27–41.Google Scholar
Hey, V. 1997. Northern accent and Southern comfort: subjectivity and social class. In Mahony, P. and Zmroczek, C. (eds.) Class Matters: ‘Working Class’ Women' Perspectives on Social Class. London: Taylor and Francis. 140–151.Google Scholar
Hill, J. 1993. Hasta la vista, baby: Anglo Spanish in the American Southwest. Critique of Anthropology. 13: 145–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. 1995. Junk Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres. Pragmatics 5(2): 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoechsman, M. 1997. Benetton culture: marketing difference to the new global consumer. In Riggins, H. (ed.) The Language and Politics of Exclusion. London: Sage. 183–202.Google Scholar
Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W. & Cain, C.. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Massachusetts MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, D. & Russell, G.. 1999. Adolescent CIT use: Paradigm shifts for educational and cultural practices?British Journal of the Sociology of Education 20(1): 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1992. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Honey, J. 1989. Does Accent Matter?London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Honey, J. 1997. Language is Power: The Story of Standard English and its Enemies. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. 1980. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. 1996. Sociolinguistics: Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. & A. Holloway. 1977. Variation in London English. Unpublished manuscript. Dept. of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London.
Humphries, S. 1981. Hooligans or Rebels? An Oral History of Working-Class Childhood and Youth 1889–1939. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. 1993. Learning to navigate. In Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (eds.) Understanding Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. [1969] 1999. The use of anthropology: critical, political, personal. In Hymes, D. (ed.) Rethinking Anthropology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 3–79.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.1972. On communicative competence. In Pride, J. and Holmes, J. (eds.) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 269–293.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.1975. Breakthrough into performance. In Ben-Amos, D. and Goldstein, K. (eds.) Folklore: Performance and Communication. The Hague: Mouton. 11–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. 1980. Language in Education: Ethnolinguistic Essays. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1996. Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.1999. Introduction to the Ann Arbor Paperbacks edition. In Hymes, D. (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Paperbacks. v–xlix.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. 1989. When talk isn't cheap: language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16(2): 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J.1990. Registering affect: heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Lutz, C. and Abu-Lughod, L. (eds.) Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 126–161.Google Scholar
Irvine, J.2001. ‘Style’ as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. (eds.) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 21–43.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1960. Concluding statement: linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (ed.) Style in Language. Massachusetts NY: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
James, W. 1978. Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth. Massachusetts, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 1984. Post-modernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review 146: 53–92.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. 1993. Planning English language acquisition in ESL and EFL societies: development and maintenance of languages and cultures. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 14: 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, F. Y. K. & Shu, S.. 1990. Language and revolution: Formulae of the Cultural Revolution. Language in Society 19(1): 61–79.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. 1997. The Linguistic Individual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. 1999. Uses of Southern-sounding speech by contemporary Texas women. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 3(4): 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J. & Taylor, T. (eds.). 1990. Ideologies of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. 1982. Introduction: the other side of English. In Kachru, B. (ed.) The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Oxford: Pergamon. 1–12.Google Scholar
Kamberellis, G. 2000. Hybrid discourse practices and the production of classroom (multi)cultures. In Mahalingam, R. and McCarthy, C. (eds.) Multicultural Curriculum: New Directions for Social Theory, Practice and Policy. London: Routledge. 261–285.Google Scholar
Kamberellis, G. 2001. Producing heteroglossic classroom (micro)cultures through hybrid discourse practice. Linguistics and Education. 12(1): 85–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamberellis, G. & L. de la Luna. 1996. Constructing multiculturally relevant pedagogy: Signifying the basal. In Leu, D., Kinzer, C. and Hinchman, K. (eds.) Forty-Fifth yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago: National Reading Conference. 329–344.Google Scholar
Kapferer, J. 1981. Socialisation and the symbolic order of the school. Anthropology and Education Quarterly. 12(4): 258–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katriel, T. 1985. Brogez: Ritual and strategy in Israeli children' conflicts. Language in Society. 14(4): 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katriel, T. 1987. Bexibùdim!: Ritualised sharing among Israeli children. Language in Society. 16(3): 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. 1987. Science for Girls. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. 1987. Levels of linguistic variation in Durham. Journal of Linguistics. 23: 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, H. & H. Kotthoff. 2001. The aesthetics and proto-aesthetics of communication. In Knoblauch, H. and Kotthoff, H. (eds.) Verbal Art across Cultures. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 7–32.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. 1993. Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C.2000. Social discursive constructions of self in L2 learning. In Lantolf, J. (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 133–153.Google Scholar
Kress, G. [1982] 1994. Learning to Write. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. 1986. Language in the media: The construction of the domains of public and private. Media, Culture and Society. 8: 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, P. 2004. Language ideologies. In Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell. 496–517.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P, Schieffelin, B. & Woolard, K. (eds.). 1992. Special Issue on Language Ideologies. Pragmatics. 2(3): 235–456.Google Scholar
Kuipers, J. 1984. Place, names, and authority in Weyéwa ritual speech. Language in Society. 13(4): 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, J. 1990. Power in Performance. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvannia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, D. & B. Schieffelin 2004. Language socialisation. In Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell. 349–368.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. 2003. No. Language and Communication. 23: 139–151.
