Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Hermeneutics
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- The Cambridge Companion to Hermeneutics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Hermeneutics and Theology
- 2 Hermeneutics and Nature
- 3 Hermeneutics and Romanticism
- 4 Hermeneutics and German Idealism
- 5 Hermeneutics and History
- 6 Hermeneutics and Positivism
- 7 Hermeneutics
- 8 Hermeneutics and Psychoanalysis
- 9 Hermeneutics and Phenomenology
- 10 Hermeneutics and Critical Theory
- 11 Hermeneutics
- 12 Hermeneutics
- 13 Hermeneutics and Literature
- 14 Hermeneutics and Law
- 15 Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences
- Bibliography
- Index
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Hermeneutics
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- The Cambridge Companion to Hermeneutics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Hermeneutics and Theology
- 2 Hermeneutics and Nature
- 3 Hermeneutics and Romanticism
- 4 Hermeneutics and German Idealism
- 5 Hermeneutics and History
- 6 Hermeneutics and Positivism
- 7 Hermeneutics
- 8 Hermeneutics and Psychoanalysis
- 9 Hermeneutics and Phenomenology
- 10 Hermeneutics and Critical Theory
- 11 Hermeneutics
- 12 Hermeneutics
- 13 Hermeneutics and Literature
- 14 Hermeneutics and Law
- 15 Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences
- Bibliography
- Index
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Hermeneutics , pp. 381 - 409Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abu Zayd, Nasr. Rethinking the Qur’an: Towards a Humanistic Hermeneutics. Utrecht: Humanistics University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Prakash, Saikrishna. “‘Is That English You’re Speaking?’ Why Intention Free Interpretation is an Impossibility.” San Diego Law Review 41 (2004): 967–95.Google Scholar
Alexander, Werner. Hermeneutica Generalis. Zur Konzeption und Entwicklung der allgemeinen Verstehenslehre im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: M & P Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank. Historical Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto. From a Transcendental-Semiotic Point of View. Edited by Papastephanou, Marianna. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
App, Urs. The Birth of Orientalism. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ashmore, Robert. The Transport of Reading. Text and Understanding in the World of Tao Qian (365–427). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Assis, Arthur Alfaix. What is History for? Johann Gustav Droysen and the Functions of Historiography. New York and Oxford: Berghahn, 2014.Google Scholar
Ast, Friedrich. Grundlinien der Grammatik, Hermeneutik und Kritik. Landshut: Jos. Thomann, Buchdrucker und Buchhändler, 1808.Google Scholar
Azzouni, Jody. Semantic Perception: How the Illusion of a Common Language Arises and Persists. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Baird, William. History of New Testament Research. Vol. 1: From Deism to Tübingen. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986: 60–102.Google Scholar
Bambach, Charles R. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. “Interpretation and Construction.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 34 (2011): 65.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Elements of Semiology. Translated by A. Lavers and C. Smith. New York: Hill & Wang, 1977 [1964].Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by R. Howard and A. Lavers. New York: Hill & Wang, 2013 [1957].Google Scholar
Barthold, Lauren Swayne. Gadamer’s Dialectical Hermeneutics. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Barton, John. The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Barton, John, and Muddiman, John. The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bauer, Christoph Johannes. “Das Geheimnis aller Bewegung ist Zweck” – Geschichtsphilosophie bei Hegel und Droysen. Hamburg: Meiner, 2001.Google Scholar
Bayer, Oswald. A Contemporary in Dissent: Johann Georg Hamann as a Radical Enlightener. Translated by Roy A. Harrisfield and Marc C. Mattes. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2012.Google Scholar
Beck, Hanno. “Kommentar” to Ideen zu einer Physiognomik der Gewächse by Humboldt, Alexander von. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1989.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, Bonss, Wolfgang and McCole, John, eds. On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. The Magus of the North: J.G. Hamann and the Origins of Modern Irrationalism. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, 1994.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, August Ferdinand. “Review of Herder’s Metacritique.” In Metacritique: The Linguistic Assault on German Idealism. Edited by Surber, Jere Paul. Amherst: Humanity Books, 2001: 139–48.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, August Ferdinand. “Verstand und Erfahrung. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft von J. G. Herder.” In Athenaeum: Eine Zeitschrift von August Wilhelm Schlegel und Friedrich Schlegel, vol. 3, 1800: 266–81.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. “What is the Difference That Makes a Difference? Gadamer, Habermas, and Rorty.” In Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy. Edited by Wachterhauser, Brice R.. Albany: SUNY Press, 1986: 343–76.Google Scholar
Betti, Emilio. “Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften.” In Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique. Edited by Bleicher, Josef. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980: 51–94.Google Scholar
Betti, Emilio. “Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften.” In The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur, Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften. Edited by Ormiston, Gayle L. and Schrift, Alan D.. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990: 159–97.Google Scholar
Binding, Karl. Handbuch des Strafrechts – Band I. Systematisches Handbuch der Deutschen Rechtswissenschaft. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1885.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann. “The Rise of Note-taking in Early Modern Europe.” Intellectual History Review 20 (2010): 303–16.Google Scholar
Blanke, Horst Walter, and Fleischer, Dirk. Theoretiker der deutschen Aufklärungshistorie. 2 vols. Stuttgart, Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1990.Google Scholar
Blanke, Horst Walter, and Rüsen, Jörn, eds. Von der Aufklärung zum Historismus: Zum Strukturwandel des historischen Denkens. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1984.Google Scholar
Bod, Rens, and Kursell, Julia, eds. “The History of Humanities and the History of Science.” Isis 106 (2015): 337–40.Google Scholar
Bödeker, Hans Erich, Iggers, Georg, Knudsen, Jonathan and Reill, Peter Hanns, eds. Aufklärung und Geschichte: Studien zur deutschen Geschichtswissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.Google Scholar
Boeckh, August. On Interpretation and Criticism. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew. From Romanticism to Critical Theory: The Philosophy of German Literary Theory. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. “Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel’s Idealism.” In Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002: 210–34.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Translated by Antos Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and Linda McAlister. Edited by Kraus, Oskar and McAlister, Linda. London: Routledge, 1973.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. “Literary Criticism.” In English Institute Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1946: 127–58.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. “A Note on the Limits of ‘History’ and the Limits of ‘Criticism.’” Sewanee Review 61 (1953): 129–35.Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom. “Philosophy Unbound: The Idea of Global Philosophy.” Metaphilosophy 44:3 (April 2013): 254–66.Google Scholar
Bruns, Gerald. Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Buchenau, Stefanie. The Founding of Aesthetics in the German Enlightenment: The Art of Invention and the Invention of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Buffon, George L. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, 36 vols. Paris: L’Imprimerie royale, 1749−1778.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Christoph. “Herder’s Biblical Studies.” In A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder. Edited by Adler, Hans and Koepke, Wulf. Rochester: Camden House, 2009: 233–46.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Christoph, and Danneberg, Lutz, eds. Hebraistik–Hermeneutik–Homiletik. Die “Philologia Sacra” im frühneuzeitlichen Bibelstudium. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Christoph, and Danneberg, Lutz, eds. “Historical-Critical Inquiry.” In The Hebrew Bible: A Critical Companion. Edited by Barton, John. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016: 431–54.Google Scholar
