Ahl, F. (1976) Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1984) “The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome,” AJPh 105: 174–208.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A. (1970) Die monarchische Repräsentation im römischen Kaiserreiche. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1995a) “Eine Bauinschrift aus dem Colosseum,” ZPE 109: 195–226.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1995b) “Bricht der Schweigsame sein Schweigen?: eine Grabinschrift aus Rom,” MDAI(R) 102: 251–68.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1949) La vie et l'œuvre d'Asinius Pollion. Études et commentaires 8. Paris.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1993) “Les Res gestae d'Auguste, ou les nuances de l'égotisme politique,” in L'invention de l'autobiographie d'Hésiode à Augustin: actes du deuxième colloque de l'Équipe de recherche sur l'hellénisme post-classique (Paris, École normale supérieure, 14–16 juin 1990), ed. Baslez, M.-F., Hoffmann, P., and Pernot, L.. Études de littérature ancienne 5. Paris: 97–114.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (1999) Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus' Histories. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ash, R. (2003) “‘Aliud est enim epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere’ (Epistles 6.16.2): Pliny the historian?,” Arethusa 36: 211–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ash, R. (2006) “Following in the footsteps of Lucullus? Tacitus' characterisation of Corbulo,” Arethusa 39: 355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubrion, E. (1985) Rhétorique et histoire chez Tacite. Metz.Google Scholar

Avenarius, G. (1956) Lukians Schrift zur Geschichtsschreibung. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1962) “Waiting for Sulla,” JRS 52: 47–61.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1993) “Livy and Augustus,” in Livius: Aspekte seines Werkes, ed. Schuller, W.. Xenia 31. Konstanz: 9–38.Google Scholar

Bandera, C. (1981) “Sacrificial levels in Virgil's Aeneid,” Arethusa 14: 217–39.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1977) “The fragments of Tacitus' Histories,” CPh 72: 224–31.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1981) “Curiatius Maternus,” Hermes 109: 382–4.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (2005) “The sack of the Temple in Josephus and Tacitus,” in Edmondson, Mason, and Rives (2005), 129–44.CrossRef

Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1997) Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan's Civil War. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1954) “Der Dialogus de Oratoribus des Tacitus (Motive und Zeit seiner Entstehung),” Sitzungsberichte der sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig 101.4.Google Scholar

Bastomsky, S. J. (1982) “Tacitus, Agricola 5.3: more than an epigram?,” Philologus 126: 151–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauman, R. A. (1989) Lawyers and Politics in the Early Roman Empire: A Study of Relations between the Roman Jurists and the Emperors from Augustus to Hadrian. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 82. Munich.Google Scholar

Baxter, R. T. S. (1971) “Virgil's influence on Tacitus in Book 3 of the Histories,” CPh 66: 93–107.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (1993) “Looking (harder) for Roman myth: Dumézil, declamation and the problems of definition,” in Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: Das Paradigma Roms, ed. Graf, F.. Colloquium Rauricum 3. Stuttgart: 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, M. (1998) “Vita inscripta,” in La biographie antique: huit exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Ehlers, W. W.. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 44. Geneva: 83–114.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2003a) “The triumph of the absurd: Roman street theatre,” in Edwards and Woolf (2003b), 21–43.

Beard, M. (2003b) “The triumph of Flavius Josephus,” in Boyle and Dominik (2003), 543–58.

Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beck, J.-W. (1998) “Germania” – “Agricola”: zwei Kapitel zu Tacitus' zwei kleinen Schriften. Spudasmata 68. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Benario, H. W. (1979) “Agricola's proconsulship,” RhM 122: 167–72.Google Scholar

Beutel, F. (2000) Vergangenheit als Politik: neue Aspekte im Werk des jüngeren Plinius. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 121. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1997) Hadrian: The Restless Emperor. London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2000) “The life and death of Cornelius Tacitus,” Historia 49: 230–47.Google Scholar

Bloch, R. (2002) Antike Vorstellungen vom Judentum: Der Judenexkurs des Tacitus im Rahmen der griechisch-römischen Ethnographie. Historia Einzelschriften 160. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1992) Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1997a) Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1997b) “A preface to the history of declamation: whose speech? whose history?,” in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997), 199–215.

Bloomer, W. M. (1997c) “Schooling in persona: imagination and subordination in Roman education,” ClAnt 16: 57–78.Google Scholar

Boatwright, M. T. (1987) Hadrian and the City of Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Boissier, G. (1913) L'opposition sous les Césars, 7th edn. Paris.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1981) Untersuchungen über die Religion der Sklaven in Griechenland und Rom, 2nd edn. Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei 14. 2 vols. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Bonnefond, M. (1987) “Transferts de functions et mutation idéologique: le Capitole et le Forum d'Auguste,” L'urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.C. – IIIe siècle ap. J.C.). Actes du colloque international organisé par le Centre national de la recherche scientifique et l'École française de Rome (Rome, 8–12 mai 1985). Collection de l'École française de Rome 98. Rome: 251–78.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Borzsák, I. (1973) “Spectaculum: ein Motiv der ‘tragischen Geschichtsschreibung’ bei Livius und Tacitus,” ACD 9: 57–67.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (1972) “Asinius Pollio and Augustus,” Historia 21: 441–73.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyce, A. A. (1942) “The origin of ornamenta triumphalia,” CPh 37: 130–41.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J. (eds.) (2003) Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bradley, K. R. (1987) Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study in Social Control. Oxford.Google Scholar

Braund, D. (1996) Ruling Roman Britain: Kings, Queens, Governors and Emperors from Julius Caesar to Agricola. London.Google Scholar

Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) (2003) Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter.Google Scholar

Braund, S. (1988) Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal's Third Book of Satires. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Briessmann, A. (1955) Tacitus und das flavische Geschichtsbild. Hermes Einzelschriften 10. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Bruère, R. T. (1954) “Tacitus and Pliny's Panegyricus,” CPh 49: 161–79.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1975) “Stoicism and the Principate,” PBSR 43: 7–35.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1988) The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1990) Roman Imperial Themes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. and Moore, J. M. (eds.) (1967) Res Gestae Divi Augusti: The Achievements of the Divine Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1962–79) Studien zur römischen Literatur. 10 vols. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1979) Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1967) “Tacitus and the date of Curiatius Maternus' death,” CR 17: 258–61.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. B. (1984) The Emperor and the Roman Army 31 bc–ad 235. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cancik-Lindemaier, H. and Cancik, H. (1986) “Zensur und Gedächtnis: Zu Tacitus, Annales IV 32–38,” AU 29: 16–35.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1993) Studi di storia della storiografia romana. Documenti e studi 15. Bari.Google Scholar

Carré, R. (2002) “Rome et l'Italie dans les Histoires de Tacite,” in Croisille and Perrin (2002), 193–225.

Champion, C. (1994) “Dialogus 5.3–10.8: a reconsideration of the character of Marcus Aper,” Phoenix 48: 152–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. (1991) Final Judgments: Duty and Emotion in Roman Wills 200 bc– ad 250. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (2003) Nero. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. (2000) Livy's Exemplary History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Chilver, G. E. F. and Townend, G. B. (1985) A Historical Commentary on Tacitus' Histories IV and V. Oxford.Google Scholar

Christ, K. (1978) “Tacitus und der Principat,” Historia 27: 449–87.Google Scholar

Christes, J. (1994) “Tacitus und die moderatio des Tiberius,” Gymnasium 101: 112–35.Google Scholar

Christes, J. (1995) “Das persönliche Vorwort des Tacitus zu den Historien,” Philologus 139: 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Citroni, M. (1989) “Marziale e la letteratura per i Saturnali (poetica dell'intrattenimento e cronologia della pubblicazione dei libri),” ICS 14: 201–26.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (2001) “An island nation: re-reading Tacitus' Agricola,” JRS 91: 94–112.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (2002) “In arto et inglorius labor: Tacitus's anti-history,” in Representations of Empire: Rome and the Mediterranean World, ed. Bowman, A. K., Cotton, H. M., Goodman, M., and Price, S.. Proceedings of the British Academy 114. Oxford: 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1983) “Il Pantheon, l'apoteosi di Augusto e l'apoteosi di Romolo,” in Città e architettura nella Roma imperiale: atti del seminario del 27 ottobre 1981 nel 25° anniversario dell'Accademia di Danimarca, ed. de Fine Licht, K.. Analecta Romana Instituti Danici Supplementum 10. Odense: 41–6.Google Scholar

Cody, J. M. (2003) “Conquerors and conquered on Flavian coins,” in Boyle and Dominik (2003), 103–23.