Labov, W. 1969. The logic of non-standard English. In Alatis, J. (ed.) Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics 22. Washington, DC: Georgetown Press. 1–22, 26–31.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972a. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972b. Rules for ritual insults. In Language in the Inner City. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1982. Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: the case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society. 11: 161–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. 1972. A social psychology of bilingualism. In Pride, J. and Holmes, J. (eds.) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 336–349.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, J. 1975. Communicative functions of phatic communion. In Kendon, A., Harris, R. and Key, M. (eds.) Organisation of Behaviour in Face-to-face Interaction. The Hague: Mouton 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, D. 1994. The Tory Mind on Education 1979–94. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Layder, D. 1993. New Strategies in Social Research. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
LeCompte, M. & Goetz, J.. 1982. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research. 52(1): 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. 1996. Gender, Literacy, Curriculum. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
LePage, R. 1988. Some premises concerning the standardisation of languages, with special reference to Caribbean Creole English. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 71: 25–36.Google Scholar
LePage, R. & Tabouret-Keller, A.. 1985. Acts of Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics. 17(5/6): 356–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N.. 1993. How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. 1997. English With An Accent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Livingstone, S. & Bovill, M.. 1999. Young People, New Media. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Lo, A. 1999. Codeswitching, speech community membership, and the construction of ethnic identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 3(4): 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. 1993. Reflexive Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J. 1983. Attitudes and expectations: a profile of female and male students of college French, German and Spanish. Modern Language Journal. 67: 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüger, H.-H. 1983. Some aspects of ritual communication. Journal of Pragmatics. 7: 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. 1975. Political ritual and social integration. Sociology. 9: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, C. & Abu-Lughod, L. (eds.). 1990. Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mac An Ghaill, M. 1988. Young, Gifted and Black. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. 1987. The social significance of Scottish dialect humour. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 65: 53–63.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. 1997. Standards and Variation in Urban Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahony, P. & C. Zmroczek. 1997. Why class matters. In Mahony, P. and Zmroczek, C. (eds.) Class Matters: ‘Working-Class’ Women' Perspectives on Social Class. London: Taylor and Francis. 1–7.Google Scholar
Marginson, S. 1999. After globalization: emerging politics of education. Journal of Education Policy. 14(1): 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. & F. Engels 1970. The German Ideology. (edited by Arthur, C. J.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. 1988. Inarticulateness. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding. New Jersey, NJ: Ablex. 37–68.Google Scholar
McDermott, R.1993. The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (eds.) Understanding Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. & K. Gospodinoff. 1981. Social contexts for ethnic borders and school failure. In Trueba, H., Guthrie, G. and Au, G. (eds.) Culture and the Bilingual Classroom. Rowley: Newbury House. 212–236. (also in R. Harris and B. Rampton (eds.) 2003. The Language, Ethnicity and Race Reader. London: Routledge. 276–290.)Google Scholar
McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K. & Aron, J.. 1978. Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica 24(3/4): 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. & H. Tylbor. 1986. On the necessity of collusion in conversation. In Fisher, S. and Dundas-Todd, A. (eds.) Discourse and Institutional Authority: Medicine, Education and Law. New York, NY: Ablex. 123–139.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. & H. Varenne. 1996. Culture, development, disability. In Jessor, R., Colby, A. and Shweder, R. (eds.) Ethnography and Human Development. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 101–126.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1983. The semiotic constitution of Kamsà ritual language. Language in Society. 12(1): 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElhinny, B. 2003. Fearful, forceful agents of the law: ideologies about language and gender in police officers' narratives about the use of physical force. Pragmatics 13(2): 254–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Measor, L. & Woods, P.. 1984. Changing Schools: Pupil Perspectives on Transfer to a Comprehensive. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H.1985. The structure of classroom discourse. In Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis Volume 3. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, K. 1994. Welcome to the Jungle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mertz, E. 1985. Beyond symbolic anthropology: introducing semiotic mediation. In Mertz, E. and Parmentier, R. (eds.) Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, E.1996. Recontextualisation as socialisation: text and pragmatics in the law school classroom. In Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. (eds.) Natural Histories of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 229–252.Google Scholar