Buntfuss, Markus et al. “Theologie.” In Herder Handbuch. Edited by Greif, Stefan, Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, 2016: 319–85.Google Scholar
Byrne, Peter. The Moral Interpretation of Religion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Byrne, Peter. Natural Religion and the Nature of Religion: The Legacy of Deism. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. Freiheit und Form. Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1961.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Translated by Fritz C. A. Koelln and James P. Pettegrove. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007 [2000].Google Scholar
Cohen, Mordechai Z. and Berlin, Adele, eds. Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: Overlapping Inquiries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Condillac, E. B. de. Essai sur l’origine des connaissances humaines. Paris: Vrin, 2014 [1746].Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry. Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Crowe, Benjamin D. Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Religion: Realism and Cultural Criticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Crowe, Benjamin D. Heidegger’s Religious Origins: Destruction and Authenticity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven G. Phenomenology and Normativity in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. Being in the World: Dialogue and Cosmopolis. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2013.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. “Life-World and Critique.” In Between Freiburg and Frankfurt: Toward a Critical Ontology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1991: 13–43.Google Scholar
Dannhauer, Johann Konrad. Idea boni interpretis et malitiosi calumniatoris. Strasbourg: Glaser, 1630.Google Scholar
Aligheri, Dante. Il Convivio. https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/library/dantes-works/the-convivio/.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Most, Glenn W.. “History of Science and History of Philologies.” Isis 106 (2015): 378–90.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” In Truth, Language, and History. Edited by Davidson, Donald. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009: 89–107.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “Three Varieties of Knowledge.” In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Edited by Donald Davidson, 205–20. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by G. Spivak. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974 [1967].Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Margins of Philosophy. Translated by A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984 [1972].Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference. Translated by A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978 [1967].Google Scholar
Detmer, David. “Gadamer’s Critique of the Enlightenment.” In The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Edited by Hahn, Lewis Edwin. The Library of Living Philosophers XXIV. Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court, 1997: 275–86.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. Thoughts on the Interpretation of Nature and Other Philosophical Works. Translated by Lorna Sandler. Manchester: Clinamen Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. “The Construction of the Historical World in the Human Studies.” In Selected Writings. Edited and translated by Rickman, H. P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976: 168–263.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. “Das hermeneutische System Schleiermachers in der Auseinandersetzung mit der älteren protestantischen Hermeneutik.” In Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 14.2. Stuttgart: Teubner, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1966: 595–787.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. In Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 7. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1968.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Gesammelte Schriften. 26 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1914–2006.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Hermeneutics and the Study of History. In Selected Works. Vol. IV. Edited by Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Rodi, Frithjof. Translated by Theodore Nordenhaug et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Poetry and Experience. In Selected Works. Vol. V. Edited by Makkreel, Rudolf and Rodi, Frithjof. Translated by Lois Agosta, Rudolf Makkreel, et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. The Later Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Donagan, William. Laws and Explanation in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Dray, William. Laws and Explanation in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Dronke, E. R. Fabula: Explorations into the Uses of Myth in Medieval Platonism. Leiden: Brill, 1974.Google Scholar
Droysen, J. G. “Die Erhebung der Geschichte zum Rang einer Wissenschaft.” Historische Zeitschrift 9 (1863): 1–22. Reprinted in Outline of the Principles of History (Boston: Ginn, 1893), 61–89.Google Scholar
Droysen, J. G. Historik. Historical-critical edition by Peter Leyh. 4 vols. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1977.Google Scholar
Droysen, J. G. Historik, Vorlesungen über Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der Geschichte. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1937.Google Scholar
Droysen, J. G. Historik: Die Vorlesungen über Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der Geschichte. Stuttgart: Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1977.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. “The Author’s Apology for Heroic Poetry and Poetic Licence.” In Essays of John Dryden. Edited by Kerr, W. P.. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1926: 178–90.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald M. “Is There Really No Right Answer in Hard Cases?” In A Matter of Principle. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985: 119–45.Google Scholar
Elkins, James. Chinese Landscape Painting as Western Art History. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ekins, Richard. The Nature of Legislative Intent. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ermarth, Michael. Wilhelm Dilthey: The Critique of Historical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Ernesti, Johann August. Elements of Interpretation. Translated and edited by Stuart, Moses. Andover: Flagg and Gould, 1822.Google Scholar
Ernesti, Johann August. Institutio interpretis Novi Testamenti. Leipzig: Weidmann, 1761.Google Scholar
Ernesti, Johann August. Principles of Biblical Interpretation. Translated by Charles H. Terrot. Edinburgh: Thomas Clark, 1833.Google Scholar
Esterhammer, Angela. The Romantic Performative: Language and Action in British and German Romanticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Feigl, Herbert. “The Scientific Outlook: Naturalism and Humanism.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Edited by H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953: 11–14.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. Addresses to the German Nation. Translated by Isaac Nakhimovsky, Béla Kapossy, and Keith Tribe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2013.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. “Foundations of the Entire Science of Knowledge.” In The Science of Knowledge. Edited and translated by Heath, Peter and Lachs, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. Foundations of Natural Right. Edited by Neuhouser, Frederick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Edited by Lauth, Reinhard and Jacob, Hans. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1962.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. “On the Linguistic Capacity and the Origin of Language.” In Language and German Idealism: Fichte’s Linguistic Philosophy. Edited by Surber, Jere Paul. New York: Humanity Books, 1996: 117–45.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. “Review of Aenesidemus.” In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism. Edited by Giovanni, George di and Harris, H. S.. Albany: SUNY Press, 1985: 105–35.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. The Vocation of Man. Edited by Chisholm, R. M.. New York: Macmillan, 1985.Google Scholar
Figal, Günter. “Phronesis as Understanding: Situating Philosophical Hermeneutics.” In The Specter of Relativism: Truth, Dialogue, and Phronesis in Philosophical Hermeneutics. Edited by Schmidt, Lawrence K.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1995: 236–47.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley Eugene. “Intention is all there is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s Purposive Interpretation in Law.” Cardozo Law Review 29 (2008): 1109–46.Google Scholar