Cole, T. (1992) “‘Initium mihi operis Servius Galba iterum T. Vinius consules …,’” YClS 29: 231–45.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1986) “The emperor Domitian and literature,” ANRW ii.32.5: 3087–115.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1998) “The liber spectaculorum: perpetuating the ephemeral,” in Toto notus in orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, ed. Grewing, F.. Palingenesia 65. Stuttgart: 15–36.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. ([1990] 2000) “Latin literature after ad 96: change or continuity?,” AJAH 15: 19–39.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2006) Martial: Liber Spectaculorum. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (1986) “The formation of the historical tradition of early Rome,” in Moxon, Smart, and Woodman (1986), 67–86.

Courtney, E. (1980) A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal. London.Google Scholar

Cramer, F. (1945) “Bookburning and censorship in ancient Rome,” JHI 6: 157–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croisille, J.-M. and Perrin, Y. (eds.) (2002) Neronia VI. Rome à l'époque néronienne: Institutions et vie politique, économie et société, vie intellectuelle, artistique et spirituelle. Collection Latomus 268. Brussels.Google Scholar

Crook, J. A. (1996) “Augustus: power, authority, achievement,” Boardman, J. et al. (eds.) (1982–2005) The Cambridge Ancient History. 2nd edn. 14 vols. Cambridge. 2 x: 113–46.Google Scholar

Daly, L. J. (1981) “Livy's veritas and the spolia opima: politics and the heroics of A. Cornelius Cossus (4.19–20),” AncW 4: 49–63.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (1999) “The trial of Cn. Piso in Tacitus' Annals and the Senatus Consultum de Cn. Pisone Patre: new light on narrative technique,” AJPh 120: 143–62.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2003) Tacitus: Histories Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2006) “Potior utroque Vespasianus: Vespasian and his predecessors in Tacitus's Histories,” Arethusa 39: 245–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwall-Smith, R. H. (1996) Emperors and Architecture: A Study of Flavian Rome. Collection Latomus 231. Brussels.Google Scholar

David, J.-M. (ed.) (1998) Valeurs et mémoire à Rome: Valère Maxime ou la vertu recomposée. Paris.Google Scholar

Davies, J. P. (2004) Rome's Religious History: Livy, Tacitus and Ammianus on their Gods. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davies, P. J. E. (2000) “‘What worse than Nero, what better than his baths?’: ‘damnatio memoriae’ and Roman architecture,” in Varner (2000), 27–44.

Cappai, Filippis C. (1989) “I rapporti tra Agricola e Domiziano nella biografia tacitiana,” CCC 10: 273–82.Google Scholar

Licht, Fine K. (1968) The Rotunda in Rome: A Study of Hadrian's Pantheon. Jutland Archeological Society Publications 8. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Degl'Innocenti Pierini, R. (2003) “Cicerone nella prima età imperiale: luci ed ombre su un martire della repubblica,” in Aspetti della fortuna di Cicerone nella cultura latina. Atti del III symposium Ciceronianum Arpinas, Arpino 10 maggio 2002, ed. Narducci, E.. Florence: 3–54.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2005) Romulus' Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dessau, H. (1906) “Livius und Augustus,” Hermes 41: 142–51.Google Scholar

Devillers, O. (1994) L'art de la persuasion dans les Annales de Tacite. Collection Latomus 223. Brussels.Google Scholar

Devillers, O. (2002) “Le rôle des passages relatifs à Thrasea Paetus dans les Annales de Tacite,” in Croisille and Perrin (2002), 296–311.

Devillers, O. (2003a) Tacite et les sources des Annales: enquêtes sur la méthode historique. Bibliothèque d'études classiques 36. Leuven.Google Scholar

Devillers, O. (2003b) “La composante biographique dans l'historiographie romaine impériale avant Tacite,” in Lachenaud and Longrée (2003), ii.609–19.

Dickey, E. (2002) Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dickison, S. (1977) “Claudius: saturnalicius princeps,” Latomus 36: 634–47.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1971) “Sine ira et studio,” RhM 114: 27–43.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1987) Die Entstehung der historischen Biographie. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1957) “The literary output of the Roman emperors,” G&R 4: 78–97.Google Scholar

Döpp, S. (1985) “Tacitus' Darstellungsweise in cap. 39–43 des ‘Agricola,’” WJA 11: 151–67.Google Scholar

Dorey, T. A. (1960) “Agricola and Domitian,” G&R 7: 66–71.Google Scholar

Drexler, H. (1962) “Gloria,” Helikon 2: 3–36.Google Scholar

Drexler, H. (1965) “Die Praefatio der Historien des Tacitus,” Helikon 5: 148–56.Google Scholar

Drexler, H. (1970) Tacitus: Grundzüge einer politischen Pathologie, 2nd edn. Auf dem Wege zum nationalpolitischen Gymnasium 8. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Ducos, M. (1977) “La liberté chez Tacite: droits du l'individu ou conduite individuelle?” BAGB: 194–217.Google Scholar

Ducos, M. (2003) “Les juristes dans les Annales de Tacite,” in Lachenaud and Longrée (2003), ii. 563–76.

Dupont, F. (1997) “Recitatio and the reorganization of the space of public discourse,” trans. T. N. Habinek and A. Lardinois, in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997), 44–59.

Durry, M. (1956) “Les empereurs comme historiens d'Auguste à Hadrien,” in Histoire et historiens dans l'antiquité: sept exposés et discussions. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 4. Geneva: 215–45.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. (2004) “Cicero's devotio: the rôles of dux and scape-goat in his post reditum rhetoric,” HSPh 102: 299–314.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. (1961) The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1984) “Senatorial self-representation: developments in the Augustan period,” in Millar and Segal (1984), 129–67.

Eck, W. (1995) Die Verwaltung des römischen Reiches in der hohen Kaizerzeit: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge. 2 vols. Arbeiten zur römischen Epigraphik und Altertumskunde 1. Basel.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1996) Tra epigrafia prosopografia e archeologia: Scritti scelti, rielaborati ed aggiornati. Vetera 10. Rome.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1999a) “Elite und Leitbilder in der römischen Kaiserzeit,” in Leitbilder der Spätantike – Eliten und Leitbilder, ed. Dummer, J. and Vielberg, M.. Altertumswissenschaftliches Kolloquium 1. Stuttgart: 31–55.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1999b) “Kaiserliche Imperatorenakklamation und Ornamenta Triumphalia,” ZPE 124: 223–7.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2002a) “Cheating the public, or: Tacitus vindicated,” SCI 21: 149–64.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2002b) “An emperor is made: senatorial politics and Trajan's adoption by Nerva in 97,” in Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin, ed. Clark, G. and Rajak, T.. Oxford: 211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eck, W. (2005) “Der Senator und die Öffentlichkeit – oder: Wie beeindruckt man das Publikum?,” in Senatores populi Romani: Realität und mediale Präsentation einer Führungsschicht, ed. Eck, W. and Heil, M.. Heidelberger Althistorische Beiträge und Epigraphische Studien 40. Stuttgart: 1–18.Google Scholar

Edmondson, J., Mason, S., and Rives, J. (eds.) (2005) Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, C. (1996) Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2007) Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.) (2003a) Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. and G. Woolf (2003b) “Cosmopolis: Rome as world city,” in Edwards and Woolf (2003a), 1–20.

Evans, J. K. (1976) “Tacitus, Domitian, and the proconsulship of Agricola,” RhM 119: 79–84.Google Scholar

Evans, R. (2003) “Containment and corruption: the discourse of Flavian empire,” in Boyle and Dominik (2003), 255–76.

