Bibliography

Brian Vickers

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511484049.019

Abbott, E. A., 1886, A Shakespearian Grammar. An Attempt to illustrate some of the differences between Elizabethan and modern English, London; rev. edn (first edn 1869)

Abrams, Richard, 1995, ‘Breaching the Canon. Elegy by W. S.: the State of the Argument’, Shakespeare Newsletter, The, vol. 45, no. 226: 51–2, 54Google Scholar

Abrams, Richard, 1996a, ‘In Defence of W. S. Reasons for Attributing A Funeral Elegy to Shakespeare’, Times Literary Supplement, 9 February, pp. 25–6Google Scholar

Abrams, Richard, 1996b, ‘W[illiam] S[hakespeare]'s “Funeral Elegy” and the Turn from the Theatrical’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 36: 435–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, Donald K., Jr, 1972, John Ford, New York

Aristotle, 1984, Rhetoric, tr. W. R. Roberts, in Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols., Princeton, N J.

Bajetta, Carlo, 1996, ‘Ralegh's Early Poetry and Its Metrical Context’, Studies in Philology, 93: 399–411Google Scholar

Baldwin, T. W., 1944, William Shakspere's ‘Small Latine and Lesse Greeke’, 2 vols., Urbana, IL

Ball, Catherine N., 1996, ‘A Diachronic Study of Relative Markers in Spoken and Written English’, Language Variation and Change, 8: 227–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Bang, W. (ed.), 1906, John Ford, The Queen in Materialien zur Kunde des älteren Englischen Dramas, vol. ⅩⅢ, Louvain

Barber, Charles, 1976, Early Modern English, London; rev. edn, Edinburgh, 1997

Barker, Richard H., 1945, ‘The Authorship of The Second Maiden's Tragedy and The Revenger's Tragedy’, Shakespeare Association Bulletin, 20: 51–62, 121–33

Barker, Richard H., 1958, Thomas Middleton, New York

Bately, Janet M., 1964, ‘Dryden's Revisions in the Essay of Dramatic Poesy: the Preposition at the End of the Sentence and the Expression of the Relative’, Review of English Studies, 15: 268–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Bately, Janet M., 1965, ‘Who and Which and the Grammarians of the 17th Century’, English Studies, 46: 245–50Google Scholar

[Bathurst, Charles], 1857, Remarks on the Differences in Shakespeare's Versification in Different Periods of his Life, London

Baugh, Albert C., 1959, ‘A Medieval Survival in Elizabethan Punctuation’, in J. W. Bennett, O. Cargill, and V. Hall, Jr (eds.), Studies in the Elizabethan Drama (London), pp. 1–15

Beal, Peter, 1986a, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement, 3 January, p. 13

Beal, Peter, 1986b, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement, 24 January, p. 88

Bennett, A. L., 1954, ‘The Principal Rhetorical Conventions in the Renaissance Personal Elegy’, Studies in Philology, 51: 107–26Google Scholar

Bentley, Gerald Eades, 1941–68, The Jacobean and Caroline Stage, 7 vols., Oxford

Bevington, David (ed.), 1997, The Complete Works of Shakespeare. Updated Fourth Edition, New York

Booth, Stephen, 1997, ‘A Long, Dull Poem by William Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Studies, 25: 229–37Google Scholar

Booty, John E. (ed.), 1976, The Book of Common Prayer 1559. The Elizabethan Prayer Book, Charlottesville, VA

Bradbrook, Muriel, 1986, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement, 31 January, p. 115Google Scholar

Brooke, C. F. Tucker, 1908, The Shakespeare Apocrypha. Being a Collection of Fourteen Plays Which Have Been Ascribed to Shakespeare, Oxford; repr. 1918

Burelbach, Frederick M. Jr, 1966, ‘John Ford's Style: the Apprentice Years’, McNeese Review, 17: 58–73Google Scholar

Burrow, Colin, 1998, ‘Life and Work in Shakespeare's Poems’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 97: 15–50Google Scholar