Mey, J. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 1999. The consequences of standardisation in descriptive linguistics. In Bex, T. and Watts, R. (eds.) Standard English: The Widening Debate. London: Routledge. 16–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L.. 1985. Authority in Language. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. 1999. Standard English and language ideology in Britain and the United States. In Bex, T. & Watts, R. (eds.) Standard English: The Widening Debate. London: Routledge. 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L.2000. Conversation, spoken language and social identity. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. (eds.) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 268–278.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1984. Case studies. In Ellen, R. (ed.) Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct. London: Academic Press. 237–241.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. 2000. Applied linguistics and evidence-based classroom practice: the case of foreign language grammar pedagogy. Applied Linguistics. 21(3): 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. 2003. Rethinking the concept of progression in the National Curriculum for Modern Foreign Languages: a research perspective. Language Learning Journal 27: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. & Martin, C.. 1997. Rote learning, creativity and ‘understanding’ in classroom foreign language teaching. Language Teaching Research. 1(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. 1971. Language Behaviour in a Black Urban Community. Language Behaviour Research Laboratory Monograph 2. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, M. 1988. Talking Culture. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moores, S. 2000. Media and Everyday Life in Modern Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. 1995. Talking Proper. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Myers, F. & D. Brenneis. 1984. Introduction: language and politics in the Pacific. In Brenneis, D. and Myers, F. (eds.) Dangerous Words. New York, NY:Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1979. Transcription as theory. In Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (eds.) Developmental Pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press. 43–72.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.1996. Linguistic resources for socialising humanity. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 438–469.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B.. 1989. Language has a heart. Text. 9(1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opie, I. & Opie, P.. 1959. The Language and Lore of Schoolchildren. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. 1991. Reading America: preliminary notes on class and culture. In Fox, R. (ed.) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. 164–189.Google Scholar
O'ullivan, T. 1998. Nostalgia, revelation and intimacy: tendencies in the flow of modern, popular television. In Lusted, D. and Geraghty, C. (eds.) The Television Studies Book. London: Edward Arnold. 175–209.Google Scholar
Papastergiadis, N. 2000. The Turbulence of Migration: Globalization, Deterritorialization and Hybridity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, D. 1977. Emergent and stabilised multilingualism: polyethnic peer groups in urban Kenya. In Giles, H. (ed.) Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. New York, NY: Academic Press. 185–210.Google Scholar
Parkin, D. 1984. Political language. Annual Review of Anthropology. 13: 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendle, M. 2002. The crisis of ‘identity’ in high modernity. British Journal of Sociology. 53(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 1994. The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. 1972. Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs Indian children in community and classroom. In Cazden, C., Hymes, D. and John, V. (eds.) Functions of Language in the Classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. 370–394.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic Effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, A. 1979. Negotiating deviance and ‘getting done’ in primary classrooms. In Barton, L. and Meighan, R. (eds.) Schools, Pupils and Deviance. Driffield: Nafferton Books.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. 1985. The Social World of the Primary School. London: Holt, Rhinehard, Winston.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. 1986. Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimising claims. Human Studies. 9: 219–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. 1997. Globalization from Below: The Rise of Transnational Communities. Oxford: ESRC Transnational Communities Working Paper WPTC-98–01. http://www.transcomm.oxford.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Potter, R. 1995. Spectacular Vernaculars: Hip-Hop and the Politics of Postmodernism. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. L. 1987. Linguistic Utopias. In Fabb, N., Attridge, D., Duranti, A. & McCabe, C. (eds.) The Linguistics of Writing. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 48–66.Google Scholar
Preston, D. 1982. Lusty language learning: confessions on acquiring Polish. Maledicta. 6: 117–120.Google Scholar
Preston, D. 1989. Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pujolar, J. 2001 Gender, Heteroglossia and Power: A Sociolinguistic Study of Youth Culture. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R. 1990. Language varieties and standard language. English Today. 21: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R. & Greenbaum, S.. 1973. A University Grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Qureshi, K. & Moores, S. 1999. Identity remix: tradition and translation in the lives of young Pakistani Scots. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2(3): 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramdin, R. 1987. The Making of the Black Working Class in Britain. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1990. Displacing the ‘native speaker’: expertise, affiliation and inheritance. ELT Journal. 44(2): 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. 1991. Second language learners in a stratified multilingual setting. Applied Linguistics. 12(3): 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. 1995a. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman. (2004: Second edition. Manchester: St Jerome Press).Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1995b. Language crossing and the problematisation of ethnicity and socialisation. Pragmatics. 5(4): 485–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. 1997. Retuning in applied linguistics?International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 7(1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B.1998a. Language crossing and the redefinition of reality. In Auer, P. (ed.) Code-switching in Conversation. London: Routledge. 290–320.Google Scholar