Fabia, P. (1901) “La préface des Histoires de Tacite,” REA 3: 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairweather, J. (1981) Seneca the Elder. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1972) Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1997) “The phenomenology of memory in Roman culture,” CJ 92: 373–83.Google Scholar

Fears, J. R. (1977) Princeps a Diis Electus: The Divine Election of the Emperor as a Political Concept at Rome. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 26. Rome.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1992) “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the problem of free speech under the Principate,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 1–25.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar's Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (1998) Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. (1980) Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology. New York.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. (1984) The Ancient Economy, rev. edn. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. (1985) Democracy Ancient and Modern, rev. edn. New Brunswick, N.J.Google Scholar

Fishwick, D. (1987–2002) The Imperial Cult in the Latin West. 3 vols. Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l'Empire romain 108, 145–6, 148. Leiden.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2000) Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flach, D. (1973a) Tacitus in der Tradition der antiken Geschichtsschreibung. Hypomnemata 39. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (1973b) “Die Vorrede zu Sallusts Historien in neuer Rekonstruktion,” Philologus 117: 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, H. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Flower, H. (1998) “Rethinking ‘damnatio memoriae’: the case of Cn. Calpurnius Piso Pater in ad 20,” ClAnt 17: 155–86.Google Scholar

Flower, H. (2000a) “Damnatio memoriae and epigraphy,” in Varner (2000), 58–69.

Flower, H. (2000b) “The tradition of the spolia opima: M. Claudius Marcellus and Augustus,” ClAnt 19: 34–64.Google Scholar

Flower, H. (2006) The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forbes, C. (1936) “Books for the burning,” TAPhA 67: 114–25.Google Scholar

Fornara, C. (1983) The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1986) “Tacitus,” in Pöschl (1986), 16–38.

Fredrick, D. (2003) “Architecture and surveillance in Flavian Rome,” in Boyle and Dominik (2003), 199–227.

Fuhrmann, M. (1960) “Das Vierkaiserjahr bei Tacitus: über den Aufbau der Historien Buch I–III,” Philologus 104: 250–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabba, E. (1984) “The historians and Augustus,” in Millar and Segal (1984), 61–88.

Galinsky, K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Galtier, F. (2002) “L'opposition symbolique des figures de Néron et Thrasea Paetus (Annales XVI, 21–35),” in Croisille and Perrin (2002), 312–21.

Gärtner, H. A. (1996) “Senecas Tod in der pisonischen Verschwörung bei Tacitus,” in Worte, Bilder, Töne: Studien zur Antike und Antikerezeption, ed. Faber, R. and Seidensticker, B.. Würzburg: 143–57.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1979) “Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger,” Athenaeum 57: 48–72.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2003) “Pliny and the art of (in)offensive self-praise,” Arethusa 36: 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gingras, M. T. (1992) “Annalistic format, Tacitean themes and the obituaries of Annals 3,” CJ 87: 241–56.Google Scholar

Giovannini, A. (ed.) (1987) Opposition et résistances à l'empire d'Auguste à Trajan: neuf exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 33. Geneva.Google Scholar

Girard, R. (1977) Violence and the Sacred, trans. P. Gregory. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Giua, M. (1985) “Storiografia e regimi politici in Tacito, Annales IV, 32–33,” Athenaeum 63: 5–27.Google Scholar

Giua, M. (2003) “Tacito e i suoi destinatari: storia per i contemporanei, storia per i posteri,” in Evento, racconto, scrittura nell'antichità classica: atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 25–26 novembre 2002, ed. Casanova, A. and Desideri, P.. Studi e testi 23. Florence: 247–68.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (1999) “Appreciating Aper: the defence of modernity in Tacitus' Dialogus de Oratoribus,” CQ 49: 224–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, M. (1989) “Nerva, the fiscus Iudaicus and Jewish identity,” JRS 79: 40–4.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1972–81) The Annals of Tacitus. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1995) “The anatomy of Rome from Capitol to cloaca,” JRS 85: 23–32.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gradel, I. (2004) Emperor Worship and Roman Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grainger, J. D. (2003) Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of ad 96–99. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. (1976) Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1984) Nero: The End of a Dynasty. New Haven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. (1986) “Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide,” G&R 33: 64–77, 192–202.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1995) “Tacitus, Tiberius and the Principate,” in Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz, ed. Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn, Z. W.. Mnemosyne Supplementum 139. Leiden: 33–57.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1999) “Pliny and Tacitus,” SCI 18: 139–58.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2003) “De Beneficiis and Roman society,” JRS 93: 92–113.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1990) Tacite. Paris.Google Scholar

Grisé, Y. (1982) Le suicide dans la Rome antique. Montreal and Paris.Google Scholar

Guerrini, R. (1977) “La giovinezza di Agricola: tecnica allusiva e narrazione storica in Tacito,” RAL ser. 8, 32: 481–503.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2003) Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1980) Kommentar zum Dialogus des Tacitus. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (2000) “Seneca's renown: gloria, claritudo, and the replication of the Roman elite,” ClAnt 19: 264–303.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.) (1997) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. (1964) “The starting-point of Tacitus' Historiae: fear or favour by omission?,” G&R 11: 128–36.Google Scholar

Håkanson, L. (ed.) (1989) L. Annaeus Seneca Maior: Oratorum et rhetorum sententiae divisiones colores. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hammond, M. (1963) “Res olim dissociabiles: principatus ac libertas: liberty under the early Roman empire,” HSPh 67: 93–113.Google Scholar

Hanslik, R. (1963) “Der Erzählungskomplex vom Brand Roms und der Christenverfolgung bei Tacitus,” WS 76: 92–108.Google Scholar

Hanson, W. S. (1987) Agricola and the Conquest of the North. Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar

Hanson, W. S. (1991) “Tacitus' ‘Agricola’: an archaeological and historical study,” ANRW ii.33.3: 1741–84.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1979) War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 bc. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (1989) “Augustus, the poets, and the spolia opima,” CQ 39: 408–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History, trans. J. Lloyd. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Häussler, R. (1965) Tacitus und das historische Bewusstsein. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neue Folge 2. Reihe 8. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Haynes, H. (2003) The History of Make-Believe: Tacitus on Imperial Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Haynes, H. (2006) “Survival and memory in the Agricola,” Arethusa 39: 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedrick, C. W. Jr. (2000) History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity. Austin.Google Scholar

Heinz, W.-R. (1975) Die Furcht als politisches Phänomen bei Tacitus. Heuremata 4. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1925) “Auctoritas,” Hermes 60: 348–66.Google Scholar

Heldmann, K. (1991) “Libertas Thraseae servitium aliorum rupit. Überlegungen zur Geschichtsauffassung im Spätwerk des Tacitus,” Gymnasium 98: 207–31.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc'h, J. (1972) Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la république. Collection d'études anciennes. Paris.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc'h, J. (1991) “Le style de Tacite: bilan et perspectives,” ANRW ii.33.4: 2385–453.Google Scholar

Henderson, A. A. R. (1985) “Agricola in Caledonia: the sixth and seventh campaigns,” EMC 29: 318–35.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1989) “Tacitus / the world in pieces,” Ramus 18: 167–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, J. (1998) Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2003) “Portrait of the artist as a figure of style: P.L.I.N.Y's Letters,” Arethusa 36: 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennig, D. (1973) “T. Labienus und der erste Majestätsprozeß de famosis libellis,” Chiron 3: 245–54.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998) The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heubner, H. (1963–82) P. Cornelius Tacitus: Die Historien. 5 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Heubner, H. (1984) Kommentar zum Agricola des Tacitus. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Hickson, F. V. (1991) “Augustus triumphator: manipulation of the triumphal theme in the political program of Augustus,” Latomus 50: 124–38.Google Scholar

Hill, T. (2004) Ambitiosa Mors: Suicide and Self in Roman Thought and Literature. London.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996) “Exempla und mos maiorum. Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität,” in Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein, ed. Gehrke, H.-J. and Möller, A.. ScriptOralia 90. Tübingen: 301–38.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2003) “Images of war in Greece and Rome: between military practice, public memory, and cultural symbolism,” JRS 93: 1–17.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2006) “The transformation of victory into power: from event to structure,” in Representations of War in Ancient Rome, ed. Dillon, S. and Welch, K. E.. Cambridge: 27–48.Google Scholar

Hopkins, K. and G. Burton (1983) “Ambition and withdrawal: the senatorial aristocracy under the emperors,” in Death and Renewal, ed. Hopkins, K.. Sociological Studies in Roman History 2. Cambridge: 120–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1974) “Labeo and Capito,” Historia 23: 252–4.Google Scholar

Horster, M. (2000) Bauinschriften römischer Kaiser: Untersuchungen zu Inschriftenpraxis und Bautätigkeit in Städten des westlichen Imperium Romanum in der Zeit des Prinzipats. Historia Einzelschriften 157. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Howell, P. (1980) A Commentary on Book One of the Epigrams of Martial. London.Google Scholar