Butler, Christopher S., 1985, Statistics in Linguistics, Oxford

Butler, Martin, 1988, ‘Love's Sacrifice: Ford's Metatheatrical Tragedy’, in Neill 1988, pp. 201–32

Byrne, M. St C., 1932, ‘Bibliographic Clues in Collaborate Plays’, Library 4th s, 13: 21–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Cantor, Paul A., 1987, ‘John Ford’, in F. Bowers (ed.), Jacobean and Caroline Dramatists (Dictionary of Literary Biography, vol. ⅬⅧ), Detroit, MI, pp. 91–106

Capell, Edward, 1783, ‘A brief Essay on Verse, asof Shakespeare's modeling: its Principles, and its Construction’, Notes and Various Readings to Shakespeare, 3 vols.; excerpts in Brian Vickers (ed.), Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. Volume Ⅵ, 1774–1801, London and Boston, 1981, pp. 253–72

Chadwyck-Healey, 1995, English Poetry 900–1900, the full text database

Chadwyck-Healey, 1995, English Verse Drama, the full text database

Chalker, Sylvia and Weiner, Edmund (eds.), 1994, The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar, Oxford

Chambers, David L., 1903, The Metre of Macbeth. Its Relation to Shakespeare's Earlier and Later Work, Princeton, N J.

Chambers, E. K., 1930, William Shakespeare. A Study of Facts and Problems, 2 vols., Oxford

Crain, Caleb, 1998, ‘The Bard's Fingerprints’, Lingua Franca July/August: 28–39Google Scholar

Davison, Peter, 1988, review of S. Wells and G. Taylor, et al. (eds.), William Shakespeare. The Complete Works and Textual Companion, Library,6th s., 10: 255–67

Davril, Robert, 1954, Le Drame de John Ford, Paris

Davril, Robert, 1958, ‘Shakespeare and Ford’, Shakespeare Jahrbuch, 94: 121–31Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas, 1953–61, The Dramatic Works, ed. F. Bowers, 4 vols., Cambridge

Deloney, Thomas, 1912, The Works of Thomas Deloney, ed. F. O Mann, Oxford

Du Vair, Guillaume, 1951, The Moral Philosophie of the Stoicks, tr. T. James (1598), ed. R. Kirk, New Brunswick NJ

Duncan-Jones, Katherine, 1983, ‘Was the 1609 Shake-speares Sonnets Really Unauthorized?’, Review of English Studies, n. s., 34: 151–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, Katherine, 1997, ‘Who Wrote A Funerall Elegie?’, Shakespeare Studies 25: 192–210Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S., 1932, ‘John Ford’, Selected Essays, London, pp. 193–204; rev. edn 1951, pp. 193–204

Elliott, Ward E. Y., and Valenza, Robert J., 1991, ‘A Touchstone for the Bard’, Computers and the Humanities, 25: 199–209CrossRef Google Scholar

Elliott, Ward E. Y., and Valenza, Robert J., 1996, ‘And Then There Were None: Winnowing the Shakespeare Claimants’, Computers and the Humanities, 30: 191–245CrossRef Google Scholar

Elliott, Ward E. Y., and Valenza, Robert J., 1997, ‘Glass Slippers and Seven-League Boots: C-Prompted Doubts About Ascribing A Funeral Elegy and “A Lover's Complaint” to Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Quarterly 48: 177–207CrossRef Google Scholar

Elliott, Ward E. Y., and Valenza, Robert J., 1998, ‘The Professor Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks: Problems with the Foster “Response”’, CHum 32: 425–90Google Scholar

Elliott, Ward E. Y., and Valenza, Robert J., 2000, ‘So much hardball, so little of it over the plate. Conclusions from our “debate” with Donald Foster’, posted online at http://govt.claremontmckenna.edu/welliott/hardball.htm, pp. 1–25. A much-shortened version is forthcoming in Computers and the Humanities

Elliott, Ward E. Y., and Valenza, Robert J., 2001, ‘Smoking Guns and Silver Bullets. Could John Ford Have Written the Funeral Elegye?’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16: 205–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Ellis, John M., 1997, Literature Lost. Social Agendas and the Corruption of the Humanities, New Haven and London