Rampton, B.1998b. Speech community. In Verschueren, J., Östman, J.-O., Blommaert, J. and Bulcaen, C. (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1–34. (Also available as WPULL 15 at http://www.kcl. ac.uk/depsta/education/ULL/wpull.html)Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1999. Sociolinguistics and cultural studies: new ethnicities, liminality and interaction. Social Semiotics. 9(3): 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B.2000a. Continuity and change in views of society in Applied Linguistics. In Trappes-Lomax, H. (ed.) Change and Continuity in Applied Linguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2000b. Multilingualism and heteroglossia in and out of school: end of project report. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 12. London: King' College. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/education/ULL/wpull.html.Google Scholar
Rampton, B.2001a. Language crossing, ‘Crosstalk’ and cross-disciplinarity in sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N., Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman. 261–296.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2001b. Critique in interaction. Critique of Anthropology. 21(1): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B., R. Harris & C. Dover. 2002. Interaction, media culture and adolescents at school: end of project report. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 20. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/education/wpull.html.
Rampton, B., Harris, R. & Leung, C.. 2002. Education and speakers of languages other than English. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 18. King' College London. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/education/wpull.html.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Leung, C. & Harris, R.. 1997. Multilingualism in England. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 17: 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappoport, R. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, D. 1998. Rethinking social class: qualitative perspectives on class and gender. Sociology. 32(2): 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C. 1998. Teen Spirits: Music and Identity in Media Education. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. 1964. The Psychologist and the Foreign Language Teacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, C., Byram, M., Barro, A., Jordan, S. & Street, B.. 2001. Language Learners as Ethnographers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. 1984. The Language of Children and Adolescents. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rose, E. & associates. 1969. Colour and Citizenship: A Report on British Race Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothenbuhler, E. 1998. Ritual Communication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. & Giles, H. (eds.). 1982. Attitudes to Language Variation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sansone, L. 1995. The making of black youth culture: lower-class young men of Surinamese origin in Amsterdam. In Amit-Talai, V. and Wulff, H. (eds.) Youth Cultures: A Cross-cultural Perspective. London: Routledge. 114–143.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1931. Communication. In Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Macmillan. 4: 78–81. (Reproduced in D. Mandelbaum. (ed.) 1949 Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 104–109.)Google Scholar
Sapir, E.1949. Edward Sapir: Selected Writings in Language, Culture and Personality. (edited by Mandelbaum, D.) Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, E.2002. The Psychology of Culture: A Course of Lectures. (edited by Irvine, J..) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. & Roberts, C. (eds.). 1999. Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S. & Slembrouck, S.. 1996. Language, Bureaucracy and Social Control. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. 1988. Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In Drew, P. and Wootton, A. (eds.) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Oxford: Polity Press. 89–135.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. 1999. Naivete vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: a rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society. 10(4): 577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. & Ochs, E.. 1986. Language socialisation. Annual Review of Anthropology. 15: 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. 1998. Foreign language education in the United States: trends and challenges. ERIC Review. 6(1): 6–13.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. 1993. London Jamaican. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sefton-Green, J. (ed.). 1998a. Digital Diversions: Youth Culture in the Age of Multimedia. London: University College London Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefton-Green, J.1998b. Introduction: Being young in the digital age. In Sefton-Green, J. (ed.) Digital Diversions: Youth Culture in the Age of Multimedia. London: University College London Press. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, E. 1969. Ritual and crisis. In Cutler, D. (ed.) The World Year Book of Religion: The Religious Situation. Volume 1. London: Evans. 733–749.Google Scholar
Shipley, J. T. (ed.). 1970. Dictionary of World Literary Terms. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 1998, Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, D.1999. Warrior or collaborators: reworking methodological controversies in the study of institutional interaction. In Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds.) Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 401–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, K. and Selby, H. (eds.) Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. 11–55.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, P., Hanks, W. and Hofbauer, C. (eds.) The Elements. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. 193–248.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1981. The limits of awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Paper No 84. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.1985. Language and the culture of gender. In Mertz, E. and Parmentier, R. (eds.) Semiotic Mediation. New York, NY: Academic Press. 219–259.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.1996. Monoglot ‘Standard’ in America: standardisation and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In Brenneis, D. and Macaulay, R. (eds.) The Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology. Colorado, CO: Westview Press. 284–306.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.1999. NIMBY goes linguistics: conflicted ‘voicings’ from the culture of local language communities. In Billings, S., Boyle, J. and Griffith, A. (eds.) Proceedings from the Panels of the Chicago Linguistic Society' Thirty-fifth Meeting. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. Volume 35(2): 101–123.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. & Urban, G. (eds.). 