Huttner, U. (2004) Recusatio imperii: ein politisches Ritual zwischen Ethik und Taktik. Spudasmata 93. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Jal, P. (1963) La guerre civile à Rome: étude littéraire et morale. Publications de la faculté des lettres et sciences humaines de Paris, Série “Recherches,” 6. Paris.Google Scholar

Janson, T. (1964) Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Studia Latina Stockholmiensia 13. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Jens, W. (1956) “Libertas bei Tacitus,” Hermes 84: 331–52.Google Scholar

Jones, B. W. (1992) The Emperor Domitian. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joshel, S. (1997) “Female desire and the discourse of empire: Tacitus' Messalina,” in Roman Sexualities, ed. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 221–54.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1998) “Becoming ‘CICERO,’” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, ed. Knox, P. and Foss, C.. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 92. Stuttgart: 248–63.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2002) “The taxonomy of patience, or when is ‘patientia’ not a virtue?,” CPh 97: 133–44.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (1984) “Principate and civil war in the Annals of Tacitus,” AJPh 105: 306–25.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (1987) “Otho's exhortations in Tacitus' Histories,” G&R 34: 73–82.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (1991) “The structure and function of speeches in Tacitus' Histories I–III,” ANRW ii.33.4: 2772–94.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (1992) “Foedum spectaculum and related motifs in Tacitus' Histories II–III,” RhM 135: 342–51.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (1993) “Speech and narrative in Histories 4,” in Luce and Woodman (1993), 39–58.CrossRef

Keitel, E. (2006) “Sententia and structure in Tacitus' Histories 1.12–49,” Arethusa 39: 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kienast, D. (1999) Augustus: Prinzeps und Monarch, rev. edn. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1978) “Die Proömien zu Tacitus' Hauptwerken: Spiegel einer Entwicklung?,” Gymnasium 85: 20–36.Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio Funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 106. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Klingner, F. (1928) “Über die Einleitung der Historien des Sallusts,” Hermes 63: 165–92.Google Scholar

Klingner, F. (1958a) “Tacitus über Augustus und Tiberius. Interpretation zum Eingang der Annalen,” Sitzungsberichte der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Philosophisch-historische Klasse 7: 1–45.Google Scholar

Klingner, F. (1958b) “Tacitus und die Geschichtsschreiber des I. Jh.s,” MH 15: 194–206.Google Scholar

Kneissel, P. (1969) Die Siegestitulatur der römischen Kaiser: Untersuchungen zu den Siegerbeinamen des 1. und 2. Jahrhunderts. Hypomnemata 23. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Knoche, U. (1934) “Der römische Ruhmesgedanke,” Philologus 89: 102–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoche, U. (1963) “Zur Beurteilung des Kaisers Tiberius durch Tacitus,” Gymnasium 70: 211–26.Google Scholar

Koestermann, E. (1961) “Der Eingang der Annalen des Tacitus,” Historia 10: 330–55.Google Scholar

Koestermann, E. (1963–8) Cornelius Tacitus: Annalen, 4 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Koestermann, E. (1965) “Tacitus und die Transpadana,” Athenaeum 43: 167–208.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (1994) “‘No second Troy’: topoi and refoundation in Livy, Book V,” TAPhA 124: 267–89.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (ed.) (1999) The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Mnemosyne Suppl. 191. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (2005) “From exempla to exemplar? Writing history around the emperor in imperial Rome,” in Edmondson, Mason, and Rives (2005), 181–200.

Kraus, C. S. and Woodman, A. J. (1997) Latin Historians. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics 27. Oxford.Google Scholar

Künzl, E. (1988) Der römische Triumph: Siegesfeiern im antiken Rom. Munich.Google Scholar

Lachenaud, G. and Longrée, D. (eds.) (2003) Grecs et Romains aux prises avec l'histoire: représentations, récits et idéologie. 2 vols. Collection “Histoire.” Rennes.Google Scholar

Lana, I. (1989) “Introspicere in Tacito,” Orpheus 10: 26–57.Google Scholar

Laruccia, S. (1980) “The wasteland of peace: a Tacitean evaluation of Pax Romana,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 2, ed. Deroux, C.. Collection Latomus 168. Brussels: 407–11.Google Scholar

Lausberg, M. (1980) “Caesar und Cato im Agricola des Tacitus,” Gymnasium 87: 411–30.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D. (1973) “Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus,” YClS 23: 169–208.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1993) “Hopelessly devoted to you: traces of the Decii in Vergil's Aeneid,” PVS 21: 89–110.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1997) Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. (1997) Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (1999) “Tacitus' Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory,” in Kraus (1999), 197–216.

Levene, D. S. (2004) “Tacitus' Dialogus as literary history,” TAPhA 134: 157–200.Google Scholar

Levick, B. (1987) “‘Caesar omnia habet’: property and politics under the Principate,” in Giovannini (1987), 187–212.

Levick, B. (1990) Claudius. New Haven.Google Scholar

Levick, B. (1999) Vespasian. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebeschuetz, W. (1966) “The theme of liberty in the Agricola of Tacitus,” CQ 16: 126–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebeschuetz, W. (1979) Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Litchfield, H. W. (1914) “National exempla virtutis in Roman literature,” HSPh 25: 1–71.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1986) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics, 2nd edn. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1989) “Ancient views on the causes of bias in historical writing,” CPh 84: 16–31.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1990) “Livy, Augustus, and the Forum Augustum,” in Raaflaub and Toher (1990), 123–38.

Luce, T. J. (1991) “Tacitus on ‘history's highest function’: praecipuum munus annalium (Ann. 3.65),” ANRW ii.33.4: 2904–27.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.) (1993) Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludolph, M. (1997) Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung: Untersuchungen zu den “Paradebriefen” Plinius des Jüngeren. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Lund, A. A. (1982) “Zu den Rassenkriterien des Tacitus,” Latomus 41: 845–9.Google Scholar

MacDonald, W. L. (1976) The Pantheon: Design, Meaning and Progeny, rev. edn. New Haven.Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. (1966) Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest, and Alienation in the Empire. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mader, G. (2005) “History as Carnival, or method and madness in the Vita Heliogabali,” ClAnt 24: 131–72.Google Scholar

Malissard, A. (2002) “Néron, Tacite et la question de l'espace romain,” in Croisille and Perrin (2002), 179–92.

Malitz, J. (1985) “Helvidius Priscus und Vespasian. Zur Geschichte der ‘stoischen’ Senatsopposition,” Hermes 113: 231–46.Google Scholar

Malitz, J. (1988) “Philosophie und Politik im frühen Prinzipat,” in Antikes Denken – Moderne Schule: Beiträge zu den antiken Grundlagen unseres Denkens, ed. Schmidt, H. W. and Wülfing, P.. Gymnasium Beiheft 9. Heidelberg: 151–79.Google Scholar

Manolaraki, E. (2005) “A picture worth a thousand words: revisiting Bedriacum (Tacitus Histories 2.70),” CPh 100: 243–67.Google Scholar

Marchetta, A. (2003) “Tacito: l'intellettuale come memoria e coscienza di un popolo,” in Atti del convegno nazionale di studi: intellettuali e potere nel mondo antico, Torino, 22–23–24 aprile 2002, ed. Uglione, R.. Collana atti dei convegni della delegazione torinese dell'associazione italiana di cultura classica. Alessandria: 205–35.Google Scholar

Marchetta, A. (2004) Studi tacitiani. Rome.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marincola, J. (1999a) “Genre, convention, and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography,” in Kraus (1999), 281–324.

