Contextualising care

Throughout our lives, we all want to give and receive care, particularly at the beginning and the end. The expectation that there will be someone to care for us in later life is almost universal. Women were, and still are, usually tasked with this role, due to what is viewed as their ‘naturally’ existing caring nature (Hayes, 2017: 80–1). The daily activities of cleaning, cooking, washing and feeding have often been taken for granted and rendered invisible within social structures. Little value has been placed on these life-sustaining tasks (The Care Collective, 2020). Waves of feminism have highlighted the injustices of care work being feminised, devalued and not recognised as ‘work’ (Hayes, 2017). Yet, women are still providing most of the care for relatives in the family as well as in outside agencies, being paid to provide care services in either domiciliary settings or within residential institutions (Bunting, 2020). Thus, the historical connotations of care work being of low value and feminised have continued. Both formally and informally, women are overwhelmingly those still doing health and social care work with older people (Bunting, 2020). This, coupled with endemic ageism in society (Ayalon and Tesch-Romer, 2018), is arguably how neoliberal governments have successfully justified the low value and pay associated with health and care work, and the low political priority given to the care of older people. In the spring of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed the years of underfunding, understaffing and privatisation within the sector to devastating effect, as thousands of older people died needlessly in the UK and around the world (The Care Collective, 2020). The care of people with the least power in society mirrors broader political values. As Sevenhuijsen (1998: 4) states:

The treatment of the most vulnerable members of society in this pandemic does not present the UK government in a good light and will hopefully lead to a transformation of health and social care services.