Forrester, John. Language and the Origins of Psychoanalysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. Translated by Brady Bowman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. “Eine Revolution in der Philosophie der Sprache, der Linguistik, der Hermeneutik und der Übersetzungstheorie im späten 18. und frühen 19. Jahrhundert: deutsche und französische Beiträge.” In Friedrich Schleiermacher and the Question of Translation. Edited by Cercel, L. and Serban, A.. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2015: 23–40.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. “Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Critical Appraisal.” Mythos-Magazine (online), July 2011.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. German Philosophy of Language: From Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. “Herder’s Doctrine of Meaning as Use.” In Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language. Edited by Cameron, M. and Stainton, R. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015: 201–22.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. “Hermeneutics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy. Edited by Rosen, Michael and Leiter, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 30–74.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. “Ideology.” In The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. Edited by Forster, M. N. and Gjesdal, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015: 806–28.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. “On the Very Idea of Denying the Existence of Radically Different Conceptual Schemes.” Inquiry 41:2 (1998): 133–85.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. L’archéologie du savoir. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” In The Foucault Reader. Edited by Rabinow, Paul. London: Penguin, 1984: 76–100.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Surveiller et punir. Discipline and Punish. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon, 1977.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What is an Author?” In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Edited by Bouchard, D. F.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980: 113–38.Google Scholar
Frank, M. Das individuelle Allgemeine: Textstrukturierung und -interpretation nach Schleiermacher. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Standard Edition. 24 vols. Edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1953.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court, 2001.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Begriffsgeschichte als Philosophie.” In Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 2. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1986: 77–91.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “The Eminent Text and its Truth.” Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association 13 (1980): 3–10.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gadamer on Celan: “Who Am I and Who Are You?” and Other Essays. Translated by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. Albany: SUNY Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gesammelte Werke. 10 vols. Tübingen: J. C. B Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1985–1985.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hegel’s Dialectics: Five Hermeneutical Studies. Translated by P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “The Hermeneutics of Suspicion.” In Hermeneutics: Questions and Prospects. Edited by Shapiro, Gary and Sica, Alan. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1984: 54–65.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hermeneutics Versus Science? Three German Views: Essays. Edited and translated by Connolly, John M. and Keutner, Thomas. Indiana: Notre Dame University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Reason in the Age of Science. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Reflections on My Philosophical Journey.” In The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Library of Living Philosophers. Vol. XXIV. Translated by Richard E. Palmer. Edited by Hahn, Lewis Edwin. Chicago: Open Court, 1997.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated and edited by Linge, David E.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophische Lehrjahre. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method (Second, Revised Edition). Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Volk und Geschichte im Denken Herders. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1942.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Wahrheit und Methode: Gründzuge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1990.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Wilhelm Dilthey nach 150 Jahren (Zwischen Romantik und Positivismus. Ein Diskussionsbeitrag).” In Dilthey und die Philosophie der Gegenwart. Edited by Orth, Ernst Wolfgang. Freiburg: Karl Alber, 1985: 157–82.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter and Stump, David, eds. The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Patrick. The Nature of Historical Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “The Unconscious: Transcendental Origins, Idealist Metaphysics and Psychoanalytic Metapsychology.” In The Impact of Idealism: The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought, Vol. 1: Philosophy and Natural Sciences. Edited by Ameriks, Karl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013: 134–65.Google Scholar
Garfield, Jay. Empty Words. Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-Cultural Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Garfield, Jay. Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gatterer, Johann. “Vom historischen Plan und dem darauf sich gründenden Zusammenhang der Erzählungen.” Allgemeine historische Bibliothek I (1767): 80–1.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. The Collapse of Mechanism and the Rise of Sensibility: Science and the Shaping of Modernity 1680–1760. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gentz, Joachim. Das Gongyang zhuan: Auslegung und Kanonisierung der Frühlings- und Herbstannalen (Chunqiu). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2001.Google Scholar
Gessinger, Joachim. “August Ferdinand Bernhardi.” In History and Historiography of Linguistics. Vol. 2: 18th–20th Century. Edited by Niederehe, Hans Josef and Koerner, Konrad. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1990: 561–76.Google Scholar
Girardot, Norman J. The Victorian Translation of China: James Legge’s Oriental Pilgrimage. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. “Acknowledging the Second Person: Schleiermacher on Imagination, Divination, and the Philosophical Problem of the Other.” In The Imagination in German Idealism and Romanticism. Edited by Gentry, Gerard and Pollok, Konstantin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. “Between Enlightenment and Romanticism: Some Problems and Challenges in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 285–305.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. “Enlightenment, History, and the Anthropological Turn: The Hermeneutical Challenge of Dilthey’s Schleiermacher Studies.” In Anthropologie und Geschichte. Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages. Edited by D’Anna, Giuseppe, Johach, Helmut, and Nelson, Eric S.. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2013: 323–54.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. Herder’s Hermeneutics: History, Poetry, Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. “A Task Most Pressing: Dilthey’s Philosophy of the Novel.” In Interpreting Dilthey. Edited by Nelson, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. “Meaning and Rule Following.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Edited by Wright, James D.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015: 841–9.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. “Reasons for Action: Wittgensteinian and Davidsonian Perspectives in Historical and Meta-Philosophical Context.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (2014): 7–46.Google Scholar
Godrej, Farah. 2011. Cosmopolitan Political Thought: Method, Practice, Discipline. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter E. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Graczyk, Annette. Das literarische Tableau zwischen Kunst und Wissenschaft. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2004.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. “Meaning.” In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989: 213–23.Google Scholar