Marincola, J. (1999b) “Tacitus' prefaces and the decline of Imperial historiography,” Latomus 58: 391–404.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2003) “Beyond pity and fear: the emotions of history,” AncSoc 33: 285–315.Google Scholar

Marks, R. (2005) “Per vulnera regnum: self-destruction, self-sacrifice, and devotio in Punica 4–10,” Ramus 34: 127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, R. H. (1969) “Tacitus and his predecessors,” in Tacitus, ed. T. A. Dorey. New York: 117–47.Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. (1994) Tacitus. London.Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. (1998) “Tacitus on Agricola: truth and stereotype,” in Form and Fabric: Studies in Rome's Material Past in Honour of B. R. Hartley, ed. Bird, J.. Oxford: 9–12.Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.) (1989) Tacitus Annals Book IV. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marx, F. A. (1937) “Tacitus und die Literatur der exitus illustrium virorum,” Philologus 92: 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslakov, G. (1984) “Valerius Maximus and Roman historiography: a study of the exempla tradition,” ANRW ii.32.1: 437–96.Google Scholar

Iovane, Mastellone E. (1989) Paura e angoscia in Tacito: implicazioni ideologiche e politiche. Naples.Google Scholar

Masters, J. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan's Bellum Civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mattern, S. P. (1999) Rome and the Enemy: Imperial Strategy in the Principate. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Matthießen, K. (1970) “Der Dialogus des Tacitus und Cassius Dio 67,12,” AC 39: 168–77.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. G. (1991) “Roman historical exempla in Seneca,” in Sénèque et la prose latine: neuf exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Grimal, P.. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 36. Geneva: 141–69.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. G. (2001) Tacitus: Dialogus de Oratoribus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McCarthy, K. (2000) Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton.Google Scholar

McCulloch, H. (1991) “The historical process and theories of history in the Annals and Histories of Tacitus,” ANRW ii.33.4: 2928–48.Google Scholar

McGing, B. C. (1982) “Synkrisis in Tacitus' ‘Agricola,’” Hermathena 132: 15–25.Google Scholar

McHugh, M. R. (2004) “Historiography and freedom of speech: the case of Cremutius Cordus,” in Sluiter and Rosen (2004), 391–408.CrossRef

Mensching, E. (1967) “Zu den namentlichen Zitaten in Tacitus' Historien und Annalen,” Hermes 95: 457–71.Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. (1995) Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1964) A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1965) “Epictetus and the imperial court,” JRS 55: 141–8.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1977) The Emperor in the Roman World, 31 bc–ad 337. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (2005) “Last year in Jerusalem: monuments of the Jewish War in Rome,” in Edmondson, Mason, and Rives (2005), 101–28.CrossRef

Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.) (1984) Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford.Google Scholar

Miravalles, A. C. (2001) “Tácito: furor ante oculos,” AC 70: 87–96.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1993) “Livy's preface,” PCPhS 39: 141–68.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1998) “Cry freedom: Tacitus Annals 4.32–35,” Histos 2 (http://www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/histos/1998/moles.html).Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (1952–3) Römisches Staatsrecht, 3rd edn. Handbuch der römischen Alterthümer 1–3. Graz.Google Scholar

Morford, M. (1991) “How Tacitus defined liberty,” ANRW ii.33.5: 3420–50.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2000) “The autopsy of C. Asinius Pollio,” JRS 90: 51–69.Google Scholar

Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J. (eds.) (1986) Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1980) “The date of Tacitus' Dialogus,” HSPh 84: 99–125.Google Scholar

Murphy, T. (2004) Pliny the Elder's Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, O. (1965) “The ‘quinquennium Neronis' and the Stoics,” Historia 14: 41–61.Google Scholar

Nauta, R. R. (1987) “Seneca's Apocolocyntosis as Saturnalian literature,” Mnemosyne 40: 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesselhauf, H. (1986) “Tacitus und Domitian,” in Pöschl (1986), 208–40.

Neumeister, C. (2000) “Otho: Demagoge – Staatsmann – stoischer Held. Seine drei Reden in den Historien des Tacitus,” in Rede und Redner: Bewertung und Darstellung in den antiken Kulturen. Kolloquium Frankfurt a. M., 14.–16. Oktober 1998, ed. Neumeister, C. and Raeck, W.. Frankfurter Archäologische Schriften 1. Möhnesee: 191–205.Google Scholar

Newbold, R. F. (1976) “The vulgus in Tacitus,” RhM 119: 85–92.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. (2002) Statius' Silvae and the Poetics of Empire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolai, R. (1992) La storiografia nell'educazione antica. Biblioteca di Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici 10. Pisa.Google Scholar

Nicolet, C. (1991) Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire, trans. H. Leclerc. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. (eds.) (2004) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III. Oxford.Google Scholar

Noè, E. (1980) “La memorialistica imperiale del I secolo,” RAL ser. 8, 35: 163–80.Google Scholar

Noè, E. (1984) Storiografia imperiale pretacitiana: linee di svolgimento. Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell'Università di Pavia 34. Florence.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1958) Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, 2nd edn. 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2007) “The social economy of Pliny's correspondence with Trajan,” AJPh 128: 239–77.Google Scholar

North, J. (1990) “Diviners and divination at Rome,” in Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, ed. Beard, M. and North, J.. Ithaca: 51–71.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1987) “The Stoics on the extirpation of the passions,” Apeiron 20: 129–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (1997–2005) A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X. 4 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. and Richmond, I. A. (eds.) (1967) Cornelii Taciti de vita Agricolae. Oxford.Google Scholar

O'Gorman, E. (1995a) “On not writing about Augustus: Tacitus' Annals Book I,” MD 35: 91–114.Google Scholar

O'Gorman, E. (1995b) “Shifting ground: Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war,” Hermathena 158: 117–31.Google Scholar

O'Gorman, E. (2000) Irony and Misreading in the Annals of Tacitus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Gorman, E. (2006) “Alternative empires: Tacitus' virtual history of the Pisonian principate,” Arethusa 36: 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orlin, E. (1997) Temples, Religion and Politics in the Roman Republic. Mnemosyne Supplementum 164. Leiden.Google Scholar

Packer, J. (2003) “Plurima et amplissima opera: parsing Flavian Rome,” in Boyle and Dominik (2003), 167–98.

Pagán, V. (2000) “Distant voices of freedom in the Annales of Tacitus,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 10, ed. Deroux, C.. Collection Latomus 254. Brussels: 358–69.Google Scholar

Pagán, V. (2004) Conspiracy Narratives in Roman History. Austin.Google Scholar

Pani, M. (1992) Potere e valori a Roma fra Augusto e Traiano. Documenti e studi 11. Bari.Google Scholar

Patterson, O. (1991) Freedom, vol. i: Freedom in the Making of Western Culture. New York.Google Scholar

Paul, G. M. (1982) “Urbs capta: sketch of an ancient literary motif,” Phoenix 36: 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pease, A. S. (1946) “Notes on book-burning,” in Munera studiosa, ed. Shepherd, M. H. Jr. and Johnson, S. E.. Cambridge, Mass.: 145–60.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1993) “Tacitus and Germanicus,” in Luce and Woodman (1993), 59–85.CrossRef

Pelling, C. (1997) “Biographical history? Cassius Dio on the early Principate,” in Portraits: Biographical Representations in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire, ed. Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. C. R.. Oxford: 117–44.Google Scholar

Perl, G. (1984) “Geschichtsschreibung in der Zeit der römischen Republik und in der Kaiserzeit,” Klio 66: 562–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perrochat, P. (1935) “Tacite imitateur de Salluste dans l’Agricola,” REL 13: 261–5.Google Scholar

Petersmann, G. (1991) “Der ‘Agricola’ des Tacitus: Versuch einer Deutung,” ANRW ii.33.3: 1785–1806.Google Scholar

Pfanner, M. (1983) Der Titusbogen. Beiträge zur Erschließung hellenistischer und kaiserzeitlicher Skulptur und Architektur 2. Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar

Philipp, G. B. (1955) “Zur Problematik des römischen Ruhmesgedankens,” Gymnasium 62: 51–82.Google Scholar

Pigón, J. (1992) “Helvidius Priscus, Eprius Marcellus, and iudicium senatus: observations on Tacitus, Histories 4.7–8,” CQ 42: 235–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigón, J. (2003) “Thrasea Paetus, libertas senatoria, and Tacitus' narrative methods,” in Freedom and its Limits in the Ancient World: Proceedings of a Colloquium Held at the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, September 2003, ed. Brodka, D., Janik, J., and Sprawski, S.. Electrum 9. Krakow: 43–53.Google Scholar

Plass, P. (1988) Wit and the Writing of History: The Rhetoric of Historiography in Imperial Rome. Madison.Google Scholar

Plass, P. (1995) The Game of Death in Ancient Rome: Arena Sport and Political Suicide. Madison.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, A. J. (2003) “Center and periphery in Tacitus's Histories,” Arethusa 36: 361–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pöschl, V. (1962) The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid, trans. G. Seligson. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Pöschl, V. (ed.) (1986) Tacitus, 2nd edn. Wege der Forschung 97. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Price, S. R. F. (1984) Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. (2003) “Becoming historical: the Roman case,” in Braund and Gill (2003), 12–40.

Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. (1987) “Grundzüge, Ziele, und Ideen der Opposition gegen die Kaiser im I. Jh. n. Chr.: Versuch einer Standortsbestimmung,” in Giovannini (1987), 1–55.

Raaflaub, K. (2004) “Aristocracy and freedom of speech in the Greco-Roman world,” in Sluiter and Rosen (2004), 41–61.CrossRef

Raaflaub, K. and L. J. Samons (1990) “Opposition to Augustus,” in Raaflaub and Toher (1990), 417–54.

Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M. (eds.) (1990) Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Radke, G. (ed.) (1971) Politik und literarische Kunst im Werk des Tacitus. AU Beiheft 1, Reihe 14. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Ramage, E. S. (1987) The Nature and Purpose of Augustus' “Res Gestae.” Historia Einzelschriften 54. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Ramage, E. S. (1989) “Juvenal and the establishment: denigration of predecessor in the ‘Satires,’” ANRW ii.33.1: 640–707.Google Scholar

Ramage, E. S. (2003) “Aspects of propaganda in the De Bello Gallico: Caesar's virtues and attributes,” Athenaeum 91: 331–72.Google Scholar

Ramondetti, P. (1974) “Il sentimento della paura nell’Agricola di Tacito,” AAT 108: 381–434.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1986) “Cassius and Brutus: the memory of the liberators,” in Moxon, Smart, and Woodman (1986), 101–19.

Rawson, E. (1991) Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Reinhold, M. and P. M. Swan (1990) “Cassius Dio's assessment of Augustus,” in Raaflaub and Toher (1990), 155–73.

Rich, J. W. (1989) “Dio on Augustus,” in History as Text, ed. Cameron, A.. London: 86–110.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. (1996) “Augustus and the spolia opima,” Chiron 26: 85–127.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (2006) Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin.Google Scholar

Rives, J. B. (1999) Tacitus: Germania. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rives. J. B. (2005) “Flavian religious policy and the destruction of the Jerusalem temple,” in Edmondson, Mason, and Rives (2005), 145–66.CrossRef

Roberts, M. (1988) “The revolt of Boudicca (Tacitus, Annals 14.29–39) and the assertion of libertas in Neronian Rome,” AJPh 109: 118–32.Google Scholar

Rogers, R. S. (1965) “The case of Cremutius Cordus,” TAPhA 96: 351–9.Google Scholar

Rokéah, D. (1995) “Tacitus and ancient antisemitism,” REJ 154: 281–94.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (1997) “Color-blindness: Cicero's death, declamation, and the production of history,” CPh 92: 109–130.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roller, M. (2004) “Exemplarity in Roman culture: the cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” CPh 99: 1–56.Google Scholar

Roman, L. (2001) “The representation of literary materiality in Martial's Epigrams,” JRS 91: 113–45.Google Scholar

Ronconi, A. (1968) Da Lucrezio a Tacito. Florence.Google Scholar

Ronning, C. (2006) “Der Konflikt zwischen Kaiser Nero und P. Clodius Thrasea Paetus: rituelle Strategien in der frühen Römischen Kaiserzeit,” Chiron 36: 329–55.Google Scholar

Rosen, K. (1996) “Der Historiker als Prophet: Tacitus und die Juden,” Gymnasium 103: 107–26.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2001) “Remapping the past: Caesar's tale of Troy (Lucan, BC 9.964–999),” Phoenix 55: 313–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouveret, A. (1991) “Tacite et les monuments,” ANRW ii.33.4: 3051–99.Google Scholar

Rudich, V. (1993) Political Dissidence under Nero: The Price of Dissimulation. London.Google Scholar

Rudich, V. (1997) Dissidence and Literature under Nero: The Price of Rhetoricization. London.Google Scholar

Rüpke, J. (1990) Domi militiae: Die religiöse Konstruktion des Krieges in Rom. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Rutledge, S. (1998) “Trajan and Tacitus' audience: reader reception of Annals 1–2,” Ramus 27: 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutledge, S. (2000) “Tacitus in tartan: textual colonization and expansionist discourse in the Agricola,” Helios 27: 75–95.Google Scholar

Sablayrolles, R. (1981) “Style et choix politique dans la Vie d'Agricola de Tacite,” BAGB: 52–63.Google Scholar

Sage, M. M. (1990) “Tacitus' historical works: a survey and appraisal,” ANRW ii.33.2: 851–1030.Google Scholar

Sailor, D. (2004) “Becoming Tacitus: significance and inconsequentiality in the prologue of Agricola,” ClAnt 23: 139–77.Google Scholar

Sailor, D. (2006) “Dirty linen, fabrication, and the authorities of Livy and Augustus,” TAPhA 136: 329–88.Google Scholar

Saller, R. ([1990] 2000) “Domitian and his successors: methodological traps in assessing emperors,” AJAH 15: 4–18.Google Scholar

L'hoir, Santoro F. (1990) “Heroic epithets and recurrent themes in Ab urbe condita,” TAPhA 120: 221–41.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. F. (1980) The Influence of Thucydides on Sallust. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften. Neue Folge. 2. Reihe. Bd. 70. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. F. (1987) Spes Frustrata: A Reading of Sallust. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Schäfer, E. (1977) “Domitians Antizipation im vierten Historienbuch des Tacitus,” Hermes 105: 455–77.Google Scholar

Scheid, J. (1998) “Les livres sibyllins et les archives des quindécemvirs,” in La mémoire perdue: recherches sur l'administration romaine. Collection de l'École française de Rome 243. Rome: 11–26.Google Scholar

Scheidle, K. (1993) Modus Optumum: Die Bedeutung des “rechten Maßes” in der römischen Literatur. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 73. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E. A. (1982) “Die Angst der mächtigen in der Annalen des Tacitus,” WS 16: 274–87.Google Scholar

Schwarte, K.-H. (1979) “Trajans Regierungsbeginn und der ‘Agricola’ des Tacitus,” BJ 179: 139–75.Google Scholar

Schwier, H. (1989) Tempel und Tempelzerstörung: Untersuchungen zu den theologischen und ideologischen Faktoren im ersten jüdisch-römischen Krieg (66–74 n. Chr.). Novum testamentum et orbis antiquus 11. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwinge, E. R. (1963) “Festinata mors,” RhM 106: 363–78.Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven.Google Scholar

Scott, R. T. (1968) Religion and Philosophy in the Histories of Tacitus. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 22. Rome.Google Scholar

Scullard, H. H. (1981) Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Seager, R. (1972) Tiberius. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Sharland, S. (2005) “Saturnalian satire: proto-carnivalesque reversals and inversions in Horace, Satire 2.7,” AClass 48: 103–20.Google Scholar

Shatzman, I. (1974) “Tacitean rumours,” Latomus 33: 549–78.Google Scholar

Shaw, B. (1985) “The divine economy: Stoicism as ideology,” Latomus 44: 16–54.Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966) The Letters of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Shipley, F. W. (1933) Agrippa's Building Activities in Rome. Washington University Studies, New Series, Language and Literature 4. St. Louis.Google Scholar

Shochat, Y. (1981a) “Tacitus' attitude to Galba,” Athenaeum 59: 199–204.Google Scholar

Shochat, Y. (1981b) “Tacitus' attitude to Otho,” Latomus 40: 365–77.Google Scholar

Shotter, D. C. A. (1967) “The starting-dates of Tacitus' historical works,” CQ 17: 158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shotter, D. C. A. (1968) “Tacitus, Tiberius and Germanicus,” Historia 17: 194–214.Google Scholar

Shotter, D. C. A. (1974) “Cnaeus Calpurnius Piso, legate of Syria,” Historia 23: 229–45.Google Scholar

Shotter, D. C. A. (1991) “Tacitus' view of emperors and the Principate,” ANRW ii.33.5: 3263–331.Google Scholar

Sinclair, P. (1995) Tacitus the Sententious Historian: A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1–6. University Park, Pa.Google Scholar

Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.) (2004) Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Mnemosyne Suppl. 254. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soverini, P. (1989) “Impero e imperatori nell'opera di Plinio il Giovane: aspetti e problemi del rapporto con Domiziano e Traiano,” ANRW ii.33.1: 515–54.Google Scholar

Soverini, P. (1996) “Note al proemio dell’Agricola di Tacito,” BStudLat 26: 19–38.Google Scholar

Spannagel, M. (1999) Exemplaria Principis: Untersuchungen zu Entstehung und Ausstattung des Augustusforums. Archäologie und Geschichte 9. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Speyer, W. (1981) Büchervernichtung und Zensur des Geistes bei Heiden, Juden und Christen. Bibliothek des Buchwesens 7. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Städele, A. (1988) “Tacitus über Agricola und Domitian (Agr. 39–43),” Gymnasium 95 : 222–35.Google Scholar

Steidle, W. (1965) “Tacitusprobleme,” MH 22: 81–114.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, P. (1968) “Die Gedankenführung des Prooemiums zu den Historien des Tacitus,” Gymnasium 75: 251–62.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, P. (1971) “Die literarische Form des ‘Agricola’ des Tacitus,” in Radke (1971), 129–41.