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstone, R. & Hirsch, E. (eds.). 1992. Consuming Technologies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeggs, B. 1997. Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. 1967. Against Interpretation. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spitulnik, D. 1997. The social circulation of media discourse and the mediation of communities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 6(2): 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitulnik, D.2001. Media. In Duranti, A. (ed.) Key Terms in Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell. 143–146.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, P. & White, A.. 1996. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Stanworth, M. 1981. Gender and Schooling: A Study of the Sexual Divisions in the Classroom. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Stanworth, M. 1984. Girls on the margins: a study of gender divisions in the classroom. In Hargreaves, A. and Woods, P. (eds.) Classrooms and Staffrooms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. 95–128.Google Scholar
Stedman-Jones, G. 1983. Languages of Class: Studies in English Working Class History 1832–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, H. 1983. Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strecker, I. 1988. The Social Practice of Symbolisation: An Anthropological Analysis. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 1976. Language, Schools and Classrooms. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 1986. Educational Linguistics. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. & Hillier, W. (eds.). 1983. Readings on Language, Schools and Classroom. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Szuchewycz, B. 1994. Evidentiality in ritual discourse: the social construction of religious meaning. Language in Society. 23(3): 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. 1989. Talking Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, N. (Chief Executive, School Curriculum and Assessment Authority) 1996. Cultural Values and Identity. Speech made at SCAA Conference on Curriculum, Culture and Society Conference 7.2.96.
ten Have, P. 1999. Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1978. The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tiffin, J. & Rajasingham, L.. 1995. In Search of the Virtual Class: Education in an Information Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, T. 1988. Knowledge in social anthropology. Anthropology Today. 4(2): 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1975. Accent, Dialect and the School. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1983. On Dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.1999. Standard English: what it isn't. In Bex, T. and Watts, R. (eds.) Standard English: The Widening Debate. London: Routledge. 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. & H. Giles. 1983. Sociolinguistics and linguistic value judgements: correctness, adequacy and aesthetics. In Trudgill, P.. On Dialect. Oxford: Blackwell. 201–225.Google Scholar
Turner, G. 1983. The Social World of the Comprehensive. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1969. The Ritual Process. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Turner, V.1978. Encounter with Freud: The making of a comparative symbologist. In Spindler, G. (ed.) The Making of Psychological Anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 558–583.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York, NY: PAJ.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1987. The Anthropology of Performance. New York, NY: PAJ.Google Scholar
Urciuoli, B. 1996. Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race and Class. New York, NY: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, T. 1999. Speech, Music, Sound. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lier, L. 1996. Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy, and Authenticity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Lier, L.2000. From input to affordance: social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In Lantolf, J. (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 245–260.Google Scholar
Varenne, H. & McDermott, R.. 1998. Successful Failure. Colorado, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. [1927] 1976. Freudianism: A Marxist Critique. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, R. 1998. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics: 3rd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watson, M. & R. McGregor. 1999. Asylum Statistics United Kingdom 1998. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. 10/99.
Wells, G. 1981. Learning through Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Volumes 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. 1958. Culture and Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1961. The Long Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, P. 1976. The class significance of school counter-culture. In Hammersley, M. and Woods, P., (eds.) The Process of Schooling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 188–200.Google Scholar
Willis, P. 1977. Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
Willis, P. & Trondman, M.. 2000. Manifesto. Ethnography 1(1): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpe, A-M. 1988. Within School Walls: The Role of Discipline, Sexuality and the Curriculum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woods, P. 1990. The Happiest Days? How Pupils Cope with School. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. 1985. Language variation and cultural hegemony: Toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist. 12: 738–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, K. 1992. Language ideology: issues and approaches. Pragmatics. 2(3): 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, K.2004. Codeswitching. In Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell. 73–94.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. & Schieffelin, B.. 1994. Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 23: 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D. 1998. Discourse identities and social identities. In Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds.) Identities in Talk. London: Sage. 87–106.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Ben Rampton, King's College London
  • Book: Language in Late Modernity
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Ben Rampton, King's College London
  • Book: Language in Late Modernity
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Ben Rampton, King's College London
  • Book: Language in Late Modernity
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722.012
Available formats
×