Grondin, Jean. Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. Edited by Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, Adolf. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. “Authenticity, Moral Values, and Psychotherapy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Edited by Guignon, Charles B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 215–39.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. “History and Commitment in the Early Heidegger.” In Heidegger: A Critical Reader. Edited by Dreyfus, Hubert and Hall, Harrison. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992: 130–42.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Arbeit und Interaktion. Bemerkungen zu Hegels Jenenser Philosophie des Geistes.” In Natur und Geschichte. Karl Löwith zum 70 Geburtstag. Edited by Braun, H. and Riedel, M.. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1967: 132–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Hermeneutic Claim to Universality.” In Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique. Edited by Bleicher, Josef. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980: 181–211.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Translated by Jeremy Shapiro. Boston: Beacon, 1971.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Labor and Interaction: Remarks on Hegel’s Jena Philosophy of Mind.” In Theory and Practice. Translated by John Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1974: 142–69.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen and Jerry A. Stark. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. On the Pragmatics of Communication. Edited by Cooke, Maeve. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Remarks on the Development of Horkheimer’s Work.” In On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives. Edited by Benhabib, Seyla, Bonß, Wolfgang and McCole, John. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993: 49–66.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon, 1987.Google Scholar
Halbfass, Wilhelm. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: SUNY Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. “Metakritik über den Purismus der reinen Vernunft.” In Schriften zur Sprache. Edited by Simon, Josef. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1976.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. Writings on Philosophy and Language. Edited and translated by Haynes, Kenneth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Christoph. “Chinese Rhetoric.” T’oung Pao, Second Series, Vol. 85, Fasc. 1/3 (1999): 114–26.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Christoph. “The Rhetoric of Premodern Prose Style.” In The Columbia History of Chinese Literature. Edited by Mair, Victor H.. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002: 881–908.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Christoph. Wilhelm von Humboldts Brief an Abel-Rémusat und die philosophische Grammatik des Altchinesischen. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann, 1979.Google Scholar
Hardenberg, Friedrich von (Novalis). Novalis Schriften. Edited by Kluckhorn, P. and Samuel, R.. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960ff.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71:4 (1958): 593–629.Google Scholar
Hayes, John H. “Historical Criticism of the Old Testament Canon.” In Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: The History of its Interpretation. Vol. 2: From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Edited by Sæbø, Magne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008: 985–1005.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Science of Logic. Edited and translated by Giovanni, G. di. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. “The Writings of Hamann.” In Hegel on Hamann. Translated by Lisa Marie Anderson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2008: 1–54.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. On the Essence of Language: The Metaphysics of Language and the Essencing of the World. Translated by Wanda Torres Gregory and Yvonne Unna. Buffalo: SUNY Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Edited by von Hermann, Friedrich-Wilhelm et al. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1975.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 2: Sein und Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 9: Wegmarken. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1976.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 17: Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1994.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 40: Einführung in die Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 56/57: Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1987.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 58: Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1993.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 59: Phänomenologie der Anschauung und des Ausdrucks. Theorie der philosophischen Begriffsbildung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1993.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 60: Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 61: Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1985.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 63: Ontologie (Hermeneutik der Faktizität). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1988.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Introduction to Metaphysics. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Translated by Richard Taft. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1973.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. On the Way to Language. Translated by Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper San Francisco, 1982 [1971].Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Ontology: Hermeneutics of Facticity. Translated by John Van Buren. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Pathmarks. Translated by William McNeill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles (Anzeige der hermeneutischen Situation).” Dilthey Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 6 (1989): 228–74.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Phenomenological Interpretations in Connection with Aristotle: An Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation (1922).” In Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. Edited and translated by Buren, John Van. Albany: SUNY Press, 2002: 111–46.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. Edited by Buren, John Van. Albany: SUNY Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. Translated by Ted Sadler. London: Athlone Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Vom Wesen der Sprache. Die Metaphysik der Sprache und die Wesung des Wortes. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1999.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Zollikon Seminars [1964–66]. Edited by Boss, Medard. Translated by Franz Mayr and Richard Askay. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, Hermann von. “On the Relation of Natural Science to Science in General.” In Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays. Edited by Cahan, David. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995: 76–95.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. “The Function of General Laws in History.” Journal of Philosophy 39 (1942): 35–48.Google Scholar
Henderson, John B. Scripture, Canon and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Against Pure Reason: Writings on Religion, Language, and History. Translated and edited by Marcia Bunge. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Ausgewählte Werke in Einzelausgaben: Schriften zur Literatur, 2/1: Kritische Wälder. Edited by Otto, Regine. Berlin and Weimar: Aufbau Verlag, 1990: 684–691.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Ideas on the Philosophy of History of Man. Translated by T. Churchill. London: Johnson, 1800.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man. Translated by T. Churchill. New York: Bergman Publishers, 1800.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Philosophical Writings. Edited and translated by Forster, Michael N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Sämtliche Werke. Edited by Suphan, B.. Berlin: Weidmann, 1882–1882.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Selected Writings on Aesthetics. Edited and translated by Moore, Gregory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. “Selections from A Metacritique of the Critique of Pure Reason.” In Metacritique: The Linguistic Assault on German Idealism. Edited by Jere Paul Surber. Amherst: Humanity Books, 2001: 89–130.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. “Shakespeare.” In Eighteenth Century German Criticism. Edited by Chamberlain, Timothy. New York: Continuum, 1992: 143–63.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Shakespeare. Translated by Gregory Moore. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Werke in zehn Bänden. Edited by Gaier, U. et al. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1985–1985.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. On World History. Edited by Adler, Hans and Menze, Ernst. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, 1997.Google Scholar