Stemmler, M. (2000) “Auctoritas exempli. Zur Wechselwirkung von kanonisierten Vergangenheitsbildern und gesellschaftlicher Gegenwart in der spätrepublikanischen Rhetorik,” in Mos Maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, ed. Linke, B. and Stemmler, M.. Historia Einzelschriften 141. Stuttgart: 141–205.Google Scholar

Stewart, Z. (1953) “Sejanus, Gaetulicus, and Seneca,” AJPh 74: 70–85.Google Scholar

Strobel, K. (1987) “Der Chattenkrieg Domitians. Historische und politische Aspekte,” Germania 65: 423–52.Google Scholar

Strobel, K. (1989) Die Donaukriege Domitians. Antiquitas Reihe 1, Abhandlungen zur alten Geschichte 38. Bonn.Google Scholar

Strocchio, R. (2001) Simulatio e dissimulatio nelle opere di Tacito. Pubblicazioni del Dipartimento di filologia, linguistica e tradizione classica ‘Augusto Rostagni,’ Università degli studi di Torino 16. Bologna.Google Scholar

Stroux, J. (1931) “Vier Zeugnisse zur römischen Literaturgeschichte der Kaiserzeit I. Maternus, Redner und Dichter,” Philologus 86: 338–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (1971) “Der Historiker und die Freiheit des Wortes. Die Rede des Cremutius Cordus bei Tacitus Ann. 4, 34–5,” in Radke (1971), 61–99.

Sullivan, D. (1976) “Innuendo and the ‘weighted alternative’ in Tacitus,” CJ 71: 312–26.Google Scholar

Sussman, L. (1978) The Elder Seneca. Mnemosyne Supplementum 51. Leiden.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1959) “Livy and Augustus,” HSPh 64: 27–87.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1964) Sallust. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1968) Ammianus and the Historia Augusta. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1970) Ten Studies in Tacitus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1971a) Emperors and Biography: Studies in the “Historia Augusta.”Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1971b) The Historia Augusta: A Call of Clarity. Antiquitas Reihe 4, Beiträge zur Historia-Augusta-Forschung 8. Bonn.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1983) Historia Augusta Papers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Teitler, H. C. (1985) Notarii and Exceptores: An Inquiry into Role and Significance of Shorthand Writers in the Imperial and Ecclesiastical Bureaucracy of the Roman Empire (from the Early Principate to c. 450 ad). Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology 1. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Timpe, D. (1987a) “Geschichtsschreibung und Prinzipatsopposition,” in Giovannini (1987), 65–95.

Timpe, D. (1987b) “Tacito e la realtà storica,” in Epigrafia e territorio, politica e società: temi di antichità romane, vol. ii, ed. Chelotti, M., Pani, M., Timpe, D., Cassano, R., Depalo, M. R., Labellarte, P., and Troisi, F. Ferrandini. 2 vols. Documenti e studi 5. Bari: 215–36.Google Scholar

Townend, G. B. (1987) “The restoration of the Capitol in ad 70,” Historia 36: 243–8.Google Scholar

Turcan, R. (1985) “Tacite et les arts plastiques dans les Histoires,” Latomus 44: 784–804.Google Scholar

Turner, V. (1968) The Drums of Affliction: A Study of Religious Processes among the Ndembu of Zambia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Turner, V. (1980) “Social dramas and stories about them,” Critical Inquiry 7: 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tzounakas, S. (2005) “Echoes of Lucan in Tacitus: the cohortationes of Pompey and Calgacus,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 12, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 395–413.Google Scholar

Tsounakas, S. (2007) “Neque enim historiam componebam: Pliny's first Epistle and his attitude towards historiography,” MH 64: 42–54.Google Scholar

van Hooff, A. J. L. (1990) From Autothanasia to Suicide: Self-killing in Classical Antiquity. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varner, E. (ed.) (2000) From Caligula to Constantine: Tyranny and Transformation in Roman Portraiture. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Vasaly, A. (1993) Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Versnel, H. (1970) Triumphus: An Inquiry into the Origin, Development and Meaning of the Roman Triumph. Leiden.Google Scholar

Versnel, H. (1976) “Two types of Roman devotio,” Mnemosyne 29: 365–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Versnel, H. (1981) “Self-sacrifice, compensation and the anonymous gods,” in Le sacrifice dans l'antiquité, ed. Rudhardt, J. and Reverdin, O.. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 27. Geneva: 135–94.Google Scholar

Versnel, H. (1993) Transition and Reversal in Myth and Ritual. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion, vol. ii. 2 vols. Studies in Greek and Roman Religion 6, II. Leiden.Google Scholar

Vielberg, M. (1987) Pflichten, Werte, Ideale: Eine Untersuchung zu den Wertvorstellungen des Tacitus. Hermes Einzelschriften 52. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Vielberg, M. (1996) Untertanentopik: Zur Darstellung der Führungsschichten in der kaiserzeitlichen Geschichtsschreibung. Zetemata 95. Munich.Google Scholar

Vittinghoff, F. (1936) Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit: Untersuchungen zur “Damnatio Memoriae.”Berlin.Google Scholar

Vogt, J. (1986) “Tacitus und die Unparteilichkeit des Historikers,” in Pöschl (1986), 39–59.

Fritz, K. (1957) “Tacitus, Agricola, Domitian and the problem of the Principate,” CPh 52: 73–97.Google Scholar

Fritz, K. (1958) The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius' Ideas. New York.Google Scholar

Walker, B. (1952) The Annals of Tacitus: A Study in the Writing of History. Manchester.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982) “Civilis princeps: between citizen and king,” JRS 72: 32–48.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1997) “Mutatio morum: the idea of a cultural revolution,” in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997), 3–22.

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2005) “Mutatas formas: the Augustan transformation of Roman knowledge,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, ed. Galinsky, K.. Cambridge: 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walser, G. (1951) Rom, das Reich und die fremden Völker in der Geschichtsschreibung der frühen Kaiserzeit: Studien zur Glaubwürdigkeit des Tacitus. Baden-Baden.Google Scholar

Walsh, P. G. (1961) “Livy and Augustus,” Proceedings of the African Classical Associations 4: 26–37.Google Scholar

Wardle, D. (1996) “Vespasian, Helvidius Priscus and the restoration of the Capitol,” Historia 45: 208–22.Google Scholar

Wardy, B. (1979) “Jewish religion in pagan literature during the late Republic and early Empire,” ANRW ii.19.1: 592–644.Google Scholar

Weinstock, S. (1971) Divus Julius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.) (1998) Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter. London.Google Scholar

Wellesley, K. (2003) The Year of the Four Emperors. 3rd edn. London.Google Scholar

Welwei, K.-W. (1995) “Verdeckte Systemkritik in der Galbarede des Tacitus,” Gymnasium 102: 353–63.Google Scholar

Wilcox, A. (2006) “Exemplary grief: gender and virtue in Seneca's consolations to women,” Helios 33: 73–100.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2003) “After the silence: Tacitus, Suetonius, Juvenal,” in Boyle and Dominik (2003), 523–42.