Ellis-Fermor, Una, 1958, The Jacobean Drama, London; rev. edn (first edn 1936)

Empson, William, 1947, Seven Types of Ambiguity, London (first edn 1930)

Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.), 1997, The Riverside Shakespeare. Second Edition, Boston

Farr, Dorothy M., 1979, John Ford and the Caroline Theatre, London

Fellowes, E. H., 1967, English Madrigal Verse 1588–1632, 3rd edn, revised and enlarged by Frederick W. Sternfeld and David Greer, Oxford

Fischer, O., 1992, ‘Syntax’, in Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume Ⅱ. 1066–1476, Cambridge, pp. 207–408

Foster, Donald W., 1986a, Letter to the Editor, New York Times Book Review, The, 19 January, p. 4Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1986b, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement, 24 January, pp. 87–8Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1986c, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement, 7 March, p. 247Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1987, ‘“Shall I Die” Post Mortem: Defining Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Quarterly 38: 58–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1989, Elegy by W. S. A Study in Attribution, Newark and London

Foster, Donald W., 1995, ‘Shaxicon 1995’, Shakespeare Newsletter, The 45: 1, 30, 32Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1996a, ‘A Funeral Elegy: W[illiam] S[hakespeare's] “Best-speaking Witnesses”’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 111: 1080–105CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1996b, ‘Response to Elliott and Valenza, “And Then There Were None”’, Computers and the Humanities, 30: 247–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1997, ‘Attributing A Funeral Elegye: Reply’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 112: 432–4Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W., 1998, ‘The Claremont Shakespeare Authorship Clinic: How Severe are the Problems?’, Computers and the Humanities, 32: 491–510CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, Don, 2000, Author Unknown: On the Trail of Anonymous, New York

Franz, Wilhelm, 1939, Shakespeare-Grammatik, 4th edn: Die Sprache Shakespeares In Vers und Prosa, Halle (earlier edns 1898–1923)

Frost, David L., 1968, The School of Shakespeare, Cambridge

Garner, Bryan A., 1987, ‘Shakespeare's Latinate Neologisms’, in Salmon and Burgess 1987, pp. 207–28; fromShakespeare Studies, 15 (1982): 149–70Google Scholar

Gayley, Charles Mills (ed.), 1937, Representative English Comedies … Volume Ⅲ. The Later Contemporaries of Shakespeare, New York; The Spanish Gypsy, pp. 119–203

Gibson, Colin A., 1988, ‘“The Stage of My Mortality”: Ford's Poetry of Death’, in Neill 1988, pp. 55–80

Giroux, Robert, 1986, Letter to the Editor, New York Times Book Review, The, 19 January, pp. 4, 24Google Scholar

Graham-White, Anthony, 1995, Punctuation and its Dramatic Value in Shakespearean Drama, Newark, N J, and London

Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, Howard, Jean E., Maus, Katharine Eisaman (eds.), 1997, The Norton Shakespeare. Based on the Oxford Edition, New York

Greg, W. W., 1955, The Shakespeare First Folio. Its Bibliographic and Textual History, Oxford

Greg, W. W., 1966, ‘An Elizabethan Printer and his Copy’, in Greg, Collected Papers, ed. J. C. Maxwell (Oxford, 1966), pp. 95–109; originally in Library, 4 (1923): 102–18

Haack, Susan, 1999, ‘Staying for an Answer. The Untidy Process of Groping for Truth’, Times Literary Supplement 9 July, pp. 12–14Google Scholar

Hannemann, Eduard, 1888, ‘Metrische Untersuchungen zu John Ford’, Inaugural-Dissertation der vereinigten Friedrichs-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle a. S

Harbage, Alfred (ed.), rev. Schoenbaum, S., 1964, Annals of English Drama 975–1700, London; Supplements 1–2 (1966 and 1970)

Harner, James L. (ed.), 2000, The World Shakespeare Bibliography 1980–1996 on CD-ROM, Cambridge

Hart, Alfred, 1934a, Shakespeare and the Homilies. And Other Pieces of Research into the Elizabethan Drama, Melbourne and London; repr. New York, 1970, 1977

Hart, Alfred, 1934b, ‘Shakespeare and the Vocabulary of The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Hart 1934a, pp. 242–56; fromReview of English Studies 10 (1934): 278–87Google Scholar

Hart, Alfred, 1943a, ‘The Vocabularies of Shakespeare's Plays’, Review of English Studies, 19: 128–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Hart, Alfred, 1943b, ‘The Growth of Shakespeare's Vocabulary’, Review of English Studies, 19: 242–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Hart, Dominick J., 1985, ‘The Fancies, Chast and Noble’ by J. Ford. A Critical Edition, New York and London

Herdan, Gustav, 1965, ‘Discussion on the Paper by Mr Morton’, following A. Q. Morton, ‘The Authorship of Greek Prose’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series a, 128: 169–233Google Scholar

Hieatt, A. Kent, 1997a, ‘Attributing A Funeral Elegye’, Letter to the Editor, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 112: 430–1CrossRef Google Scholar

Hieatt, Charles W., 1997b, ‘Attributing A Funeral Elegye’, Letter to the Editor, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 112: 429–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Hirsh, James, 2000, ‘A Funeral Elegy, Shakespeare, and Elizabeth Cary’, The Ben Jonson Journal 7: 567–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Honigmann, E. A. J., 1990, review of Foster 1989, Notes and Queries, 235: 465–7CrossRef Google Scholar

Hope, Jonathan, 1994, The Authorship of Shakespeare's Plays. A Socio-Linguistic Study, Cambridge

Horden, John (ed.), 1980, Samuel Halkett and John Laing, A Dictionary of Anonymous and Pseudonymous Publications in the English Language. Third (revised and enlarged) edition, 1475–1640, London

Houston, John Porter, 1988, Shakespearean Sentences. A Study in Style and Syntax, Baton Rouge, LA

Hoy, Cyrus, 1959, ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon (Ⅳ)’, Studies in Bibliography, 12: 91–116Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus, 1960, ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon (Ⅴ)’, Studies in Bibliography, 13: 77–108Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus, 1980, Introductions, Notes, and Commentaries to Texts in ‘The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker’, 4 vols., Cambridge

Huebert, Ronald, 1977, John Ford. Baroque English Dramatist, Montreal and London

Ingram, John K., 1874, ‘On the “weak endings” of Shakspere, with some account of the history of the verse-tests in general’, Transactions of the New Shakspere Society, 1: 442–64Google Scholar

Jackson, MacDonald P., 1979, Studies in Attribution. Middleton and Shakespeare, Salzburg

Jackson, MacDonald P., 1991, review of Foster 1989, Shakespeare Survey 43: 258–61Google Scholar

Jackson, MacDonald P., 1995, ‘Function Words in the Funeral Elegy’, Shakespeare Newsletter, The, vol. 45, no. 227: 74, 78

Jentoft, C. W., 1976, ‘Surrey's Five Elegies: Rhetoric, Structure, and the Poetry of Praise’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 91: 23–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, Gerald D., 1992, ‘Thomas Pavier, Publisher, 1600–25’, Library 6th s., 14: 12–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Joseph, Sister Miriam, 1947, Shakespeare's Use of the Arts of Language, New York; repr. 1966

Kenny, Anthony, 1982, The Computation of Style. An Introduction to Statistics for Students of Literature and Humanities, Oxford

Kerl, Erich, 1922, ‘Das Hendiadyoin bei Shakespeare’, PhD Diss., Universität Marburg

Krüger, Alfred, 1929, ‘Studien über die Syntax des englischen Relativpronouns zu Beginn der spätenglischen Zeit’, PhD Diss., Universität Giessen

Lake, David J., 1975, The Canon of Thomas Middleton's Plays, Cambridge

Lass, Roger (ed.), 1999, The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume Ⅲ. 1476–1776, Cambridge

Leech, Clifford, 1957, John Ford and the Drama of His Time, London

Leishman, J. B. (ed.), 1949, The Three Parnassus Plays, London

Lipsius, Iustus, 1939, Two Bookes of Constancie Written in Latin by Iustus Lipsius, Englished by Sir John Stradling, ed. R. Kirk, New Brunswick, N J

Littledale, Harold, and Greg, W. W. (eds.), 1920, The Welsh Ambassador, Oxford (Malone Society Reprint)

Lloyd, Bertram, 1945, ‘The Authorship of The Welsh Embassadour’, Review of English Studies, 21: 192–201CrossRef Google Scholar

Lomax, Marion (ed.), 1995, John Ford: The Lover's Melancholy, The Broken Heart, 'Tis Pity She's a Whore, and Perkin Warbeck, Oxford (Oxford Drama Library)

Lucas, F. L. (ed.), 1927, The Works of John Webster, 4 vols., London

Maule, Jeremy, 2000, ‘“To the Memory of the Late Excellent Poet John Fletcher”: a New Poem by John Ford’, English Manuscript Studies 1100–1700 8: 136–59Google Scholar

Maxwell, Baldwin, 1956, Studies in the Shakespeare Apocrypha, New York; repr. New York, 1969

Monsarrat, Gilles D., 1971, ‘John Ford's Authorship of Christes Bloodie Sweat’, English Language Notes 9: 20–5Google Scholar

Monsarrat, Gilles D., 1975, ‘Les Thèmes Stoïciens dans la littérature de la Renaissance Anglaise’, Thèse, Université de Lille

Monsarrat, Gilles D., 1980, ‘The Unity of John Ford: 'Tis Pity She's a Whore and Christ's Bloody Sweat’, Studies in Philology, 77: 247–70Google Scholar

Monsarrat, Gilles D., 1984, Light from the Porch. Stoicism and English Renaissance Literature, Paris

Monsarrat, Gilles D., 2002, ‘A Funeral Elegy: Ford, W. S., and Shakespeare’, Review of English Studies vol. 53, no. 210CrossRef Google Scholar

Müller, C. F. W., 1852, ‘Ueber das sogenannte hen dia dyoin im lateinischen’, Philologus 7: 297–318CrossRef Google Scholar

Neill, Michael (ed.), 1988, John Ford. Critical Re-Visions, Cambridge

Ness, Frederic W., 1941, The Use of Rhyme in Shakespeare's Plays, New Haven, CT

Oates, Joyce Carol, 1999, ‘The Mystery of Jon Benét Ramsey’, New York Review of Books 24 June, pp. 31–2, 34–6Google Scholar

Oliphant, E. H. C., 1926, ‘The Authorship of The Revenger's Tragedy’, Studies in Philology, 23: 157–68Google Scholar

Oliphant, E. H. C., 1927, The Plays of Beaumont and Fletcher. An Attempt to Determine Their Respective Shares and the Shares of Others, New Haven, CT, 1927; New York, 1970

Oliver, H. J., 1955, The Problem of John Ford, Melbourne

Oras, Ants, 1960, Pause Patterns in Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama. An Experiment in Prosody, Gainesville, FL

Obortello, Alfredo, 1949, Madrigali Italiani in Inghilterra. Storia, Critica, Testi, Milan

Parkes, M., 1993, Pause and Effect. An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West, London, Berkeley, and Los Angeles

Partridge, A. C., 1964, Orthography in Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama. A Study of Colloquial Contractions, Elision, Prosody and Punctuation, London

Partridge, A. C., 1976, A Substantive Grammar of Shakespeare's Nondramatic Texts, Charlottesville, VA

Peacham, Henry, 1954, The Garden of Eloquence (1593), ed. W. G. Crane, Gainesville, FL; repr. Delmar, NY, 1977

Pendleton, Thomas A., 1986, Letter to the Editor, New York Times Book Review, The, 19 January, p. 24Google Scholar

Pendleton, Thomas A., 1989, ‘The Non-Shakespearian Language of “Shall I Die?”’, Review of English Studies, n. s. 40: 323–51CrossRef Google Scholar

Peters, Hans, 1996, ‘Early Modern English Who: Discourse Function and Standardization’, North-Western European Language Evolution, 27: 67–185CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierce, Frederick E., 1909, The Collaboration of Webster and Dekker, New Haven

Pierce, Frederick E., 1912a, ‘The Collaboration of Dekker and Ford (Ⅰ). The Authorship of The Sun's Darling’, Anglia n. f. 34: 141–68Google Scholar

Pierce, Frederick E., 1912b, ‘The Collaboration of Dekker and Ford (Ⅱ). The Authorship of The Witch of Edmonton’, Anglia n. f. 34: 289–312Google Scholar

Prestin, Terry, 1997, ‘From Sonnets to Ransom Notes. Shakespeare Sleuth Helps Police in Literary Detection’, New York Times, 19 November, p. a24

Proudfoot, Richard, 1990, review of Foster 1989 inTimes Literary Supplement, 8–14 June, p. 420Google Scholar

Puttenham, George, 1936, The Arte of English Poesie, ed. G. D. Willcock and A. Walker, Cambridge; repr. 1970

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan, 1972, A Grammar of Contemporary English, London

Ringler, William A. Jr (ed.), 1962, The Poems of Sir Philip Sidney, Oxford

Rissanen, Matti, 1999, ‘Syntax’, in Lass 1999, pp. 187–331

Robbins, Robin, 1985, ‘A New Shakespeare Poem? … The Counter-Arguments’, Times Literary Supplement, 20 December, pp. 1449–50Google Scholar

Rowntree, Derek, 1981, Statistics Without Tears. A Primer for Non-mathematicians, Harmondsworth

Rydén, Mats, 1966, Relative Constructions in Early Sixteenth-Century English. With Special Reference to Sir Thomas Elyot, Uppsala

Salmon, Vivien and Burgess, Edwina (eds.), 1987, A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama, Amsterdam and Philadelphia

Sampley, Arthur M., 1933, ‘“Verbal Tests” for Peele's Plays’, Studies in Philology, 30: 473–96Google Scholar

Sargeaunt, M. Joan, 1934, ‘Writings Ascribed to John Ford by Joseph Hunter in Chorus Vatum’, Review of English Studies, 10: 165–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Sargeaunt, M. Joan, 1935, John Ford, Oxford; New York 1966

Schäfer, Jürgen, 1973, Shakespeares Stil. Germanisches und romanisches Vokabular, Frankfurt

Schäfer, Jürgen, 1980, Documentation in the OED Shakespeare and Nashe as Test Cases, Oxford

Schoenbaum, S., 1966, Internal Evidence and Elizabethan Dramatic Authorship, London

Sedge, Douglas, 1963, ‘An Edition of The Queen; or, The Excellency of her Sex’, MA thesis, the Shakespeare Institute, University of Birmingham

Shaheen, Naseeb, 1987, Biblical References in Shakespeare's Tragedies, Newark and London

Shaheen, Naseeb, 1989, Biblical References in Shakespeare's History Plays, Newark and London

Shaheen, Naseeb, 1993, Biblical References in Shakespeare's Comedies, Newark and London

Shapiro, I. A., 1985, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement, 27 December, pp. 1481, 1492Google Scholar

Sheen, Erica and Maule, Jeremy, 1986, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement 17 January, p. 61Google Scholar

Spevack, Marvin, 1973, The Harvard Concordance to Shakespeare, Hildesheim

Stock, L. E., Monsarrat, Gilles D., Kennedy, Judith M., and Danielson, Dennis (eds.), 1991, The Nondramatic Works of John Ford, Binghamton, NY

Sutfin, Joe Andrews, 1964, ‘Ford's Love's Sacrifice, The Lady's Trial, and The Queen. Critical, Old-spelling Editions of the Texts of the Original Quartos’, PhD Diss., Vanderbilt University (University Microfilms, 64–10, 565)

Sykes, H. Dugdale, 1924, Sidelights on Elizabethan Drama. A Series of Studies Dealing with the Authorship of Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Plays, Oxford; repr. London, 1966

Tarlinskaja, Marina, 1987, Shakespeare's Verse. Iambic Pentameter and the Poet's Idiosyncrasies, New York

Taylor, Gary, 1985a, ‘Shakespeare's New Poem: a Scholar's Clues and Conclusions’, New York Times Book Review, The, 15 December, pp. 11–14Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, 1985b, ‘A New Shakespeare Poem? The Evidence …’, Times Literary Supplement, 20 December, pp. 1447–8Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, 1986, ‘“Shall I Die” Immortalized?’, Times Literary Supplement 31 January, pp. 123–4Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, 1988, ‘Poem by Shakespeare! Read All About It!’, New York Times Book Review, The, 26 JuneGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Steve, 2000, JonBenét. Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation (with Don Davis), rev. edn, New York

Ure, Peter, 1951, ‘A Note on “Opinion” in Daniel, Greville, and Chapman’, Modern Language Review, 46: 331–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian, 1968, The Artistry of Shakespeare's Prose, London; repr. 1979

Vickers, Brian, 1971, ‘Shakespeare's Use of Rhetoric’, in K. Muir and S. Schoenbaum (eds.), A New Companion to Shakespeare Studies, Cambridge, pp. 83–98, 266–7 (repr. in Salmon and Burgess 1987, pp. 391–406)

Vickers, Brian., 1984, ‘Rhetoric and Feeling in Shakespeare's Sonnets’, in Shakespeare Today: Directions and Methods of Research, ed. K. Elam, Florence, pp. 53–98

Vickers, Brian, 1988, In Defence of Rhetoric, Oxford; rev. edn, 1997

Vickers, Brian, 1989, review of S. Wells and G. Taylor (eds.), William Shakespeare. The Complete Works and A Textual Companion, Review of English Studies, 40:402–11

Vickers, Brian, 1993, ‘Shakespearian Consolations’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 82: 219–84Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian (ed.), 1996, Francis Bacon, Oxford

Vickers, Brian, 1999, English Renaissance Literary Criticism, Oxford

Vickers, Brian, 1996b, ‘Whose Thumbprints? A More Plausible Author for A Funeral Elegy’, Times Literary Supplement, 8 March, pp. 16–18

Vickers, Brian, 2002, Shakespeare, Co-author. A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays, Oxford

Möllendorf, Peter, 1996, ‘Hendyiadyoin’, Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Tübingen, vol. III, cols. 1344–50Google Scholar

Warren, Michael J., 1977, ‘Repunctuation as Interpretation in Editions of Shakespeare’, English Literary Renaissance, 7: 155–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley and Taylor, Gary, with Jowett, John and Montgomery, William, 1987, William Shakespeare. A Textual Companion, Oxford

Wells, Stanley, 1996a, ‘In Memory of Master William Peter. The Difficulties of Attributing A Funeral Elegy to Shakespeare’, Times Literary Supplement, 26 January, p. 28Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley, 1996b, ‘Shakespeare and the Funeral Elegy’, Letter to the Editor, Times Literary Supplement, 16 February, p. 17Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley, 1997, ‘A Funeral Elegy: Obstacles to Belief’, Shakespeare Studies 25: 186–91Google Scholar

Williams, C. B., 1970, Style and Vocabulary: Numerical Studies, London

Williams, Franklin B. Jr, 1957, ‘An Initiation into Initials’, Studies in Bibliography, 9: 163–78Google Scholar

Wood, Thomas A., 1965, ‘John Ford: Three Studies’, PhD Diss., University of Birmingham

Wright, George T., 1981, ‘Hendiadys and Hamlet’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 96: 168–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Wright, George T., 1986, ‘The Meter of “Shall I die?”’, Eidos. The International Prosody Bulletin, 3: 6, 11, 12Google Scholar

Wright, George T., 1988, Shakespeare's Metrical Art, Berkeley and Los Angeles