Herling, Bradley L. The German Gita: Hermeneutics and Discipline in the Early German Reception of Indian Thought. New York and London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Holborn, Hajo. “Wilhelm Dilthey and the Critique of Historical Reason.” Journal of the History of Ideas 11 (1953): 93–116.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. “On the Destructive Power of the Third: Gadamer and Heidegger’s Doctrine of Intersubjectivity.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2003): 5–21.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. “The State of Contemporary Social Philosophy and the Tasks of an Institute for Social Research.” In Critical Theory and Society: A Reader. Edited by Bronner, Stephen Eric and Kellner, Douglas MacKay. New York: Routledge, 1989: 25–36.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodore W.. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Edited by Noerr, Gunzelin Schmid. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
How, Alan. The Habermas-Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social: Back to Bedrock. New York: Avebury Series in Philosophy, 1995.Google Scholar
Hoy, David C. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hoy, David C. “Interpreting the Law: Hermeneutical and Poststructuralist Perspectives.” Southern California Law Review 58 (1985): 135–76.Google Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Context of Discovery and Context of Justification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1987): 501–15.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Alexander von and Bonpland, Aimé. Personal Narrative of Travels to the Equinoctial Regions of America, During the Years 1799–1804. Vol. 1. Translated and edited by Ross, Thomasina. London: Bohn, 1852.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm. Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by Akademie der Wissenschaften, Königlich Preussische. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1968.Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg, and Powell, James, eds. Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman. The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature; With an Appendix on the Functions of Language in the Theater. Translated by George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. “Jürgen Habermas and Hans-Georg Gadamer.” In The Blackwell Guide to Continental Philosophy. Edited by Solomon, Robert and Sherman, David. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003: 219–42.Google Scholar
Irmscher, Hans-Dietrich. “Grundfragen der Geschichtsphilosophie Herders bis 1774.” In Bückeburger Gespräche über Johann Gottfried Herder 1983. Edited by Poschman, Brigitte. Rinteln: Bösendahl, 1984: 10–32.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, and Pettit, Philip. “Functionalism and Broad Content.” Mind 97 (1988): 381–400.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, and Pettit, Philip. “Program Explanation: A General Perspective.” Analysis 50 (1990): 107–17.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, and Pettit, Philip. “Structural Explanation in Social Theory.” In Reduction, Explanation, and Realism. Edited by Charles, David and Lennon, Kathleen. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992: 97–131.Google Scholar
Jäger, Friedrich, and Rüsen, Jörn, eds. Geschichte des Historismus: Eine Einführung. Munich: Beck, 1992.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. “De l’Iphigénie de Racine à celle de Goethe.” In Pour une esthétique de la réception. Paris: Gallimard, 1978: 210–62.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. “The Poetic Text within the Change of Horizons of Reading: The Example of Baudelaire’s ‘Spleen II.’” In Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Translated by Timothy Bahti. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982: 139–88.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg. Verfassungsänderung und Verfassungswandlung: eine staatsrechtlich-politische Abhandlung. Edited by Pauly, Walter. Goldbach: Keip, 1996.Google Scholar
Jenco, Leigh. Changing Referents: Learning Across Space and Time in China and the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. “The Pauses in English Poetry, Adjusted.” Rambler 90 (January 26, 1751).Google Scholar
Jullien, François. Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in Greece and China. Translated by Sophie Hawkes. New York: Zone Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1900ff.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Political Writings (Second Edition). Edited by Reiss, Hans. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. Edited and translated by Hatfield, Gary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion and Rational Theology. Translated and edited by Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George di. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. Agency and the Foundations of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. The Nietzschean Self: Moral Psychology, Agency, and the Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Keast, W. R. Seventeenth Century English Poetry: Modern Essays in Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Keil, Geert. “Beyond Assimilationism and Differentialism: Comment on Glock.” In Welt der Gründe: Vorträge und Kolloquien des XXII. Deutschen Kongresses für Philosophie vom 11. bis 15. September 2011 an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Edited by Nida-Rümelin, Julian and Özmen, Elif. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2012: 914–22.Google Scholar
Keil, Geert. “Über die deskriptive Unerschöpflichkeit der Einzeldinge.” In Phänomenologie und Sprachanalyse. Edited by Keil, Geert and Tietz, Udo. Paderborn: Mentis, 2006: 83–125.Google Scholar
Kelletat, Andreas F. Herder und die Weltliteratur. Zur Geschichte des Übersetzens im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1984.Google Scholar
Kinzel, Katherina. “The History of Philosophy and the Puzzles of Life: Windelband and Dilthey on the Ahistorical Core of Philosophical Thinking.” In The Emergence of Modern Relativism: The German Debates from the 1770s to the 1930s. Edited by Kusch, Martin, Kinzel, Katherina, Steizinger, Johannes, and Wildschut, Niels. London: Routledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. Freud’s Dream: A Complete Interdisciplinary Science of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Klass, Gregory M. “Interpretation and Construction Distinction in Contract Law.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=2913228.Google Scholar
Knapp, Steven, and Michaels, Walter Benn. “Against Theory.” Critical Inquiry 8 (1982): 723–42.Google Scholar
Kohler, Josef. “Über die Interpretation von Gesetzen.” Zeitschrift für das Privat- und Öffentliche Recht der Gegenwart 13 (1886): 1–61.Google Scholar
Kohlstrunk, Irene. Logik und Historie in Droysens Geschichtstheorie: Eine Analyse von Genese und Konstruktionsprinzipien seiner “Historik.” Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1980.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue, and the Novel.” In Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Edited by Roudiez, L. S.. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980: 64–91.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970 [1962].Google Scholar
Kümmel, Werner Georg. Das Neue Testament. Geschichte der Erforschung seiner Probleme. Freiburg: Alber, 1958.Google Scholar
Laband, Paul. Die Wandlungen der deutschen Reichsverfassung. Dresden: Jahn & Jaensch, 1895.Google Scholar
Lamberton, Robert. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “The Hermeneutics of Suspicion: Recovering Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud.” In The Future for Philosophy. Edited by Leiter, Brian. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006: 74–105.Google Scholar
Lepore, Ernest, and Stone, Matthew. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Philosophical and Theological Writings. Translated and edited by Hugh Barr Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lieber, Francis. “On Political Hermeneutics, or on Political Interpretation and Construction, and Also on Precedents.” American Jurist and Law Magazine 18 (1837): 37–101.Google Scholar
Lifschitz, Avi. Language and Enlightenment: The Berlin Debates of the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Lin, Weijie. Zhu Xi yu jingdian quanshi [Zhu Xi and the Interpretation of Classics]. Taipei: Taiwan daxue chuban zhongxin, 2008.Google Scholar
Lorenzer, Alfred. Die Wahrheit der psychoanalytischen Erkenntnis. Ein historisch-materialistischer Entwurf. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974.Google Scholar
Ma, Lin. Heidegger on East-West Dialogue: Anticipating the Event. New York and London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Ma, Lin, and Brakel, Jaap van. Fundamentals of Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Makeham, John. Transmitters and Creators: Chinese Commentators and Commentaries on the Analects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center and Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutic Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff, and Gander, Hans-Helmuth. The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice. “Historical Explanation: The Problem of ‘Covering Laws’.” In The Philosophy of History. Edited by Gardiner, Patrick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974: 51–65.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. “Historismus.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 52 (1924): 1–60.Google Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne L. German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religion, Race, and Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. “Reflections on Intentionality.” In The Cambridge Companion to Brentano. Edited by Jacquette, Dale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 131–48.Google Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline. The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Marra, Michael F., ed. Japanese Hermeneutics: Current Debates on Aesthetics and Interpretation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Martin, Raymond. “Objectivity and Meaning in Historical Studies.” History and Theory 32 (1993): 25–50.Google Scholar
Matczak, Marcin. “Does Legal Interpretation Need Paul Grice? Reflections on Lepore and Stone’s Imagination and Convention.” Polish Journal of Philosophy 10 (2016): 67–87. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2716629.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. “The Idea of a Critical Theory and its Relation to Philosophy.” In On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives. Edited by Benhabib, Seyla, Bonß, Wolfgang and McCole, John. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993: 127–52.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. “Rationality and Relativism: Habermas’s ‘Overcoming of Hermeneutics.’” In Habermas: Critical Debates. Edited by Thompson, John B. and Held, David. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1982: 57–78.Google Scholar
McKim, Donald K. Dictionary of Major Biblical Interpreters. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mehta, J. L. India and the West: The Problem of Understanding. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook. Translated by J. E. Anderson. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972 [1936].Google Scholar
Meyer, Georg Friedrich. Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst. Edited by Bühler, Axel and Madonna, Luigi Cataldi. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996.Google Scholar
Minnis, Alistair, and Johnson, Ian, eds. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Minnis, A. J., and Scott, A. B., eds. Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism: The Commentary Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Misgeld, Dieter. “Critical Theory and Hermeneutics: The Debate Between Habermas and Gadamer.” In On Critical Theory. Edited by O’Neill, John. New York: Seabury Press, 1976: 164–83.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Interpreting Interpretation.” In Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Edited by Marmor, Andrei A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995: 1–30.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Law as a Functional Kind.” In Educating Oneself in Public: Critical Essays in Jurisprudence. Edited by Moore, Michael S.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000: 188–242.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Legal Reality: A Naturalist Approach to Legal Ontology.” Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 619–705.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Can Objectivity be Grounded in Semantics.” In Law, Metaphysics, Meaning, and Objectivity. Edited by Villanueva, Enrique. Mexico City: Rodopi, 2007: 235–61.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Semantics, Metaphysics and Objectivity in Law.” In Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Edited by Keil, Geert and Poscher, Ralf. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016: 127–60.Google Scholar
Moore, Stephen D., and Sherwood, Yvonne. The Invention of the Biblical Scholar: A Critical Manifesto. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Moravia, Sergio. “The Enlightenment and the Sciences of Man.” History of Science 18 (1980): 247–68.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “The Bible Hermeneutics of Baruch de Spinoza.” In Hebrew Bible / Old Testament: The History of its Interpretation. Vol. 2: From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Edited by Sæbø, Magne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008: 827–36.Google Scholar
Nassar, Dalia. “Analogy, Natural History, and the Philosophy of Nature: Kant, Herder and the Problem of Empirical Science.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 9 (2015): 240–57.Google Scholar
Nassar, Dalia. “Understanding as Explanation: The Significance of Herder and Goethe’s Science of Describing.” In Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology. Edited by Waldow, Anik and Souza, Nigel de. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017: 106–24.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte, and Clarke, David D.. Language, Action and Context: The Early History of Pragmatics in Europe and America, 1780–1930. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. “Sociology and Physicalism.” In Logical Positivism. Edited by Ayer, A. J.. New York: Free Press, 1959: 282–317.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Angelika. Der Koran als Text der Spätantike. Ein europäischer Zugang. Berlin: Verlag der Weltreligionen, 2010.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Der Antichrist. The Antichrist. In The Portable Nietzsche. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Viking, 1968.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. Edited by Geuss, Raymond and Speirs, Ronald. Translated by Ronald Speirs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. The Gay Science. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random House, 1974.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik. The Birth of Tragedy. In Basic Writings of Nietzsche. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Modern Library, 1967.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Zur Genealogie der Moral. On the Genealogy of Morals. Translated by Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Götzen-Dämmerung. Twilight of the Idols. In The Portable Nietzsche. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Viking, 1968.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Menschliches, Allzumenschliches. Human, All too Human. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Morgenröthe. Daybreak. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Nietzsche Contra Wagner. Nietzsche Contra Wagner. In The Portable Nietzsche. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Viking, 1968.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden. Edited by Colli, Giorgio and Montinari, Mazzino. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1967–1967.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Hugh Barr. Gotthold Ephraim Lessing: His Life, Works, and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Novick, Peter. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Obert, Mathias. Sinndeutung und Zeitlichkeit: Zur Hermeneutik des Huayan-Buddhismus. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
Oexle, Otto, and Rüsen, Jörn, eds. Historismus in den Kulturwissenschaften. Cologne: Böhlau, 1996.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Brian. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Orozco, Theresa. Platonische Gewalt. Gadamers politische Hermeneutik der NS-Zeit. Hamburg: Argument Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Perkins, Franklin. “Virtue, Reason, and Cultural Exchange: Leibniz’s Praise of Chinese Morality.” Journal of the History of Ideas 63:3 (2002): 447–64.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Pitt, David. “Mental Representation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N..Google Scholar
Plaks, Andrew. “Why the Chinese Gods Don’t Suffer.” In Studies in Chinese Language and Culture – Festschrift in Honour of Christoph Harbsmeier on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Edited by Anderl, Christoph und Eifring, Halvor. Oslo: Hermes Academic Publishing, 2006: 123–34.Google Scholar
Plaul, Constantin. “Johann August Ernesti. Institutio Interpretis Novi Testamenti (1761).” In Handbuch der Bibelhermeneutiken. Von Origenes bis zur Gegenwart. Edited by Wischmeyer, Oda. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2016: 651–62.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon, Elman, Benjamin A. and Chang, Ku-ming Kevin, eds. World Philology. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. The Major Works. Edited by Rogers, Pat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . On the Cave of the Nymphs. Translated by Robert Lamberton. Barrytown: Station Hill Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Poscher, Ralf. “Interpretation and Rule Following in Law: The Complexity of Easy Cases.” In Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following. Edited by Araszkiewicz, Michał et al. Heidelberg: Springer, 2015: 281–93.Google Scholar
Poscher, Ralf. “The Hermeneutic Character of Legal Construction.” In Law’s Hermeneutics: Other Investigations. Edited by Glanert, Simone and Girard, Fabien. New York: Routledge, 2017: 207–27.Google Scholar
Poscher, Ralf. “The Normative Construction of Legislative Intent.” Forthcoming: Droit & Philosophie, Annuaire de l’Institut Michel Villey, 2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2861250.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman. “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World.” Erkenntnis 9 (1975): 313–28.Google Scholar
Quirin, Michael. “Scholarship, Value, Method, and Hermeneutics in Kaozheng: Some Reflections on Cui Shu (1740–1816) and the Confucian Classics.” History and Theory 35:4 (1996): 34–53.Google Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. The Theory and Practice of History. Edited by Iggers, G. and Moltke, K. von. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, David M. “Hermeneutics and Public Deliberation.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2002): 505–7.Google Scholar
Redding, Paul. “The Independence and Dependence of Self-Consciousness: The Dialectic of Lord and Bondsman in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.” In The New Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy. Edited by Beiser, Frederick C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008: 94–110.Google Scholar
Redding, Paul. Thoughts, Deeds, Words, and World: Hegel’s Idealist Response to the Linguistic “Metacritical Invasion.” Aurora: Noesis Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. “Buffon and Historical Thought in Germany and Great Britain.” In Buffon 88. Edited by Gayon, Jean. Paris: Vrin, 1992: 667–79.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. “Science and the Construction of the Cultural Sciences in Late Enlightenment Germany: The Case of Wilhelm von Humboldt.” History and Theory 33 (1994): 345–66.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Reventlow, Henning Graf. History of Biblical Interpretation. Vol. 4: From the Enlightenment to the Twentieth Century. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2010.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Edited by Ihde, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. “Ethics and Culture: Habermas and Gadamer in Dialogue.” Philosophy Today 17 (1973): 153–65.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy. Translated by Denis Savage. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. “Structure et herméneutique.” In Le Conflit des interprétations. Paris: Seuil, 1969: 31–63.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. From Text to Action. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and John Thompson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. “The Unity of the Voluntary and the Involuntary as a Limit-Idea [1951].” In Philosophical Anthropology. Translated by David Pellauer. Cambridge: Polity, 2015: 53–71.Google Scholar
Riskin, Jessica. Science in the Age of Sensibility: The Sentimental Empiricists of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques. Buffon: A Life in Natural History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. “On the Misunderstanding of Ranke and the Origins of the Historical Profession in America.” In Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline. Edited by Iggers, Georg and Powell, James. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1990: 154–69.Google Scholar
Rothacker, Erich. “J. G. Droysens Historik.” Historische Zeitschrift 161 (1940): 84–92.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean, and Thouard, Denis, eds. Lettres édifiantes et curieuses sur la langue chinoise. Un débat philosophico-grammatical entre Wilhelm von Humboldt et Jean-Pierre Abel-Rémusat (1821–1831), avec une correspondance inédite de Humboldt (1824–1831). Paris: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 1999.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. A Critique of Max Weber’s Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas A. Alexander von Humboldt: A Metabiography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Rüsen, Jörn. Begriffene Geschichte: Genesis und Begründung der Geschichtstheorie J. G. Droysens. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1969.Google Scholar
Rüsen, Jörn. “Droysen heute – Plädoyer zum Bedenken verlorener Themen der Historik.” In Droysen-Vorlesungen. Edited by Niethammer, Lutz. Jena: Philosophical Faculty, Historical Institute, University of Jena, 2005: 177–200.Google Scholar
Augustine, Saint. On Christian Doctrine. Translated by D. W. Robertson. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1980.Google Scholar
Sandys-Wunsch, John. “Early Old Testament Critics on the Continent.” In Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: The History of its Interpretation. Vol. 2: From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Edited by Sæbø, Magne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008: 971–84.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness. Translated by H. E. Barnes. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1956.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. The Emotions: Outline of a Theory. Translated by Bernard Frechtman. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. L’idiot de la famille: Gustave Flaubert de 1821 à 1857. Paris: Gallimard, 1988.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Search for a Method. Translated by H. E. Barnes. New York: Vintage, 1968.Google Scholar
Saussy, Haun. Great Walls of Discourse and Other Adventures in Cultural China. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. “Methodologie (Vorlesungsnotizen).” In Vorlesungen über juristische Methodologie 1802–1842. Edited by Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1993.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. System of the Modern Roman Law. Translated by W. Holloway. Madras: J. Higginbotham, 1867.Google Scholar
Schafer, Roy. “Narration in the Psychoanalytic Dialogue.” Critical Inquiry 7:1 (1980): 29–53.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. Kritische Friedrich Schlegel Ausgabe. Edited by Behler, E., Anstett, J.-J., and Eichner, H.. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1964ff.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings. Edited by Bowie, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutik. Edited by Kimmerle, Heinz. Heidelberg: C. Winter, 1959.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts. Edited by Heinz Kimmerle, translated by James Duke and Jack Forstman. Missoula: Scholars Press for the American Academy of Religion, 1977.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Edited by Frank, Manfred. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1993 [1977].Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers. Translated and edited by Crouter, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schlink, Bernhard. “Juristische Methodik zwischen Verfassungstheorie und Wissenschaftstheorie.” Rechtstheorie 7 (1976): 94–102.Google Scholar
Schnur, Harald. Schleiermachers Hermeneutik und ihre Vorgeschichte im 18. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1994.Google Scholar
Scholz, Oliver R. Verstehen und Rationalität: Untersuchungen zu den Grundlagen von Hermeneutik und Sprachphilosophie. Klostermann Rote Reihe. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2016.Google Scholar
Schröter, Marianne. Aufklärung durch Historisierung. Johann Salomo Semlers Hermeneutik des Christentums. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Schröter, Marianne. “Johann Salomo Semler. Vorbereitung zur theologischen Hermeneutik (1760).” In Handbuch der Bibelhermeneutiken. Von Origenes bis zur Gegenwart. Edited by Wischmeyer, Oda. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2016: 729–42.Google Scholar
Schröter, Marianne. “Johann Salomo Semler. Neuer Versuch die gemeinnü(t)zige Auslegung und Anwendung des Neuen Testaments zu befördern (1786).” In Handbuch der Bibelhermeneutiken. Von Origenes bis zur Gegenwart. Edited by Wischmeyer, Oda. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016: 743–54.Google Scholar
Seifert, Arno. Cognitio historica: Die Geschichte als Namengeberin der frühneuzeitlichen Empirie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1976.Google Scholar
Semler, Johann Salomo. Abhandlung von freier Untersuchung des Canon. Halle: C. H. Hemmerde, 1771.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Jonathan. The Enlightenment Bible: Translation, Scholarship, Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Sherma, Rita, and Sharma, Arvind, eds. Hermeneutics and Hindu Thought: Toward a Fusion of Horizons. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008.Google Scholar
Sikka, Sonia. Herder on Humanity and Cultural Difference: Enlightened Relativism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. Friedrich Nietzsche – Eine moralphilosophische Silhouette. In Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, 1894 bis 1900. Edited by Dahme, H. and Frisby, D.. Gesamtausgabe Band 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992: 115–29.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip. “Buffon, German Biology and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species.” The British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1979): 109–53.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip. “The Idea of Racial Degeneracy in Buffon’s Histoire naturelle.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 3 (1973): 293–321.Google Scholar
Slocum, Brian G. Ordinary Meaning: A Theory of the Most Fundamental Principle of Legal Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B. “The Interpretation-Construction Distinction.” Constitutional Commentary 27 (2010): 95.Google Scholar
Sorkin, David. The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Spencer, Vicky. Herder’s Political Thought: A Study of Language, Culture, and Community. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (Benedict de). Theological-Political Treatise. Edited by Israel, Jonathan. Translated by Michael Silverthorne and Jonathan Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (Benedict de). Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (Latin and German). Edited by Gawlick, Günter and Niewöhner, Friedrich. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1970.Google Scholar
Staël, Anne Louise Germaine de. Germany. Translated by O. W. Wright. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, and Company, 1859.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason. “The Crisis of Philosophy.” Inside Higher Ed. Last modified April 5, 2010. www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/04/05/crisis-philosophy.Google Scholar
Stecker, Robert. Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech, and the Law. Malden: Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar
Stern, Alexander. Fallen Language: Benjamin and Wittgenstein on the Aesthetics of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Robert R. Political Hermeneutics: The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer. State Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Surber, Jere Paul, ed. Metacritique: The Linguistic Assault on German Idealism. Amherst: Humanity Books, 2001.Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter. Introduction to Literary Hermeneutics. Translated by Martha Woodmansee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tang, Chenxi. The Geographic Imagination of Modernity: Geography, Literature and Philosophy in German Romanticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B., and Held, David, eds. Habermas: Critical Debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain D. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. Genres in Discourse. Translated by C. Porter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Van Zoeren, Steven. Poetry and Personality: Reading, Exegesis, and Hermeneutics in Traditional China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Vasilache, Andreas. Interkulturelles Verstehen nach Gadamer und Foucault. Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Vessey, David. “Gadamer and the Fusion of Horizons.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2009): 531–42.Google Scholar
Voltaire, (F. M. Arouet). “Essai sur la poésie épique.” In Œuvres complètes de Voltaire. Edited by Moland, L.. Paris: Garnier Frères, 1877.Google Scholar
Wach, Adolf. Handbuch des deutschen Civilprozessrechts, Erster Band. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1885.Google Scholar
Wach, Joachim. Das Verstehen. Grundzüge einer Geschichte der hermeneutischen Theorie im 19. Jahrhundert. 3 vols. (1926–1926). Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.Google Scholar
Wang, Qingjie. Jieshixue, Haidege yu Ru Dao jin shi [Hermeneutics, Heidegger and a New Interpretation of Confucianism and Daoism]. Beijing: Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe, 2004.Google Scholar
Warnke, Georgia. Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition, and Reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. “Ideal Types and Historical Explanation.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953: 723–43.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “The ‘Objectivity’ of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy.” In Collected Methodological Writings. Edited by Bruun, Hans H. and Whimster, Sam. London: Routledge, 2012: 100–38.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Roscher und Knies und die logischen Probleme der historischen Nationalökonomie.” In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1973.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Edited by Parsons, Talcott. New York: Free Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Ueber einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie.” Logos IV (1913): 253–94.Google Scholar
Weimar, Klaus. Historische Einleitung zur literaturwissenschaftlichen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr, 1975.Google Scholar
Whistler, Daniel. Schelling’s Theory of Symbolic Language: Forming the System of Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “Historik by Johann Gustav Droysen.” History and Theory 19 (1980): 73–93.Google Scholar
Whitebook, Joel. Freud: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm. “Kritische oder genetische Methode?” (1883). Reprinted in Windelband, Wilhelm. Präludien: Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte. Vol. 2. Tübingen: Mohr, 1924: 99–135.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief. Edited by Barrett, Cyril. Oxford: Blackwell, 1966.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Grammar. Edited by Rhees, Rush. Translated by Anthony Kenny. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Edited by Anscombe, Gertrude E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.Google Scholar
Wolin, Richard. The Seduction of Unreason: The Intellectual Romance with Fascism from Nietzsche to Postmodernism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. “The Mind and the Mind’s Image of Itself.” In On Art and the Mind: Essays and Lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974: 31–53.Google Scholar
Wright, Kathleen. “Hermeneutics and Confucianism.” In The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics. Edited by Malpas, Jeffrey and Gander, Hans-Helmuth. London and New York: Routledge Press, 2014: 674–91.Google Scholar
Wu, Chan-liang. “Historicity, Tradition, Praxis, and Tao: A Comparison of the World Views of Zhang Xuecheng and Modern Philosophical Hermeneutics.” In Interpretation and Intellectual Change: Chinese Hermeneutics in Historical Perspective. Edited by Tu, Ching-i. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 2005: 227–44.Google Scholar
Wu, Kuang-ming. On the “Logic” of Togetherness: A Cultural Hermeneutic. Leiden, New York, and Köln: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. “Are We Being Theoretical Yet?” Journal of Modern History 65 (1993): 783–814.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. “Philosophy of History: The German Tradition from Herder to Marx.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870). Edited by Wood, Allen W. and Hahn, Songsuk Susan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 817–65.Google Scholar
Zhang, Longxi. The Tao and the Logos: Literary Hermeneutics, East and West. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xianglong. Haidege’er sixiang yu Zhongguo tiandao [Heidegger and China’s Way of Heaven]. Beijing: Sanlian chubanshe, 1996.Google Scholar
Zilsel, Edgar. “Physics and the Problem of Historico-Sociological Laws.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953: 714–22.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Catherine. “Hermeneutics in Practice: Gadamer on Ancient Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Edited by Dostal, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002: 201–24.Google Scholar