Winterbottom, M. (1982) “Cicero and the Silver Age,” in Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron: sept exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Stroh, W.. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 28. Geneva: 237–74.Google Scholar

Wirszubski, Ch. (1968) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1987a) Roman Studies Literary and Historical. Collected Classical Papers 1. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1987b) “Conspicui postes tectaque digna deo: the public image of aristocratic and imperial houses in the late Republic and early Empire,” in L'urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.C. – IIIe siècle ap. J.C.). Actes du colloque international organisé par le Centre national de la recherche scientifique et l'École française de Rome (Rome, 8–12 mai 1985). Collection de l'École française de Rome 98. Rome: 393–413.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1992) “Erridge's answer: response to James Zetzel,” in The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics?, ed. Galinsky, K., Studien zur klassischen Philologie 67. Frankfurt am Main: 58–64.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1994) Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter.Google Scholar

Wissowa, G. (1912) Religion und Kultus der Römer, 2nd edn. Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Band 5, Abteilung 4. Munich.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1977) Velleius Paterculus: The Tiberian Narrative (2.94–131). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1983) Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. Portland, Oreg.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1998) Tacitus Reviewed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2003) “Poems to historians: Catullus 1 and Horace, Odes 2.1,” in Braund and Gill (2003), 191–216.

Woodman, A. J. (2006a) “Mutiny and madness: Tacitus Annals 1.16–49,” Arethusa 39: 303–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2006b) “Tiberius and the taste of power: the year 33 in Tacitus,” CQ 56: 175–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodman, A. J. and Martin, R. H. (eds.) (1996) The Annals of Tacitus: Book 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wright, A. (2001) “The death of Cicero. Forming a tradition: the contamination of history,” Historia 50: 436–52.Google Scholar

Yarden, L. (1991) The Spoils of Jerusalem on the Arch of Titus: A Re-Investigation. Skrifter Utgivna av Svenska Institutet i Rom 8° 16. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Yavetz, Z. (1984) “The Res Gestae and Augustus' public image,” in Millar and Segal (1984), 1–36.

Zanker, P. (1968) Forum Augustum: Das Bildprogramm. Monumenta artis antiquae 2. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, trans. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Zecchini, G. (1982) “Asinio Pollione: dall'attività politica alla riflessione storiografica,” ANRW ii.20.3: 1265–96.Google Scholar

Zecchini, G. (1984) “La profezia dei druidi sull'incendio del Campidoglio nel 69 d. C.,” Contributi dell'Istituto di Storia antica dell’ Università del Sacro Cuore 10: 121–31.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (ed.) (1995) Cicero De Re Publica: Selections. Cambridge.Google Scholar

, S. (1993) Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham, N.C.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1976) Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1984) “The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome,” AJPh 105: 174–208.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A. (1970) Die monarchische Repräsentation im römischen Kaiserreiche. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1995a) “Eine Bauinschrift aus dem Colosseum,” ZPE 109: 195–226.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1995b) “Bricht der Schweigsame sein Schweigen?: eine Grabinschrift aus Rom,” MDAI(R) 102: 251–68.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1949) La vie et l'œuvre d'Asinius Pollion. Études et commentaires 8. Paris.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1993) “Les Res gestae d'Auguste, ou les nuances de l'égotisme politique,” in L'invention de l'autobiographie d'Hésiode à Augustin: actes du deuxième colloque de l'Équipe de recherche sur l'hellénisme post-classique (Paris, École normale supérieure, 14–16 juin 1990), ed. Baslez, M.-F., Hoffmann, P., and Pernot, L.. Études de littérature ancienne 5. Paris: 97–114.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (1999) Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus' Histories. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ash, R. (2003) “‘Aliud est enim epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere’ (Epistles 6.16.2): Pliny the historian?,” Arethusa 36: 211–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ash, R. (2006) “Following in the footsteps of Lucullus? Tacitus' characterisation of Corbulo,” Arethusa 39: 355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubrion, E. (1985) Rhétorique et histoire chez Tacite. Metz.Google Scholar

Avenarius, G. (1956) Lukians Schrift zur Geschichtsschreibung. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1962) “Waiting for Sulla,” JRS 52: 47–61.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1993) “Livy and Augustus,” in Livius: Aspekte seines Werkes, ed. Schuller, W.. Xenia 31. Konstanz: 9–38.Google Scholar

Bandera, C. (1981) “Sacrificial levels in Virgil's Aeneid,” Arethusa 14: 217–39.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1977) “The fragments of Tacitus' Histories,” CPh 72: 224–31.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1981) “Curiatius Maternus,” Hermes 109: 382–4.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (2005) “The sack of the Temple in Josephus and Tacitus,” in Edmondson, Mason, and Rives (2005), 129–44.CrossRef

Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1997) Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan's Civil War. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1954) “Der Dialogus de Oratoribus des Tacitus (Motive und Zeit seiner Entstehung),” Sitzungsberichte der sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig 101.4.Google Scholar

Bastomsky, S. J. (1982) “Tacitus, Agricola 5.3: more than an epigram?,” Philologus 126: 151–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauman, R. A. (1989) Lawyers and Politics in the Early Roman Empire: A Study of Relations between the Roman Jurists and the Emperors from Augustus to Hadrian. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 82. Munich.Google Scholar

Baxter, R. T. S. (1971) “Virgil's influence on Tacitus in Book 3 of the Histories,” CPh 66: 93–107.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (1993) “Looking (harder) for Roman myth: Dumézil, declamation and the problems of definition,” in Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: Das Paradigma Roms, ed. Graf, F.. Colloquium Rauricum 3. Stuttgart: 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, M. (1998) “Vita inscripta,” in La biographie antique: huit exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Ehlers, W. W.. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 44. Geneva: 83–114.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2003a) “The triumph of the absurd: Roman street theatre,” in Edwards and Woolf (2003b), 21–43.

Beard, M. (2003b) “The triumph of Flavius Josephus,” in Boyle and Dominik (2003), 543–58.

Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beck, J.-W. (1998) “Germania” – “Agricola”: zwei Kapitel zu Tacitus' zwei kleinen Schriften. Spudasmata 68. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Benario, H. W. (1979) “Agricola's proconsulship,” RhM 122: 167–72.Google Scholar

Beutel, F. (2000) Vergangenheit als Politik: neue Aspekte im Werk des jüngeren Plinius. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 121. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1997) Hadrian: The Restless Emperor. London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2000) “The life and death of Cornelius Tacitus,” Historia 49: 230–47.Google Scholar

Bloch, R. (2002) Antike Vorstellungen vom Judentum: Der Judenexkurs des Tacitus im Rahmen der griechisch-römischen Ethnographie. Historia Einzelschriften 160. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1992) Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1997a) Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1997b) “A preface to the history of declamation: whose speech? whose history?,” in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997), 199–215.

Bloomer, W. M. (1997c) “Schooling in persona: imagination and subordination in Roman education,” ClAnt 16: 57–78.Google Scholar

Boatwright, M. T. (1987) Hadrian and the City of Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Boissier, G. (1913) L'opposition sous les Césars, 7th edn. Paris.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1981) Untersuchungen über die Religion der Sklaven in Griechenland und Rom, 2nd edn. Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei 14. 2 vols. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Bonnefond, M. (1987) “Transferts de functions et mutation idéologique: le Capitole et le Forum d'Auguste,” L'urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.C. – IIIe siècle ap. J.C.). Actes du colloque international organisé par le Centre national de la recherche scientifique et l'École française de Rome (Rome, 8–12 mai 1985). Collection de l'École française de Rome 98. Rome: 251–78.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Borzsák, I. (1973) “Spectaculum: ein Motiv der ‘tragischen Geschichtsschreibung’ bei Livius und Tacitus,” ACD 9: 57–67.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (1972) “Asinius Pollio and Augustus,” Historia 21: 441–73.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyce, A. A. (1942) “The origin of ornamenta triumphalia,” CPh 37: 130–41.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J. (eds.) (2003) Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bradley, K. R. (1987) Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study in Social Control. Oxford.Google Scholar

Braund, D. (1996) Ruling Roman Britain: Kings, Queens, Governors and Emperors from Julius Caesar to Agricola. London.Google Scholar

Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) (2003) Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter.Google Scholar

Braund, S. (1988) Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal's Third Book of Satires. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Briessmann, A. (1955) Tacitus und das flavische Geschichtsbild. Hermes Einzelschriften 10. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Bruère, R. T. (1954) “Tacitus and Pliny's Panegyricus,” CPh 49: 161–79.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1975) “Stoicism and the Principate,” PBSR 43: 7–35.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1988) The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1990) Roman Imperial Themes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. and Moore, J. M. (eds.) (1967) Res Gestae Divi Augusti: The Achievements of the Divine Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1962–79) Studien zur römischen Literatur. 10 vols. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar